ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05525377Updated Apr 27, 2023

Better Living With Non-memory-led Dementia

An interventional study of Better living with non-memory led dementia course in Primary Progressive Aphasia, Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer Disease, sponsored by University College, London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-27.

Sponsored by University College, London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a feasibility study on the effects of an online-based training and education programme for carers of people with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is:

To evaluate the feasibility of an online training course for carers of people with PCA, PPA, and bvFTD. Feasibility measures will focus on the recruitment process and measurement tools.

To determine the acceptability of an online training course for carers of people with PCA, PPA and bvFTD.

The study will involve 6 online modules over the course of 7 weeks. All sessions will take place over the internet, using an online platform. A research team member (facilitator) will be available to assist participants over the course completion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Progressive Aphasia
  • Frontotemporal Dementia
  • Alzheimer Disease

Keywords

  • "Posterior Cortical Atrophy"
03

In context

Aphasia, Primary Progressive

211 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphasia, Primary Progressive; 59 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is close to the median of 31 across 135 interventional studies indexed under Aphasia, Primary Progressive.

Browse Aphasia, Primary Progressive studies →

Lead sponsor

University College, London is the lead sponsor of 647 studies on the registry; 145 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. . Adults (18+) who self-identify as an unpaid carer (partners, children, friends, etc.) of someone with PPA, PCA or bvFTD who is not living in a full-time care facility.
  2. . The care recipient has to have a confirmed diagnosis of dementia (through self-report of the carer, to reflect the 'real world' application of the intervention).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. . Those unable to comprehend written English
  2. . Those with no access to the internet
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Subjects in the intervention group receive access to an online training and educational phenotype-specific programme on how to support their relative with non-memory-led dementia. The online course consists on 6 modules to complete in 7 weeks. A course facilitator is available throughout the duration of the intervention to support participants.

    Behavioral: Better living with non-memory led dementia course

  • No intervention
    Treatment as usual (TAU)

    The "treatment as usual" group does not receive access to the educational programme.

Interventions

  • BehavioralBetter living with non-memory led dementia course

    Caregivers online training and educational phenotype-specific programme on how to support people with non-memory-led dementia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Study feasibility

    Feasibility of recruitment process and measurement tools (e.g., number of people agreeing to be sent information about the study, time taken to fill in questionnaires).

    Time frame: Since June 2022 to January 2023 (8 months)

  2. Acceptability

    Prospective and retrospective acceptability (e.g., reasons for not taking part, task completion rate after every module)

    Time frame: Since June 2022 to January 2023 (8 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. WHO 5 Wellbeing Index

    Short self-reported measure of current mental wellbeing (ranging from 0 (minimun) to 25 (maximun) scores). 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7)

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (ranging from 0 (minimun) to 21 (maximun) scores). Higher scores indicates higher anxiety.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Assesses depression severity (ranging from 0 (minimun) to 27 (maximun) scores. Higher scores indicate higher depression.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  4. De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale

    Measure variations in total loneliness score ranging from 0 (minimun) to 11 (maximun) scores. 0 meaning not lonely and 100 very severe lonely score.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  5. Lubben Social Network Scale

    Brief instrument designed to gauge social isolation in older adults by measuring perceived social support received by family and friends. Ranging from 0 (minimun) to 60 (maximun) scores. Higher scores represent higher social network.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  6. Pearling Mastery Scale

    Measures the extent to which an individual regards their life chances as being under their personal control. Ranging from 7 (minimun) to 28 (maximun) scores. Higher scores indicate greater levels of mastery.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  7. Caregiver self-efficacy scale

    Measures caregivers' beliefs about their ability to carry out behaviors such as obtaining respite, responding to disruptive patient behaviors, etc. Ranging from 0 (minimun) to 100 (maximun) scores. Higher scores reflect higher confidence.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  8. Dementia Management Strategies Scale

    Instrument to appraise 3 care styles of caregivers: 1) Active management, 2) Criticism and 3) Encouragement. Ranging from 34 (minimun) to 170 (maximun). Higher scores mean a greater presence of behaviours associated to the the corresponding caregiver style.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  9. The quality of carer-partner relationship scale

    Scale that measures closeness in a relationship. Ranging from 14 (minimun) to 70 (maximun). Higher scores reflect higher quality of carer-partner relationship.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  10. Questions about perceived burden and ethicality

    Tailored questions administered in a purposed-built interview. They

    Time frame: At 8 weeks post-randomisation and 3 month follow up

  11. Health economics questions

    Tailored questions administered in a purposed-built interview.

    Time frame: At 8 weeks post-randomisation and 3 month follow up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University College London
    London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Suarez-Gonzalez A, John A, Brotherhood E, Camic PM, McKee-Jackson R, Melville M, Sullivan MP, Tudor-Edwards R, Windle G, Crutch S, Hoare Z, Stott J; Rare Dementia Support Impact team. "Better Living with Non-memory-led Dementia": protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a web-based caregiver educational programme. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Oct 11;9(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01403-1. PubMed 37821924 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2022 to primary completion in Feb 2023, 7 months.

Of 58 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Aphasia, Primary Progressive, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 97. This study's 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 59 studies reached it within 40 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 97.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 12, 2022
First posted
Sep 1, 2022
StartActual
Jun 21, 2022
Primary completionActual
Feb 9, 2023
CompletionActual
Feb 9, 2023
Last update
Apr 27, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05525377
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 1, 2022
Start date
Jun 21, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 9, 2023
Completion
Feb 9, 2023
Last update
Apr 27, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion