ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05632653CTO-HFUpdated Sep 19, 2024

CTO-PCI in Heart Failure Patients

An interventional study of CTO-PCI in Coronary Artery Disease, Chronic Total Occlusion and Heart Failure, sponsored by Universitätsmedizin Mannheim. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by Universitätsmedizin Mannheim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
783
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study investigates wheather CTO-PCI improves survival and heart failure related rehospitalization compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT). This hypothesis will be investigated within a large-scaled international, representative, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, event-driven, multicentre trial (trial acronym: CTO - Heart Failure) recruiting patients with planned CTO-PCI.

Read the detailed description

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of heart failure and death worldwide. Beside non-occlusive coronary arterial stenoses, 25% of CAD patients have a so called chronic total occlusion (CTO) at one out of three main coronary arteries. CTO are often left untreated by physicians over many years due to lack of knowledge of its prognostic relevance and due to be too challenging and risky for the interventional cardiologist, particularly in the presence of severe comorbidities such as heart failure. By development of new interventional devices, techniques and algorithms, CTO can be revascularized in more than 90% with low complication rates. Per se, a patient suffering from comorbid heart failure caused by CAD including a CTO is often regarded as inoperable for heart surgery by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Therefore, the only causal alternative therapy represents the less-invasive interventional revascularization of the CTO by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Until now, the prognostic impact of CTO-PCI has never been proven. Our recent work has outlined the beneficial impact of CTO-PCI to improve both left ventricular cardiac function and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure. Our objective is to understand whether CTO-PCI improves survival and heart failure related rehospitalization compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT). This hypothesis will be investigated within a large-scaled representative, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, event-driven, multicentre trial (trial acronym: CTO - Heart Failure) recruiting patients with planned CTO-PCI. The CTO Heart Failure aims to deliver evidence whether CTO-PCI might become a prognostically relevant established therapeutic option for patients with systolic heart failure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Chronic Total Occlusion
  • Heart Failure
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

4,857 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 890 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 783 is above the median of 124 across 3,006 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitätsmedizin Mannheim is the lead sponsor of 78 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written .
  • Presence of at least one CTO located at the proximal to midpart of left artery descending (LAD), or at proximal left circumflex (LCX), or at proximal to midpart LCX in left dominant system, or at proximal to distal right coronary artery (RCA).
  • \<50% (assessed within 6 weeks prior to enrolment by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) (Simpson biplane method) or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI).
  • In patients with multivessel disease (MVD) and Syntax I score ≥ 22, and all patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary 3 vessel disease, a heart team decision favouring CTO-PCI is needed.
  • Mandatory baseline imaging assessment (assessed within 6 weeks prior to enrolment):
  • TTE: Normal wall motion or hypokinesia in the CTO-territory.
  • In case of severe hypokinesia, akinesia or dyskinesia a viability testing with cMRI or myocardial scintigraphy (MS) indicating at least 50% of viability in the CTO territory (mandatory only in the presence of akinesia in the CTO-territory assessed by prior TTE) prior to PCI is mandatory.
  • Symptoms including dyspnea (according to the (NYHA), classes II-III) or angina pectoris (according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), classes II-IV).
  • In the absence of symptoms evidence of myocardial ischemia of at least 10% is needed being assessed by invasive or non-invasive imaging, such as stress-MRI, PET-CT-scan, myocardial scintigraphy, stress-echocardiography

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18 and >90 years.
  • Akinesia or dyskinesia assessed by TTE plus subendocardial late gadolinium enhancement of >50% assessed by cMRI or MS in the CTO-territory or any evidence of transmural scarring of the CTO-territory (i.e. 100%).
  • Presence of terminal kidney disease with need for renal replacement therapy.
  • Severe chronic kidney disease (defined as \< 25 ml/min).
  • Type I myocardial infarction (ST segment elevation or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI)) related to critical arteriosclerosis \< 30 days.
  • End-stage heart failure (defined by constant administration of intravenous inotropes, use of prolonged assist devices (more than 5 days), listing for high urgent cardiac transplantation).
  • Cardiogenic shock (\< 30 days).
  • Heart team decision favoring CABG surgery (in the presence of coronary multivessel disease with intermediate to high SYNTAX I score).
  • Grade II-III heart valve disorders requiring interventional or surgical treatment within 3 months.
  • Right-sided heart failure with echocardiographic evidence of severe right ventricular dysfunction.
  • requiring long-term oxygen therapy.
  • Non-cardiac comorbidity with \< 12 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
783 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CTO-PCI

    Procedure: CTO-PCI

  • No intervention
    non-CTO-PCI

Interventions

  • ProcedureCTO-PCI

    Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) (CTO-PCI) in patients with systolic heart failure (LVEF \<50%).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure related rehospitalization.

    Heart failure related rehospitalization is defined as a rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure requiring intravenous therapy as the primary cause, or as a result of another cause but associated with worsening heart failure at the time of admission, or as a result of another cause but complicated by worsening heart failure during its course

    Time frame: up to 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) class

    angina pectoris

    Time frame: up to 3 years

  2. All-cause mortality.

    Time frame: up to 3 years

  3. Heart failure related rehospitalization.

    Time frame: up to 3 years

  4. MACCE

    MACCE are defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (type I and II), any further type of coronary revascularization (i.e. PCI or CABG) based on functional invasive assessment by fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and stroke.

    Time frame: up to 3 years

  5. Number of participanty with rehospitalization due to cardiac diseases beyond heart failure.

    Time frame: up to 3 years

  6. assessment of quality of life

    Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) (0-100; 75-100 normal).

    Time frame: up to 3 years

  7. cost effectivenes

    direct and indirect health care related costs

    Time frame: up to 3 years

  8. Re-assessment of LVEF

    Time frame: up to 3 years

  9. New York Heart association (NYHA) class

    dyspnea

    Time frame: up to 36 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2025; primary completion for Mar 2030, 54 months later.

Of 753 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Coronary Artery Disease, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 53. This study's planned 54 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 930 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 27, 2022
First posted
Nov 30, 2022
StartEst.
Sep 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2030
CompletionEst.
Dec 2030
Last update
Sep 19, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05632653
Lead sponsor
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Collaborators
Herzzentrum Lahr, IHF GmbH - Institut für Herzinfarktforschung
Responsible party
Michael Behnes (Prof. Dr. med., Universitätsmedizin Mannheim) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 30, 2022
Start date
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Study contacts

Michael Behnes, Prof. Dr.
Contact
michael.behnes@umm.de
+49 621 383 6239
Michael Behnes, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Kambis Mashayekhi, PD Dr.
study director · MEDICLIN Herzzentrum Lahr

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion