An observational study in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.
Sponsored by IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo · Observational
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the slowing/reduction of cognitive dysfunction progression and to evaluate grey matter (GM) and thalamus structural changes in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) patients after 12 months of treatment with Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
At baseline visit, RRMS patients undergo extensive neurological examination in which their disability is evaluated by using Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The efficacy assessments of this study are:
All RRMS patients undergo MRI: conventional MRI measures (T2-, T1-enhancing and T1-hypointense lesions), global brain atrophy, regional brain atrophy and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) (GM and thalamus) examinations.
Six and 12 months after the baseline visit, the RRMS patients in treatment with DMF undergo the BRB, DKEFS and MRI/DTI study and neurological evaluation (EDSS).
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved for management of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) patients. Clinical trials have shown that DMF has a significant beneficial impact on relapse rate, disability accrual and the number of new lesions along with their volumes. In addition, a neuroprotective role of DMF has been suggested to occur on both the gray matter (GM) and thalamus. However, there are no correlation data in the literature between the effects of DMF on cognitive performance and those on the GM, with a focus on thalamic pathology in MS patients.
The primary objectives of this study are:
i) to evaluate the slowing/reduction of cognitive dysfunction progression in RRMS patients after 12 months of treatment with DMF; ii) to evaluate the effects of DMF on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) parameters in GM and thalamus.
The secondary objective is to evaluate how the effects on cognitive dysfunction progression are associated to the effect of slowing the brain volume reduction at MRI (antiatrophic effect) and to change of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) parameters that DMT might have in RRMS patients, in the GM and thalamus.
The tertiary objective is to assess whether differences exist between patients with RRMS de novo to DMF treatment and patients switching from first-line DMT to DMF.
After signing informed consent, demographics, medical history and current therapies are collected for each RRMS patient enrolled. RRMS patients undergo extensive neurological examination in which their disability is evaluated by using EDSS. The efficacy assessments of this study are:
All MS patients undergo MRI: conventional MRI measures (T2-, T1-enhancing and T1-hypointense lesions), global brain atrophy, regional brain atrophy and DTI (GM and thalamus) examinations.
Six and 12 months after the baseline visit, the RRMS patients in treatment with DMF undergo the BRB, DKEFS and MRI/DTI study and neurological evaluation (EDSS).
3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 100 across 1,016 observational studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.
Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo is the lead sponsor of 67 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The study is conducted in 52 patients: twenty-six de novo MS patients who start DMF treatment and 26 patients who switch from first-line DMT treatment (interferon, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide) to treatment with DMF are matched for age and gender. Sample size calculation considers a significance level of 5% and a power of 80% to detect a difference of 0.22 with a standard deviation of 0.5, assuming a patients' loss of 20-30%.
Exclusion Criteria:
RRMS patients with de novo treatment who start DMF.
Drug: Dimethyl Fumarate 240 MG [Tecfidera]
RRMS patients who switch from first-line DMT treatment (interferon, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide) to treatment with DMF.
Drug: Dimethyl Fumarate 240 MG [Tecfidera]
DMF is admnistered to RRMS patients who are candidates for treatment according to clinical practice at a dosage of 120 mg twice daily, increased to 240 mg twice daily after 7 days.
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Selective Reminding Test - Long-Term Storage (SRT-LTS) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 6 months. This is one of the five tests of BRB for episodic memory (verbal learning and delayed recall). A word recalled on two consecutive trials is considered to have entered long-term storage (LTS) on the first of these trials and scored as LTS on all following trials. The total score ranged from 0 to 72. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Selective Reminding Test - Consistent Long Term Retrieval (SRT-CLTR) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 6 months. This is one of the five tests of BRB for episodic memory (verbal learning and delayed recall). A word recalled on two consecutive trials is considered to have entered long-term storage (LTS) on the first of these trials and scored as LTS on all following trials. The total of the words in LTS of all six trials is then summed. If a word in LTS is consistently recalled on all subsequent trials, it is then scored as Consistent Long Term Retrieval (CLTR). The total of the words in CLTR of all six trials is summed. The total score ranged from 0 to 72. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Spatial Recall Test (SPART) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 6 months. The spatial recall test assesses visuospatial learning and delayed recall. The total score ranged from 0 to 30. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 6 months. Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT) for sustained attention and information processing speed. The score is the number of correct answers in 90 seconds. The total score ranged from 0 to 110. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test - 3 Seconds (PASAT 3) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 6 months. Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) for working memory (and sustained attention and information processing speed). The total score ranged from 0 to 60. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test - 2 (PASAT 2) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 6 months. Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) for working memory (and sustained attention and information processing speed). The total score ranged from 0 to 60. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Selective Reminding Test - Delayed Recall (SRT-D) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 6 months. The tests SRT (Selective Reminding Test) for episodic memory (verbal learning and delayed recall).The total score ranged from 0 to 12. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Spatial Recall Test - Delayed Recall (SPART-D) of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 6 months. Spatial Recall Test (SPART) for visuospatial learning and delayed recall. Spatial Recall Test (10/36): The spatial recall test assesses visuospatial learning and delayed recall (10/36-D). The total score ranged from 0 to 10. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Word List Generation (WLG) of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 6 months. Word List Generation (COWAT/WLG): The COWAT assesses verbal fluency on semantic stimulus by asking the patient to produce as many words as possible belonging to a semantic category. No maximum range is available. Higher values represent a better outcome. The score is the number of correct words. The more words the patient pronounces, the better it is. We can imagine that the minimum value might be zero words, but it is not a score scale.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Selective Reminding Test - Long-Term Storage (SRT-LTS) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 12 months. One of the five tests of BRB is SRT (Selective Reminding Test) for episodic memory (verbal learning and delayed recall). A word recalled on two consecutive trials is considered to have entered long-term storage (LTS) on the first of these trials and scored as LTS on all following trials. The total score ranged from 0 to 72. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Selective Reminding Test - Consistent Long Term Retrieval (SRT-CLTR) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 12 months. One of the five tests of BRB is SRT (Selective Reminding Test) for episodic memory (verbal learning and delayed recall). A word recalled on two consecutive trials is considered to have entered long-term storage (LTS) on the first of these trials and scored as LTS on all following trials. The total of the words in LTS of all six trials is then summed. If a word in LTS is consistently recalled on all subsequent trials, it is then scored as Consistent Long Term Retrieval (CLTR). The total of the words in CLTR of all six trials is summed. The total score ranged from 0 to 72. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Spatial Recall Test (SPART) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 12 months. The spatial recall test assesses visuospatial learning and delayed recall. The total score ranged from 0 to 30. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 12 months. Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT) for sustained attention and information processing speed. The score is the number of correct answers in 90 seconds. The total score ranged from 0 to 110. Higher values represent a better outcome
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test - 3 Seconds (PASAT 3) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 12 months. Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) for working memory (and sustained attention and information processing speed). The total score ranged from 0 to 60. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test - 2 (PASAT 2) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 12 months. +Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) for working memory (and sustained attention and information processing speed). The total score ranged from 0 to 60. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Selective Reminding Test - Delayed Recall (SRT-D) Raw Score of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 12 months. The tests SRT (Selective Reminding Test) for episodic memory (verbal learning and delayed recall).The total score ranged from 0 to 12. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Spatial Recall Test - Delayed Recall (SPART-D) of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 12 months. Spatial Recall Test (SPART) for visuospatial learning and delayed recall.Spatial Recall Test (10/36): The spatial recall test assesses visuospatial learning and delayed recall (10/36-D). The total score ranged from 0 to 10. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Word List Generation (WLG) of Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) at 12 months. Word List Generation (COWAT/WLG): The COWAT assesses verbal fluency on semantic stimulus by asking the patient to produce as many words as possible belonging to a semantic category. No maximum range is available. Higher values represent a better outcome. The score is the number of correct words. The more words the patient pronounces, the better it is. We can imagine that the minimum value might be zero words, but it is not a score scale.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Condition 1: Free Sorting, Confirmed Correct Sort - Card Set 1+2 at 6 months. The standard form consists of the practice card set, card set 1 and card set 2. The alternate form consists of the same practice card set, card set 3 and card set 4. The DKFES test consisted of two testing procedures: free sorting and sort recognition. In free sorting, six scores are obtained: Confirmed Correct sorts for card sets 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B), sum of confirmed Correct Sorts. In sort recognition, a description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) is obtained, as well as the sum of description scores of both sets. The total score ranges from 0 to 16. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in DKEFS Condition 1: Free Sorting, Free Sorting, Description Score, Card Set 1+2 at 6 months. The standard form consists of the practice card set, card set 1 and card set 2. The alternate form consists of the same practice card set, card set 3 and card set 4. In free sorting, six scores were obtained: Confirmed Correct sorts for card sets 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B), sum of confirmed Correct Sorts, Free Sorting Description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) and sum of Free Sorting Description scores. In sort recognition, a description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) was obtained, as well as the sum of description scores of both sets. The total score ranged from 0 to 64. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in DKEFS Condition 2: Sort Recognition, Sort Recognition Description Score- Card Set 1+22 at 6 months. The standard form consists of the practice card set, card set 1 and card set 2. The alternate form consists of the same practice card set, card set 3 and card set 4. Free sorting and sort recognition. In free sorting, six scores were obtained: Confirmed Correct sorts for card sets 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B), sum of confirmed Correct Sorts, Free Sorting Description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) and sum of Free Sorting Description scores. The total score ranged from 0 to 64. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Condition 1: Free Sorting, Confirmed Correct Sort - Card Set 1+2 at 12 months. The standard form consists of the practice card set, card set 1 and card set 2. The alternate form consists of the same practice card set, card set 3 and card set 4. The DKFES test consisted of two testing procedures: free sorting and sort recognition. In free sorting, six scores are obtained: Confirmed Correct sorts for card sets 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B), sum of confirmed Correct Sorts. In sort recognition, a description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) is obtained, as well as the sum of description scores of both sets. The total score ranges from 0 to 16. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in DKEFS Condition 1: Free Sorting, Free Sorting, Description Score, Card Set 1+2 at 12 months. The standard form consists of the practice card set, card set 1 and card set 2. The alternate form consists of the same practice card set, card set 3 and card set 4. In free sorting, six scores were obtained: Confirmed Correct sorts for card sets 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B), sum of confirmed Correct Sorts, Free Sorting Description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) and sum of Free Sorting Description scores. In sort recognition, a description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) was obtained, as well as the sum of description scores of both sets. The total score ranged from 0 to 64. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Change in subjects' cognitive performance
Change from baseline in DKEFS Condition 2: Sort Recognition, Sort Recognition Description Score - Card Set 1+22 at 12 months. The standard form consists of the practice card set, card set 1 and card set 2. The alternate form consists of the same practice card set, card set 3 and card set 4. Free sorting and sort recognition. In free sorting, six scores were obtained: Confirmed Correct sorts for card sets 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B), sum of confirmed Correct Sorts, Free Sorting Description score for card set 1 and 2 (or 3 and 4 for version B) and sum of Free Sorting Description scores. The total score ranged from 0 to 64. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Changes brain MRI parameters
Change from baseline GM and thalamus volume at 6 months.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Changes brain MRI parameters
Change from baseline GM and thalamus volume at 12 months.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Changes brain MRI parameters
Change from baseline DTI measures in the GM and thalamus at 6 months.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 6 Follow-up
Changes brain MRI parameters
Change from baseline DTI measures in the GM and thalamus at 12 months.
Time frame: Month 0 Baseline to Month 12 Follow-up
Correlation between scores of cognitive battery and brain MRI parameters
Correlation data between each test of cognitive battery, in terms of mean changes in total score observed at endpoint vs. baseline, and brain volume reduction and DTI parameters (in GM and thalamus), as mean change after 12 months of treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 and 12 months after.
Difference between the two cohorts
Difference between the two cohorts in terms of mean changes in total score of BRB and DKEFS scale and in terms of mean changes in brain volume and DTI parameters (in GM and thalamus).
Time frame: Baseline and 6 and 12 months after.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo