CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05138614STAR-CODUpdated Jun 4, 2026

Supporting Treatment Access and Recovery in COD

An interventional study of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder and MISSION Critical Time Intervention in Opioid Use Disorder and Mental Health Disorder, sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Recruiting at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2022; still recruiting 4 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This 4-year study will randomize 1,000 people with co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD) at medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) clinics to evaluate the effectiveness of MISSION, a multi-component team approach, or its components with MOUD versus MOUD alone, as well as the incremental benefits of MISSION or its components for improving outcomes. We expect that individuals receiving MISSION or its parts + MOUD will show greater improvement over MOUD alone on: engagement, substance use, and mental health.

Read the detailed description

This is a 5-arm randomized control trial with a fractional factorial design among 1,000 patients across Massachusetts. Patients will be randomized to: 1) MOUD alone; 2) full MISSION (CTI \& DRT \& PS) + MOUD; 3) CTI \& DRT + MOUD; 4) PS \& DRT + MOUD; or 5) CTI \& PS + MOUD (Arms 3-5 are the 3 combinations of 2 MISSION parts). MISSION is a time-limited, cross disciplinary, team-based wraparound approach that provides 6 months of psychosocial treatment combined with assertive outreach, empowering clients to access and engage in care and community services to promote recovery. The MISSION treatment curriculum integrates 3 evidence-based practices along with MOUD: 1) Critical Time Intervention (CTI), a time-limited form of assertive community treatment; 2) Dual Recovery Therapy (DRT), which is integrated mental health and substance use group therapy; and 3) Peer Support (PS), offering support for people in recovery by people in recovery. Participants will receive 6 months of treatment and be followed for 1-year.

Study aims include:

Aim 1: To evaluate the effectiveness of MISSION or its bundled parts with MOUD versus MOUD alone, as well as the incremental benefits of MISSION and its parts + MOUD to improve outcomes 1a-c for CODs.

Hypothesis 1.1: Individuals receiving MISSION or its parts + MOUD will show greater improvement over MOUD alone on: 1a. Engagement (measured by total days in treatment, percentage of days receiving MOUD, and total number of outreach and linkages sessions); 1b. Opioid use and other substance use (measured by self-report days of use and drug screens); and 1c. Mental health (measured by self-report mental health symptoms).

Hypothesis 1.2: MISSION + MOUD will outperform its parts + MOUD but at least one of the three combinations + MOUD will be at least 75% as effective compared to the full MISSION protocol on outcomes 1a-c.

Aim 2: To examine mechanisms of action of MISSION in CODs. Hypothesis 2.1: The effects of MISSION and its bundled parts on health outcomes (mental health, opioid and other substance use) are mediated by treatment participation and other measures (e.g., recovery capital, psychosocial supports, and quality of life). Hypothesis 2.2: The effects of MISSION and its parts on health outcomes are moderated by key patient characteristics (e.g., demographics, severity of COD, and MOUD type).

Aim 3: To conduct a comprehensive economic evaluation of MISSION or its bundled parts and MOUD.

Estimate cost of full MISSION or its bundled parts compared to MOUD alone, and to evaluate cost-effectiveness and return on investment from multiple perspectives, including patient, clinic, healthcare, taxpayer, and societal.

Exploratory Aim: 4. To construct a predictive model that can match optimum combined use of MISSION parts with specific patient's needs for greater improvements in health outcomes, which will inform a future randomized controlled trial on cost-effective patient-level precision intervention assignment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Mental Health Disorder

Keywords

  • opioid use disorder
  • mental health
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Massachusetts, Worcester is the lead sponsor of 288 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Are 18 years-old and older;
  • Are fluent in English or Spanish;
  • Have OUD who (a) are newly admitted into the program with OUD; or (b) who have been active in the program for the treatment of OUD with medications like buprenorphine or naltrexone, but experienced a recent relapse with any substance (e.g., alcohol, cocaine, opioids, or benzodiazepines). This second group is necessary to include because patients who may have been stable for a long period of time may have a relapse and need intensive treatment to help them regain their abstinence and facilitate the path towards recovery. Thus, by taking those newly enrolled and those who were stable on MOUD but had a recent relapse, the second group is clinically similar to the first group and the intervention will be meaningful.;
  • Able to provide consent;
  • Potentially have a concurrent substance use disorder in addition to opioids; and
  • Have a co-occurring mental health disorder (COD) including depression, anxiety, trauma-related disorders, bipolar, and/or schizophrenia, and those who are stable on buprenorphine or naltrexone but have recurrence or worsening at any time of symptoms of any co-occurring mental health disorder (COD) including depression, anxiety, trauma-related disorders, bipolar, and/or schizophrenia, even if the patient has not relapsed. Instability is defined in two ways in the study: (a) a substance use relapse; and (b) recurrence to symptom exacerbation in regard to a subject's mental health disorder(s). If subjects do not meet criteria for "a" (i.e., not having a substance use relapse), but they do meet criteria for "b" (i.e., they do in fact have worsening of mental health symptoms), they are then defined as unstable, and will meet study inclusion criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are not fluent in English or Spanish;
  • Are acutely psychotic, acutely suicidal with a plan, or homicidal;
  • Are incompetent and unable to provide informed consent; and
  • Have concurrent severe alcohol use disorder or high dose benzodiazepine needing detoxification. This exclusion factor is based on DSM-5 criteria, and those who are currently drinking or with a history of severe alcohol withdrawal (i.e., alcohol related seizures, and delirium tremens) will also be excluded. High dose benzodiazepine is defined as using Lorazepam equivalent of > 10 mg/day; Diazepam > 100 mg/day; Clonazepam 5 mg/ day; Alprazolam 5 mg/day.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Full MISSION

    CTI + DRT + PS + MOUD

    Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder · Behavioral: MISSION Critical Time Intervention · Behavioral: MISSION Peer Support · Behavioral: MISSION Dual Recovery Therapy

  • Experimental
    CTI & DRT

    CTI + DRT + MOUD

    Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder · Behavioral: MISSION Critical Time Intervention · Behavioral: MISSION Dual Recovery Therapy

  • Experimental
    CTI & PS

    CTI + PS + MOUD

    Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder · Behavioral: MISSION Critical Time Intervention · Behavioral: MISSION Peer Support

  • Experimental
    DRT & PS

    DRT + PS + MOUD

    Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder · Behavioral: MISSION Peer Support · Behavioral: MISSION Dual Recovery Therapy

  • Other
    MOUD only

    MOUD

    Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder

Interventions

  • OtherMedication for Opioid Use Disorder

    medication management

    Also known as: MOUD

  • BehavioralMISSION Critical Time Intervention

    offering intensive community-based services that decrease in intensity over time

    Also known as: CTI

  • BehavioralMISSION Peer Support

    including 11 recovery-oriented sessions from someone with lived experience of co-occurring disorders

    Also known as: PS

  • BehavioralMISSION Dual Recovery Therapy

    comprised of 13 structured co-occurring disorders treatment sessions

    Also known as: DRT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Engagement in treatment

    Measured by total days in treatment

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Engagement in medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD)

    Measured by percentage of days receiving MOUD

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Engagement in outreach and linkage sessions

    Measured by total number of outreach and linkage sessions

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Self-report opioid use and other substance use

    Measured by self-report days of use

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Self-report opioid use and other substance use

    Measured by self-report days of use

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Self-report opioid use and other substance use

    Measured by self-report days of use

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Self-report opioid use and other substance use

    Measured by self-report days of use

    Time frame: 9 months

  8. Self-report opioid use and other substance use

    Measured by self-report days of use

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Opioid use and other substance use (drug screen)

    Measured by positive drug screens

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Opioid use and other substance use (drug screen)

    Measured by positive drug screens

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Mental health functioning

    Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24)

    Time frame: Baseline

  12. Mental health functioning

    Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on BASIS-24

    Time frame: 3 months

  13. Mental health functioning

    Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on BASIS-24

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. Mental health functioning

    Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on BASIS-24

    Time frame: 9 months

  15. Mental health functioning

    Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on BASIS-24

    Time frame: 12 months

  16. PTSD symptoms

    Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: Baseline

  17. PTSD symptoms

    Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: 3 months

  18. PTSD symptoms

    Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: 6 months

  19. PTSD symptoms

    Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: 9 months

  20. PTSD symptoms

    Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: 12 months

  21. Mental health impairment

    Measured by self-report on World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHODAS 2.0)

    Time frame: Baseline

  22. Mental health impairment

    Measured by self-report on WHODAS 2.0

    Time frame: 3 months

  23. Mental health impairment

    Measured by self-report on WHODAS 2.0

    Time frame: 6 months

  24. Mental health impairment

    Measured by self-report on WHODAS 2.0

    Time frame: 9 months

  25. Mental health impairment

    Measured by self-report on WHODAS 2.0

    Time frame: 12 months

  26. Psychiatric severity

    Measured by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-RV)

    Time frame: Baseline

  27. Health functioning

    Measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Time frame: Baseline

  28. Health functioning

    Measured by the WHOQOL-BREF

    Time frame: 3 months

  29. Health functioning

    Measured by the WHOQOL-BREF

    Time frame: 6 months

  30. Health functioning

    Measured by the WHOQOL-BREF

    Time frame: 9 months

  31. Health functioning

    Measured by the WHOQOL-BREF

    Time frame: 12 months

  32. Motivation for treatment

    Measured by Stages of Change, Readiness, and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES)

    Time frame: Baseline

  33. Motivation for treatment

    Measured by SOCRATES

    Time frame: 3 months

  34. Motivation for treatment

    Measured by SOCRATES

    Time frame: 6 months

  35. Motivation for treatment

    Measured by SOCRATES

    Time frame: 9 months

  36. Motivation for treatment

    Measured by SOCRATES

    Time frame: 12 months

  37. Suicide Severity

    Measured by Columbia- Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    Time frame: Baseline

  38. Suicide Severity

    Measured by C-SSRS

    Time frame: 3 months

  39. Suicide Severity

    Measured by C-SSRS

    Time frame: 6 months

  40. Suicide Severity

    Measured by C-SSRS

    Time frame: 9 months

  41. Suicide Severity

    Measured by C-SSRS

    Time frame: 12 months

  42. Therapeutic alliance

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory

    Time frame: Baseline

  43. Therapeutic alliance

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory

    Time frame: 3 months

  44. Therapeutic alliance

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory

    Time frame: 6 months

  45. Therapeutic alliance

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory

    Time frame: 9 months

  46. Therapeutic alliance

    Measured by Working Alliance Inventory

    Time frame: 12 months

  47. Recovery Capital

    Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital

    Time frame: Baseline

  48. Recovery Capital

    Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital

    Time frame: 3 months

  49. Recovery Capital

    Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital

    Time frame: 6 months

  50. Recovery Capital

    Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital

    Time frame: 9 months

  51. Recovery Capital

    Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital

    Time frame: 12 months

  52. Chronic pain

    Measured by Chronic Pain assessment

    Time frame: Baseline

  53. Chronic pain

    Measured by Chronic Pain assessment

    Time frame: 3 months

  54. Chronic pain

    Measured by Chronic Pain assessment

    Time frame: 6 months

  55. Chronic pain

    Measured by Chronic Pain assessment

    Time frame: 9 months

  56. Chronic pain

    Measured by Chronic Pain assessment

    Time frame: 12 months

  57. Medication Adherence

    Measured by Medication Adherence Rating Scale

    Time frame: 3 months

  58. Medication Adherence

    Measured by Medication Adherence Rating Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Data extracted from medical records

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health

    Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health

    Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health

    Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health

    Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Time frame: 9 months

  6. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health

    Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life

    Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life

    Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life

    Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life

    Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

    Time frame: 9 months

  11. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life

    Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Economic impact of full MISSION

    Cost of full MISSION and MOUD measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Preference (PROPr)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Economic impact of CTI & PS

    Cost of MISSION CTI, PS, and MOUD measured by PROPr

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Economic impact of CTI & DRT

    Cost of MISSION CTI, DRT, and MOUD measured by PROPr

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Economic impact of PS & DRT

    Cost of MISSION PS, DRT, and MOUD measured by PROPr

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Economic impact of MOUD alone

    Cost of MOUD alone measured by PROPr

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Behavioral Health Network
    Holyoke, Massachusetts 01040, United States
    • Herschelle Reaves · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Behavioral Health Network
    Orange, Massachusetts 01364, United States
    Recruiting
  • Behavioral Health Network
    Springfield, Massachusetts 01104, United States
    Recruiting
  • UMass Chan Road to Care Clinic
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01601, United States
    Recruiting
  • SaVida Health
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Consistent with the NIH HEAL Initiative, Underlying Primary Data collected from participants in this project will be made readily available to the public through twice-yearly submissions to the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). In consultation with the University of Massachusetts Medical School's institutional review board (IRB), project consent forms will include relevant information for participants to be made aware that their de-identified data will be available to other investigators as a part of the HEAL Initiative Public Access and Data Sharing Policy.

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05138614
Lead sponsor
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Cornell University, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Responsible party
David Smelson (Professor, University of Massachusetts, Worcester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 1, 2021
Start date
Mar 11, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

David Smelson, PsyD
Contact
David.Smelson@umassmed.edu
508-713-5420
Abigail Helm, PhD
Contact
Abigail.Helm@umassmed.edu
413-313-2806
David Smelson, PsyD
principal investigator · University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion