ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05713695STAR-LSUpdated Oct 13, 2026

Supporting Treatment Access and Recovery Through Linkage and Support

An interventional study of Full MISSION and Linkage Only Delivered by a Peer Specialist in Mental Health Disorders and Substance Use Disorders, sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.

Sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 13, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
208
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This 3-year Hybrid Type 1 study will randomize 208 people with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders (COD) referred from the Worcester Hub. This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of MISSION, a multi-component team approach, versus linkage with a Peer Specialist on improving outcomes among individuals with CODs. We expect that individuals receiving MISSION versus linkage only will show greater improvement in treatment engagement, substance use, and mental health outcomes. This study will also concurrently conduct a process evaluation to inform sustainability and future implementation of such interventions.

Read the detailed description

Addiction is a growing public health problem in the United States (U.S.), with nearly 21 million Americans meeting criteria for substance use disorder (SUD), 1.6 million meeting criteria for opioid use disorder (OUD), and opioid-related overdoses have increased by 50% over the past 5 years. Among people with SUD, 49% have comorbid mental health disorders (COD). Individuals with COD are vulnerable to substance use relapses, mental illness exacerbations, overdoses, homelessness, and criminal justice involvement. However, despite the high rates of morbidity, mortality, and broad social determinant of health needs among people with COD, only 8% of individuals in the U.S. received treatment for both mental illness and SUD. Among those with a COD receiving treatment, 6-month engagement rates are as low as 16% for psychosocial treatments, and 90% of individuals leaving treatment will relapse within 12 weeks. Massachusetts is also hard hit, with a 16% higher SUD prevalence compared to the U.S., and Worcester, the second largest city in Massachusetts, is disproportionately affected by SUD, having one of the highest overdose rates in the state and is ranked 2nd on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's social vulnerability index. These findings highlight the need to improve treatment access and engagement to support recovery in Worcester, Massachusetts. Both linkage and multicomponent wraparound models have gained popularity as a solution to increase treatment access and engagement. Maintaining Independence and Sobriety through Systems Integration, Outreach and Networking (MISSION) is a hybrid multicomponent linkage and treatment approach, providing assertive outreach linkage support combined with psychosocial treatment, delivered by a cross disciplinary team. MISSION is aligned with the Social Ecological Model (SEM) to address multilevel client needs via 3 evidence-based practices. They include 1) Critical Time Intervention (CTI), a time-limited form of assertive community treatment; 2) Dual Recovery Therapy (DRT), which is integrated group therapy for COD; and 3) Peer Support (PS), offering support for people in recovery by people in recovery. In response to Funding Opportunity Announcement (RFA-CE-22-010), the proposed 3-year Hybrid Type I study, "Supporting Treatment Access and Recovery through Linkage and Support (STAR-LS)," will recruit and randomize 208 patients with COD in Worcester, MA in the Hub, a program run by the Worcester Health and Human Services to one of the following conditions: 1) MISSION; or 2) Peer Support (linkage only). There are three specific aims: Aim 1: To evaluate the effectiveness of MISSION or compared to Peer Support to improve engagement, substance use and mental health symptoms. Aim 2: To examine mechanisms of action of the interventions. Aim 3: To conduct a sequential mixed methods process evaluation to inform sustainability and future implementation. This proposal is aligned with CDC's Strategic Priority Areas and Health People 2030 Core Objectives as it intends to improve behavioral health outcomes strengthen and sustain the recovery ecosystem for people with COD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mental Health Disorders
  • Substance Use Disorders

Keywords

  • Co-Occurring Disorders
  • Opioid Overdose
  • Mental Health Disorders
  • Substance Use
  • Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)
  • Peer Support
  • Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT)
  • Healthcare Access
  • Social Determinants of Health
  • Coordination of Care
  • Socioecological Model
  • Multi-component Interventions
  • Addiction
  • Equity
03

In context

Substance-Related Disorders

2,238 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 409 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 208 is above the median of 108 across 1,840 interventional studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.

Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Massachusetts, Worcester is the lead sponsor of 291 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Are 18 or older;
  • Have a COD (1 or more substance use disorders (e.g., alcohol and illicit substances), and a mental health disorder (including depression, anxiety, trauma related disorders, bipolar, and/or schizophrenia);
  • Are in the Hub; and
  • Are not engaged in other ongoing multi-component treatment for COD with a behavioral health treatment provider or have not seen their provider for at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • We will exclude individuals who are acutely psychotic, acutely suicidal with a plan, or homicidal
  • Or with concurrent severe alcohol use disorder or high dose benzodiazepine requiring detoxification.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
208 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Full MISSION

    Participants assigned to this condition will receive full MISSION services. MISSION services include 6-months of integrated mental health and substance use treatment and treatment planning with the MISSION Case Manager (13 session curriculum) and Peer Support Specialist (11 session curriculum). Content of these sessions will be directed using the MISSION Treatment Manual and Consumer Workbooks. MISSION teams will also provide linkages and supports to treatment services within the participant's community throughout the duration of the study.

    Behavioral: Full MISSION

  • Active comparator
    Linkage Only Delivered by a Peer Specialist

    Our Linkage only arm delivered by a Peer Specialist will act as the comparison group to the MISSION arm. Participants randomized to the linkage only arm will receive 6-months of linkage care from a Peer Specialist. The Peer Specialist will provide informal treatment planning as well as linkages and support to community services, but will not provide integrated dual disorders treatment, nor will this arm utilize any MISSION materials or offer Peer led groups.

    Behavioral: Linkage Only Delivered by a Peer Specialist

Interventions

  • BehavioralFull MISSION

    MISSION is a time-limited, cross disciplinary, team-based wraparound approach that provides 6 months of psychosocial treatment combined with assertive outreach, empowering clients to access and engage in care and community services to promote recovery. The MISSION treatment curriculum integrates 3 evidence-based practices: 1) Critical Time Intervention (CTI), a time-limited form of assertive community treatment; 2) Dual Recovery Therapy (DRT), which is integrated mental health and substance use group therapy; and 3) Peer Support (PS), offering support for people in recovery by people in recovery.

  • BehavioralLinkage Only Delivered by a Peer Specialist

    Linkage only is provided via Peer Specialists whom have lived experiences similar to that of our participants. Linkage only includes informal treatment planning and linkages and supports to needed community services.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-report opioid use and other substance use

    Measured by self-report days of use using the Time-line Follow Back (TLFB)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Self-report opioid use and other substance use

    Measured by self-report days of use using the Time-line Follow Back (TLFB)

    Time frame: 3-months

  3. Self-report opioid use and other substance use

    Measured by self-report days of use using the Time-line Follow Back (TLFB)

    Time frame: 6-months

  4. Self-report opioid use and other substance use

    Measured by self-report days of use using the Time-line Follow Back (TLFB)

    Time frame: 9-months

  5. Mental Health Functioning

    Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24)

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Mental Health Functioning

    Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24)

    Time frame: 3-months

  7. Mental Health Functioning

    Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24)

    Time frame: 6-months

  8. Mental Health Functioning

    Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24)

    Time frame: 9-months

  9. PTSD Symptoms

    Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. PTSD Symptoms

    Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: 3-months

  11. PTSD Symptoms

    Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: 6-months

  12. PTSD Symptoms

    Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: 9-months

  13. Mental Health Impairment

    Measured by self-report on World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHODAS 2.0)

    Time frame: Baseline

  14. Mental Health Impairment

    Measured by self-report on World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHODAS 2.0)

    Time frame: 3-months

  15. Mental Health Impairment

    Measured by self-report on World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHODAS 2.0)

    Time frame: 6-months

  16. Mental Health Impairment

    Measured by self-report on World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHODAS 2.0)

    Time frame: 9-months

  17. Psychiatric Severity

    Measured by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 (SCID-RV)

    Time frame: Screening

  18. Psychiatric Severity

    Measured by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 (SCID-RV)

    Time frame: Baseline

  19. Psychiatric Severity

    Measured by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 (SCID-RV)

    Time frame: 3-months

  20. Psychiatric Severity

    Measured by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 (SCID-RV)

    Time frame: 6-months

  21. Psychiatric Severity

    Measured by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 (SCID-RV)

    Time frame: 9-months

  22. Health functioning

    Measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Time frame: Baseline

  23. Health functioning

    Measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Time frame: 3-months

  24. Health functioning

    Measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Time frame: 6-months

  25. Health functioning

    Measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Time frame: 9-months

  26. Therapeutic Alliance Client

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory-C

    Time frame: Baseline

  27. Therapeutic Alliance Client

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory-C

    Time frame: 3-months

  28. Therapeutic Alliance Client

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory-C

    Time frame: 6-months

  29. Therapeutic Alliance Client

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory-C

    Time frame: 9-months

  30. Therapeutic Alliance Therapist

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory-T

    Time frame: Baseline

  31. Therapeutic Alliance Therapist

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory-T

    Time frame: 3-months

  32. Therapeutic Alliance Therapist

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory-T

    Time frame: 6-months

  33. Therapeutic Alliance Therapist

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory-T

    Time frame: 9-months

  34. Recovery Capital

    Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC)

    Time frame: Baseline

  35. Recovery Capital

    Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC)

    Time frame: 3-months

  36. Recovery Capital

    Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC)

    Time frame: 6-months

  37. Recovery Capital

    Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC)

    Time frame: 9-months

  38. Alcohol or other drug 12-Step Participation

    Measured by self-report using the Alcoholics Anonymous Inventory (AAI)

    Time frame: Baseline

  39. Alcohol or other drug 12-Step Participation

    Measured by self-report using the Alcoholics Anonymous Inventory (AAI)

    Time frame: 3-months

  40. Alcohol or other drug 12-Step Participation

    Measured by self-report using the Alcoholics Anonymous Inventory (AAI)

    Time frame: 6-months

  41. Alcohol or other drug 12-Step Participation

    Measured by self-report using the Alcoholics Anonymous Inventory (AAI)

    Time frame: 9-months

  42. Overdose Risk

    Self-report using the Overdose Risk Questionnaire (OdRi)

    Time frame: Baseline

  43. Overdose Risk

    Self-report using the Overdose Risk Questionnaire (OdRi)

    Time frame: 3-months

  44. Overdose Risk

    Self-report using the Overdose Risk Questionnaire (OdRi)

    Time frame: 6-months

  45. Overdose Risk

    Self-report using the Overdose Risk Questionnaire (OdRi)

    Time frame: 9-months

  46. Number of Outreach and Linkage Sessions

    Self-reported using the Psychosocial Treatment \& Healthcare Services Tracking Sheet

    Time frame: Baseline

  47. Number of Outreach and Linkage Sessions

    Self-reported using the Psychosocial Treatment \& Healthcare Services Tracking Sheet

    Time frame: 3-months

  48. Number of Outreach and Linkage Sessions

    Self-reported using the Psychosocial Treatment \& Healthcare Services Tracking Sheet

    Time frame: 6-months

  49. Number of Outreach and Linkage Sessions

    Self-reported using the Psychosocial Treatment \& Healthcare Services Tracking Sheet

    Time frame: 9-months

  50. Baseline Demographics

    Self-reported using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI)

    Time frame: Baseline

  51. Suicide Severity

    Self-report using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    Time frame: Screening

  52. Community Health & Social Needs

    Self-report using the Accountable Health Communities \& Health-Related Social Needs

    Time frame: Baseline

  53. Fidelity to Intervention

    Measured via clinical staff submitting weekly treatment fidelity logs

    Time frame: Weekly

  54. Acceptability & Appropriateness

    Using the The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) and Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    Time frame: 6-months

  55. Feasibility of Intervention

    Using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    Time frame: 6-months

  56. Satisfaction with Care

    Self-report using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Time frame: 6-months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Consistent with Health and Human Services/Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) policy, research resources and data will be made readily available for research purposes to qualified individuals within the scientific community after publication of any scholarly work. Scholarly publications will also be immediately available to the public on PubMed Central. Additionally, raw and analyzed de-identified data used in publications will be responsibly shared through submissions to a CDC-approved data repository. Other methods for data sharing will be via presentations at professional conferences and, as findings permit, disclosure of summary data to professionals and the general public. To the extent feasible and appropriate, we will share pre-publication findings with colleagues who have a demonstrable, legitimate scientific interest that may be addressed by research findings. We expect to further disseminate the study via gray literature and the project website.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: De-identified data will be shared with qualified and approved researchers via an appropriate data repository. Research data will be destroyed 6 years after the end of the Fiscal Year in which the study is completed. The master list of identifiers will be destroyed at the 6-year mark or when all statistical analyses have been completed and scientific papers have been published, whichever comes first.

Access criteria: We will share findings with colleagues who have a demonstrable, legitimate scientific interest that may be addressed by research findings.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 43 months after the start.

Of 814 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Substance-Related Disorders, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 53. This study's planned 43 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 854 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 53.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 13, 2026: primary completion Sep 2026 → Dec 2026 and completion Sep 2026 → Dec 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 27, 2023
First posted
Feb 6, 2023
StartActual
May 24, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026was Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027was Sep 2026
Last update
Oct 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Sep 2026→Dec 2026
Oct 13, 2026
Study completion
Sep 2026→Dec 2027
Oct 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 13, 2026
    Primary completion Sep 2026→Dec 2026
    Study completion Sep 2026→Dec 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05713695
Collaborators
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Responsible party
David Smelson (Professor, University of Massachusetts, Worcester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 6, 2023
Start date
May 24, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 13, 2026

Study contacts

David Smelson, PsyD
principal investigator · University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion