CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05582226BioACLUpdated Feb 10, 2023

Augmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Collagen Matrix Carrier

An interventional study of ACL reconstruction and Mesenchymal stem cell implantation in ACL Tear, sponsored by Andrews Research & Education Foundation. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-10.

Sponsored by Andrews Research & Education Foundation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare patient outcomes for reconstructive surgery of ACL tears. This study utilizes two randomized groups, one being the control group that receives standard ACL reconstructive surgery, while the other is the test group at will receive an injection of stem cells taken from elsewhere within the body. The main objectives are to determine the usefulness of stem cells as a cost-effective implant in reconstructive surgery and to determine if the stem cells provide more optimized healing outcomes.

Participants will:

  • Receive ACL reconstructive surgery as normal
  • One-half of the participants will receive stem cells at the repair site as the test group
  • All participants will have 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 month followups to chart their recovery progress Thus, the outcomes of the group receiving stem cell injections will be compared directly with the outcomes of the standard ACL reconstructive care group.
Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to develop a cost-effective, autologous biologic augmentation technique for ACL reconstruction. The technique involves encasing MSCs harvested from the patient's ACL stump tissue with the GraftNet device in a porous bovine collagen matrix carrier around the ACL autograft. This study is key to determining a reproducible and effective autologous biologic augmentation technique that can be utilized at the point-of-care during ACL reconstruction surgery.

FTA results as well as measurements from MRI evaluation will be recorded and utilized to quantify the healing and ACL graft maturation processes. MRI evaluation will be performed in accordance with accepted ACL imaging protocols. This data will then be compared to FTA results and MRI evaluation from patients who did not undergo the bioaugmentation technique for ACL reconstruction.

Study design will be a prospective, blinded randomized, single center trial. Patients at the Andrews Institute who meet the inclusion criteria will have the study explained in detail and informed consent will be obtained as outlined below. Fifty patients will be blinded, randomized, and undergo a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BTB) ACL reconstruction surgery. Twenty-Five randomized patients will receive standard of care (SOC) BTB ACL reconstruction surgery. Twenty-Five randomized patients will receive BTB ACL reconstruction surgery augmented with the patient's ACL stump tissue harvested with the GraftNet device and a porous bovine collagen matrix carrier around the ACL autograft.

At each follow up visit after ACL reconstruction, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) will be collected by the research team to assist in assessing the overall health and rehabilitation of each participant. The following patient reported outcomes will be collected in written or electronic format after informed consent has been obtained from each participant:Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC), Patient Reported Outcome Measurements Information System (PROMIS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

512 studies on the registry are indexed under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 56 across 373 interventional studies indexed under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.

Browse Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Andrews Research & Education Foundation is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between the ages of 14 and 50 who are scheduled to have ACL reconstruction by one of the investigating physicians

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring ACL and posterior cruciate ligament combined surgery
  • Patients with a history of an autoimmune disease, diabetes, a blood/clotting disorder
  • History of previous surgery on the injured knee
  • Patients outside of the acceptable age range of this study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ACL reconstruction utilizing stump-derived mesenchymal stem cells

    This is the test group of this study. These participants will receive the augmented ACL reconstruction treatment involving extraction and injection of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem cell tissue will be harvested from each participant using the GraftNet device intraoperatively. During the intra-articular preparation phase of the reconstruction, the stem cell tissue will be applied to the ACL graft using a bovine collagen matrix.

    Procedure: ACL reconstruction · Procedure: Mesenchymal stem cell implantation

  • Other
    Standard of care ACL reconstructive surgery

    This is the control group of this study. These participants will receive standard ACL reconstructive surgery without any augmentations.

    Procedure: ACL reconstruction

Interventions

  • ProcedureACL reconstruction

    Orthopedic surgical operation in which a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament is repaired and reattached to the muscle connection points with a "graft", a fashioned ligament that is meant to serve as a replacement for the ruptured muscle tissue.

  • ProcedureMesenchymal stem cell implantation

    Stem cells are to be extracted from tissue at the stump of the ACL attachment point and inserted on the graft in the hopes of improving healing response

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessing functional movement using Functional Testing Algorithm

    Battery of tests used to determine the participant's capability of movement during the post-op recovery process; provides physical functional evidence of biomechanical recovery

    Time frame: 3 months post-operative

  2. Assessing functional movement using Functional Testing Algorithm

    Battery of tests used to determine the participant's capability of movement during the post-op recovery process; provides physical functional evidence of biomechanical recovery

    Time frame: 6 months post-operative

  3. Assessing functional movement using Functional Testing Algorithm

    Battery of tests used to determine the participant's capability of movement during the post-op recovery process; provides physical functional evidence of biomechanical recovery

    Time frame: 9 months post-operative

  4. Assessing functional movement using Functional Testing Algorithm

    Battery of tests used to determine the participant's capability of movement during the post-op recovery process; provides physical functional evidence of biomechanical recovery

    Time frame: 12 months post-operative

  5. Assessing functional movement using Functional Testing Algorithm

    Battery of tests used to determine the participant's capability of movement during the post-op recovery process; provides physical functional evidence of biomechanical recovery

    Time frame: 18 months post-operative

  6. Assessing functional movement using Functional Testing Algorithm

    Battery of tests used to determine the participant's capability of movement during the post-op recovery process; provides physical functional evidence of biomechanical recovery

    Time frame: 24 months post-operative

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA, Dick RW, Garrett WE, Garrick JG, Hewett TE, Huston L, Ireland ML, Johnson RJ, Kibler WB, Lephart S, Lewis JL, Lindenfeld TN, Mandelbaum BR, Marchak P, Teitz CC, Wojtys EM. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 May-Jun;8(3):141-50. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200005000-00001. PubMed 10874221 ↗
  • Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Nov;12(6):622-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Oct 2. PubMed 18835221 ↗
  • Leathers MP, Merz A, Wong J, Scott T, Wang JC, Hame SL. Trends and Demographics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States. J Knee Surg. 2015 Oct;28(5):390-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1544193. Epub 2015 Jan 30. PubMed 25635874 ↗
  • Hernigou P, Flouzat Lachaniette CH, Delambre J, Zilber S, Duffiet P, Chevallier N, Rouard H. Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff repair with mesenchymal stem cells during arthroscopy improves healing and prevents further tears: a case-controlled study. Int Orthop. 2014 Sep;38(9):1811-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2391-1. Epub 2014 Jun 7. PubMed 24913770 ↗
  • Ullah I, Subbarao RB, Rho GJ. Human mesenchymal stem cells - current trends and future prospective. Biosci Rep. 2015 Apr 28;35(2):e00191. doi: 10.1042/BSR20150025. PubMed 25797907 ↗
  • Anz AW, Branch EA, Rodriguez J, Chillemi F, Bruce JR, Murphy MB, Suzuki RK, Andrews JR. Viable Stem Cells Are in the Injury Effusion Fluid and Arthroscopic Byproducts From Knee Cruciate Ligament Surgery: An In Vivo Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr;33(4):790-797. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Dec 30. PubMed 28043750 ↗
  • Branch EA, Matuska AM, Plummer HA, Harrison RM, Anz AW. Platelet-Rich Plasma Devices Can Be Used to Isolate Stem Cells From Synovial Fluid at the Point of Care. Arthroscopy. 2021 Mar;37(3):893-900. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.035. Epub 2020 Oct 1. PubMed 33010328 ↗
  • Shi Y, Zhang X, Wan Z, Liu X, Chen F, Zhang J, Leng Y. Mesenchymal stem cells against intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022 May 26;13(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-02896-y. PubMed 35619154 ↗
  • Fu X, Liu G, Halim A, Ju Y, Luo Q, Song AG. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Migration and Tissue Repair. Cells. 2019 Jul 28;8(8):784. doi: 10.3390/cells8080784. PubMed 31357692 ↗
  • Kim MJ, Son MJ, Son MY, Seol B, Kim J, Park J, Kim JH, Kim YH, Park SA, Lee CH, Lee KS, Han YM, Chang JS, Cho YS. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from osteoarthritis patient-derived synovial cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;63(10):3010-21. doi: 10.1002/art.30488. PubMed 21953087 ↗
  • Matsumoto T, Ingham SM, Mifune Y, Osawa A, Logar A, Usas A, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M, Fu FH, Huard J. Isolation and characterization of human anterior cruciate ligament-derived vascular stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2012 Apr 10;21(6):859-72. doi: 10.1089/scd.2010.0528. Epub 2011 Aug 17. PubMed 21732814 ↗
  • Mifune Y, Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Terada S, Sekiya N, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M, Fu FH, Huard J. Tendon graft revitalization using adult anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-derived CD34+ cell sheets for ACL reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2013 Jul;34(22):5476-87. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Apr 28. PubMed 23632324 ↗
  • Suzuki S, Muneta T, Tsuji K, Ichinose S, Makino H, Umezawa A, Sekiya I. Properties and usefulness of aggregates of synovial mesenchymal stem cells as a source for cartilage regeneration. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 Jun 7;14(3):R136. doi: 10.1186/ar3869. PubMed 22676383 ↗
  • Horie M, Driscoll MD, Sampson HW, Sekiya I, Caroom CT, Prockop DJ, Thomas DB. Implantation of allogenic synovial stem cells promotes meniscal regeneration in a rabbit meniscal defect model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 18;94(8):701-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00176. PubMed 22517386 ↗
  • Koyama N, Okubo Y, Nakao K, Osawa K, Fujimura K, Bessho K. Pluripotency of mesenchymal cells derived from synovial fluid in patients with temporomandibular joint disorder. Life Sci. 2011 Nov 7;89(19-20):741-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 19. PubMed 21958469 ↗
  • Harvanova D, Tothova T, Sarissky M, Amrichova J, Rosocha J. Isolation and characterization of synovial mesenchymal stem cells. Folia Biol (Praha). 2011;57(3):119-24. PubMed 21888835 ↗
  • Sekiya I, Muneta T, Horie M, Koga H. Arthroscopic Transplantation of Synovial Stem Cells Improves Clinical Outcomes in Knees With Cartilage Defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2316-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4324-8. Epub 2015 Apr 30. PubMed 25925939 ↗
  • Zhu H, Jiang XX, Wu Y, Liu YL, Li XS, Zhang Y, Mao N. [Identification of mesenchymal stem cells derived from rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid and their regulatory effect on osteoblast formation]. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;17(4):977-80. Chinese. PubMed 19698242 ↗
  • Sekiya I, Ojima M, Suzuki S, Yamaga M, Horie M, Koga H, Tsuji K, Miyaguchi K, Ogishima S, Tanaka H, Muneta T. Human mesenchymal stem cells in synovial fluid increase in the knee with degenerated cartilage and osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2012 Jun;30(6):943-9. doi: 10.1002/jor.22029. Epub 2011 Dec 6. PubMed 22147634 ↗
  • Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Sasaki K, Kawakami Y, Oka S, Sasaki H, Takayama K, Tei K, Matsushita T, Mifune Y, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R. Acceleration of tendon-bone healing of anterior cruciate ligament graft using autologous ruptured tissue. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1296-302. doi: 10.1177/0363546512439026. Epub 2012 Mar 16. PubMed 22427618 ↗
  • Radice F, Yanez R, Gutierrez V, Rosales J, Pinedo M, Coda S. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in anterior cruciate ligament grafts with and without autologous platelet-derived growth factors. Arthroscopy. 2010 Jan;26(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.030. PubMed 20117627 ↗
  • Berdis AS, Veale K, Fleissner PR Jr. Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Biologic Augmentation in Patients 21 Years of Age and Younger. Arthroscopy. 2019 Nov;35(11):3107-3113. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.047. Epub 2019 Aug 19. PubMed 31439458 ↗
  • Looney AM, Leider JD, Horn AR, Bodendorfer BM. Bioaugmentation in the surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: A review of current concepts and emerging techniques. SAGE Open Med. 2020 May 12;8:2050312120921057. doi: 10.1177/2050312120921057. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32435488 ↗
  • Wang C, Hu Y, Zhang S, Ruan D, Huang Z, He P, Cai H, Heng BC, Chen X, Shen W. Application of Stem Cell Therapy for ACL Graft Regeneration. Stem Cells Int. 2021 Aug 2;2021:6641818. doi: 10.1155/2021/6641818. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34381504 ↗
  • Kim K, Zhao R, Doi A, Ng K, Unternaehrer J, Cahan P, Huo H, Loh YH, Aryee MJ, Lensch MW, Li H, Collins JJ, Feinberg AP, Daley GQ. Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Nov 27;29(12):1117-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2052. Erratum In: Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Jan;30(1):112. PubMed 22119740 ↗
  • Musial-Wysocka A, Kot M, Majka M. The Pros and Cons of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapies. Cell Transplant. 2019 Jul;28(7):801-812. doi: 10.1177/0963689719837897. Epub 2019 Apr 24. PubMed 31018669 ↗
  • Takeuchi H, Niki Y, Matsunari H, Umeyama K, Nagashima H, Enomoto H, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M. Temporal Changes in Cellular Repopulation and Collagen Fibril Remodeling and Regeneration After Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Experimental Study Using Kusabira-Orange Transgenic Pigs. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):2375-83. doi: 10.1177/0363546516650881. Epub 2016 Jun 21. PubMed 27329998 ↗
  • Davies GJ, McCarty E, Provencher M, Manske RC. ACL Return to Sport Guidelines and Criteria. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Sep;10(3):307-314. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9420-9. PubMed 28702921 ↗
  • Grassi A, Bailey JR, Signorelli C, Carbone G, Tchonang Wakam A, Lucidi GA, Zaffagnini S. Magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A practical guide. World J Orthop. 2016 Oct 18;7(10):638-649. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i10.638. eCollection 2016 Oct 18. PubMed 27795945 ↗
  • Lundberg M, Styf J, Jansson B. On what patients does the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia fit? Physiother Theory Pract. 2009 Oct;25(7):495-506. doi: 10.3109/09593980802662160. PubMed 19925172 ↗
  • Brodke DJ, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS. PROMIS for Orthopaedic Outcomes Measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov;24(11):744-749. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404. PubMed 27661391 ↗
  • O'Connor CM, Ring D. Correlation of Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) with other Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 Jul;7(4):303-306. PubMed 31448305 ↗
  • Parekkadan B, Milwid JM. Mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010 Aug 15;12:87-117. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105309. PubMed 20415588 ↗
  • Yoshihara M, Hayashizaki Y, Murakawa Y. Genomic Instability of iPSCs: Challenges Towards Their Clinical Applications. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2017 Feb;13(1):7-16. doi: 10.1007/s12015-016-9680-6. PubMed 27592701 ↗
  • Takayama K, Kawakami Y, Mifune Y, Matsumoto T, Tang Y, Cummins JH, Greco N, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M, Wang B, Fu FH, Huard J. The effect of blocking angiogenesis on anterior cruciate ligament healing following stem cell transplantation. Biomaterials. 2015 Aug;60:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.036. Epub 2015 May 14. PubMed 25965282 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 16, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Aug 17, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05582226
Lead sponsor
Andrews Research & Education Foundation
Collaborators
Florida
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 17, 2022
Start date
Aug 16, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 16, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 16, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 10, 2023

Study contacts

Jessi Truett, MA, BCBA
Contact
jessica.truett@andrewsref.org
8509168570
Matt Farmer, BS
Contact
matt.farmer@andrewsref.org
8509168487
Adam Anz, MD
principal investigator · Orthopedic Surgeon

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion