ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07654166Updated Jun 18, 2026

Tissue Adhesive Versus Sutures in Oral Biopsy Closure

An interventional study of Tissue adhesive (PeriAcryl 90 HV) and Surgical suture (Nylon 4-0) in Mouth Neoplasms, sponsored by Damascus University. Recruiting at 1 site in Syria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-18.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2025, registered Jun 2026).
  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Excisional biopsies are commonly performed in the oral mucosa, and proper wound closure and hemostasis are critical for the success of the surgical procedure. Suturing remains the gold standard for closing surgical incisions; however, it has several drawbacks, including being time-consuming and requiring technical skill for proper placement. In addition, access to posterior areas of the oral cavity can be challenging. Suturing may also cause patient discomfort during needle penetration of tissues and can serve as a potential pathway for microbial contamination. Therefore, this randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate one of the latest tissue adhesives from the cyanoacrylate group (PeriAcryl 90 HV) compared to conventional surgical sutures (Nylon 4-0) for wound closure following oral excisional biopsies. A total of 28 patients with oral fibroma will be randomly assigned to either the tissue adhesive group or the suture group (14 patients per group).

Read the detailed description

Appropriate closure of the surgical wound is essential for achieving successful surgical outcomes and optimal wound healing. Although sutures are the most commonly used method for closing wounds in the oral mucosa, they may cause discomfort to patients, particularly in the buccal and labial mucosa. Furthermore, sutures require a second clinical visit for removal. These limitations highlight the clinical need for an alternative to conventional sutures that is easy to apply, does not require removal, and minimizes patient discomfort. This study will compare tissue adhesive (PeriAcryl 90 HV) versus surgical sutures (Nylon 4-0) for wound closure after oral fibroma excision in a randomized controlled trial design.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mouth Neoplasms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • PeriAcryl 90 HV
  • Oral fibroma
  • surgical sutures
  • excisional biopsy
  • tissue adhesive
03

In context

Mouth Neoplasms

446 studies on the registry are indexed under Mouth Neoplasms; 130 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28 is below the median of 60 across 313 interventional studies indexed under Mouth Neoplasms.

Browse Mouth Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

-Patients clinically diagnosed with oral fibroma located on the

labial mucosa (lip) or buccal mucosa (cheek).

  • Lesion requires excisional .
  • Lesion size greater than 3 mm and less than 3 cm in

greatest diameter.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Patients taking anticoagulant medications (blood thinners).
  • Patients with infectious diseases such as hepatitis, , etc.
  • Patients taking .
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
  • Patients taking medications that affect bleeding and wound healing.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tissue adhesive(PeriAcryl90 HV)

    Tissue adhesive (PeriAcryl 90 HV) will be applied directly to the wound surface after excisional biopsy.

    Device: Tissue adhesive (PeriAcryl 90 HV)

  • Active comparator
    Surgical sutures(Nylon 4-0)

    Surgical suture (Nylon 4-0) will be used to close the wound with interrupted stitches.

    Device: Surgical suture (Nylon 4-0)

Interventions

  • DeviceTissue adhesive (PeriAcryl 90 HV)

    After excisional biopsy of oral fibroma and achieving hemostasis by applying pressure with saline-soaked gauze, the wound surface will be gently dried. PeriAcryl 90 HV (high viscosity butyl cyanoacrylate) will be applied directly using a pipette to cover the entire wound surface . A second layer will be applied 10-15 seconds after the first layer to ensure adequate thickness and durability. The adhesive will polymerize upon contact with moist tissue within approximately 10-20 seconds.

  • DeviceSurgical suture (Nylon 4-0)

    After excisional biopsy of oral fibroma and achieving hemostasis, the wound margins will be approximated using tissue forceps. Interrupted sutures using Nylon 4-0 will be placed to close the wound. Sutures will be removed on day 7 postoperatively.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Early Wound Healing Score (EHS)

    Wound healing will be assessed using the Early Wound Healing Score (EHS), a validated clinical index that evaluates three parameters: clinical signs of re-epithelialization (CSR, scored 0-6), clinical signs of haemostasis (CSH, scored 0-2), and clinical signs of inflammation (CSI, scored 0-2). The total score ranges from 0 (worst healing) to 10 (excellent healing).

    Time frame: Assessed at day 7 and day 14 postoperatively.

  2. Operative time (minutes)

    The time measured from the start of wound closure (immediately after excisional biopsy and hemostasis) to the complete wound closure. For the tissue adhesive group, this ends when the second layer polymerizes. For the suture group, this ends after the last interrupted suture is placed.

    Time frame: Measured intraoperatively using a stopwatch.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 cm represents "no pain" and 10 cm represents "the worst possible pain". Patients will be asked to mark their pain level on the scale at each time point.

    Time frame: Measured at 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days postoperatively.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Damascus University ,Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry
    Damascus, Mazzh, Syria
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gogulanathan M, Elavenil P, Gnanam A, Raja VB. Evaluation of fibrin sealant as a wound closure agent in mandibular third molar surgery--a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;44(7):871-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 23. PubMed 25721919 ↗
  • Medeiros I, Pascoal S, Castro F, Macedo JP, Lopes O, Pereira J. Tissue adhesives for closure of intraoral surgical incisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2024 Oct;21(10):e70047. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70047. PubMed 39376068 ↗
  • Oladega AA, James O, Adeyemo WL. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive or silk suture for closure of surgical wound following removal of an impacted mandibular third molar: A randomized controlled study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;47(1):93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 12. PubMed 30501926 ↗
  • Marini L, Rojas MA, Sahrmann P, Aghazada R, Pilloni A. Early Wound Healing Score: a system to evaluate the early healing of periodontal soft tissue wounds. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018 Oct 24;48(5):274-283. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.5.274. eCollection 2018 Oct. PubMed 30405935 ↗
  • Suthar P, Shah S, Waknis P, Limaye G, Saha A, Sathe P. Comparing intra-oral wound healing after alveoloplasty using silk sutures and n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):28-35. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.1.28. Epub 2020 Feb 26. PubMed 32158678 ↗
  • Rezende ML, Cunha Pde O, Damante CA, Santana AC, Greghi SL, Zangrando MS. Cyanoacrylate Adhesive as an Alternative Tool for Membrane Fixation in Guided Tissue Regeneration. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Jun 1;16(6):512-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1714. PubMed 26323456 ↗
  • Akhter J, Kalita S, Goyal R, Jaiswal P, Ramalingam K, Yadav D. A Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Isoamyl 2-Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive and Silk Sutures in Wound Closure Following Minor Oral Surgical Procedures: A Prospective Clinical Study. Cureus. 2023 Jul 16;15(7):e41973. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41973. eCollection 2023 Jul. PubMed 37593271 ↗
  • Ludlow JB, Kutcher MJ, Samuelson A. Intraoral digital imaging documenting recurrent aphthous ulcer healing in 2-octyl cyanoacrylate versus sham-treated lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Apr;89(4):425-31. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(00)70123-5. PubMed 10760725 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07654166
Responsible party
Omar Hamadah (Professor of oral medicine, Damascus University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 17, 2026
Start date
Aug 12, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 18, 2026

Study contacts

Nour J Ibrahim, DDS _ MSc student
Contact
nouribrahim649@gmail.com
+963959800513
Omar H Hamadah, Professor
Contact
Omar.hamadah@gmail.com
+963940705554

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion