ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05306782Updated Oct 2, 2024

Shaping Motor Neural Functioning of Developmental Stuttering to Improve Fluency

An interventional study of transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Speech Therapy in Stuttering, sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 59 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-02.

Sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 59 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Developmental stuttering (DS) is a motor/speech disorder, characterized by specific alterations in the functioning of brain circuits. Non-invasive brain stimulation may be useful to shape the altered functioning and connectivity of these systems. As a consequence, this project aims to expand the neurophysiological understanding of DS, evaluating effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) on speech fluency and brain functioning of adults with persistent DS. This project will provide high-impact insights into the functioning of DS neural system, also proposing innovative and/or personalized rehabilitation.

Read the detailed description

Investigators will evaluate the effect of different tES protocols targeting motor associative regions (about 10 "consecutive" stimulation sessions, in different days; tES will be compared to sham stimulation), in association with "canonical" speech therapy. About 30 right-handed adults with idiopathic and persistent DS since childhood will be recruited (age 18-59 years; please see below for inlusion/exclusion criteria). Participants will be subdivided in three groups (in association to speech therapy): two groups will undergo transcranial random noise stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation, while the third group will undergo sham (placebo) stimulation . Effects will be assessed by measuring stuttering severity (i.e. objective evaluation of stuttering), behavioral/cognitive scales (i.e. subjective evaluation of stuttering), as well as a series of neurophysiological indexes useful to evaluate brain functioning and connectivity (e.g. TMS[transcranial magnetic stimulation]-induced motor/evoked potentials and EEG brain activity). Evaluations will be realized before the start of the tES protocols, as well as at the end of the cycles. Follow-up evaluations (starting from about 6 weeks after completion of stimulation sessions) are also foreseen after the end of the treatments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stuttering

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Developmental Stuttering
  • Neuromodulation
  • transcranial Electrical Stimulation
  • Speech Fluency
  • Motor Networks
03

In context

Stuttering

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Stuttering; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 44 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Stuttering.

Browse Stuttering studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

(main) Inclusion Criteria:

-Right-handed adults with idiopathic, persistent DS since childhood

(main) Exclusion Criteria:

  • to non-invasive brain stimulation;
  • Currently assumption of drugs acting on the Central Nervous System;
  • Presence of overt neurological/psychiatric/medical conditions or overt comorbidities (e.g. obsessive-compulsive disorder).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation

    Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (1.5 mA, High Frequency) administered by using surface scalp electrodes (20 minutes, initial part of the session) in correspondence of associative motor regions, during speech therapy sessions (45 minutes).

    Device: transcranial Electrical Stimulation · Behavioral: Speech Therapy

  • Experimental
    Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (1.5 mA, anodal) administered by using surface scalp electrodes (20 minutes, initial part of the session) in correspondence of associative motor regions, during speech therapy sessions (45 minutes).

    Device: transcranial Electrical Stimulation · Behavioral: Speech Therapy

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Direct Current/Random Noise Stimulation

    Sham stimulation administered by using surface scalp electrodes (20 minutes, initial part of the session) in correspondence of associative motor regions, during speech therapy sessions (45 minutes).

    Device: transcranial Electrical Stimulation · Behavioral: Speech Therapy

Interventions

  • Devicetranscranial Electrical Stimulation

    transcranial Random Noise Stimulation, transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, or Sham are administered (by means of surface electrodes) on associative motor regions during speech therapy sessions (20 minutes, in the initial part of the sessions; 1.5 mA).

  • BehavioralSpeech Therapy

    Speech Therapy is associated to transcranial electrical stimulation or sham, during stimulation sessions. Total duration of the single session: 45 minutes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Speech Fluency and Stuttering Severity (change from baseline)

    Utilization of (objective) scales to evaluate stuttering severity and speech fluency (Stuttering Severity Instrument \[range 0-56; higher values indicate higher numbers of dysfluencies\])

    Time frame: Evaluated immediately after the end of treatments

  2. TMS-induced (Motor) Evoked Potentials (change from baseline)

    Utilization of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to evaluate excitability (and reactivity) of motor cortex

    Time frame: Evaluated immediately after the end of treatments

  3. EEG (change from baseline)

    Utilization of EEG to evaluate brain functioning and brain connectivity (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma activity)

    Time frame: Evaluated immediately after the end of treatments

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stuttering Severity (subjective perception) (change from baseline)

    Utilization of (subjective) scales to evaluate stuttering severity/speech fluency (e.g. Premonitory Awareness in Stuttering Scale \[range 0-42; higher values indicate higher "invasiveness" of stuttering with respect to quality of life\])

    Time frame: Evaluated immediately after the end of treatments

  2. Stuttering Severity (subjective perception) (change from baseline)

    Utilization of (subjective) scales to evaluate stuttering severity/speech fluency (e.g. Premonitory Awareness in Stuttering Scale \[range 0-42; higher values indicate higher "invasiveness" of stuttering with respect to quality of life\])

    Time frame: Evaluated about 6 weeks after the end of treatments

  3. Speech Fluency and Stuttering Severity (change from baseline)

    Utilization of (objective) scales to evaluate stuttering severity and speech fluency (Stuttering Severity Instrument \[range 0-56; higher values indicate higher numbers of dysfluencies\])

    Time frame: Evaluated about 6 weeks after the end of treatments

  4. TMS-induced (Motor) Evoked Potentials (change from baseline)

    Utilization of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to evaluate excitability (and reactivity) of motor cortex

    Time frame: Evaluated about 6 weeks after the end of treatments

  5. EEG (change from baseline)

    Utilization of EEG to evaluate brain functioning and brain connectivity (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma activity)

    Time frame: Evaluated about 6 weeks after the end of treatments

  6. Cognitive/behavioral indexes (associated with stuttering) (change from baseline)

    Utilization of (subjective) scales to evaluate cognitive/behavioral reactions (e.g. Beck Depression Inventory \[range 0-63; higher values indicate higher presence of depressive symptoms\])

    Time frame: Evaluated immediately after the end of treatments

  7. Cognitive/behavioral indexes (associated with stuttering) (change from baseline)

    Utilization of (subjective) scales to evaluate cognitive/behavioral reactions (e.g. Beck Depression Inventory \[range 0-63; higher values indicate higher presence of depressive symptoms\])

    Time frame: Evaluated about 6 weeks after the end of treatments

07

Study locations

1 site
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Camillo
    Venice, 30126, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05306782
Lead sponsor
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
Responsible party
Pierpaolo Busan (Principal Investigator, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2022
Start date
Apr 2, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2024
Completion
Sep 30, 2024
Last update
Oct 2, 2024

Study contacts

Pierpaolo Busan, Dr.
principal investigator · IRCCS Ospedale San Camillo s.r.l.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion