CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05302076Updated Mar 31, 2022

Clinical Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Speeding up Orthodontic Tooth Movement

An interventional study of Low-intensity electrical current (LIEC) and Traditional fixed orthodontic appliance in Class II Malocclusion, sponsored by Damascus University. Completed at 1 site in Syrian Arab Republic. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-31.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2019, registered Mar 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Thirty two patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars and en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth will participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: electrical group and control group. In each group, en-masse retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side, Mini-implants will be used as an anchor unit.

The overall retraction duration will be calculated. The skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes will be detected using panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs which will be obtained pretreatment, pre and post en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth.

Read the detailed description

Prior to enrollment of each subject into the study, they will be examined completely to determine the orthodontic treatment plan. The operator will inform them about the aim of the study and ask them to provide a written informed consent.

Self-drilling titanium mini-implants (1.6mm diameter and 8mm length) will be used. They will be inserted between the maxillary second premolar and first molar at approximately 8-10 mm above the archwires at the mucogingival junction and will be checked for primary stability (mechanical retention). Then the maxillary first premolar will be extracted. The maxillary arch will be levelled and aligned. The rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") with anterior 8mm height soldered hooks distal to the canines will be inserted.

A removable device containing a small electrical circuit will be applied to each patient to supply the required electric current.

Each patient in the electrical group will be asked to wear a removable device containing a small electrical circuit that will supply the required electric current for five hours a day until the completion the retraction of the upper anterior teeth.

(250-300) g force will be applied on each side using two NiTi springs attached between the mini-implants and the soldered hooks in a direction approximately parallel to the occlusal plane for conducting an en-masse retraction. The force level will be measured every 2 weeks. Retraction will be stopped when a class I canine relationship will be achieved and a good incisor relationship will be obtained.

The duration of retraction will be calculated by calculating the time required to achieve complete retraction of the upper anterior teeth through clinical examination.

Panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs will be obtained pretreatment, pre and post en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth, to assess the skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes.

Periodontal health will be assessed at the beginning of orthodontic treatment, before and after en-masse retraction by evaluating the following parameters: plaque index, gingival index, bleeding index, probing depth and gingival recession.

02

Conditions studied

  • Class II Malocclusion

Keywords

  • En-masse retraction
  • Acceleration
  • Low-intensity electric current
03

In context

Malocclusion

457 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 36 across 372 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion.

Browse Malocclusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult healthy patients, Male and female, Age range: 15-27 years.
  2. Class II Division 1 malocclusion :

    • Mild / moderate skeletal Class II (sagittal discrepancy angle ≤7)
    • Overjet ≤10
    • Normal or excessive facial height (Clinically and then cephalometrically assessed using these three angles : mandibular/cranial base angle, maxillary/mandibular plane angle and facial axis angle)
    • Mild to moderate crowding ≤ 4
  3. Permanent occlusion.
  4. Existence of all the upper teeth (except third molars).
  5. Good oral and periodontal health:

    • Probing depth \< 4 mm
    • No radiographic evidence of bone loss.
    • Gingival index ≤ 1
    • Plaque index ≤ 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medical problems that affect tooth movement (corticosteroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ...)
  2. Presence of primary teeth in the maxillary arch
  3. Missing permanent maxillary teeth (except third molars).
  4. Poor oral hygiene or Current periodontal disease:

    • Probing depth ≥ 4 mm
    • radiographic evidence of bone loss
    • Gingival index > 1
    • Plaque index > 1
  5. Patient had previous orthodontic treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    electric current

    Electric current will be applied in this group of patients using removable device.

    Device: Low-intensity electrical current (LIEC)

  • Active comparator
    Traditional treatment

    No acceleration method will be performed in this group.

    Device: Traditional fixed orthodontic appliance

Interventions

  • DeviceLow-intensity electrical current (LIEC)

    Each patient in the electrical group will be asked to wear a removable device containing a small electrical circuit that will supply the required electric current for five hours a day until the completion the retraction of the upper anterior teeth.

  • DeviceTraditional fixed orthodontic appliance

    The maxillary arch will be levelled and aligned. The rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") with anterior 8mm height soldered hooks distal to the canines will be inserted. (250-300) g force will be applied on each side using two NiTi springs attached between the mini-implants and the soldered hooks in a direction approximately parallel to the occlusal plane for conducting an en-masse retraction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of en-masse retraction of anterior teeth

    Assessment will be performed by calculating the time required to achieve complete retraction of the upper anterior teeth (six teeth) through clinical examination.

    Time frame: The months required to complete the retraction procedure will be recorded. Completion of this procedure is expected to be occur within six months in the experimental group and eight months in the control group.

  2. Change in the SN-U1 angle

    This angle the represents the relationship of the upper anterior teeth with SN in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.

    Time frame: : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  3. Change in the SNA angle

    This angle the represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.

    Time frame: : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  4. Change in the MM angle

    This angle the represents the amount of vertical divergence between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.

    Time frame: : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the Nasolabial angle

    This angle the represents the relationship of the upper lip with nose in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.

    Time frame: : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  2. Change in the Li-E Line

    This measurement represents the relationship between the upper lip and the Ricketts line in cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable will be measured in mm.

    Time frame: : The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  3. Change in Root Length

    The root length will be measured for each root of six upper anterior teeth using panorama imaging, the change will be calculated between before and after images in mm.

    Time frame: This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  4. Change in the Plaque index

    The plaque index will be used to assess the status of the oral hygiene in these patients.

    Time frame: This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  5. Change in the Gingival Index

    The Gingival index will be used to assess the status of the gingival tissues around the teeth.

    Time frame: This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  6. Change in the Bleeding Index

    The Bleeding index will be used to assess the status of periodontal tissues and the amount of congestion in the gingival margins around the anterior teeth.

    Time frame: This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  7. Change in the Probing Depth

    This will be measured in millimeters from the gingival margin to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket around the six anterior teeth.

    Time frame: Two measurements are required for this calculation: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

  8. Change in the Gingival Recession

    This will be measured in millimeters from the cement-enamel junction to the level of the gingival margin around the six anterior teeth.

    Time frame: Two measurements are required for this calculation: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Damascus
    Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Davidovitch Z, Finkelson MD, Steigman S, Shanfeld JL, Montgomery PC, Korostoff E. Electric currents, bone remodeling, and orthodontic tooth movement. II. Increase in rate of tooth movement and periodontal cyclic nucleotide levels by combined force and electric current. Am J Orthod. 1980 Jan;77(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90222-5. PubMed 6243448 ↗
  • Spadari GS, Zaniboni E, Vedovello SA, Santamaria MP, do Amaral ME, Dos Santos GM, Esquisatto MA, Mendonca FA, Santamaria M Jr. Electrical stimulation enhances tissue reorganization during orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1759-6. Epub 2016 Feb 26. PubMed 26917494 ↗
  • Zaniboni E, Bagne L, Camargo T, do Amaral MEC, Felonato M, de Andrade TAM, Dos Santos GMT, Caetano GF, Esquisatto MAM, Santamaria M Jr, Mendonca FAS. Do electrical current and laser therapies improve bone remodeling during an orthodontic treatment with corticotomy? Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):4083-4097. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02845-9. Epub 2019 Feb 15. PubMed 30771000 ↗
  • Chaudhari SD, Sharma KK, Marchetto JJ, Hydren JR, Burton BM, Moreno AP. Modulating OPG and TGF-beta1 mRNA expression via bioelectrical stimulation. Bone Rep. 2021 Oct 9;15:101141. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101141. eCollection 2021 Dec. PubMed 34692946 ↗
  • Gkantidis N, Mistakidis I, Kouskoura T, Pandis N. Effectiveness of non-conventional methods for accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2014 Oct;42(10):1300-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 27. PubMed 25072362 ↗
  • Masella RS, Meister M. Current concepts in the biology of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr;129(4):458-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.013. PubMed 16627170 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05302076
Lead sponsor
Damascus University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 31, 2022
Start date
Aug 23, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 12, 2021
Completion
Dec 5, 2021
Last update
Mar 31, 2022

Study contacts

Rashad Ibrahem Shaadouh, DDS
principal investigator · Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS,MSc,PhD
study director · Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
Ghiath Mahmoud, DDS,MSc,PhD
study director · Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion