ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05624684Updated Feb 23, 2024

Diagnostic Performance and Impact of a Multiplex PCR Pneumonia Panel in ICU Patients With Severe Pneumonia.

An observational study in Community-acquired Pneumonia, Hospital-acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator Associated Pneumonia, sponsored by Avicenna Military Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Morocco. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-23.

Sponsored by Avicenna Military Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of multiplex respiratory PCR (PCR-RM) compared to standard microbiological tests and its potential impact on the early adaptation of antibiotic treatment in intensive care patients with severe pneumonia.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, observational, multicenter ICU study. Adult patients with severe pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation will be included. Severe pneumonia consists of 3 categories of pneumonia: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP). The microbiological testing will be performed before antibiotic initiation on tracheobronchial aspirations, protected distal sampling, or mini-bronchoalveolar lavage as part of routine care. No additional samples will becollected for this study. Respiratory samples will be simultaneously tested by conventional microbiological techniques and multiplex respiratory PCR [PCR-RM] (BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel Plus). Classical microbiological culture (CMC) will be considered the gold standard for microbiological pneumonia diagnosis. The agreement between the results of the Pneumonia Plus® panel and the results of conventional microbial culture (CMC) will be assessed.

An empiric antibiotic therapy will be prescribed according to the local ecology and the protocols of each ICU unit. Two senior experts in each participating center will have to approve the antibiotic prescription. The antibiotic therapy could be modified after the reception of the Mutilpex PCR results by the two senior experts. After the reception of the results of the classic microbiological culture, the previous antibiotic changes will be judged as appropriate or inappropriate by a multidisciplinary team including intensivists, infectious disease specialists, and microbiologists. Appropriate changes include adequacy, de-escalation, and optimization of antibiotic therapy, and inappropriate changes include inadequacy, escalation, and de-optimization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Community-acquired Pneumonia
  • Hospital-acquired Pneumonia
  • Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Keywords

  • Community-acquired Pneumonia
  • Hospital-acquired Pneumonia
  • Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
  • Multiplex PCR
  • Antibiotic stewardship
03

In context

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Community-Acquired Pneumonia; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 210 is below the median of 650 across 111 observational studies indexed under Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Browse Community-Acquired Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Avicenna Military Hospital is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), or hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). For CAP and HAP, only patients under invasive mechanical ventilation will be included.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • critically ill adult patients
  • clinical, biological, and radiological signs of severe pneumonia.
  • community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, or ventilator-associated pneumonia
  • invasive mechanical ventilation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • ICU patients with severe pneumonia

    Critically ill patients with severe pneumonia under mechanical ventilation including ventilator-associated pneumonia, community-acquired or hospital-acquired pneumonia.

    Diagnostic Test: Multiplex respiratory PCR

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMultiplex respiratory PCR

    The BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia plus Panel

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The rate of diagnostic concordance between Classical microbiological cultures and the respiratory multiplex PCR (RM-PCR) and conventional microbiological cultures (CMC) to identify pathogens responsible for severe pneumonia in critically ill patients.

    Classical microbiological cultures (CMC) will serve as the gold standard for the comparison between techniques, considering a test result: 1. A true positive, when CMC and RM-PCR have identified the same microorganism (CMC+, PCR-RM +). 2. A false positive, when RM-PCR detected an organism but not CMC (CMC-, RM-PCR+) 3. A true negative, when no method detected any microorganism (CMC-, RM-PCR -) 4. A false negative, when CMC but not RM-PCR has detected an organism (CMC+, RM-PCR -). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the respiratory multiplex PCR will be calculated using the precedent findings.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  2. The impact of the respiratory multiplex PCR (RM-PCR) on the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy.

    The proportion of patients for whom the respiratory multiplex PCR (RM-PCR) induces an appropriate change of antibiotic therapy. Appropriate changes include adequacy, de-escalation, and escalation of antibiotic treatment. * Adequacy is defined as introducing an antibiotic to cover a microorganism that was not adequately treated before the results of RM-PCR. * Escalation is defined by a widening of the ATB spectrum to cover a pathogen not taken into account or the detection of resistance genes. * De-escalation is defined as the use of a narrower-spectrum anti-infective or the discontinuation of an ATB combination.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Avicenna Military Hospital
    Marrakesh, Marrakesh Tensift El Haouz 40000, Morocco
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The datasets of the study will be available from the principal investigator on reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: until 5 years after study completion

Access criteria: Healthcare workers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05624684
Lead sponsor
Avicenna Military Hospital
Responsible party
Younes Aissaoui, MD (Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine - Head of surgical intensive care unit, Avicenna Military Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2022
Start date
Feb 3, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 22, 2024
Completion
Feb 22, 2024
Last update
Feb 23, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion