ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05691348SAMBAUpdated Mar 31, 2026

Same Day Ambulatory Appendectomy (SAMBA)

An interventional study of Ambulatory appendectomy and Conventional appendectomy in Appendicitis, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice. Recruiting at 33 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The potential benefit of outpatient care for this common digestive emergency is considerable, both for the patients themselves and for the public health system:

  1. Optimization of the care pathway, reducing the length of stay in hospital (a major issue in the context of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic) liberating patient beds and staff, and reducing the risk of nosocomial exposure.
  2. Improved patient satisfaction compared to waiting for hours in the emergency department due to lack of hospital beds.
  3. Non-inferiority of care in an outpatient unit in terms of quality and safety in day hospitalization.
  4. Significant decrease in the overall cost of this pathology as a result of a reduction in the hospital stay.
02

Conditions studied

  • Appendicitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Appendicitis

419 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,400 is above the median of 111 across 252 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice is the lead sponsor of 723 studies on the registry; 176 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 15-74 years
  • ≤ 35 kg/m2
  • Uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by imaging (ultrasound and/or CT and/or MRI)

    • Temperature ≤ 38,1°C and > 35,5°C
    • Appendix diameter > 6mm and ≤ 15mm
    • Without effusion or with only localized peri-appendicular effusion
    • Infiltration of peri-appendicular fat without abscess or plastron
    • No sign of perforation
    • Leukocytes ≤ 18,000G/L AND
    • CRP (C reactive protein) ≤ 60mg/L
  • If pain, calmed by level 3 analgesic at maximum
  • Ambulatory criteria

    • Availability of monitoring by a relative during the 12 hours after discharge from the hospital
    • Residence located less than 20 minutes by car from a health center (hospital or clinic)
    • Access to a telephone mobile or fixed in case of problems
  • Signature of the written form by the patient
  • If the patient is a minor, signature of the written informed consent form by both parents or their legal representative
  • Affiliation to a French health insurance scheme or equivalent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Criteria that exclude ambulatory care such as an (Physical status score) > 2, severe or uncontrolled comorbidities, severe pulmonary disease including obstructive sleep apnea, anticoagulation or antiplatelet drug or to ambulatory surgery such as intubation difficulties
  • Presence of active cancer, a malignant hemopathy, drug addiction, coagulopathy, treatment
  • Non-acute or interval appendectomy, i.e. after antibiotic treatment of a complicated appendicitis of the plastron or drainage of an appendicular abscess;
  • History of pelvic surgery
  • Vulnerable people: pregnant or breast-feeding women (patients will undergo a pregnancy test: plasmatic β-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) or urinary test), adult under guardianship or deprived of freedom. Pregnant women are considered to have a full stomach, with risk of inhalation at anesthetic induction and represent a contraindication to ambulatory surgery. In addition, the need to perform abdominal surgery on a pregnant woman requires obstetric monitoring that is difficult to reconcile with management in an outpatient surgery unit (need for obstetric ultrasound or monitoring).
  • Suspicion of a tumor of the appendix : Mucocele and pseudomyxoma, Carcinoid tumor, Adenocarcinoma of the appendix, Another type of tumor
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ambulatory pathway

    Procedure: Ambulatory appendectomy

  • Active comparator
    Conventional hospitalisation

    Procedure: Conventional appendectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureAmbulatory appendectomy

    Appendectomy will be performed in outpatient surgery unit. Patient will be discharge from the hospital the same day as surgery

  • ProcedureConventional appendectomy

    Appendectomy will be performed in digestive surgery department. Patient will be discharge from the hospital the day after surgery: he will spend a night under observation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To demonstrate that outpatient care, compared with conventional care, in selected patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis operated by laparoscopy, is non-inferior in terms of overall morbi-mortality on the 30th postoperative day.

    Morbi-mortality will be assessed by classifying post-operative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification. It will be compared between both groups ("ambulatory pathway" versus "conventional hospitalization" CONV) on the 30th postoperative day. The Clavien-Dindo classification was originally published in 2004 in the Annals of Surgery for elective general surgery. Later, it has been objectively validated for all surgical specialties. This classification ranks complications from 0 (no complication) to 5 (death). Complications that potentially lead to long-lasting disability after discharge (e.g.: paralysis of a vocal cord after thyroid surgery) are highlighted in the present classification by a suffix ("d" for disability). This suffix indicates that a long-term follow-up is required to comprehensively evaluate the outcome and related long-term quality of life.

    Time frame: 30 days post surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare between both groups, at post-operative day 30, the delay from diagnosis to appendectomy

    The delay from diagnosis to appendectomy is defined as the time between the performance of the CT scan (or ultrasound or MRI) for diagnosis and the skin incision in the operating room. This time is expressed in minutes.

    Time frame: 30 days post surgery

  2. To compare between both groups, at post-operative day 30, the real cumulated length of hospitalization

    The real cumulated length of hospitalization is the cumulative length of the entire hospital stay(s) in hours until the 30th postoperative day (rehospitalizations included). The length of stay in a non-hospital health structure, such as a convalescent center, will not be included.

    Time frame: 30 days post surgery

  3. To compare between both groups, at post-operative day 30, the rehospitalization rate

    All re-hospitalization(s) after initial discharge will be counted until 30 days post surgery, whatever the cause or type of hospitalization.

    Time frame: 30 days post surgery

  4. To compare between both groups, the mild morbidity (Clavien-Dindo I-II) during 30 days post surgery

    Post-operative mild morbidity will be assessed with the Clavien-Dindo classification (grade I, II) up to the 30th day post surgery. Clavien-Dindo classification was originally published in 2004 in the Annals of Surgery for elective general surgery. Later, it has been objectively validated for all surgical specialties. This classification ranks complications from 0 (no complication) to 5 (death).

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  5. To compare between both groups, the severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III, IV, V) during 30 days post surgery

    Post-operative mild morbidity will be assessed with the severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III, IV, V) up to the 30th day post surgery. Clavien-Dindo classification was originally published in 2004 in the Annals of Surgery for elective general surgery. Later, it has been objectively validated for all surgical specialties. This classification ranks complications from 0 (no complication) to 5 (death).

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  6. To compare between both groups, the rate of interventional radiology re-intervention (radio-guided drainage)

    All the Clavien-Dindo interventional radiology re-interventions (radio-guided drainage) performed in relation with the appendicitis and any potential complications will be recorded up to the 30th day post surgery.

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  7. To compare between both groups, the rate of laparoscopic re-intervention

    All laparoscopic re-interventions performed in relation with the appendectomy and the potential complications will be recorded up to the 30th day post surgery.

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  8. To compare between both groups, at post-operative day 30, the rate of re-intervention by laparotomy

    All the laparotomic re-interventions performed in relation with the appendectomy and the potential complications will be recorded up to the 30th day post surgery.

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  9. To compare between both groups, patient satisfaction 7 and 30 days post surgery

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a numerical scale from 0 to 10, using the Link4Life app. Zero '0', placed on the left, means that the patient is not satisfied at all with her/his postoperative course; '10', placed on the right, means that the patient is extremely satisfied with her/his postoperative course. If the patient does not have access or does not wish to access Link4Life, a clinical research assistant from the investigating center will collect the patient's satisfaction through a phone call. The questions that will be asked are: "How satisfied are you with your care?"; "are you in pain and if so, how severe is it?"; "Were you worried about same-day discharge (for patients in the outpatient group)?

    Time frame: 7 and 30 days post surgery

  10. To compare between both groups, patient quality of life 7 and 30 days post surgery

    Quality of life will be evaluated using the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), at inclusion, and at 7 and 30 days post surgery.The EQ-5D-5L comprises a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system is composed of five health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) with 5 levels of health (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). For each of the 5 dimensions, the participant's answer is converted to a number between 1 and 5, expressing the health state reported. The responses are combined to produce a five-digit number describing the participant's health status which is converted to a utility value from the country specific value set. The French EQ-5D-5L value set has utility between -0.530 (health condition worse than death) and 1 (best possible health). The VAS records the self-rated health status on a graduated scale from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: at inclusion and at 7 and 30 days post surgery

  11. To evaluate the rate of conversion from outpatient to conventional care

    A conversion will be defined as a patient randomized to the outpatient care group who is finally treated following the conventional care procedure, whatever the reason

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  12. To estimate the cost of outpatient appendectomy management

    The cost will be estimated by the hospital cost (intervention and outpatient stay).

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  13. To study the economic impact (utility) of outpatient appendectomy management compared to conventional hospitalization

    The economic impact will be studied with a cost-utility analysis which will estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in cost per QALY (quality adjusted life years) gained.

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  14. To study the economic impact (effectiveness) of outpatient appendectomy management compared to conventional hospitalization

    The economic impact will be studied with a cost-effectiveness analysis which will estimate the ICER in cost per patient without rehospitalization.

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  15. To study the generalization of outpatient appendectomy management in all French hospitals at the budgetary level

    The generalization of outpatient appendectomy management will be studied with a budget impact model which will estimate the consequences in terms of costs

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

  16. To study the generalization of outpatient appendectomy management in all French hospitals at a strategic level

    The generalization of outpatient appendectomy management will be studied with QALYs (quality adjusted life years) of the adoption of the outpatient strategy in all French hospitals

    Time frame: up to the 30th day post surgery

07

Study locations

17 of 33 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arvieux C, Tidadini F, Barbois S, Fontas E, Carles M, Gridel V, Orban JC, Quesada JL, Foote A, Cruzel C, Anthony S, Bulsei J, Hivelin C, Massalou D. SAME day amBulatory c (SAMBA): a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial protocol. Trials. 2024 Sep 9;25(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08336-x. PubMed 39252106 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2028, 54 months after the start.

Of 89 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Appendicitis, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 54 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 91 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 9, 2023
First posted
Jan 20, 2023
StartActual
Jul 17, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jan 17, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 17, 2028
Last update
Mar 31, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05691348
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 20, 2023
Start date
Jul 17, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 17, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 17, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Study contacts

Catherine ARVIEUX
Contact
catherine.arvieux@intradef.gouv.fr
04 43 98 52 42 ext. +33
Damien MASSALOU
Contact
massalou.d@chu-nice.Fr
04 92 03 33 13 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion