ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06740968Updated Oct 13, 2026

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) in Stuttering

An interventional study of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in Stuttering, Adult, Stuttering, Childhood and Stuttering, Developmental, sponsored by University of Michigan. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate how mild, noninvasive electrical brain stimulation affects speech relevant brain areas, which may in turn affect speech fluency and speaking-related brain activity in people that stutter. The long-term goal of this study is to test the therapeutic potential of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) for the treatment of stuttering.

The study team hypothesizes that if stuttering involves impaired initiation of motor programs, delta-tuned tACS will strengthen communication between brain regions and decrease stuttering. Therefore, delta-tuned sensorimotor tACS will be paired with fluency-induced speech (choral reading), which is hypothesized to decrease stuttering via improved auditory motor integration.

Read the detailed description

Participants will have screening and baseline visits that include a variety of tests and procedures (i.e. standardized tests of speech, language, hearing test, music training questionnaire, working memory tests, and speech sample to characterize stuttering, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG)). Following these, participants will have 3 sessions (active and sham conditions) and then a one month follow-up phone or video call.

Of note, there will be an embedded pilot study to refine the experimental protocol in terms of practicality and feasibility and these participants will not be included in this registration. The only purpose of this embedded study is to refine the protocol and it does not have any health or behavioral outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stuttering, Adult
  • Stuttering, Childhood
  • Stuttering, Developmental

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • tACS
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Electroencephalogram
  • Auditory perturbation
  • Neural oscillations
  • Brain stimulation
03

In context

Stuttering

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Stuttering; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 44 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Stuttering.

Browse Stuttering studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,506 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 169 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 133 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have normal language, hearing, and cognition
  • Speak English as the primary language
  • Currently stutter
  • Score (per protocol) a certain value on the Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI-4).
  • Have not received any treatment for stuttering within the past year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria for stutterers:

  • History of seizures
  • Major medical or neurological illness (e.g., stroke, serious head trauma, brain infection, Parkinson's disease, etc.)
  • History of closed head injury with loss of consciousness (e.g., concussion)
  • Metal or electronic implants such as cochlear implants and pacemakers anywhere in the body
  • Braids or other hair styling that prevents direct access to the scalp (if removal not possible)
  • Currently pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

    Participants will receive 3 sessions of tACS. Each session can be active or sham. The stimulation parameters regarding the active and sham will not be disclosed at this time to maintain blind to participants. At the end of the trial the study will be updated to list these.

    Device: transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Interventions

  • Devicetranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

    During each of the 3 stimulation visits, participants will be seated in a comfortable position and a cap will be placed on participant's head similar to a swimming cap. Small electrodes will be placed near the surface of the scalp at certain regions of interest, and a weak electrical current will be passed through the electrodes into speech related brain areas for 20 minutes. The study team will not use current strengths exceeding 2 milliamps (mA).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Phase Synchronization

    The study will compare EEG data recorded before and after stimulation to determine if tACS contributed to any changes. This will be measured by Phase Locking Value (PLV; measured from 0 to 1) between the two regions targeted by stimulation calculated as \[pre(active-sham)\] - \[post(active-sham)\] at each tACS visit.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-tACS), approximately 3 hours (post-tACS) (visits 3-5)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of stuttered syllables produced during speech sample

    The study will calculate the percentage of stuttered syllables (out of total syllables) in a speech sample. Decreased stuttered syllables represents better outcomes (greater reduction in stuttering).

    Time frame: Baseline (before tACS), approximately 3 hours (post-tACS) (visits 3-5)

Other outcomes

  1. Percent change in perturbation response

    The study will compare the perturbation task from before and after tACS. This is measured by the percent change in perturbation response.

    Time frame: Baseline (before tACS), approximately 3 hours (post-tACS) (visits 3-5)

  2. Change in Phase Amplitude Coupling

    The study will compare EEG data recorded before and after stimulation to determine if tACS contributed to any changes. Phase Amplitude Coupling (PAC) will be calculated within and between the two regions targeted by stimulation calculated as \[pre(active-sham)\] - \[post(active-sham)\] at each tACS visit.

    Time frame: Baseline (before tACS), approximately 3 hours (post-tACS) (visits 3-5)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2029, 52 months after the start.

Of 37 interventional studies with no phase under Stuttering, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38. This study's planned 52 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 14, 2024
First posted
Dec 18, 2024
StartActual
Aug 5, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 2029
Last update
Oct 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date and oversight details
1 update, last Oct 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 13, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 2 other changes: verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06740968
Responsible party
Soo-Eun Chang (Associate Professor of Psychiatry, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 18, 2024
Start date
Aug 5, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 13, 2026

Study contacts

Soo-Eun Chang, PhD
Contact
sooeunc@umich.edu
734-232-0300
Emily Garnett, PhD
Contact
emilyog@med.umich.edu
734-232-3371
Soo-Eun Chang, PhD
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion