ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05536921Updated Jul 20, 2023

Eye Tracking Technology in the Diagnosis of Neurological Patients

An observational study in Postcomatose Unawareness State, Minimally Conscious State and Vegetative State, sponsored by AssisTech Sp. z o.o.. Completed at 5 sites in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-20.

Sponsored by AssisTech Sp. z o.o. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Demonstrating that diagnostics of the state of consciousness and cognitive functions of patients with consciousness disorders performed using C-Eye X (based on eye-tracking technology) allows a more objective assessment of state of patients who were wrongly diagnosed based on popular methods using in a clinical practice (like behavioural scales on paper forms).

Read the detailed description

The aim of this Study is to perform a clinical evaluation of the authors' original battery of diagnostic tests in the C-Eye X system (based on eye-tracking technology), addressed to patients who have suffered damage to the central nervous system (CNS) with communication barriers. Validation is being conducting for 2 original diagnostic tests: MCSD (Minimally Conscious State Detection): to differentiate patients' state of consciousness (for patients diagnosed as being in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or minimally consciousness state (MCS) and CFA (Cognitive Functions Assessment) to assess the level of preserved cognitive functions in patients (for patients diagnosed as being in at least minimally consciousness state minus (MCS-). The intention of the project's authors is to introduce a novel diagnostic solution that will help reduce misdiagnoses made for neurological patients with reduced consciousness, due to the inadequacy of current behavioural tools to work with patients after severe brain damage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postcomatose Unawareness State
  • Minimally Conscious State
  • Vegetative State
  • Disorder of Consciousness
  • Post-Traumatic Coma
  • Neurological Injury
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Diagnosis
  • Cognitive Dysfunction
  • Neurological Disease

Keywords

  • Coma
  • Hypoxia
  • Cognitive Functions Assessment (CFA)
  • trauma
  • cognitive assessment
  • diagnostic test
  • reduced consciousness
  • eye tracking
  • Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS)
  • Minimally Conscious State Detection (MCSD)
  • brain injury
  • coma recovery
03

In context

Persistent Vegetative State

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Persistent Vegetative State; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 80 across 31 observational studies indexed under Persistent Vegetative State.

Browse Persistent Vegetative State studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with AssisTech Sp. z o.o. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Neurological patients after brain injury with communication barriers, diagnosed as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or minimal consciousness state (MCS) patients.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Completed 18 years of age.
  2. Consent of the legal guardian to participate in the Study and access to medical records.
  3. Medical diagnosis indicating damage to the central nervous system.
  4. Having and sharing a description of imaging tests (alternatively MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imaging or CT - Computed Tomography) and (alternatively) ophthalmoscopy, ophthalmology, auditory tests.
  5. Presentation of a list of medications used by the patient that may affect the results obtained in tests of cognitive function.
  6. Acceptance by a physician (e.g. neurologist, neurosurgeon, internist) to participate in a clinical trial, taken after reviewing the Study protocol, including there is a need to take into account:

    1. the ability to communicate only by sight (no verbal, sign or other communication),
    2. the absence of dementia and aphasic disorders before the event that led to CNS damage and the patient's current condition,
    3. preserved at least one functioning eyeball (possibility of cooperation with an eye tracker).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Visual defect (refractive defect) diagnosed before the incident, requiring work with glasses with lenses of more than ±3 diopters.
  2. Inclusion of drug treatment during the Study (observation), which can affect the patient's cognitive functioning (both in terms of cognitive enhancement and impairment/dementia).
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Test 1: Minimally Conscious State Detection (MCSD Test)

    The Test 1 consist of 6 subscales (including 11 points): 1. Auditory sensitivity 2. Visual functions 3. Auditory-visual integration 4. Command execution 5. Autopsychic orientation 6. Pressure localisation test The MCSD Test is performed in 5 trials during 14 days of observation with intervals of at least one day between test repetitions. The result of the completed test is an indicator of one of the following states of the patient's condition diagnosis: * UWS * MCS - * MCS +

    Time frame: 14 days

  2. Test 2: Cognitive Function Assessment (CFA Test)

    The Test 2 consist of 6 subscales (including 24 points): 1. Attention 2. Language functions 3. Visual-spatial functions 4. Autopsychic orientation 5. Memory 6. Abstract thinking The total number of points that a patient can obtain in a single trial for performing tasks in the CFA test is 24 points. The CFA Test is performed in 3 trials during 14 days at intervals of at least one day. For the CFA test, the results will be presented as: 1. the sum of scores for all subscales of the test, 2. the point value obtained in each subscale, 3. the percentage of the total score for all subscales of the test related to the maximum value possible for the test - 24 points 4. the percentage value in each subscale related to the maximum value possible in the subscale. The result obtained: 1. ______ - ____% 2. ______ - ____% 3. ______ - ____% Total score = ____% Scale: 0 - 100%

    Time frame: 14 days

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Care and Rehabilitation Center "HEALTH" ("ZDROWIE")
    Częstochowa, 42-207, Poland
  • Polish Center for Functional Rehabilitation VOTUM
    Kraków, 30-723, Poland
  • Polish Center for Functional Rehabilitation SAWIMED
    Sawice, 08-307, Poland
  • Neurorehabilitation Center of Dr. Roman Olejniczak
    Wrocław, 54-530, Poland
  • County Hospital
    Zawiercie, 42-400, Poland
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05536921
Lead sponsor
AssisTech Sp. z o.o.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2022
Start date
May 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2023
Completion
Mar 31, 2023
Last update
Jul 20, 2023

Study contacts

Grzegorz Żurek, Prof.
principal investigator · Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences
Bartosz Kunka, Ph.D.
study chair · AssisTech Sp. z o.o.

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion