An interventional study of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder and MISSION Critical Time Intervention in Opioid Use Disorder and Mental Health Disorder, sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Recruiting at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.
Sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This 4-year study will randomize 1,000 people with co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD) at medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) clinics to evaluate the effectiveness of MISSION, a multi-component team approach, or its components with MOUD versus MOUD alone, as well as the incremental benefits of MISSION or its components for improving outcomes. We expect that individuals receiving MISSION or its parts + MOUD will show greater improvement over MOUD alone on: engagement, substance use, and mental health.
This is a 5-arm randomized control trial with a fractional factorial design among 1,000 patients across Massachusetts. Patients will be randomized to: 1) MOUD alone; 2) full MISSION (CTI \& DRT \& PS) + MOUD; 3) CTI \& DRT + MOUD; 4) PS \& DRT + MOUD; or 5) CTI \& PS + MOUD (Arms 3-5 are the 3 combinations of 2 MISSION parts). MISSION is a time-limited, cross disciplinary, team-based wraparound approach that provides 6 months of psychosocial treatment combined with assertive outreach, empowering clients to access and engage in care and community services to promote recovery. The MISSION treatment curriculum integrates 3 evidence-based practices along with MOUD: 1) Critical Time Intervention (CTI), a time-limited form of assertive community treatment; 2) Dual Recovery Therapy (DRT), which is integrated mental health and substance use group therapy; and 3) Peer Support (PS), offering support for people in recovery by people in recovery. Participants will receive 6 months of treatment and be followed for 1-year.
Study aims include:
Aim 1: To evaluate the effectiveness of MISSION or its bundled parts with MOUD versus MOUD alone, as well as the incremental benefits of MISSION and its parts + MOUD to improve outcomes 1a-c for CODs.
Hypothesis 1.1: Individuals receiving MISSION or its parts + MOUD will show greater improvement over MOUD alone on: 1a. Engagement (measured by total days in treatment, percentage of days receiving MOUD, and total number of outreach and linkages sessions); 1b. Opioid use and other substance use (measured by self-report days of use and drug screens); and 1c. Mental health (measured by self-report mental health symptoms).
Hypothesis 1.2: MISSION + MOUD will outperform its parts + MOUD but at least one of the three combinations + MOUD will be at least 75% as effective compared to the full MISSION protocol on outcomes 1a-c.
Aim 2: To examine mechanisms of action of MISSION in CODs. Hypothesis 2.1: The effects of MISSION and its bundled parts on health outcomes (mental health, opioid and other substance use) are mediated by treatment participation and other measures (e.g., recovery capital, psychosocial supports, and quality of life). Hypothesis 2.2: The effects of MISSION and its parts on health outcomes are moderated by key patient characteristics (e.g., demographics, severity of COD, and MOUD type).
Aim 3: To conduct a comprehensive economic evaluation of MISSION or its bundled parts and MOUD.
Estimate cost of full MISSION or its bundled parts compared to MOUD alone, and to evaluate cost-effectiveness and return on investment from multiple perspectives, including patient, clinic, healthcare, taxpayer, and societal.
Exploratory Aim: 4. To construct a predictive model that can match optimum combined use of MISSION parts with specific patient's needs for greater improvements in health outcomes, which will inform a future randomized controlled trial on cost-effective patient-level precision intervention assignment.
1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.
Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →University of Massachusetts, Worcester is the lead sponsor of 288 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.
Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (72%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
CTI + DRT + PS + MOUD
Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder · Behavioral: MISSION Critical Time Intervention · Behavioral: MISSION Peer Support · Behavioral: MISSION Dual Recovery Therapy
CTI + DRT + MOUD
Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder · Behavioral: MISSION Critical Time Intervention · Behavioral: MISSION Dual Recovery Therapy
CTI + PS + MOUD
Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder · Behavioral: MISSION Critical Time Intervention · Behavioral: MISSION Peer Support
DRT + PS + MOUD
Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder · Behavioral: MISSION Peer Support · Behavioral: MISSION Dual Recovery Therapy
MOUD
Other: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder
medication management
Also known as: MOUD
offering intensive community-based services that decrease in intensity over time
Also known as: CTI
including 11 recovery-oriented sessions from someone with lived experience of co-occurring disorders
Also known as: PS
comprised of 13 structured co-occurring disorders treatment sessions
Also known as: DRT
Engagement in treatment
Measured by total days in treatment
Time frame: 6 months
Engagement in medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD)
Measured by percentage of days receiving MOUD
Time frame: 6 months
Engagement in outreach and linkage sessions
Measured by total number of outreach and linkage sessions
Time frame: 6 months
Self-report opioid use and other substance use
Measured by self-report days of use
Time frame: Baseline
Self-report opioid use and other substance use
Measured by self-report days of use
Time frame: 3 months
Self-report opioid use and other substance use
Measured by self-report days of use
Time frame: 6 months
Self-report opioid use and other substance use
Measured by self-report days of use
Time frame: 9 months
Self-report opioid use and other substance use
Measured by self-report days of use
Time frame: 12 months
Opioid use and other substance use (drug screen)
Measured by positive drug screens
Time frame: 3 months
Opioid use and other substance use (drug screen)
Measured by positive drug screens
Time frame: 6 months
Mental health functioning
Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24)
Time frame: Baseline
Mental health functioning
Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on BASIS-24
Time frame: 3 months
Mental health functioning
Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on BASIS-24
Time frame: 6 months
Mental health functioning
Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on BASIS-24
Time frame: 9 months
Mental health functioning
Measured by self-report mental health symptoms on BASIS-24
Time frame: 12 months
PTSD symptoms
Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)
Time frame: Baseline
PTSD symptoms
Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)
Time frame: 3 months
PTSD symptoms
Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)
Time frame: 6 months
PTSD symptoms
Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)
Time frame: 9 months
PTSD symptoms
Measured by self-report PTSD symptoms on Patient Checklist (PCL-5)
Time frame: 12 months
Mental health impairment
Measured by self-report on World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHODAS 2.0)
Time frame: Baseline
Mental health impairment
Measured by self-report on WHODAS 2.0
Time frame: 3 months
Mental health impairment
Measured by self-report on WHODAS 2.0
Time frame: 6 months
Mental health impairment
Measured by self-report on WHODAS 2.0
Time frame: 9 months
Mental health impairment
Measured by self-report on WHODAS 2.0
Time frame: 12 months
Psychiatric severity
Measured by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-RV)
Time frame: Baseline
Health functioning
Measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time frame: Baseline
Health functioning
Measured by the WHOQOL-BREF
Time frame: 3 months
Health functioning
Measured by the WHOQOL-BREF
Time frame: 6 months
Health functioning
Measured by the WHOQOL-BREF
Time frame: 9 months
Health functioning
Measured by the WHOQOL-BREF
Time frame: 12 months
Motivation for treatment
Measured by Stages of Change, Readiness, and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES)
Time frame: Baseline
Motivation for treatment
Measured by SOCRATES
Time frame: 3 months
Motivation for treatment
Measured by SOCRATES
Time frame: 6 months
Motivation for treatment
Measured by SOCRATES
Time frame: 9 months
Motivation for treatment
Measured by SOCRATES
Time frame: 12 months
Suicide Severity
Measured by Columbia- Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time frame: Baseline
Suicide Severity
Measured by C-SSRS
Time frame: 3 months
Suicide Severity
Measured by C-SSRS
Time frame: 6 months
Suicide Severity
Measured by C-SSRS
Time frame: 9 months
Suicide Severity
Measured by C-SSRS
Time frame: 12 months
Therapeutic alliance
Measured by Working Alliance Inventory
Time frame: Baseline
Therapeutic alliance
Measured by Working Alliance Inventory
Time frame: 3 months
Therapeutic alliance
Measured by Working Alliance Inventory
Time frame: 6 months
Therapeutic alliance
Measured by Working Alliance Inventory
Time frame: 9 months
Therapeutic alliance
Measured by Working Alliance Inventory
Time frame: 12 months
Recovery Capital
Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital
Time frame: Baseline
Recovery Capital
Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital
Time frame: 3 months
Recovery Capital
Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital
Time frame: 6 months
Recovery Capital
Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital
Time frame: 9 months
Recovery Capital
Measured by Assessment of Recovery Capital
Time frame: 12 months
Chronic pain
Measured by Chronic Pain assessment
Time frame: Baseline
Chronic pain
Measured by Chronic Pain assessment
Time frame: 3 months
Chronic pain
Measured by Chronic Pain assessment
Time frame: 6 months
Chronic pain
Measured by Chronic Pain assessment
Time frame: 9 months
Chronic pain
Measured by Chronic Pain assessment
Time frame: 12 months
Medication Adherence
Measured by Medication Adherence Rating Scale
Time frame: 3 months
Medication Adherence
Measured by Medication Adherence Rating Scale
Time frame: 6 months
Mortality
Data extracted from medical records
Time frame: 6 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health
Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: Baseline
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health
Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: 3 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health
Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: 6 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health
Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: 9 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): health
Measured by self-report on the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scores range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: 12 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life
Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life
Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Time frame: 3 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life
Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Time frame: 6 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life
Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Time frame: 9 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): quality of life
Measured by self-report on Patient Reported Outcomes - Preference (PROPr). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Time frame: 12 months
Economic impact of full MISSION
Cost of full MISSION and MOUD measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Preference (PROPr)
Time frame: 6 months
Economic impact of CTI & PS
Cost of MISSION CTI, PS, and MOUD measured by PROPr
Time frame: 6 months
Economic impact of CTI & DRT
Cost of MISSION CTI, DRT, and MOUD measured by PROPr
Time frame: 6 months
Economic impact of PS & DRT
Cost of MISSION PS, DRT, and MOUD measured by PROPr
Time frame: 6 months
Economic impact of MOUD alone
Cost of MOUD alone measured by PROPr
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: Yes — Consistent with the NIH HEAL Initiative, Underlying Primary Data collected from participants in this project will be made readily available to the public through twice-yearly submissions to the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). In consultation with the University of Massachusetts Medical School's institutional review board (IRB), project consent forms will include relevant information for participants to be made aware that their de-identified data will be available to other investigators as a part of the HEAL Initiative Public Access and Data Sharing Policy.
Supporting information: Study protocol
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Massachusetts, Worcester