ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07918274Updated Nov 5, 2026

Restoring Awareness

A Phase 2 interventional study of Saxagliptin (Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., NDC: 0378-4706-93) and Saxagliptin (Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., NDC: 0378-4706-93) in Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State, sponsored by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hopsital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).

Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be under continuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90.

A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 6 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB), chaired by a Medical doctor , will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for subsequent patients (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout.

Read the detailed description

When individuals suffer a severe brain injury and do not completely regain their previous functional abilities, frequently develop a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC). This refers to a collection of interconnected conditions characterized by reduced awareness and alertness, such as the Vegetative State (VS) and the Minimally Conscious State(MCS). When these conditions persist over time, there are currently no authorized pharmacological interventions available to enhance their recovery. Only one medication, amantadine, has Class II evidence for DOC, offering modest benefit with no group difference versus placebo at trial end . Eight drugs, which are indicated for other conditions, have previously shown some promise in improving alertness and awareness in some DoC patients. These drugs are amantadine, apomorphine, baclofen, bromocriptine, desipramine, levodopa, methylphenidate, and zolpidem. In order to identify new potential drugs for DoC, investigators trained a deep neural network to predict the efficacy of these eight drugs, as well as 288 other drugs known to be ineffective (from prior research and patient records), based on their molecular structure. This phenotypic AI screening was trained on both acute coma and prolonged DOC cases. Investigators then used this trained network to predict the efficacy of all other FDA-approved drugs in chronic DoC. This in silico drug screen identified a new, FDA-approved medication with promise in ameliorating chronic DoC: the type 2 diabetes medication saxagliptin. This finding has since been supported by a retrospective study of 4,047 ICU acute coma patients matched by age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score, etiology, and glycemic status, in which incretin-based therapies (including DPP-4 inhibitors) yielded significantly higher recovery rates versus non-incretin diabetes medications (P=0.0331), patients without diabetes (P=0.0272), and amantadine-treated patients (P=0.0364) (Toker et al., 2025). Recovery rates with incretin-based drugs were consistent across coma etiologies: TBI (76.5%), stroke (73.7%), and anoxic (74.9%); saxagliptin-treated patients showed 89% recovery. A new preclinical study also demonstrated saxagliptin significantly improved neurobehavioral outcomes and attenuated neuropathologies in severe TBI in non-diabetic rats .

In the present study, investigators propose to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).

Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be undercontinuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90. A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 8 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB),chaired by a Medical Doctor, will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for only the remaining 6 patients in the full treatment arm; All 12 Delayed-Start patients will remain at 5 mg during active treatment (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout. No confirmed adverse events of special interest (AESIs), no permanent study-drug discontinuations for safety reasons, completion of treatment and follow-up through Day 44 before escalation review.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vegetative State
  • Minimally Conscious State

Keywords

  • vegetative state
  • Minimally Conscious State
03

In context

Persistent Vegetative State

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Persistent Vegetative State; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 30 across 55 interventional studies indexed under Persistent Vegetative State.

Browse Persistent Vegetative State studies →

Lead sponsor

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Any etiology: traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, or vascular (stroke) brain injury.
  • Enrolled at Casa Colina Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).
  • Legally authorized representative (LAR) available to provide .
  • Medically stable for participation as determined by the Clinical Co-Investigator (Dr. David Patterson, MD).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type I or Type II Diabetes Mellitus.
  • Current use of strong inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, clarithromycin) due to potential saxagliptin exposure increase.
  • Current use of insulin or insulin secretagogues.
  • Heart failure of Class II-IV, active decompensated heart failure, or hospitalization for heart failure within 12 months before screening. Because NYHA class is defined by symptoms during physical exertion and cannot be assessed in patients with disorders of consciousness, any patient with a documented diagnosis of heart failure is excluded unless the medical record documents NYHA Class I status before the qualifying brain injury and there has been no subsequent heart failure decompensation or hospitalization.
  • Estimated (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73 m², calculated from the screening serum creatinine using the CKD-EPI 2021 equation (Inker et al., 2021). Because reduced muscle mass after prolonged immobility can cause creatinine-based eGFR to overestimate renal function, the Clinical Co-Investigator may additionally obtain a cystatin C-based eGFR; a patient is excluded if either estimate is \<60 mL/min/1.73 m².
  • Known to saxagliptin or any DPP-4 inhibitor, or a history of angioedema.
  • History of pancreatitis or bullous pemphigoid.
  • Unstable vital signs, active infections, or recent hospitalizations for acute medical illness.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for participation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Delayed Start Group

    Placebo on days 1-15. Saxagliptin on days 16-30.

    Drug: Saxagliptin (Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., NDC: 0378-4706-93)

  • Experimental
    Full Treatment Group

    Saxagliptin given on days 1-30.

    Drug: Saxagliptin (Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., NDC: 0378-4706-93)

  • No intervention
    Placebo

    See delayed group information. Placebo will be given day 0-15

Interventions

  • DrugSaxagliptin (Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., NDC: 0378-4706-93)

    Days 16-30- administer 5 mg/day via G-tube

  • DrugSaxagliptin (Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., NDC: 0378-4706-93)

    Days 1-30- administer 5 mg/day (or 10 mg/day per adaptive design) via G tube

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Hypoglycemia (\<70 mg/dL via continuous glucose monitoring), non-serious AEs (CTCAE v5.0), and discontinuations vs. placebo (first 15 days), and vitals.

    Time frame: From days 1-30

  2. Change in CRS-R total score from baseline to Day 15 (placebo-controlled comparison) and Day 30.

    CRS-R assessment divided into 6 subscales Total score ranging from 0-23. Higher scores indicate higher levels of neurological function and consciousness. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 15 and Days 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. CRS-R subscales

    ≥2-point increase or diagnostic advancement. DRS is out of 29 points (Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 29 (extreme vegetative state). Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 15, day 30

  2. Portable EEG-based AI biomarker of consciousness level

    A framework to decode consciousness level

    Time frame: Baseline, days 15, days 30

  3. DRS-PI

    The DRS-PI (Disability Rating Scale-Postacute Interview) is a standardized interview version of the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) designed for reliable telephone or direct administration with patients or proxy caregivers. Lower DRS-PI better outcome. Lower scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Days 60 and Days 90

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Turner-Stokes L, Dzingina M, Shavelle R, Bill A, Williams H, Sephton K. Estimated Life-Time Savings in the Cost of Ongoing Care Following Specialist Rehabilitation for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the United Kingdom. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019 Jul/Aug;34(4):205-214. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000473. PubMed 30801440 ↗
  • Toker D, Chiang JN, Vespa PM, Schnakers C, Monti MM. The Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Saxagliptin as a Candidate Treatment for Disorders of Consciousness: A Deep Learning and Retrospective Clinical Analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug;43(1):101-118. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02217-0. Epub 2025 Feb 4. PubMed 39904872 ↗
  • TBI Model systems National Database (2016). Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury is a lifelong condition. https:// www.tbindsc.org/StaticFiles/Documents/CDC_NIDILRR_IAA_Policy.pdf.
  • Schnakers C, Monti MM. Disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: therapeutic options. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017 Dec;30(6):573-579. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000495. PubMed 28901969 ↗
  • Pistoia F, Mura E, Govoni S, Fini M, Sara M. Awakenings and awareness recovery in disorders of consciousness: is there a role for drugs? CNS Drugs. 2010 Aug;24(8):625-38. doi: 10.2165/11535940-000000000-00000. PubMed 20658796 ↗
  • Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, Kalyane D, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021 Jan;26(1):80-93. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 21. PubMed 33099022 ↗
  • Pastores SM, Dakwar J, Halpern NA. Costs of critical care medicine. Crit Care Clin. 2012 Jan;28(1):1-10, v. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2011.10.003. PubMed 22123095 ↗
  • Monti MM. Cognition in the vegetative state. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:431-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143050. Epub 2012 Jan 3. PubMed 22224835 ↗
  • Gray DS, Burnham RS. Preliminary outcome analysis of a long-term rehabilitation program for severe acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Nov;81(11):1447-56. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.16343. PubMed 11083347 ↗
  • Gosseries O, Demertzi A, Ledoux D, Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Laureys S, Schnakers C. Burnout in healthcare workers managing chronic patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj. 2012;26(12):1493-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.695426. Epub 2012 Jun 22. PubMed 22725684 ↗
  • Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033. PubMed 15605342 ↗
  • Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002 Feb 12;58(3):349-53. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.3.349. PubMed 11839831 ↗
  • Deacon CF, Holst JJ. Saxagliptin: a new dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Adv Ther. 2009 May;26(5):488-99. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0030-9. Epub 2009 May 14. PubMed 19444391 ↗
  • Cullen NK, Park YG, Bayley MT. Functional recovery following traumatic vs non-traumatic brain injury: a case-controlled study. Brain Inj. 2008 Dec;22(13-14):1013-20. doi: 10.1080/02699050802530581. PubMed 19117180 ↗
  • Corso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T, Fiebelkorn I, Zaloshnja E. Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj Prev. 2015 Dec;21(6):434-40. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010983rep. PubMed 26609059 ↗
  • Chen A, Bushmeneva K, Zagorski B, Colantonio A, Parsons D, Wodchis WP. Direct cost associated with acquired brain injury in Ontario. BMC Neurol. 2012 Aug 17;12:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-76. PubMed 22901094 ↗
  • Bernat JL. Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet. 2006 Apr 8;367(9517):1181-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68508-5. PubMed 16616561 ↗
  • Baral B, Chauhan C, Mishra T, Kaundal RK. Neuroprotective effects of Saxagliptin in traumatic brain injury: ameliorating oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and apoptosis. Metab Brain Dis. 2025 Apr 11;40(4):175. doi: 10.1007/s11011-025-01584-z. PubMed 40214844 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Oct 2029, 35 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 12, 2026
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 30, 2029
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2030
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07918274
Lead sponsor
Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Caroline Schnakers, PhD, Schnakers, PhD
Contact
CSchnakers@casacolina.org
(909)596-7733 ext. 3038

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion