ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05973838PRISMUpdated Apr 27, 2026

Peer Recovery to Improve Polysubstance Use and Mobile Telemedicine Retention

An interventional study of Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation ("Peer Activate") in Polysubstance Addiction, Opioid Medication Assisted Treatment and Treatment Adherence, sponsored by University of Maryland, College Park. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-27.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, College Park · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a peer-led, brief, behavioral intervention to improve adherence to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and reduce polysubstance use among patients with OUD and polysubstance use in underserved areas. The intervention is based on behavioral activation (BA) and is specifically designed to be implemented by a trained peer recovery specialist. In this hybrid, Type-1 effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial (RCT), the investigators will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of Peer Activate vs. treatment as usual (TAU) over twelve months.

Read the detailed description

There is a significant burden of opioid and polysubstance use within the US. Yet many communities are poorly equipped to meet the pressing need for addiction treatment, including medications for OUD (MOUD) and evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to address the rise in opioid use disorder (OUD) and co-occurring stimulant use. The availability of telemedicine has helped fill the void of practitioners by providing buprenorphine for OUD treatment in underserved areas, however, OUD treatment retention remains an ongoing challenge, with polysubstance use and stimulant use exacerbating this. Peer recovery specialists (PRSs), trained individuals with their own lived experience with substance use disorder (SUD) and recovery, are a promising strategy to improve OUD treatment retention and polysubstance use at these sites using a reinforcement-based approach.

Behavioral activation (BA) may be a feasible, scalable, reinforcement-based approach for improving OUD treatment retention and reducing polysubstance use in underserved areas. By targeting increases in positive reinforcement, BA has been found to be effective for improving SUD treatment retention, preventing future relapse, including for stimulant use specifically, and improving medication adherence (i.e., for HIV) among low-income, minority populations with SUD as well as depression, which is a barrier to MOUD retention. BA has been shown to be feasibly delivered by peers and community health workers.

This study proposes to evaluate the effectiveness, implementation, and cost-effectiveness of an adapted PRS-delivered BA approach on the TM-MTU ("Peer Activate-MTU") compared to enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU; facilitated referrals and general PRS support) for patients with OUD and other polysubstance use receiving telemedicine buprenorphine. The investigators propose a randomized Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (n=160) to evaluate Peer Activate-MTU compared to ETAU. Specific aims are to evaluate the effectiveness of Peer Activate-MTU over 12-months on OUD treatment retention and polysubstance use. The investigators will also evaluate the implementation of Peer-Active-MTU, including feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and adoption guided by RE-AIM.

02

Conditions studied

  • Polysubstance Addiction
  • Opioid Medication Assisted Treatment
  • Treatment Adherence
  • Retention in Care
  • Substance-Related Disorders

Keywords

  • Substance-Related Disorders
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Polysubstance Use
  • Mental disorders
03

In context

Treatment Adherence and Compliance

351 studies on the registry are indexed under Treatment Adherence and Compliance; 109 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 82 across 271 interventional studies indexed under Treatment Adherence and Compliance.

Browse Treatment Adherence and Compliance studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, College Park is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patient participants in the RCT must be 18 or older; receive OUD treatment as part of the telemedicine program; and exhibit polysubstance use within the past three-months (i.e., use of one or more non-prescribed substances (excluding opioids and/or tobacco) by urine toxicology or self-report.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Demonstrating active, unstable or untreated psychiatric symptoms, including mania and/or psychosis that would interfere with study participation
  • Inability to understand the study and provide in English
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation ("Peer Activate")

    Participants in the Peer Activate intervention will receive a PRS-delivered behavioral activation intervention to address barriers to retention in methadone treatment and increase substance-free, positive reinforcement to support retention and reduce polysubstance use.

    Behavioral: Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation ("Peer Activate")

  • No intervention
    Treatment As Usual

    Participants in the TAU group will receive enhanced treatment as usual, defined as MTU services as usual enhanced with additional community referrals and follow-ups on those referrals, in addition to regular meetings with an addiction medicine physician and PRS on the MTU. Standard PRS contact typically includes connection to local resources and general peer support as needed.

Interventions

  • BehavioralPeer-Delivered Behavioral Activation ("Peer Activate")

    The PRS-delivered Peer Activate intervention will consist of approximately six weekly "core" sessions (approximately 30 minutes-1 hour), and then 6 optional "booster" sessions to reinforce skill practice. In Peer Activate sessions, participants will learn behavioral activation and problem-solving skills to reduce barriers to medication nonadherence and incorporate value-driven, substance-free, rewarding activities into their daily life to reduce polysubstance use and improve retention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Six-Month Polysubstance Use Urinalysis

    Polysubstance use will be assessed using urinalysis. Urine samples are collected at each visit and sent out for toxicological analysis using a customized panel composed of 40 analytes, including both qualitative and quantitative results for opioids, stimulants, benzodiazepines, alcohol, marijuana, hallucinogens, methadone, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine.

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 6-month follow-up

  2. Six-Month Polysubstance Use Self Report

    The New York University (NYU) polysubstance use measurement tool will be utilized to assess polysubstance frequency.

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment 6-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Six-month OUD Treatment Retention

    Retention is measured using chart review of clinic records of appointment attendance. Retention will be assessed measured as dichotomous retention (yes/no) at six months post MOUD initiation.

    Time frame: Measured from intake through 6-month follow up

  2. Six-month Buprenorphine Adherence

    Buprenorphine adherence will be assessed through urinalysis. Urine samples are collected at each visit and sent out for toxicological analysis using a customized panel composed of 40 analytes, including both qualitative and quantitative results for opioids, stimulants, benzodiazepines, alcohol, marijuana, hallucinogens, methadone, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine. Continuity of pharmacy for MOUD through 6 months will be assessed and calculated via the percent retained on MT for at least 6 months, defined as having one or more additional MOUD-related visits for each 30-day period up to 6 months.

    Time frame: Measured from intake to six-month follow-up

  3. Six-month Self-Report Buprenorphine Adherence

    The IRA Wilson will be utilized to assess self-report buprenorphine adherence

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and 6-month follow-up

  4. Six-Month Problems Associated with Substance Use

    Problems associated with use will be assessed using the Short Inventory of Problems (SIP), a 15-item measure that will be used to assess five domains of impairment related to polysubstance use.

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and 6-month follow-up

  5. Intervention Uptake

    Feasibility, defined as the suitability and practicability of the approach, will be measured quantitatively as the % of patients who agree to participate in the intervention.

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and 6-month follow-up

  6. Intervention Session Attendance

    Acceptability, defined as satisfaction with or tolerability of the proposed approach, will be measured quantitatively by session attendance. Specifically, % of patients enrolled who attend ≥75% sessions will be measured.

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment 6-month follow-up

  7. Intervention Fidelity

    Fidelity, defined as the delivery of the intervention as intended, will be measured based on PRS adherence to the intervention delivery. A random selection of 20% of sessions will be rated for fidelity by an independent rater, and % of intervention components delivered as intended will be measured.

    Time frame: Assessed at the acute post-treatment follow-up (approximately 3-months post-baseline assessment)

Other outcomes

  1. Three-month OUD Treatment Retention

    Retention is measured using chart review of clinic records of appointment attendance. Retention will be assessed measured as dichotomous retention (yes/no) at three months post MOUD initiation.

    Time frame: Measured from intake through 3-month follow up

  2. Three-Month Polysubstance Use Urinalysis

    Polysubstance use will be assessed using urinalysis. Urine samples are collected at each visit and sent out for toxicological analysis using a customized panel composed of 40 analytes, including both qualitative and quantitative results for opioids, stimulants, benzodiazepines, alcohol, marijuana, hallucinogens, methadone, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine.

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 3-month follow-up.

  3. Three-Month Polysubstance Use Self Report

    The New York University (NYU) polysubstance use measurement tool will be utilized to assess polysubstance frequency.

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 3-month follow-up.

  4. Three-Month Problems Associated with Substance Use

    Problems associated with use will be assessed using the Short Inventory of Problems (SIP), a 15-item measure that will be used to assess five domains of impairment related to polysubstance use.

    Time frame: Assessed between baseline assessment and 3-month follow-up.

  5. Three-month Buprenorphine Adherence

    Buprenorphine adherence will be assessed through urinalysis. Urine samples are collected at each visit and sent out for toxicological analysis using a customized panel composed of 40 analytes, including both qualitative and quantitative results for opioids, stimulants, benzodiazepines, alcohol, marijuana, hallucinogens, methadone, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine. Continuity of pharmacy for MOUD through 3 months will be assessed and calculated via the percent retained on MT for at least 3 months, defined as having one or more additional MOUD-related visits for each 30-day period up to 3 months.

    Time frame: Measured over 3 months

  6. Three-month Self-Report Buprenorphine Adherence

    The IRA Wilson will be utilized to assess self-report buprenorphine adherence

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and 3-month follow-up

  7. Twelve-month OUD Treatment Retention

    Retention is measured using chart review of clinic records of appointment attendance. Retention will be assessed measured as dichotomous retention (yes/no) at twelve months post MOUD initiation.

    Time frame: Measured from intake through 12-month follow up

  8. Twelve-Month Polysubstance Use Urinalysis

    Polysubstance use will be assessed using urinalysis. Urine samples are collected at each visit and sent out for toxicological analysis using a customized panel composed of 40 analytes, including both qualitative and quantitative results for opioids, stimulants, benzodiazepines, alcohol, marijuana, hallucinogens, methadone, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine.

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 12-month follow-up.

  9. Twelve-Month Polysubstance Use Self Report

    The New York University (NYU) polysubstance use measurement tool will be utilized to assess polysubstance frequency.

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 12-month follow-up.

  10. Twelve-Month Problems Associated with Substance Use

    Problems associated with use will be assessed using the Short Inventory of Problems (SIP), a 15-item measure that will be used to assess five domains of impairment related to polysubstance use.

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline and 12-month follow-up.

  11. Twelve-month Buprenorphine Adherence

    Buprenorphine adherence will be assessed through urinalysis. Urine samples are collected at each visit and sent out for toxicological analysis using a customized panel composed of 40 analytes, including both qualitative and quantitative results for opioids, stimulants, benzodiazepines, alcohol, marijuana, hallucinogens, methadone, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine. Continuity of pharmacy for MOUD through 12 months will be assessed and calculated via the percent retained on MT for at least 12 months, defined as having one or more additional MOUD-related visits for each 30-day period up to 12 months.

    Time frame: Measured over 12 months

  12. Twelve-month Self-Report Buprenorphine Adherence

    The IRA Wilson will be utilized to assess self-report buprenorphine adherence

    Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and 12-month follow-up

  13. Six-month Treatment Cost

    The resources required to implement and sustain the interventions (Peer Activate-MTU, and ETAU) will be identified via micro-costing techniques, using a tailored version of the Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (DATCAP) instrument, a standardized, customizable tool designed to capture intervention resources in multiple settings for the purpose of estimating costs.

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 6-month follow-up

  14. Six-month Healthcare Resource Utilization

    Healthcare Resource Utilization by participants will be self-reported using time-anchoring methodology via the Non-study Medical and Other Services (NMOS) form, and will include non-study MOUD care, inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department services; SUD treatment medications; residential and outpatient SUD treatment days; hospital SUD detoxification days; and mental health treatment.

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 6-month follow-up

  15. Six-month Health-related Quality of Life

    Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Preference (PROPr) instrument.

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 6-month follow-up

  16. Six-month Non-Medical and Other Resource Utilization

    Use of non-medical and other resources from the societal perspective (e.g., school/workplace productivity, travel time to care, caregiver burden, etc.) will also be self-reported using the NMOS.

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 6-month follow-up

  17. Six-month Criminal and Legal Activities

    Criminal and legal activities will be measured using the time-anchoring methodology via the Criminal-Legal Activities Form (CLAF).

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 6-month follow-up

  18. Overdose risk

    Overdose risk will be assessed as a binary outcome (including both fatal and non-fatal overdoses).

    Time frame: Measured from baseline to 6-month follow-up

07

Study locations

1 of 4 sites recruiting
  • HIPS Clinic
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20002, United States
    Not yet recruiting
  • University of Maryland Baltimore (UMD Drug Treatment Center)
    Baltimore, Maryland 21223, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Heather Fitzsimons · Contacthfitzsimons@som.umaryland.edu · 443-462-3400
    • Sarah M Kattakuzhy, MD · Principal investigator
    • Eric Weintraub, MD · Sub investigator
    • Annabelle M Belcher, PhD · Sub investigator
  • University of Maryland, College Park
    College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Morgan S Anvari, BA · Contactmanvari@umd.edu · 3014055095
    • Jessica F Magidson, PhD · Contactjmagidso@umd.edu · 301-405-5095
    • Jessica F Magidson, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Caroline County Behavioral Health
    Denton, Maryland 21629, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ghertner R. U.S. trends in the supply of providers with a waiver to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in 2016 and 2018. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107527. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.029. Epub 2019 Aug 30. PubMed 31525570 ↗
  • Magidson JF, Gorka SM, MacPherson L, Hopko DR, Blanco C, Lejuez CW, Daughters SB. Examining the effect of the Life Enhancement Treatment for Substance Use (LETS ACT) on residential substance abuse treatment retention. Addict Behav. 2011 Jun;36(6):615-623. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Jan 21. PubMed 21310539 ↗
  • Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Pantalone DW, O'Cleirigh C, Mayer KH, Safren SA. A pilot trial of integrated behavioral activation and sexual risk reduction counseling for HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men abusing crystal methamphetamine. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012 Nov;26(11):681-93. doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0216. Epub 2012 Oct 3. PubMed 23030605 ↗
  • Mimiaga MJ, Pantalone DW, Biello KB, Hughto JMW, Frank J, O'Cleirigh C, Reisner SL, Restar A, Mayer KH, Safren SA. An initial randomized controlled trial of behavioral activation for treatment of concurrent crystal methamphetamine dependence and sexual risk for HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 2019 Sep;31(9):1083-1095. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1595518. Epub 2019 Mar 19. PubMed 30887824 ↗
  • Daughters SB, Magidson JF, Anand D, Seitz-Brown CJ, Chen Y, Baker S. The effect of a behavioral activation treatment for substance use on post-treatment abstinence: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2018 Mar;113(3):535-544. doi: 10.1111/add.14049. Epub 2017 Nov 19. PubMed 28963853 ↗
  • Magidson JF, Seitz-Brown CJ, Safren SA, Daughters SB. Implementing Behavioral Activation and Life-Steps for Depression and HIV Medication Adherence in a Community Health Center. Cogn Behav Pract. 2014 Nov 1;21(4):386-403. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2013.10.002. PubMed 25419102 ↗
  • Magidson JF, Joska JA, Regenauer KS, Satinsky E, Andersen LS, Seitz-Brown CJ, Borba CPC, Safren SA, Myers B. "Someone who is in this thing that I am suffering from": The role of peers and other facilitators for task sharing substance use treatment in South African HIV care. Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Aug;70:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.11.004. Epub 2019 May 10. PubMed 31082664 ↗
  • Daughters SB, Magidson JF, Schuster RM, Safren SA. ACT HEALTHY: A Combined Cognitive-Behavioral Depression and Medication Adherence Treatment for HIV-Infected Substance Users. Cogn Behav Pract. 2010 Aug 1;17(3):309-321. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.12.003. PubMed 21709737 ↗
  • Tull MT, Berghoff CR, Bardeen JR, Schoenleber M, Konkle-Parker DJ. An Initial Open Trial of a Brief Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression and Medication Adherence in HIV-Infected Patients. Behav Modif. 2018 Mar;42(2):196-209. doi: 10.1177/0145445517723901. Epub 2017 Aug 11. PubMed 28799413 ↗
  • Carroll KM. Lost in translation? Moving contingency management and cognitive behavioral therapy into clinical practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Oct;1327(1):94-111. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12501. Epub 2014 Sep 9. PubMed 25204847 ↗
  • Magidson JF, Lejuez CW, Kamal T, Blevins EJ, Murray LK, Bass JK, Bolton P, Pagoto S. Adaptation of community health worker-delivered behavioral activation for torture survivors in Kurdistan, Iraq. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2015 Dec;2:e24. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2015.22. PubMed 27478619 ↗
  • Richards DA, Ekers D, McMillan D, Taylor RS, Byford S, Warren FC, Barrett B, Farrand PA, Gilbody S, Kuyken W, O'Mahen H, Watkins ER, Wright KA, Hollon SD, Reed N, Rhodes S, Fletcher E, Finning K. Cost and Outcome of Behavioural Activation versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression (COBRA): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Aug 27;388(10047):871-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31140-0. Epub 2016 Jul 23. PubMed 27461440 ↗
  • Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322. PubMed 10474547 ↗
  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7. PubMed 20957426 ↗
  • Mack KA, Jones CM, Ballesteros MF. Illicit Drug Use, Illicit Drug Use Disorders, and Drug Overdose Deaths in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Areas-United States. Am J Transplant. 2017 Dec;17(12):3241-3252. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14555. PubMed 29145698 ↗
  • Langabeer JR, Stotts AL, Cortez A, Tortolero G, Champagne-Langabeer T. Geographic proximity to buprenorphine treatment providers in the U.S. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Aug 1;213:108131. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108131. Epub 2020 Jun 24. PubMed 32599495 ↗
  • Magidson JF, Kleinman MB, Bradley V, Anvari MS, Abidogun TM, Belcher AM, Greenblatt AD, Dean D, Hines A, Seitz-Brown CJ, Wagner M, Bennett M, Felton JW. Peer recovery specialist-delivered, behavioral activation intervention to improve retention in methadone treatment: Results from an open-label, Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot trial. Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Oct;108:103813. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103813. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PubMed 35932644 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After all primary analyses are complete, de-identified data will be uploaded to an NIH-supported data repository and/or available by request to the MPIs.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05973838
Lead sponsor
University of Maryland, College Park
Responsible party
Jessica Magidson (Director and Associate Professor, University of Maryland, College Park) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 3, 2023
Start date
Jun 15, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2026

Study contacts

Morgan S Anvari, BA
Contact
manvari@umd.edu
3014055095
Jessica F Magidson, PhD
principal investigator · University of Maryland, College Park
Sarah M Kattakuzhy, MD
principal investigator · University of Maryland, Baltimore

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion