ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05416385CIRCEUpdated Feb 6, 2025

Carotid Intraplaque Neovascularization Combined With Stress Echo

An observational study in Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases and Acute Coronary Syndrome, sponsored by Dr. Amer Johri. Recruiting at 6 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-06.

Sponsored by Dr. Amer Johri · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2021; still recruiting 5 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The root cause of heart attacks and strokes is atherosclerosis, the hardening and thickening of blood vessels due to the presence of "plaque" which is a build-up of fat and cholesterol in the walls of vessels. To diagnose heart disease, patients receive a stress test to find out if they require surgery. Up to 52% of patients receiving an angiogram (surgery) to look at plaque blockages in the heart are found to be normal (no blockage). Patients who are suspected of having heart disease often undergo a stress test, which helps cardiologists decide if the patient has heart disease, but stress tests can give false results. In Ontario alone, 90% are stress tests are found to be normal and patients are sent home with little follow-up. Of these 3-5% (\~4,000 patients/year) will have a major cardiovascular event (heart attack, surgery, or death) within 3 years. We need to improve the stress test accuracy to reduce cardiac outcome. We now know that it is not just the total amount of plaque that leads to heart attacks and strokes, but the composition of the plaque that can lead to breakage causing a heart attack. Plaques are soft and fragile, and typically contain fat and small leaky blood vessels within their cores. If we are able to identify patients that have leaky plaques using ultrasound, we may be able to improve the accuracy of stress testing. We propose a study looking at the combination of stress testing (assessing heart function) and neck ultrasound (assessing plaque composition), to identify patients at risk for cardiovascular events (heart attacks and death). We will enrol patients from 6 sites across Canada and follow-them for cardiac outcome for 3 years.

Read the detailed description

Primary Aim: To determine if carotid intraplaque neovascularization score (IPN) combined with stress echo (SE) [IPN+SE] enhances prediction of 3-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared to SE alone.

Objectives: 1) The % change in test sensitivity of IPN+SE for predicting 3-year MACE compared with SE alone. 2) The Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) for MACE will be determined (patients "missed" by the SE, but captured as high risk for MACE by IPN).

02

Conditions studied

  • Atherosclerosis
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Ischemic Heart Disease
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Carotid Artery Diseases

Keywords

  • Ultrasound
  • Echocardiography
  • Stress Testing
  • Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound
03

In context

Atherosclerosis

1,596 studies on the registry are indexed under Atherosclerosis; 262 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,500 is above the median of 230 across 581 observational studies indexed under Atherosclerosis.

Browse Atherosclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Dr. Amer Johri is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Low to intermediate risk outpatient subjects referred for stress echo (SE) for assessment of ischemia and risk stratification will be screened for inclusion.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men and women >18 years;
  2. Referred for a clinically indicated SE for assessment of ischemia and risk stratification;
  3. Able and willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency procedure, or active acute coronary syndrome (active chest pain, ischemic electrocardiogram changes, or cardiac enzyme elevation);
  2. Referral for viability, pulmonary hypertension, or valve assessment;
  3. Referral outside of the normal working hours;
  4. History of significant CAD: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (GABG), or coronary angioplasty;
  5. History of stroke or myocardial infarction (MI);
  6. Known or documented hypersensitivity or allergy to perflutren (DEFINITY® contrast agent);
  7. Known or documented allergy to Polyethylene Glycol (Peg) a component of DEFINITY®;
  8. History of carotid surgery (endarterectomy or stenting);
  9. Any serious medical condition or complication from the stress test that according to the investigator could interfere with the carotid scan or optimal care;
  10. Currently pregnant or breastfeeding;
  11. Previous enrolment into the study.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cardiac outpatients

    Subjects referred for outpatient stress echocardiogram (SE).

    Other: Carotid Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

Interventions

  • OtherCarotid Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

    Carotid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS), a diagnostic ultrasound enhancing agent that opacifies the blood to delineate the vessel walls.

    Also known as: Contrast injection, DEFINITY®, Perflutren Lipid Microsphere

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Our primary outcomes will be the improvement in sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV).

    Our primary analysis will compare the sensitivity of an established binary test based on SE alone to a binary test based on SE and plaque assessment (using established thresholds, IPN≥1.25) to predict 3-year MACE.

    Time frame: This is a 5-year study. The outcome follow up for mace will be 3-years from the index date (SE).

07

Study locations

5 of 6 sites recruiting
  • University of Calgary
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
    • Omid Kiamanesh, MD · Principal investigator
    • Nowell Fine, MD SM FRCPC · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • University of Alberta
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada
    Not yet recruiting
  • Dalhousie University
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3A7, Canada
    • Sharon Mulvagh, MD, FRCPC · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • The Kingston Heart Clinic
    Kingston, Ontario K7L 1C2, Canada
    • Murray Matangi, MB ChB, FRCPC, FACP, FACC · Contact · cinq.research@gmail.com · (613) 544-3242;
    • Murray Matangi, MB ChB, FRCPC, FACP, FACC · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Queen's University, Cardiovascular Imaging Network at Queen's (CINQ)
    Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada
    Recruiting
  • Unity Health Toronto
    Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2026, 60 months after the start.

Of 173 non-industry observational studies under Atherosclerosis, half reached primary completion within 62 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 34 and three quarters within 153. This study's planned 60 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 198 studies reached it within 54 months; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 129.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 8, 2022
First posted
Jun 13, 2022
StartActual
Aug 16, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Aug 16, 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 16, 2026
Last update
Feb 6, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05416385
Lead sponsor
Dr. Amer Johri
Responsible party
Dr. Amer Johri (Professor, Queen's University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 13, 2022
Start date
Aug 16, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 16, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 16, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 6, 2025

Study contacts

Marie-France Hetu, PhD
Contact
cinq.research@gmail.com
1 613-549-6666 ext. 8174
Amer Johri, MD
principal investigator · Queen's University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion