ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07193134Updated Mar 18, 2026

GMEB-SASS: A Gene-Modified Skin Substitute for RDEB Treatment

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Genetically Modified Epidermolysis Bullosa Self-Assembled Skin Substitute (GMEB-SASS) in RDEB, Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa and Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica, Recessive, sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 7 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
7 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being done to find out if a new type of skin graft, called GMEB-SASS, is safe and effective for helping wounds heal in people with RDEB (Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa).

The GMEB-SASS graft contains two types of living skin cells: keratinocytes and fibroblasts. It is made in a laboratory using a small sample of the patient's own skin.

To help the patient's skin cells produce a missing protein called type VII collagen, scientists grow the patient's cells in the lab and use a virus-like tool (called a retroviral vector) to give the cells the correct instructions. This allows the cells to make the normal protein that is missing in people with RDEB.

The graft is designed to be permanent, and the goal is to improve wound healing by replacing damaged skin cells with healthy ones.

Read the detailed description

The GMEB-SASS is a skin tissue composed of living cells genetically modified in the laboratory to express a functional form of type VII collagen. The GMEB-SASS integrates with the patient's skin once grafted. The graft is autologous and expected to be permanent.

This is a first-in-human trial aiming to explore indications of the safety and efficacy of the GMEB-SASS skin graft in healing skin wounds in RDEB patients. Adults and children are included. However, a risk mitigation measure was added in order that at least some safety data from adults be available before the pediatric population is treated. Therefore, the study design is adaptative and divided into two phases: a learning phase (phase A) and a confirmatory phase (phase B).

In the present trial, the investigators hypothesize that retroviral transfer of the COL7A1 gene, combined with the use of the self-inactivated (SIN) COL7A1 vector, will restore a functional dermo-epidermal junction in the bilayer tissue-engineered skin produced at the LOEX research center by the self-assembly method. The method for the production of substitutes is similar to the one used in the ongoing clinical trial for the treatment of burn patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02350205) using SASS, with the exception of gene modification.

An important issue in RDEB patients is that their skin is colonized by bacteria due to the continuous presence of wounds. The method used to decontaminate the graft bed is crucial to ensure proper integration of the GMEB-SASS. The proposed intervention in this trial involves two surgical steps: the use of allografts to prepare the graft bed in a first step, followed by the application of the GMEB-SASS a few days later. This approach will be applied to at least participants enrolled in Phase A of the study.

The maximum daily dose per grafting session is the number of GMEB-SASS covering a maximum of 9% of the total body surface area. The number will be calculated based on the participant's height, weight, and age.

02

Conditions studied

  • RDEB
  • Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
  • Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica, Recessive

Keywords

  • Skin Abnormalities
  • Congenital Abnormalities
  • Epidermolysis Bullosa
  • Skin Diseases, Genetic
  • Genetic Diseases, Inborn
  • Collagen Diseases
  • Connective Tissue Diseases
  • Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
  • Skin Diseases
  • Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous
  • Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica
  • Genetic therapy
  • Autologous Skin Graft
  • SIN Retroviral Vector
  • Type VII Collagen
  • COL7A1
03

In context

Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica

78 studies on the registry are indexed under Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 9 is close to the median of 9 across 55 interventional studies indexed under Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica.

Browse Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica studies →

Lead sponsor

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age

Learning phase:

  • Subjects 1 to 3: Eighteen (18) years old or older.
  • Subjects 4 to 6: Twelve (12) years old or older.
  • Subjects 7 to 9: Seven (7) years old or older.

Other Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) with confirmed biallelic pathogenic variant in the COL7A1 gene.
  • Candidates - or their parents/caregivers if the candidates have limited comprehension, who are able to understand the study and to comply with the study procedures.
  • On the day of grafting, one or more blistered and/or erosive skin areas on the trunk and/or extremities large enough to graft at least three 25 to 50 cm2 GMEB-SASS grafts.
  • Ability to undergo anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical instability limiting the ability to travel to the investigative center.
  • Any medical condition or illness that may impact study participation or compromise the safety of the participants, as per the investigator's judgment.
  • Evidence of systemic infection.
  • Current evidence or a history of non- or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma at the site to be grafted.
  • Any abnormal laboratory values or abnormal findings identified during physical examination or through medical history that could compromise participant safety, as per the investigator's judgment.
  • History of or known allergy to bovine proteins.
  • Active drug or alcohol addiction.
  • Female candidate who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • Candidate who has received immunotherapy, including oral (Prednisolone > 1 mg/kg), for more than one week, within 2 weeks prior to the study intervention (initial and GMEB-SASS grafting) (intranasal and topical preparations are permitted).
  • Candidate who has received chemotherapy within 60 days prior to the study intervention (initial biopsy and GMEB-SASS grafting).
  • Candidate who has received, in the last 6 months prior to the study intervention (initial biopsy and GMEB-SASS grafting), any gene therapy, chemical or biological product modifying collagen 7 expression.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GMEB-SASS

    All patients will receive GMEB-SASS

    Drug: Genetically Modified Epidermolysis Bullosa Self-Assembled Skin Substitute (GMEB-SASS)

Interventions

  • DrugGenetically Modified Epidermolysis Bullosa Self-Assembled Skin Substitute (GMEB-SASS)

    Wound debridement will be performed, followed by the application of temporary allogeneic skin grafts for 3-5 days. The allografts will then be removed, and the GMEB-SASS grafts will be applied.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Record of Adverse Events (AE), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Reactions (ARs) and Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  2. Pain score changes using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Pain score of the grafted wounds for the past 7 days. Horizontal line, typically 10 centimeters in length, anchored by two verbal descriptors: 0 = No pain; 10 = Worst pain possible.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 2, months 1, 3, 6 and 12

  3. Itch score changes using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Itch score of the grafted wounds for the past 7 days (100-point visual analog scale). Horizontal line, typically 10 centimeters in length, anchored by two verbal descriptors: 0 = No itch, 100 = Worst itch Time Frame: Baseline, week 2, months 1, 3, 6 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline, week 2, months 1, 3, 6 and 12 post intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of the grafted GMEB-SASS surface area that has healed

    Percentage of epithelialization

    Time frame: Week 2, months 1, 3, 6 and 12 post intervention

  2. iscorEB questionnaire - clinician portion

    Instrument for scoring clinical severity outcomes for research of EB. iscorEB is a measurement tool for evaluating the disease severity in EB patient. It evaluates the cutaneous, mucosal and other organ impact of EB and includes clinician and patient reported outcomes in a single instrument. Score ranges between 0-138 for the clinician subscore.

    Time frame: Baseline, months 3 and 12 post intervention

  3. Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI)

    Instrument for scoring clinical severity outcomes for research of EB. Total EBDASI activity score ranges of 0-42 (mild), 43-106 (moderate) and 107-506 (severe).

    Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline, months 3 and 12 post intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) questionnaire

    Instrument for scoring quality-of-life. 17 questions covering physical, emotional, and social aspects of living with EB, with four response choices from "not at all" to "constant".

    Time frame: Baseline, months 1, 3, 6 and 12

  2. Quality-of-life EQ-5D questionnaire

    Tool developed by the EuroQol Group to measure health-related quality of life. It evaluates health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: from no problems to extreme/unable. The tool includes a visual analogue ccale (EQ VAS): a vertical scale from 0 ("worst health imaginable") to 100 ("best health imaginable") where patients rate their overall health.

    Time frame: Baseline, months 1, 3, 6 and 12

  3. Quality-of-life iscorEB questionnaire - patient portion

    Instrument for scoring clinical severity outcomes for research of EB. It evaluates the cutaneous, mucosal and other organ impact of EB and includes clinician and patient reported outcomes in a single instrument. The patient portion of the iscorEB instrument, is considered a quality-of-life measure because it captures the patient's internal perceptions and experiences. Score ranges between 0-120 for the patient subscore.

    Time frame: Baseline, months 1, 3, 6 and 12

  4. Scar evaluation - Vancouver scar scale (VSS)

    The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) is a tool used to measure scar severity across four aspects: vascularity (0-3), pliability (0-5), pigmentation (0-3), and scar height (0-4). The total score ranges from 0 (best outcome) to 15 (worst outcome).

    Time frame: months 3, 6 and 12

  5. Participant's self-perception about the persistence of healing in the treated areas

    The participant is asked about the durability of the GMEB-SASS under study compared with the skin before, choosing from three options: more durable (better), no change, or less durable (worse).

    Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12

  6. Participant's self-perception of how easily the skin blisters in the treated areas

    The participant is asked how easily the GMEB-SASS under study blister compared with the skin before, choosing from three options: more resistant to blistering (better), no change, blisters more easily (worse)

    Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12

  7. Type VII collagen protein expression

    Type VII collagen protein expression in tissue biopsies

    Time frame: Baseline, months 3 and 12

  8. Autoantibody against type VII collagen

    Change in the level of autoantibody against type VII collagen in the blood

    Time frame: Baseline, month 3 post intervention if signs of rejection, month 12 for others

  9. Economic impact evaluation

    Economic impact evaluation questionnaire: tool to measure direct and indirect costs of a health condition for patients and their families.

    Time frame: Baseline, months 1, 6, 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2030, 59 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 16, 2025
First posted
Sep 25, 2025
StartActual
Jan 7, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2030
CompletionEst.
Dec 2035
Last update
Mar 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07193134
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2025
Start date
Jan 7, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Lucie Germain, PhD
Contact
lucie.germain@fmed.ulaval.ca
418-525-4444 ext. 61696
Lucie Germain, PhD
study director · CHU de Québec-Université Laval
Elena Pope, MD, FRCPC
principal investigator · The Hospital for Sick Children

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion