CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05350280Updated Apr 7, 2023

Evaluation of the Effect of Electrical Stimulation on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement and the Dental Arches

An interventional study of electric current and Traditional treatment in Class II Malocclusion, sponsored by Damascus University. Completed at 1 site in Syrian Arab Republic. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-07.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2018, registered Apr 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Thirty-eight patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars and maximum anchorage to retract the upper anterior teeth will participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: electrical group and control group. In each group, en-masse retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side, Mini-implants will be used as an anchor unit.

The dental changes will be detected using dental casts and to evaluate the rate of teeth retraction.

Read the detailed description

Prior to enrollment of each subject into the study, they will be examined completely to determine the orthodontic treatment plan. The operator will inform them about the aim of the study and ask them to provide a written informed consent.

Self-drilling titanium mini-implants (1.6mm diameter and 8mm length) will be used. They will be inserted between the maxillary second premolar and first molar at approximately 8-10mm above the archwires at the mucogingival junction and will be checked for primary stability (mechanical retention). Then the maxillary first premolar will be extracted. The maxillary arch will be levelled and aligned. The rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") with anterior 8mm height soldered hooks distal to the canines will be inserted.

A removable device containing a small electrical circuit will be applied to each patient to supply the required electric current.

Each patient in the electrical group will be asked to wear the device for five hours a day until the completion of the retraction of the upper anterior.

(250-300) g force will be applied on each side using two NiTi springs attached between the mini-implants and the soldered hooks in a direction approximately parallel to the occlusal plane for conducting an en-masse retraction. The force level will be measured every 2 weeks. Retraction will be stopped when a class I canine relationship will be achieved and a good incisor relationship will be obtained.

Dental casts will be used for the quantification of the anteroposterior movement of the anterior teeth and the first molars every 30 days until class I canine relationship will be achieved and a good incisor relationship will be obtained. Photographs of the upper casts will be taken with a central vertical projection on the occlusal plane and with a millimeter scale at the same level used to standardize and calibrate the conditions to match the casts when photographing them. Reference points will be used for upper casts study and the measurements will be calculated using the Image J computer program. To evaluate the movement of the anterior teeth: we will project the incisive edge on the median line and measure the distance from this point to the projected position of the medial end of the third palatine wrinkle on the median line.

To evaluate the movement of the first molars: we will project the mesial contact point of the first molar on the median line and measure the distance from this point to the to the projected position of the medial end of the third palatine wrinkle on the median line.

02

Conditions studied

  • Class II Malocclusion

Keywords

  • Electrical stimulation
  • Low-intensity electrical current (LIEC)
  • En-masse retraction
  • Pain
  • Discomfort
03

In context

Malocclusion

455 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is close to the median of 36 across 371 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion.

Browse Malocclusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult healthy patients, Male and female, Age range: 15-27 years.
  2. Class II Division 1 malocclusion:

    • Mild / moderate skeletal Class II (sagittal discrepancy angle ≤7)
    • Overjet ≤10
    • Normal or excessive facial height (Clinically and then cephalometrically assessed using these three angles: mandibular/cranial base angle, maxillary/mandibular plane angle and facial axis angle)
    • Mild to moderate crowding ≤ 4
  3. Permanent occlusion.
  4. Existence of all the upper teeth (except third molars).
  5. Good oral and periodontal health:

    • Probing depth \< 4 mm
    • No radiographic evidence of bone loss.
    • Gingival index ≤ 1
    • Plaque index ≤ 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medical problems that affect tooth movement (corticosteroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ...)
  2. Presence of primary teeth in the maxillary arch
  3. Missing permanent maxillary teeth (except third molars).
  4. Poor oral hygiene or Current periodontal disease:

    • Probing depth ≥ 4 mm
    • radiographic evidence of bone loss
    • Gingival index > 1
    • Plaque index > 1
  5. Patient had previous orthodontic treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low-intensity electrical current (LIEC)

    A removable device containing a small electrical circuit will supply the required electric current for five hours a day until the completion the retraction of the upper anterior teeth.

    Device: electric current

  • Active comparator
    Traditional fixed orthodontic appliance

    The maxillary arch will be levelled and aligned. (250-300) g force will be applied on each side using two NiTi springs attached between the mini-implants and the soldered hooks in a direction approximately parallel to the occlusal plane for conducting an en-masse retraction.

    Device: Traditional treatment

Interventions

  • Deviceelectric current

    Electric current will be applied in this group of patients using removable device.

  • DeviceTraditional treatment

    No acceleration method will be performed in this group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of retraction

    Assessment will be performed on study models. The amount of distance being retracted in millimeters will be divided by the duration of retraction in weeks to give an estimation of the retraction rate.

    Time frame: The calculation of the rate of retraction will be done once the retraction procedures has finished. Completion of this procedure is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  2. Change in Incisors' positions

    Amount of distance being traveled by the retracted anterior teeth is going to be measured on study models taken at monthly intervals until the end of the retraction phase.

    Time frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of retraction. T1: after 1 month (m) of retraction. T2: after 2 m of retraction. T3: after 3 m. T4: after 4 m. T5: at the end of retraction (expected to be within 6 m in the exp. group and 8 m in the control group)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Molars' positions

    Amount of distance being traveled by the first molars and is going to be measured on study models taken at monthly intervals until the end of the retraction phase.

    Time frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of retraction. T1: after 1 month (m) of retraction. T2: after 2 m of retraction. T3: after 3 m. T4: after 4 m. T5: at the end of retraction (expected to be within 6 m in the exp. group and 8 m in the control group)

  2. Change in the inter-canine width

    The change in the inter-canine width (mm/month) in each group will be calculated. Assessment will be performed on the dental casts by measuring the distance between the cusp tips of the two upper canines.

    Time frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of retraction. T1: after 1 month (m) of retraction. T2: after 2 m of retraction. T3: after 3 m. T4: after 4 m. T5: at the end of retraction (expected to be within 6 m in the exp. group and 8 m in the control group)

  3. Change in the inter-molar width

    The change in the inter-molar width (mm/month) in each group will be calculated. Assessment will be performed on the dental casts by measuring the distance between the central groove of the two first maxillary molars.

    Time frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of retraction. T1: after 1 month (m) of retraction. T2: after 2 m of retraction. T3: after 3 m. T4: after 4 m. T5: at the end of retraction (expected to be within 6 m in the exp. group and 8 m in the control group)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Damascus
    Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Spadari GS, Zaniboni E, Vedovello SA, Santamaria MP, do Amaral ME, Dos Santos GM, Esquisatto MA, Mendonca FA, Santamaria M Jr. Electrical stimulation enhances tissue reorganization during orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1759-6. Epub 2016 Feb 26. PubMed 26917494 ↗
  • Kalemaj Z, DebernardI CL, Buti J. Efficacy of surgical and non-surgical interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Spring;8(1):9-24. PubMed 25738176 ↗
  • Zaniboni E, Bagne L, Camargo T, do Amaral MEC, Felonato M, de Andrade TAM, Dos Santos GMT, Caetano GF, Esquisatto MAM, Santamaria M Jr, Mendonca FAS. Do electrical current and laser therapies improve bone remodeling during an orthodontic treatment with corticotomy? Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):4083-4097. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02845-9. Epub 2019 Feb 15. PubMed 30771000 ↗
  • Jing D, Xiao J, Li X, Li Y, Zhao Z. The effectiveness of vibrational stimulus to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 1;17(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0437-7. PubMed 29195495 ↗
  • Cadenas de Llano-Perula M, Yanez-Vico RM, Solano-Reina E, Palma-Fernandez JC, Iglesias-Linares A. Effectiveness of Biology-Based Methods for Inhibiting Orthodontic Tooth Movement. A Systematic Review. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(6):494-502. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.6.14. Epub 2017 Sep 22. PubMed 28937886 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05350280
Lead sponsor
Damascus University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 28, 2022
Start date
Aug 20, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2021
Completion
Dec 1, 2021
Last update
Apr 7, 2023

Study contacts

Rashad I. Shaadouh, DDS
principal investigator · Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
Mohammad Y. Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD
study director · Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
Ghiath Mahmoud, DDS MSc PhD
study director · Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion