CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05425784Updated Feb 18, 2025

Home Use of Dual-light Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Periodontitis

An interventional study of Lumoral treatment and Standard oral hygiene self care in Periodontal Diseases, Periodontitis and Plaque, Dental, sponsored by Koite Health Oy. Completed at 3 sites in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-18.

Sponsored by Koite Health Oy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This early-stage research is designed to determine the efficacy of the Lumoral method in chronic periodontitis patients. Improved supragingival plaque control can help to also sustain the subgingival plaque management in the long term. In addition, the device might have a photobiomodulation effect on periodontal tissues.

Read the detailed description

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease leading to a progressive loss of the tooth-supporting apparatus. The disease is strongly associated with deranged biodiversity patterns in dental plaque.

The Lumoral is a CE-marked medical device developed to provide a potent, targeted antibacterial action on dental plaque in a home environment. The device mechanism of action is antibacterial photodynamic therapy. The device is used by swishing a mouth rinse, which has a strong adherence to dental plaque. The plaque-adhered photoactive mouth rinse can be activated by a simple to use light applicator. The antibacterial efficacy far exceeds chlorhexidine, without side effects in a longterm use. Preliminary results have shown a promising anti-inflammatory response in addition to plaque reduction.

Ninety (90) stage I-III periodontitis patients are randomized to Lumoral treatment group or control group. Both groups shall receive mechanical plaque control by scaling and root planning (SRP) and standard oral hygiene instructions for electric toothbrush, interdental brush, and dental floss use. All the patients shall be assessed for the clinical periodontitis status. These assessment and analyses shall be performed at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months after the treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Periodontal Diseases
  • Periodontitis
  • Plaque, Dental
  • Plaque Induced Gingivitis

Keywords

  • Lumoral
  • Lumorinse
  • Plaque
  • Periodontitis
  • Plaque control
  • aPDT
  • aMMP-8
03

In context

Gingivitis

590 studies on the registry are indexed under Gingivitis; 105 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 64 across 478 interventional studies indexed under Gingivitis.

Browse Gingivitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Koite Health Oy is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Periodontal disease stage I-III, according to criteria the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) with at least 2 mm interdental CAL in the site of greatest loss.
  • Age of 18- 85 years
  • Presence of ≥20 teeth, including implants
  • Agreement to participate in the study and to sign a written consent form
  • Able to co-operate with the treatment protocol and avoid any other oral hygiene measures outside of the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of major physical limitation or restriction that prohibit the hygiene procedures used in the study protocol
  • Removable major prosthesis or major orthodontic appliance
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Use of antibiotics within 2 weeks prior the study
  • A need for immediate antimicrobial treatment for periodontitis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lumoral Treatment (Study group)

    Subjects will receive detailed instructions for the use of Lumoral treatment -device and Lumorinse -tablets. Subjects will be instructed to use the Lumoral treatment -device and follow the protocol five to seven (5-7) times a week. Regular use shall be defined as frequency of a minimum of twice a week. Standard oral hygiene instructions will be provided verbally and in writing. In addition, an electric toothbrush will be provided to all subjects.

    Device: Lumoral treatment · Other: Standard oral hygiene self care

  • Active comparator
    Standard of care (Control group)

    Standard oral hygiene instructions will be provided verbally and in writing. In addition, an electric toothbrush will be provided to all subjects.

    Other: Standard oral hygiene self care

Interventions

  • DeviceLumoral treatment

    The investigational Lumoral treatment -device provides a constant and repeatable application which can be done at home and is easily available. All subjects in the study group will receive their own Lumoral treatment -device and Lumorinse-mouth rinse tablets for the complete duration of the study.

    Also known as: Lumorinse mouth rinse

  • OtherStandard oral hygiene self care

    Both groups shall be given oral and written instructions for twice-daily standard oral hygiene self-care.

    Also known as: Electric toothbrush provided

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in dental inflammation

    Possible changes in dental inflammation measured by bleeding on probing (BoP) when compared to control group at 3 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Reduction in dental inflammation

    Possible changes in dental inflammation measured by bleeding on probing (BoP) when compared to control group at 6 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Stabilization of the periodontal disease

    Possible changes in the periodontal disease, measured by total probing pocket depth (PPD) progression in the patient mouth at 3 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Stabilization of the periodontal disease

    Possible changes in the periodontal disease, measured by total probing pocket depth (PPD) progression in the patient mouth at 6 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction in aMMP-8 measurement

    Clinical improvement in periodontal inflammation marker aMMP-8 measured by Periosafe® at 3 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Reduction in aMMP-8 measurement

    Clinical improvement in periodontal inflammation marker aMMP-8 measured by Periosafe® at 6 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Improvement in probing pocket depth (PPD) reflecting the clinical periodontitis status

    Clinical improvement of periodontitis measured by probing pocket depth (PPD) at 3 months based on the absolute values of PPD. All clinical parameters will be recorded with the help of a graded periodontal manual probe (for example, North Carolina 54B or UNC15 probe (Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co., LLC) or similar device) with a maximum force of 0.25 N.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Improvement in probing pocket depth (PPD) reflecting the clinical periodontitis status

    Clinical improvement of periodontitis measured by probing pocket depth (PPD) at 6 months based on the absolute values of PPD. All clinical parameters will be recorded with the help of a graded periodontal manual probe (for example, North Carolina 54B or UNC15 probe (Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co., LLC) or similar device) with a maximum force of 0.25 N.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Improvement in clinical attachment level (CAL) reflecting the clinical periodontitis status

    Clinical improvement of periodontitis measured by clinical attachment level (CAL) at 3 months based on the absolute values of CAL. All clinical parameters will be recorded with the help of a graded periodontal manual probe (for example, North Carolina 54B or UNC15 probe (Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co., LLC) or similar device) with a maximum force of 0.25 N.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Improvement in clinical attachment level (CAL) reflecting the clinical periodontitis status

    Clinical improvement of periodontitis measured by clinical attachment level (CAL) at 6 months based on the absolute values of CAL. All clinical parameters will be recorded with the help of a graded periodontal manual probe (for example, North Carolina 54B or UNC15 probe (Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co., LLC) or similar device) with a maximum force of 0.25 N.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Change in periodontal microbiological pathogens.

    Clinical improvement in periodontal microbiological pathogens at 3 months compared to baseline. The microbiological evaluation is the Quantification of periodontopathic bacteria by 16S rRNA sequencing analysis. Microbiological sample will be collected using so called Iso Taper Paper Points, size-20 (VDW GmbH) from selected gingival/periodontal pockets with maximum initial probing depth. The paper points will then be be placed into sterile, small-aliquot containers, and immediately stored at -20°C until analysis.

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. Change in periodontal microbiological pathogens.

    Clinical improvement in periodontal microbiological pathogens at 6 months compared to baseline. The microbiological evaluation is the Quantification of periodontopathic bacteria by 16S rRNA sequencing analysis. Microbiological sample will be collected using so called Iso Taper Paper Points, size-20 (VDW GmbH) from selected gingival/periodontal pockets with maximum initial probing depth. The paper points will then be be placed into sterile, small-aliquot containers, and immediately stored at -20°C until analysis.

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Improvement in oral-related quality of life.

    Patient related objectives: Improvement in oral-related quality of life measurement (OHIP-14) questionnaire at baseline, at 3 months compared to baseline. Fourteen items of OHIP are divided into seven dimensions: functional limitation, physical discomfort, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicaps. Grading is based on answering a five-scale questionnaire from 'Never' to 'Very often'.

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Improvement in oral-related quality of life.

    Patient related objectives: Improvement in oral-related quality of life measurement (OHIP-14) questionnaire at baseline, at 6 months compared to baseline. Fourteen items of OHIP are divided into seven dimensions: functional limitation, physical discomfort, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicaps. Grading is based on answering a five-scale questionnaire from 'Never' to 'Very often'.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Mehiläinen Länsi-Pohja Central Hospital
    Kemi, Lappi 94100, Finland
  • Hammas Hohde Oy
    Oulu, Oulun Lääni 90230, Finland
  • City of Rovaniemi Health Cervices, Oral Health
    Rovaniemi, 96100, Finland
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05425784
Lead sponsor
Koite Health Oy
Collaborators
University of Helsinki, University of Oulu
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 21, 2022
Start date
Jan 19, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 29, 2024
Completion
Jan 13, 2025
Last update
Feb 18, 2025

Study contacts

Tommi Pätilä, Docent
study director · Chief Medical Officer
Timo Sorsa, Professor
principal investigator · University of Helsinki

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion