CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05299515HEAL TogetherUpdated Oct 27, 2025

Peer Activate: Trial of Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation for Methadone Adherence

An interventional study of Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation ("Peer Activate") in Substance-Related Disorders, Opioid Medication Assisted Treatment and Opioid Use Disorder, sponsored by University of Maryland, College Park. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-27.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, College Park · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a peer-led, brief, behavioral intervention to improve adherence to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among low-income, minority individuals living with opioid use disorder (OUD) in Baltimore, Maryland. The intervention is based on behavioral activation (BA) and is specifically designed to be implemented by a trained peer recovery specialist. In this Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial (RCT), we will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of Peer Activate vs. treatment as usual (TAU) over six months.

Read the detailed description

The opioid use disorder (OUD) crisis disproportionately affects low-income, racial/ethnic minorities. There is a pressing need to improve retention in medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), particularly among low-income, racial/ethnic minorities. Training peer recovery specialists (PRSs), individuals with their own lived experience with substance use disorder (SUD), in evidence-based interventions (EBIs) may be a promising strategy to improve MOUD retention for low-income, minority individuals with OUD. Yet, few EBIs have been evaluated for PRS delivery to promote MOUD retention.

Behavioral activation (BA) may be a feasible, scalable, reinforcement-based approach for improving MOUD retention for low-income, minority individuals with OUD. By targeting increases in positive reinforcement, BA has been found to be effective for improving SUD treatment retention, preventing future relapse, and improving medication adherence (i.e., for HIV) among low-income, minority populations with SUD as well as depression, which is a barrier to MOUD retention. Importantly for implementation, BA also is feasible and cost-effective using lay counselor delivery. Following from this prior research, BA is an ideal EBI to evaluate for improving MOUD retention using a PRS-delivered model.

This Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial (RCT) builds upon our team's formative work, as well as our recent open label-pilot (R61AT010799) to develop and pilot the PRS-delivered BA approach. Guided by Aarons' stage model and Proctor's model of implementation, we proposed a mixed-methods, Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study to evaluate implementation and the effectiveness of the intervention on MT retention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Substance-Related Disorders
  • Opioid Medication Assisted Treatment
  • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Opioid Use
  • Opioid Addiction
  • Treatment Adherence
  • Retention in Care

Keywords

  • Disease
  • Substance-Related Disorders
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Mental Disorders
03

In context

Substance-Related Disorders

2,124 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 393 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 108 across 1,727 interventional studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.

Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, College Park is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Initiated methadone at the study site in the past three months (and no less than two weeks prior to study enrollment) or demonstrated challenges with methadone adherence in the past three months as indicated by one or more of the following: a) at least one missing take-home bottle at the time of bottle return; b) screened negative for methadone in routinely administered clinic urinalysis tests; c) transitioned from an extended take-home bottle schedule to daily dosing schedule; or d) at least one missed methadone dose in the past 3 months as identified through clinic records
  • Minimum of 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Demonstrating active, unstable or untreated psychiatric symptoms, including mania and/or psychosis that would interfere with study participation
  • Inability to understand the study and provide informed consent in English
  • Positive pregnancy status at enrollment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation ("Peer Activate")

    Participants in the Peer Activate intervention will receive a PRS-delivered behavioral activation intervention to address barriers to retention in methadone treatment and increase substance-free, positive reinforcement to support retention.

    Behavioral: Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation ("Peer Activate")

  • No intervention
    Treatment As Usual

    Participants in the TAU group will receive treatment as usual (weekly group and individual counseling with an addiction counselor in addition to referral to other available services in the community through study contact).

Interventions

  • BehavioralPeer-Delivered Behavioral Activation ("Peer Activate")

    The PRS-delivered Peer Activate intervention will consist of approximately four weekly "core" sessions (approximately 30 minutes-1 hour) with two additional sessions to reinforce core content, and then 6 optional "booster" sessions to reinforce skill practice. In Peer Activate sessions, participants will learn behavioral activation and problem-solving skills to assist in their retention and persistence in methadone treatment and incorporating value-driven, substance-free, rewarding activities into their daily life.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MT Retention

    Defined dichotomously as retention (yes/no) in methadone treatment

    Time frame: Measured at final follow up (approximately six-months post-baseline assessment)

  2. MT Persistence

    Calculated as the proportion retained on MT monthly (i.e., at least one methadone dose for each 30 day period)

    Time frame: Measured at final follow up (approximately six-months post-baseline)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intervention Feasibility Measured by Intervention Initiation

    Feasibility, defined as the suitability and practicability of the approach, will be measured quantitatively as the % of patients who agree to participate in the intervention. We will also collect qualitative feedback relating to feasibility.

    Time frame: Assessed at the post-treatment follow-up (approximately 3-months post-baseline assessment)

  2. Intervention Acceptability Measured by Intervention Attendance

    Acceptability, defined as satisfaction with or tolerability of the proposed approach, will be measured quantitatively by session attendance. Specifically, we will measure the % of patients enrolled who attend ≥75% sessions. We will also collect qualitative feedback relating to acceptability.

    Time frame: Assessed at the acute post-treatment follow-up (approximately 3-months post-baseline assessment)

  3. Intervention Fidelity Measured by Independent Rating

    Fidelity, defined as the delivery of the intervention as intended, will be measured based on PRS adherence to the intervention delivery. A random selection of 20% of sessions will be rated for fidelity by an independent rater, and we will assess the % of intervention components delivered as intended.

    Time frame: Assessed at the acute posttreatment follow-up (approximately 3-months post-baseline assessment)

  4. MT Retention

    Defined dichotomously as retention (yes/no) in methadone treatment

    Time frame: Measured at the acute posttreatment follow-up (approximately 3-months post-baseline assessment)

  5. MT Persistence

    Calculated as the proportion retained on MT monthly (i.e., at least one methadone dose for each 30 day period)

    Time frame: Measured at the acute posttreatment follow-up (approximately 3-months post-baseline assessment)

  6. Changes in substance use

    Assess prevalence of opioid use and other substance use (urinalysis and timeline follow back)

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and the final follow-up (approximately 6 months post-baseline)

Other outcomes

  1. Change in depressive symptoms

    Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8). Possible score of 0 - 24, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and the acute posttreatment follow-up (approximately 3 months post-baseline)

  2. Change in depressive symptoms

    Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8). Possible score of 0 - 24, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and the final follow-up (approximately 6 months post-baseline)

  3. Changes in substance use

    Assess prevalence of opioid use and other substance use (urinalysis and timeline followback)

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and the acute posttreatment follow-up (approximately 3 months post-baseline)

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Maryland Baltimore (UMD Drug Treatment Center)
    Baltimore, Maryland 21223, United States
  • University of Maryland College Park
    College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):4-23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7. PubMed 21197565 ↗
  • Carroll KM, Nich C, Frankforter TL, Yip SW, Kiluk BD, DeVito EE, Sofuoglu M. Accounting for the uncounted: Physical and affective distress in individuals dropping out of oral naltrexone treatment for opioid use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Nov 1;192:264-270. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.019. Epub 2018 Oct 4. PubMed 30300800 ↗
  • Daughters SB, Magidson JF, Schuster RM, Safren SA. ACT HEALTHY: A Combined Cognitive-Behavioral Depression and Medication Adherence Treatment for HIV-Infected Substance Users. Cogn Behav Pract. 2010 Aug 1;17(3):309-321. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.12.003. PubMed 21709737 ↗
  • Daughters SB, Magidson JF, Anand D, Seitz-Brown CJ, Chen Y, Baker S. The effect of a behavioral activation treatment for substance use on post-treatment abstinence: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2018 Mar;113(3):535-544. doi: 10.1111/add.14049. Epub 2017 Nov 19. PubMed 28963853 ↗
  • Ekers D, Richards D, McMillan D, Bland JM, Gilbody S. Behavioural activation delivered by the non-specialist: phase II randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;198(1):66-72. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.079111. PubMed 21200079 ↗
  • Ekers D, Webster L, Van Straten A, Cuijpers P, Richards D, Gilbody S. Behavioural activation for depression; an update of meta-analysis of effectiveness and sub group analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 17;9(6):e100100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100100. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24936656 ↗
  • Magidson JF, Gorka SM, MacPherson L, Hopko DR, Blanco C, Lejuez CW, Daughters SB. Examining the effect of the Life Enhancement Treatment for Substance Use (LETS ACT) on residential substance abuse treatment retention. Addict Behav. 2011 Jun;36(6):615-623. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Jan 21. PubMed 21310539 ↗
  • Magidson JF, Seitz-Brown CJ, Safren SA, Daughters SB. Implementing Behavioral Activation and Life-Steps for Depression and HIV Medication Adherence in a Community Health Center. Cogn Behav Pract. 2014 Nov 1;21(4):386-403. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2013.10.002. PubMed 25419102 ↗
  • Magidson JF, Joska JA, Regenauer KS, et al Adapting evidence-based, peer-delivered substance use treatment for HIV care in South Africa. Society of Behavioral Medicine New Orleans, LA, 2018.
  • Magidson JF, Lejuez CW, Kamal T, Blevins EJ, Murray LK, Bass JK, Bolton P, Pagoto S. Adaptation of community health worker-delivered behavioral activation for torture survivors in Kurdistan, Iraq. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2015 Dec;2:e24. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2015.22. PubMed 27478619 ↗
  • Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Pantalone DW, O'Cleirigh C, Mayer KH, Safren SA. A pilot trial of integrated behavioral activation and sexual risk reduction counseling for HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men abusing crystal methamphetamine. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012 Nov;26(11):681-93. doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0216. Epub 2012 Oct 3. PubMed 23030605 ↗
  • Mimiaga MJ, Closson EF, Pantalone DW, Safren SA, Mitty JA. Applying behavioral activation to sustain and enhance the effects of contingency management for reducing stimulant use among individuals with HIV infection. Psychol Health Med. 2019 Mar;24(3):374-381. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1515492. Epub 2018 Sep 13. PubMed 30211620 ↗
  • Mitchell SG, Kelly SM, Gryczynski J, Myers CP, Jaffe JH, O'Grady KE, Olsen YK, Schwartz RP. African American patients seeking treatment in the public sector: characteristics of buprenorphine vs. methadone patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Apr 1;122(1-2):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.009. Epub 2011 Sep 29. PubMed 21962726 ↗
  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7. PubMed 20957426 ↗
  • Richards DA, Ekers D, McMillan D, Taylor RS, Byford S, Warren FC, Barrett B, Farrand PA, Gilbody S, Kuyken W, O'Mahen H, Watkins ER, Wright KA, Hollon SD, Reed N, Rhodes S, Fletcher E, Finning K. Cost and Outcome of Behavioural Activation versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression (COBRA): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Aug 27;388(10047):871-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31140-0. Epub 2016 Jul 23. PubMed 27461440 ↗
  • Saloner B, Daubresse M, Caleb Alexander G. Patterns of Buprenorphine-Naloxone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in a Multistate Population. Med Care. 2017 Jul;55(7):669-676. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000727. PubMed 28410339 ↗
  • Stahler GJ, Mennis J. Treatment outcome disparities for opioid users: Are there racial and ethnic differences in treatment completion across large US metropolitan areas? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Sep 1;190:170-178. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jul 11. PubMed 30041092 ↗
  • Satinsky E, Doran K, Felton J, et al Adapting a community-based peer-delivered Behavioral Activation intervention for substance use in an underserved population. Society for Behavioral Medicine Washington, D.C., 2019.
  • Tull MT, Berghoff CR, Bardeen JR, Schoenleber M, Konkle-Parker DJ. An Initial Open Trial of a Brief Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression and Medication Adherence in HIV-Infected Patients. Behav Modif. 2018 Mar;42(2):196-209. doi: 10.1177/0145445517723901. Epub 2017 Aug 11. PubMed 28799413 ↗
  • Weinstein ZM, Kim HW, Cheng DM, Quinn E, Hui D, Labelle CT, Drainoni ML, Bachman SS, Samet JH. Long-term retention in Office Based Opioid Treatment with buprenorphine. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Mar;74:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 30. PubMed 28132702 ↗
  • Magidson JF, Bradley VD, Anane JS, Kleinman MB, Felton JW, Hines AC, Baskar R, Greenblatt AD, Dean D, Anvari MS, Fitzsimons H, Bennett ME, Belcher AM. "HEAL together": a randomized, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial protocol of a peer-delivered behavioral activation intervention to improve methadone treatment retention. Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 18;13:1637846. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1637846. eCollection 2025. PubMed 40756389 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After all primary analyses are complete, de-identified data will be made available.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05299515
Lead sponsor
University of Maryland, College Park
Collaborators
University of Maryland, Baltimore, Henry Ford Health System
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 29, 2022
Start date
Apr 5, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 24, 2025
Completion
Sep 24, 2025
Last update
Oct 27, 2025

Study contacts

Jessica F Magidson, PhD
principal investigator · University of Maryland, College Park

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion