ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05923996Updated Dec 27, 2023

Fractional Co2 Laser Versus Microbotox Injection in the Treatment of Wide Facial Pores: A Split Face Comparative Study

A Phase 1 interventional study of microbotox and fractional carbon dioxide laser in Skin Abnormalities, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-27.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. Evaluation of fractional Co2 laser as a treatment option for wide pores in skin type (III - VI)
  2. Evaluation of mesobotox as a new modality for improving wide pores appearance.
  3. Comparison of both treatment modalities in treatment of enlarged pores.
Read the detailed description

Skin pores (SP), as they are called by laymen, are common and benign features mostly located on the face (nose, cheeks, etc) that generate many aesthetic concerns or complaints.

Enlarged skin pores refer to conditions that present with visible topographic changes of skin surfaces. Although not a medical concern, enlarged pores are a cosmetic concern for a large number of individuals.

Enlarged facial pores affect individuals of different ages, sexes, and races for which many seek treatment. The exact patho-mechanism of enlarged facial pores is not completely understood. Possible causes include genetic predisposition, seborrhea, aging, increased ultraviolet exposure and comedogenic products.

The treatment of dilated facial pores is difficult, and the ideal modality is not established yet. Many treatment modalities reduce facial pores' count and area, including oral and topical medications as well as different wavelengths of laser. Different ablative and non ablative lasers have been used in the treatment of dilated pores with variable outcomes.

The short-term results showed that treatment with low energy level CO2 fractional laser therapy could be a safe and effective option for patients with Fitzpatrick skin Types III and IV who are concerned with enlarged pores.

Microbotox also called mesobotox, is the injection of multiple microdroplets of diluted onabotulinum toxin A into the upper dermis. It has been previously used in study to decrease pore size and to improve skin texture.

Microbotox has been proved to be effective in improving the sheen and texture of the skin, as well as decreasing sweat and sebum production and enlarged pores as it causes atrophy of sebaceous glands, which subsequently causes tightening of the skin envelope.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Abnormalities

Browse trials for

03

In context

Skin Abnormalities

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Skin Abnormalities; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 21 is below the median of 39 across 26 interventional studies indexed under Skin Abnormalities.

Browse Skin Abnormalities studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient with wide facial pores any grade.
  2. Sex: male and female patient.
  3. Age groups: patient above 18 and below 45 years old.
  4. Co-operative patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient below 18 and above 45 years old.
  2. Patient with systemic illness or other dermatological disease.
  3. Patient who receive topical treatment for facial wide pores in past month.
  4. Patient who receive systemic treatment for facial wide pores in past 2 month.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Microbotox injection

    21 Egyptian patients with wide facial pores will be treated in a split-face manner. In this side of the face will received single session of microbotox injection contains 20 units of botulinum toxin A.

    Drug: microbotox

  • Experimental
    Fractional carbon dioxide laser in second side of the face

    21 Egyptian patients with wide facial pores will be treated in a split-face manner. In this side will be treated by Two sessions of the fractional CO2 laser on this side of the face at 4-weeks intervals.

    Radiation: fractional carbon dioxide laser

Interventions

  • Will be treated by single session of microbotox injection

    Also known as: botulinum toxin type A

  • Radiationfractional carbon dioxide laser

    Two sessions of the fractional CO2 laser on this side of the face at 4-weeks intervals

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pore score

    evaluation of facial pores after four weeks of second session by pore score: score "0" referred to absence of visible pores. score "1" referred to patients with visible pores. score "2" referred to patient with enlarged pores. score "3" referred to patient with black heads when embedded on facial pores.

    Time frame: three months

  2. sebum score

    evaluation the degree of seborea after four weeks of second session by sebum score: 0 (dry skin) 1. (mild oiliness) 2. (moderate oiliness) 3. (severe oiliness)

    Time frame: three months

  3. Quartile improvement scale

    assessment the improvement after four weeks of first session and after four weeks of second session by Quartile improvement scale: 0 = No improvement 1. = Minor/mild improvement (1%-25%) 2. = Moderate improvement (26%-50%) 3. = Marked improvement (51%-75%) 4. = Very significant improvement (76%-100%)

    Time frame: three months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Likert satisfaction scale

    1. = Very dissatisfied 2. = Dissatisfied 3. = Neither satisfied 4. = Satisfied 5. = Very satisfied

    Time frame: three months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Flament F, Francois G, Qiu H, Ye C, Hanaya T, Batisse D, Cointereau-Chardon S, Seixas MD, Dal Belo SE, Bazin R. Facial skin pores: a multiethnic study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Feb 16;8:85-93. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S74401. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25733918 ↗
  • Lee SJ, Seok J, Jeong SY, Park KY, Li K, Seo SJ. Facial Pores: Definition, Causes, and Treatment Options. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Mar;42(3):277-85. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000657. PubMed 26918966 ↗
  • Tarek E, Mostafa WZ, Allam RSHM, El-Samanoudy SI, Saadi DG. Short-pulsed and Q-switched ND-YAG laser with topical carbon versus fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of enlarged facial pores: A split-face comparative study. Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Feb;54(2):237-244. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23454. Epub 2021 Jul 13. PubMed 34255869 ↗
  • Eldeeb F, Wahid RM, Alakad R. Fractional carbon dioxide laser versus carbon-assisted Q-switched Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of dilated facial pores. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Dec;20(12):3917-3923. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14311. Epub 2021 Jul 1. PubMed 34169628 ↗
  • Kwon HH, Choi SC, Lee WY, Jung JY, Park GH. Clinical and Histological Evaluations of Enlarged Facial Skin Pores After Low Energy Level Treatments With Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Korean Patients. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Mar;44(3):405-412. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001313. PubMed 28902036 ↗
  • Ahmed El Attar Y, Nofal A. Microbotox for the treatment of wide facial pores: A promising therapeutic approach. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 May;20(5):1361-1366. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13675. Epub 2020 Sep 27. PubMed 32799408 ↗
  • Salem RM, Salah SAE, Ibrahim SE. Microbotox injection versus its topical application following microneedling in the treatment of wide facial pores: A split face comparative study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Apr;22(4):1249-1255. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15590. Epub 2023 Jan 6. PubMed 36606384 ↗
  • Sayed KS, Hegazy R, Gawdat HI, Abdel Hay RM, Ahmed MM, Mohammed FN, Allam R, Fahim A. The efficacy of intradermal injections of botulinum toxin in the management of enlarged facial pores and seborrhea: a split face-controlled study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Nov;32(7):771-777. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1708241. Epub 2020 Jan 3. PubMed 31865815 ↗
  • Saedi N, Petrell K, Arndt K, Dover J. Evaluating facial pores and skin texture after low-energy nonablative fractional 1440-nm laser treatments. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jan;68(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.08.041. Epub 2012 Oct 23. PubMed 23098639 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05923996
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Ahmed Alaa Eldin Ibrahim (doctor, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 29, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 27, 2023

Study contacts

Ahmed AE Ibrahim
Contact
ahmedalaa12494@gmail.com
01200889665
Dalia A Ahmed, professor
study director · Assiut University
Howida O Mahmoud, lecturer
principal investigator · Assiut University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Botulinum toxin type A

Start the discussion