ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03289416EmCyteUpdated Apr 20, 2025Results posted

Bone Marrow Aspirate Compared to Platelet Rich Plasma for Treating Knee Osteoarthritis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Pure PRP II and PureBMC in Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Andrews Research & Education Foundation. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-20.

Sponsored by Andrews Research & Education Foundation · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2013, registered Sep 2017).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is intended to compare whether bone marrow aspirate concentrate or platelet rich plasma injections is more effective in treating knee osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description

While PRP shows promise in helping restore function to these patients, there are still concerns with PRP's long term outcomes. Another option that has become more popular for physicians treating this debilitation condition is bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMA), which use's undifferentiated cells found in the bone marrow to promote healing and tissue regeneration. These cells have the ability to replicate into a multiple different tissue types. With BMA, the marrow is concentrated provide better healing of the damaged tissue and aid in growth and repair. The full benefits of BMA are still unknown, but studies have shown the treatment can reduce swelling, relieve pain, and improve healing in articular cartilage and bone grafts.

Autologous BMA has shown promising clinical potential as a therapeutic agent in regenerative medicine, including the treatment of osteoarthritis and cartilage defects, and the clinical efficacy platelet rich plasma has been documented to alleviate symptoms related to knee osteoarthritis. However, randomized, prospective comparison of the two techniques has not been reported in the literature and long term follow-up for both treatments is limited, and especially limited in the use of BMA for osteoarthritis treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • knee
  • osteoarthritis
  • platelet rich plasma (PRP)
  • bone marrow concentrate (BMC)
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 623 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 68 across 2,714 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

Andrews Research & Education Foundation is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female age 18-80 years
  • Knee osteoarthritis
  • Subjects must present with pain or swelling to target knee for at least 4 months
  • Kellgren-Lawrence score between 1 and 3 upon x-ray evaluation
  • Must be willing and able to provide
  • Willing and able to return for scheduled follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major mechanical axis deviation of more than 50% into either compartment (varus or valgus )
  • Have had a injection within 3 months or a hyaluronic acid injection within 6 months
  • History of the following medical conditions:
  • diabetes
  • disorders
  • disorders requiring
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • hemophilic arthropathy
  • infectious arthritis
  • Charcot's knee
  • Paget's disease of the femur or tibia
  • Cancer
  • Ongoing infectious disease
  • Significant cardiovascular, renal or hepatic disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)

    Blood will be drawn from the patient using the Pure PRP II system into a syringe with anticoagulant (sodium citrate). 1 mL of blood will be separated and sent to a lab for analysis. Remaining blood will be separated into a single concentrating device and centrifuged to separate red blood cells from plasma and platelets. The plasma and platelets will be separated off with a syringe and re-centrifuged to separate the platelets from the plasma. 1 mL will be separated and sent to a lab for analysis leaving 6 mL for injection. Both the 1 mL of blood and the 1 mL of PRP will be sent to an independent lab to undergo analysis for CBC, TNC, human CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell assay and CFU-F. Physician will then inject the PRP into the affected knee joint.

    Combination Product: Pure PRP II

  • Other
    Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)

    Bone marrow will be harvested from the posterior iliac crest using the PureBMC system. 50 mL of bone marrow will be drawn into one syringe containing 10 mL of sodium citrate. Marrow will be filtered and centrifuged for separation of the bone marrow concentrate. Plasma and cell concentrate will be separated off with two syringes and re-centrifuged to separate the cell concentrate from the plasma. After plasma is drawn off, BMC will be drawn into a syringe for injection into affected knee. BMC production procedure results in 7 mL of product and 1 mL will be separated and sent to a lab for analysis. Both 1 mL of BMA and 1 mL of BMC will be sent to an independent lab to undergo analysis for CBC, TNC, human CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell assay and CFU-F.

    Combination Product: PureBMC

Interventions

  • Combination productPure PRP II

    The Pure PRP II system will be used to collect and concentrate blood into platelet rich plasma that will be injected into the knee.

    Also known as: GS60-PURE-II

  • Combination productPureBMC

    The PureBMC system will be used to collect and concentrate bone marrow aspirate into bone marrow concentrate that will be injected into the knee.

    Also known as: BC60-PURE

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Measurements

    Pain score measurements utilizing patient surveys; scale 0-20 with 20 being most pain and 0 being least pain

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Score (IKDC)

    Pain score measurement utilizing patient surveys; scale is 0-100 with 0 being lowest level of function and 100 being the highest

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 20, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlatelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)
Started4149
Completed4149
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Measurements

Pain score measurements utilizing patient surveys; scale 0-20 with 20 being most pain and 0 being least pain

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Measurements
score on a scalePlatelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)
Baseline32.1 (26.4 to 37.9)35.3 (29.9 to 40.6)
1 month19.5 (14.6 to 24.4)19.8 (15.2 to 24.3)
3 Months18.2 (13.7 to 22.8)15.2 (11 to 19.4)
6 Months16.2 (11 to 21.5)19.4 (14.5 to 24.3)
9 Months18.4 (13.1 to 23.7)17.6 (12.7 to 22.6)
12 Months16.8 (11.5 to 22.1)19.4 (14.5 to 24.3)
SecondarySubjective International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Score (IKDC)

Pain score measurement utilizing patient surveys; scale is 0-100 with 0 being lowest level of function and 100 being the highest

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Score (IKDC)
score on a scalePlatelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)
Baseline47.4 (42.5 to 52.3).909 (-6.3 to 7.0)
1 Month58.4 (52.5 to 64.4)58.5 (53 to 64.1)
3 Months61.6 (56.2 to 67.1)63.6 (58.6 to 68.7)
6 Months65 (58.5 to 71.5)63.7 (57.6 to 69.7)
9 Months63.1 (56.3 to 69.9)63.7 (57.4 to 70)
12 Months63.7 (57.2 to 70.1)64.3 (58.3 to 70.3)

Adverse events

Collected over 2 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)0/41 (0%)0/41 (0%)0/41 (0%)
Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)0/49 (0%)2/49 (4.1%)0/49 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlatelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)
Patient Hospitalized due to Unrelated AilmentsGeneral disorders0/411/49
Patient Withdrawn due to Unrelated AilmentsImmune system disorders0/411/49

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)Total
Mean52.2 ± 12.455.8 ± 11.354.1 ± 11.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)Total
Female182139
Male232851
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)Total
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)Total
United States414990
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Andrews Research & Education Foundation
    Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hootman JM, Helmick CG. Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jan;54(1):226-9. doi: 10.1002/art.21562. PubMed 16385518 ↗
  • Spakova T, Rosocha J, Lacko M, Harvanova D, Gharaibeh A. Treatment of knee joint osteoarthritis with autologous platelet-rich plasma in comparison with hyaluronic acid. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;91(5):411-7. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182aab72. PubMed 22513879 ↗
  • Kon E, Mandelbaum B, Buda R, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Timoncini A, Fornasari PM, Giannini S, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injection versus hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation as treatments for cartilage pathology: from early degeneration to osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy. 2011 Nov;27(11):1490-501. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Aug 10. PubMed 21831567 ↗
  • Cerza F, Carni S, Carcangiu A, Di Vavo I, Schiavilla V, Pecora A, De Biasi G, Ciuffreda M. Comparison between hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma, intra-articular infiltration in the treatment of gonarthrosis. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):2822-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512461902. Epub 2012 Oct 25. PubMed 23104611 ↗
  • Patel S, Dhillon MS, Aggarwal S, Marwaha N, Jain A. Treatment with platelet-rich plasma is more effective than placebo for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):356-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546512471299. Epub 2013 Jan 8. PubMed 23299850 ↗
  • Li M, Zhang C, Ai Z, Yuan T, Feng Y, Jia W. [Therapeutic effectiveness of intra-knee-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma on knee articular cartilage degeneration]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;25(10):1192-6. Chinese. PubMed 22069972 ↗
  • Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, Di Matteo B, Merli ML, Cenacchi A, Fornasari PM, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma vs hyaluronic acid to treat knee degenerative pathology: study design and preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Nov 23;13:229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-229. PubMed 23176112 ↗
  • Vaquerizo V, Plasencia MA, Arribas I, Seijas R, Padilla S, Orive G, Anitua E. Comparison of intra-articular injections of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF-Endoret) versus Durolane hyaluronic acid in the treatment of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy. 2013 Oct;29(10):1635-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.07.264. PubMed 24075613 ↗
  • Convery PN, Milligan KR, Quinn P, Scott K, Clarke RC. Low-dose intra-articular ketorolac for pain relief following arthroscopy of the knee joint. Anaesthesia. 1998 Nov;53(11):1125-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00582.x. PubMed 10023285 ↗
  • Ng HP, Nordstrom U, Axelsson K, Perniola AD, Gustav E, Ryttberg L, Gupta A. Efficacy of intra-articular bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or a combination of ropivacaine, morphine, and ketorolac on postoperative pain relief after ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery: a randomized double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.09.009. PubMed 16418021 ↗
  • Gupta A, Axelsson K, Allvin R, Liszka-Hackzell J, Rawal N, Althoff B, Augustini BG. Postoperative pain following knee arthroscopy: the effects of intra-articular ketorolac and/or morphine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 May-Jun;24(3):225-30. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(99)90132-3. PubMed 10338172 ↗
  • Beitzel K, McCarthy MB, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, Russell RP, Bradley J, ElAttrache NS, Romeo AA, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD. The effect of ketorolac tromethamine, methylprednisolone, and platelet-rich plasma on human chondrocyte and tenocyte viability. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul;29(7):1164-74. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.04.006. PubMed 23809450 ↗
  • Hauser RA, Orlofsky A. Regenerative injection therapy with whole bone marrow aspirate for degenerative joint disease: a case series. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Sep 4;6:65-72. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S10951. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24046512 ↗
  • Saw KY, Hussin P, Loke SC, Azam M, Chen HC, Tay YG, Low S, Wallin KL, Ragavanaidu K. Articular cartilage regeneration with autologous marrow aspirate and hyaluronic Acid: an experimental study in a goat model. Arthroscopy. 2009 Dec;25(12):1391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Sep 17. PubMed 19962065 ↗
  • Anz AW, Plummer HA, Cohen A, Everts PA, Andrews JR, Hackel JG. Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Is Equivalent to Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis at 2 Years: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(3):618-629. doi: 10.1177/03635465211072554. PubMed 35289231 ↗
  • Anz AW, Hubbard R, Rendos NK, Everts PA, Andrews JR, Hackel JG. Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Is Equivalent to Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis at 1 Year: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Feb 18;8(2):2325967119900958. doi: 10.1177/2325967119900958. eCollection 2020 Feb. PubMed 32118081 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03289416
Lead sponsor
Andrews Research & Education Foundation
Collaborators
EmCyte Corporation, BioSciences Research Associates, Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 2017
Start date
Dec 5, 2013
Primary completion
Feb 2020
Completion
Feb 2020
Results posted
Apr 20, 2025
Last update
Apr 20, 2025

Study contacts

Joshua Hackel, MD
principal investigator · Andrews Institute for Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion