ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05214768Updated Sep 14, 2026Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CC-93538 in Adult and Adolescent Japanese Participants With Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

A Phase 3 interventional study of CC-93538 and Placebo in Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis, sponsored by Celgene. Completed at 25 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Celgene (part of Bristol-Myers Squibb) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CC-93538 in adult and adolescent participants with eosinophilic gastroenteritis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

Keywords

  • Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis
  • CC-93538
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases
  • Eosinophilic Gastro-Intestinal Disorder
  • EGID
  • Digestive system diseases
  • Gastroenteritis
03

In context

Eosinophilic enteropathy

28 studies on the registry are indexed under Eosinophilic enteropathy; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is above the median of 36 across 16 interventional studies indexed under Eosinophilic enteropathy.

Browse Eosinophilic enteropathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Celgene is the lead sponsor of 428 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Of its 104 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (29%) have results posted.

First submitted after Celgene became part of Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologic evidence of eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) defined as ≥ 30 eosinophils (eos)/high-power field (hpf) in at least 5 hpf in the stomach and/or ≥ 30 eos/hpf in at least 3 hpf in the duodenum while on stable background therapy for EGE
  • Has weekly symptom scores of ≥ 4/15 for any of Gastric Pain Symptoms domain, Stomach Heaviness Symptom domains, and /or Diarrhea Symptoms domain as assessed by the Izumo Scale with electronic device for the 2 consecutive weeks before Day 1
  • Must agree to maintain a stable diet from the first Screening Visit and throughout the duration of the study, and participants must have maintained a stable diet for at least 4 weeks prior to the first Screening Visit
  • Females of must have 2 negative pregnancy tests as verified by the Investigator prior to starting study therapy and agree to practice a highly effective method of until 5 months after the last dose

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ascites requiring treatment or symptomatic ascites
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease, achalasia or esophageal surgery
  • Has other causes of gastric and/or duodenal eosinophilia or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA)

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CC-93538

    Drug: CC-93538

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Specified dose on specified days

    Also known as: Cendakimab, BMS-986355

  • DrugPlacebo

    Specified dose on specified days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Peak Eosinophils (Eos) Count Per High-power Field (Hpf) in Gastrointestinal (GI) Biopsies

    Blood samples were collected to assess eosinophils count. Baseline data are defined as last measurement collected on or prior the date of first dose for Induction Phase.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Induction Phase: Changes in Each of 5 Domain Scores of the Izumo Scale From Baseline at Week 16

    The Izumo Scale questionnaire assesses the comprehensive 5 different GI symptom domains during the past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Questions1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Questions7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Questions13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and the score for each question within a domain is added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

  2. Induction + Maintenance: Changes in Each of 5 Domain Scores of the Izumo Scale From Baseline at Week 48

    The Izumo Scale questionnaire assesses the comprehensive 5 different GI symptom domains during the past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Questions1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Questions7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Questions13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and the score for each question within a domain is added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  3. Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both Clinical and Histologic Response Composite at Week 16

    Clinical response defined as percentage of participants who achieve \<4/15 in each of three Symptoms of Interest (Gastric Pain Symptoms domain, Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain, and Diarrhea Symptoms domain) scores of Izumo Scale from baseline. Histologic response defined as a \> 75% reduction of peak gastric and/or duodenal eos count from baseline. Izumo Scale tests 5 different GI symptom domains during past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Ques1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Ques7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Ques13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and score for each question within a domain added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Week 16

  4. Induction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both Clinical and Histologic Response Composite at Week 48

    Clinical response defined as percentage of participants who achieve \<4/15 in each of three Symptoms of Interest (Gastric Pain Symptoms domain, Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain, and Diarrhea Symptoms domain) scores of Izumo Scale from baseline. Histologic response defined as a \> 75% reduction of peak gastric and/or duodenal eos count from baseline. Izumo Scale tests 5 different GI symptom domains during past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Ques1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Ques7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Ques13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and score for each question within a domain added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 48

  5. Induction + Maintenance: Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Peak Eosinophils (Eos) Count Per High-power Field (Hpf) in Gastrointestinal (GI) Biopsies at Week 48

    Blood samples were collected to assess eosinophils count. Baseline data are defined as last measurement collected on or prior the date of first dose for Induction Phase. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  6. Induction Phase: Percent Changes in Mean Number of Peak Eos Per Hpf in GI Biopsies From Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to assess eosinophils count. Baseline data are defined as last measurement collected on or prior the date of first dose for Induction Phase.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

  7. Induction + Maintenance: Percent Changes in Mean Number of Peak Eos Per Hpf in GI Biopsies From Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to assess eosinophils count. Baseline data are defined as last measurement collected on or prior the date of first dose for Induction Phase. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  8. Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Eosinophil Histologic Response (> 75% Reduction)

    Histologic response defined as a \> 75% reduction of peak gastric and/or duodenal eos count from baseline.

    Time frame: Week 16

  9. Induction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants With Eosinophil Histologic Response (> 75% Reduction)

    Histologic response defined as a \> 75% reduction of peak gastric and/or duodenal eos count from baseline. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: Week 48

  10. Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve <4/15 in Each of Three Symptoms of Interest Scores Using the Izumo Scale

    The Izumo Scale questionnaire assesses the comprehensive 5 different GI symptom domains during the past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Questions1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Questions7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Questions13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and the score for each question within a domain is added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity. Gastric Pain Symptoms domain, Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain, and Diarrhea Symptoms domain are Symptoms of Interest.

    Time frame: Week 16

  11. Induction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve <4/15 in Each of Three Symptoms of Interest Scores Using the Izumo Scale

    The Izumo Scale questionnaire assesses the comprehensive 5 different GI symptom domains during the past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Questions1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Questions7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Questions13 through15). Each question is scored on a scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and one symptom domain is scored from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity. Gastric Pain Symptoms domain, Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain, and Diarrhea Symptoms domain are Symptoms of Interest. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm. Only participants from ages 12 -19 years old at specified timepoint are included in the analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  12. Induction Phase: Changes in Total Score of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorder (EGID) Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 16 in Adolescent (12 to 19 Years)

    The EGID Severity Score for participants from 12 to 19 years old assesses 6 different symptoms (vomiting, dysphagia, anorexia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool), 2 clinical laboratory tests (albumin, eos ratio of peripheral blood cells) and general condition, including height and weight. The score ranges from 0 to 100 and the higher the score, the greater the severity. A score of ≥ 40 is considered as severe, a score of 15 to 39 as moderate and ≤ 14 score as mild.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

  13. Induction Phase: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 16 in Adults (>= 20 Years)

    The EGID Severity Scores are assessed by the investigator. The EGID Severity Score for participants ≥ 20 years old assess the intensity and the frequency of 6 different symptoms (vomiting, dysphagia, anorexia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool), 2 clinical laboratory tests (albumin, eos ratio of peripheral blood cells) and 2 medical history items (history of surgery and use of systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressives). The score ranges from 0 to 82 and the higher the score, the greater the severity. A score of ≥ 40 is considered as severe, a score of 15 to 39 as moderate and a score of ≤ 14 score as mild.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

  14. Induction+ Maintenance: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 48 in Adolescent (12 to 19 Years)

    The EGID Severity Score for participants from 12 to 19 years old assesses 6 different symptoms (vomiting, dysphagia, anorexia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool), 2 clinical laboratory tests (albumin, eos ratio of peripheral blood cells) and general condition, including height and weight. The score ranges from 0 to 100 and the higher the score, the greater the severity. A score of ≥ 40 is considered as severe, a score of 15 to 39 as moderate and ≤ 14 score as mild. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  15. Induction + Maintenance: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 48 in Adults (>= 20 Years)

    The EGID Severity Scores are assessed by the investigator. The EGID Severity Score for participants ≥ 20 years old assess the intensity and the frequency of 6 different symptoms (vomiting, dysphagia, anorexia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool), 2 clinical laboratory tests (albumin, eos ratio of peripheral blood cells) and 2 medical history items (history of surgery and use of systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressives). The score ranges from 0 to 82 and the higher the score, the greater the severity. A score of ≥ 40 is considered as severe, a score of 15 to 39 as moderate and a score of ≤ 14 score as mild. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  16. Induction Phase: Time to First Event of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis (EGE) Flare and First Use of Rescue Therapy

    Any worsening of EGE symptoms during study participation will be documented as an EGE flare. Worsening of EGE symptoms is defined as continuous worsening of symptoms for 2 consecutive visits (4 weeks apart) compared to baseline, measured by the weekly Izumo Scale score (≥ 4 weeks of no change from baseline or ≥ 4 weeks of worsening from baseline).

    Time frame: Through Week 16

  17. Induction + Maintenance: Time to First Event of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis (EGE) Flare and First Use of Rescue Therapy

    Any worsening of EGE symptoms during study participation will be documented as an EGE flare. Worsening of EGE symptoms is defined as continuous worsening of symptoms for 2 consecutive visits (4 weeks apart) compared to baseline, measured by the weekly Izumo Scale score (≥ 4 weeks of no change from baseline or ≥ 4 weeks of worsening from baseline). Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: Through Week 48

  18. Maintenance Phase: Time to Reduce to Zero Concomitant Corticosteroid Use

    Participants who use concomitant corticosteroid at baseline and entered Maintenance Phase

    Time frame: From Week 16 through Week 48

  19. Percentage of Participants for Whom the Dose of Concomitant Steroids is Reduced to Zero

    Participants who use concomitant corticosteroid at baseline and entered Maintenance period were included in the analysis.

    Time frame: Week 24, 32, 40 and 48

  20. Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is any AE that emerges during treatment or Safety Follow-up Period having been absent pre-treatment or worsens in severity relative to the pretreatment state. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: From Day 1 untill Week 48

  21. Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Remarkable Differences of Clinically Relevant Mean Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Measurements

    Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: From Day 1 untill Week 48

  22. Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Remarkable Differences of Clinically Relevant Mean Changes From Baseline in Physical Examinations Parameters

    Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: From Day 1 untill Week 48

  23. Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Mean Changes Over Time That Were of Clinically Concern in Hematology Parameters, Serum Chemistry Parameters, and Urinalysis Parameters

    Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: From Day 1 untill Week 48

  24. Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug-Antibody

    Blood samples were collected to assess Anti-Drug-Antibody. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: From Day 1 till Week 48

  25. Induction Phase: CC-93538 Trough Concentration at Week 16

    Blood samples were collected to assess CC-93538 trough concentrations.

    Time frame: Week 16

  26. Maintenance Phase: CC-93538 Trough Concentration at Week 48

    Blood samples were collected to assess CC-93538 trough concentrations. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

    Time frame: Week 48

07

Results

Posted Sep 18, 2025

Participant flow

Induction Period
Participant flow — Induction Period
MilestoneInduction Phase - CC-93538 360 mg QWInduction Phase - PlaceboMaintenance Phase - CC-93538 360 mg QWMaintenance Phase - CC-93538 360 QW/Q2WMaintenance Phase - PlaceboOpen-Label Extension - CC-93538 360 mg QW
Started32160000
Completed30160000
Not completed200000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100000
Withdrew: Physician decision100000
Maintenance Period
Participant flow — Maintenance Period
MilestoneInduction Phase - CC-93538 360 mg QWInduction Phase - PlaceboMaintenance Phase - CC-93538 360 mg QWMaintenance Phase - CC-93538 360 QW/Q2WMaintenance Phase - PlaceboOpen-Label Extension - CC-93538 360 mg QW
Started001312120
Completed001110110
Not completed002210
Withdrew: Other reasons001100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject000100
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy001010
Open Label Extension Period
Participant flow — Open Label Extension Period
MilestoneInduction Phase - CC-93538 360 mg QWInduction Phase - PlaceboMaintenance Phase - CC-93538 360 mg QWMaintenance Phase - CC-93538 360 QW/Q2WMaintenance Phase - PlaceboOpen-Label Extension - CC-93538 360 mg QW
Started0000044
Completed000005
Not completed0000039
Withdrew: Physician decision000001
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy000002
Withdrew: Site terminated by sponsor0000035
Withdrew: Adverse event000001

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Peak Eosinophils (Eos) Count Per High-power Field (Hpf) in Gastrointestinal (GI) Biopsies

Blood samples were collected to assess eosinophils count. Baseline data are defined as last measurement collected on or prior the date of first dose for Induction Phase.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Peak # of eosinophils counted per field
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Peak Eosinophils (Eos) Count Per High-power Field (Hpf) in Gastrointestinal (GI) Biopsies
Peak # of eosinophils counted per fieldCC-93538 360 mg QWPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Peak Eosinophils (Eos) Count Per High-power Field (Hpf) in Gastrointestinal (GI) Biopsies-100.4 ± 44.23122.8 ± 60.27
Statistical analysis
  • CC-93538 360 mg QW vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.003 · Least square mean difference: -223.2 · 95% CI -370.2 to -76.3
SecondaryInduction Phase: Changes in Each of 5 Domain Scores of the Izumo Scale From Baseline at Week 16

The Izumo Scale questionnaire assesses the comprehensive 5 different GI symptom domains during the past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Questions1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Questions7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Questions13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and the score for each question within a domain is added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a Scale
Induction Phase: Changes in Each of 5 Domain Scores of the Izumo Scale From Baseline at Week 16
Score on a ScaleCC-93538 360 mg QWPlacebo
Heartburn Symptoms domain-1.9 ± 0.46-1.7 ± 0.66
Gastric Pain Symptoms domain-2.1 ± 0.60-0.9 ± 0.86
Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain-2.1 ± 0.61-2.2 ± 0.87
Constipation Symptoms domain-1.0 ± 0.49-0.9 ± 0.69
Diarrhea Symptoms domain-1.8 ± 0.46-1.6 ± 0.65
SecondaryInduction + Maintenance: Changes in Each of 5 Domain Scores of the Izumo Scale From Baseline at Week 48

The Izumo Scale questionnaire assesses the comprehensive 5 different GI symptom domains during the past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Questions1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Questions7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Questions13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and the score for each question within a domain is added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a Scale
Induction + Maintenance: Changes in Each of 5 Domain Scores of the Izumo Scale From Baseline at Week 48
Score on a ScaleCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Heartburn Symptoms domain0.2 ± 0.74-2.0 ± 0.98-1.4 ± 0.84
Gastric Pain Symptoms domain0.1 ± 0.81-2.5 ± 1.08-1.8 ± 0.91
Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain0.7 ± 0.81-3.4 ± 1.05-1.5 ± 0.90
Constipation Symptoms domain0.6 ± 0.79-1.0 ± 1.07-1.4 ± 0.85
Diarrhea Symptoms domain1.5 ± 0.87-0.1 ± 1.16-2.3 ± 0.97
SecondaryInduction Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both Clinical and Histologic Response Composite at Week 16

Clinical response defined as percentage of participants who achieve \<4/15 in each of three Symptoms of Interest (Gastric Pain Symptoms domain, Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain, and Diarrhea Symptoms domain) scores of Izumo Scale from baseline. Histologic response defined as a \> 75% reduction of peak gastric and/or duodenal eos count from baseline. Izumo Scale tests 5 different GI symptom domains during past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Ques1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Ques7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Ques13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and score for each question within a domain added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both Clinical and Histologic Response Composite at Week 16
percentage of participantsCC-93538 360 mg QWPlacebo
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both Clinical and Histologic Response Composite at Week 166.30
SecondaryInduction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both Clinical and Histologic Response Composite at Week 48

Clinical response defined as percentage of participants who achieve \<4/15 in each of three Symptoms of Interest (Gastric Pain Symptoms domain, Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain, and Diarrhea Symptoms domain) scores of Izumo Scale from baseline. Histologic response defined as a \> 75% reduction of peak gastric and/or duodenal eos count from baseline. Izumo Scale tests 5 different GI symptom domains during past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Ques1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Ques7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Ques13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and score for each question within a domain added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Induction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both Clinical and Histologic Response Composite at Week 48
percentage of participantsCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both Clinical and Histologic Response Composite at Week 4808.30
SecondaryInduction + Maintenance: Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Peak Eosinophils (Eos) Count Per High-power Field (Hpf) in Gastrointestinal (GI) Biopsies at Week 48

Blood samples were collected to assess eosinophils count. Baseline data are defined as last measurement collected on or prior the date of first dose for Induction Phase. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Peak # of eosinophils counted per field
Induction + Maintenance: Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Peak Eosinophils (Eos) Count Per High-power Field (Hpf) in Gastrointestinal (GI) Biopsies at Week 48
Peak # of eosinophils counted per fieldCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction + Maintenance: Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Peak Eosinophils (Eos) Count Per High-power Field (Hpf) in Gastrointestinal (GI) Biopsies at Week 48-24.1 ± 61.26-151.2 ± 89.7098.6 ± 66.03
SecondaryInduction Phase: Percent Changes in Mean Number of Peak Eos Per Hpf in GI Biopsies From Baseline

Blood samples were collected to assess eosinophils count. Baseline data are defined as last measurement collected on or prior the date of first dose for Induction Phase.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent change
Induction Phase: Percent Changes in Mean Number of Peak Eos Per Hpf in GI Biopsies From Baseline
Percent changeCC-93538 360 mg QWPlacebo
Induction Phase: Percent Changes in Mean Number of Peak Eos Per Hpf in GI Biopsies From Baseline-13.4 ± 18.8561.6 ± 22.18
SecondaryInduction + Maintenance: Percent Changes in Mean Number of Peak Eos Per Hpf in GI Biopsies From Baseline

Blood samples were collected to assess eosinophils count. Baseline data are defined as last measurement collected on or prior the date of first dose for Induction Phase. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent change
Induction + Maintenance: Percent Changes in Mean Number of Peak Eos Per Hpf in GI Biopsies From Baseline
Percent changeCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction + Maintenance: Percent Changes in Mean Number of Peak Eos Per Hpf in GI Biopsies From Baseline7.2 ± 29.78-39.9 ± 50.5443.7 ± 36.15
SecondaryInduction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Eosinophil Histologic Response (> 75% Reduction)

Histologic response defined as a \> 75% reduction of peak gastric and/or duodenal eos count from baseline.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Eosinophil Histologic Response (> 75% Reduction)
percentage of participantsCC-93538 360 mg QWPlacebo
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Eosinophil Histologic Response (> 75% Reduction)15.60
SecondaryInduction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants With Eosinophil Histologic Response (> 75% Reduction)

Histologic response defined as a \> 75% reduction of peak gastric and/or duodenal eos count from baseline. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
Week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Induction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants With Eosinophil Histologic Response (> 75% Reduction)
percentage of participantsCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants With Eosinophil Histologic Response (> 75% Reduction)025.00
SecondaryInduction Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve <4/15 in Each of Three Symptoms of Interest Scores Using the Izumo Scale

The Izumo Scale questionnaire assesses the comprehensive 5 different GI symptom domains during the past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Questions1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Questions7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Questions13 through15). Each question is scored on a 6-point Likert scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and the score for each question within a domain is added to determine domain specific scores scaled from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity. Gastric Pain Symptoms domain, Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain, and Diarrhea Symptoms domain are Symptoms of Interest.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve <4/15 in Each of Three Symptoms of Interest Scores Using the Izumo Scale
percentage of participantsCC-93538 360 mg QWPlacebo
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve <4/15 in Each of Three Symptoms of Interest Scores Using the Izumo Scale28.118.8
SecondaryInduction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve <4/15 in Each of Three Symptoms of Interest Scores Using the Izumo Scale

The Izumo Scale questionnaire assesses the comprehensive 5 different GI symptom domains during the past week and consists with 15 weekly questions (3 questions per 1 domain): Heartburn Symptoms domain(Questions1 through3), Gastric Pain Symptoms domain(Questions4 through6), Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain(Questions7 through9), Constipation Symptoms domain (Question 10 through12), Diarrhea Symptoms domain (Questions13 through15). Each question is scored on a scale of "0 = No trouble at all" to "5 = Can't stand it," and one symptom domain is scored from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating greater symptom severity. Gastric Pain Symptoms domain, Stomach Heaviness Symptoms domain, and Diarrhea Symptoms domain are Symptoms of Interest. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm. Only participants from ages 12 -19 years old at specified timepoint are included in the analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Induction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve <4/15 in Each of Three Symptoms of Interest Scores Using the Izumo Scale
percentage of participantsCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction + Maintenance: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve <4/15 in Each of Three Symptoms of Interest Scores Using the Izumo Scale10.025.031.3
SecondaryInduction Phase: Changes in Total Score of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorder (EGID) Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 16 in Adolescent (12 to 19 Years)

The EGID Severity Score for participants from 12 to 19 years old assesses 6 different symptoms (vomiting, dysphagia, anorexia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool), 2 clinical laboratory tests (albumin, eos ratio of peripheral blood cells) and general condition, including height and weight. The score ranges from 0 to 100 and the higher the score, the greater the severity. A score of ≥ 40 is considered as severe, a score of 15 to 39 as moderate and ≤ 14 score as mild.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a Scale
Induction Phase: Changes in Total Score of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorder (EGID) Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 16 in Adolescent (12 to 19 Years)
Score on a ScaleCC-93538 360 mg QWPlacebo
Induction Phase: Changes in Total Score of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorder (EGID) Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 16 in Adolescent (12 to 19 Years)-6.4 ± 1.70-3.8 ± 2.91
SecondaryInduction Phase: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 16 in Adults (>= 20 Years)

The EGID Severity Scores are assessed by the investigator. The EGID Severity Score for participants ≥ 20 years old assess the intensity and the frequency of 6 different symptoms (vomiting, dysphagia, anorexia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool), 2 clinical laboratory tests (albumin, eos ratio of peripheral blood cells) and 2 medical history items (history of surgery and use of systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressives). The score ranges from 0 to 82 and the higher the score, the greater the severity. A score of ≥ 40 is considered as severe, a score of 15 to 39 as moderate and a score of ≤ 14 score as mild.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a Scale
Induction Phase: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 16 in Adults (>= 20 Years)
Score on a ScaleCC-93538 360 mg QWPlacebo
Induction Phase: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 16 in Adults (>= 20 Years)-5.5 ± 1.40-4.5 ± 2.12
SecondaryInduction+ Maintenance: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 48 in Adolescent (12 to 19 Years)

The EGID Severity Score for participants from 12 to 19 years old assesses 6 different symptoms (vomiting, dysphagia, anorexia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool), 2 clinical laboratory tests (albumin, eos ratio of peripheral blood cells) and general condition, including height and weight. The score ranges from 0 to 100 and the higher the score, the greater the severity. A score of ≥ 40 is considered as severe, a score of 15 to 39 as moderate and ≤ 14 score as mild. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a Scale
Induction+ Maintenance: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 48 in Adolescent (12 to 19 Years)
Score on a ScaleCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction+ Maintenance: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 48 in Adolescent (12 to 19 Years)7.1 ± 0.00-10.4 ± 0.001.7 ± 0.00
SecondaryInduction + Maintenance: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 48 in Adults (>= 20 Years)

The EGID Severity Scores are assessed by the investigator. The EGID Severity Score for participants ≥ 20 years old assess the intensity and the frequency of 6 different symptoms (vomiting, dysphagia, anorexia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool), 2 clinical laboratory tests (albumin, eos ratio of peripheral blood cells) and 2 medical history items (history of surgery and use of systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressives). The score ranges from 0 to 82 and the higher the score, the greater the severity. A score of ≥ 40 is considered as severe, a score of 15 to 39 as moderate and a score of ≤ 14 score as mild. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a Scale
Induction + Maintenance: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 48 in Adults (>= 20 Years)
Score on a ScaleCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction + Maintenance: Changes in Total Score of EGID Severity Score From Baseline to Weeks 48 in Adults (>= 20 Years)-3.3 ± 2.76-2.4 ± 5.32-7.2 ± 3.35
SecondaryInduction Phase: Time to First Event of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis (EGE) Flare and First Use of Rescue Therapy

Any worsening of EGE symptoms during study participation will be documented as an EGE flare. Worsening of EGE symptoms is defined as continuous worsening of symptoms for 2 consecutive visits (4 weeks apart) compared to baseline, measured by the weekly Izumo Scale score (≥ 4 weeks of no change from baseline or ≥ 4 weeks of worsening from baseline).

Time frame:
Through Week 16
Reported as:
Median · days
Induction Phase: Time to First Event of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis (EGE) Flare and First Use of Rescue Therapy
daysCC-93538 360 mg QWPlacebo
EGE FlareNA (NA to NA)NA (113 to NA)
Use of rescue therapyNA (NA to NA)NA (113 to NA)
SecondaryInduction + Maintenance: Time to First Event of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis (EGE) Flare and First Use of Rescue Therapy

Any worsening of EGE symptoms during study participation will be documented as an EGE flare. Worsening of EGE symptoms is defined as continuous worsening of symptoms for 2 consecutive visits (4 weeks apart) compared to baseline, measured by the weekly Izumo Scale score (≥ 4 weeks of no change from baseline or ≥ 4 weeks of worsening from baseline). Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
Through Week 48
Reported as:
Median · days
Induction + Maintenance: Time to First Event of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis (EGE) Flare and First Use of Rescue Therapy
daysCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
EGE FlareNA (92 to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (113 to NA)
Use of rescue therapyNA (113 to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (115 to NA)
SecondaryMaintenance Phase: Time to Reduce to Zero Concomitant Corticosteroid Use

Participants who use concomitant corticosteroid at baseline and entered Maintenance Phase

Time frame:
From Week 16 through Week 48
Reported as:
Median · days
Maintenance Phase: Time to Reduce to Zero Concomitant Corticosteroid Use
daysCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Maintenance Phase: Time to Reduce to Zero Concomitant Corticosteroid UseNA (144 to NA)NA (176 to NA)NA (113 to NA)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants for Whom the Dose of Concomitant Steroids is Reduced to Zero

Participants who use concomitant corticosteroid at baseline and entered Maintenance period were included in the analysis.

Time frame:
Week 24, 32, 40 and 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants for Whom the Dose of Concomitant Steroids is Reduced to Zero
percentage of participantsCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Week 24000
Week 32000
Week 4014.300
Week 4814.325.00
SecondaryInduction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is any AE that emerges during treatment or Safety Follow-up Period having been absent pre-treatment or worsens in severity relative to the pretreatment state. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
From Day 1 untill Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
ParticipantsCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Any TEAEs16913
Any Serious TEAEs010
Any Moderate or Severe TEAE10610
ANY TEAE suspected to be related to study drug632
SecondaryInduction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Remarkable Differences of Clinically Relevant Mean Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Measurements

Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
From Day 1 untill Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Remarkable Differences of Clinically Relevant Mean Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Measurements
ParticipantsCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Remarkable Differences of Clinically Relevant Mean Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Measurements000
SecondaryInduction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Remarkable Differences of Clinically Relevant Mean Changes From Baseline in Physical Examinations Parameters

Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
From Day 1 untill Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Remarkable Differences of Clinically Relevant Mean Changes From Baseline in Physical Examinations Parameters
ParticipantsCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Remarkable Differences of Clinically Relevant Mean Changes From Baseline in Physical Examinations Parameters000
SecondaryInduction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Mean Changes Over Time That Were of Clinically Concern in Hematology Parameters, Serum Chemistry Parameters, and Urinalysis Parameters

Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
From Day 1 untill Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Mean Changes Over Time That Were of Clinically Concern in Hematology Parameters, Serum Chemistry Parameters, and Urinalysis Parameters
ParticipantsCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2WPlacebo
Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Mean Changes Over Time That Were of Clinically Concern in Hematology Parameters, Serum Chemistry Parameters, and Urinalysis Parameters000
SecondaryInduction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug-Antibody

Blood samples were collected to assess Anti-Drug-Antibody. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
From Day 1 till Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug-Antibody
ParticipantsCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2W
Induction and Maintenance: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug-Antibody20
SecondaryInduction Phase: CC-93538 Trough Concentration at Week 16

Blood samples were collected to assess CC-93538 trough concentrations.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Induction Phase: CC-93538 Trough Concentration at Week 16
ng/mLCC-93538 360 mg QW
Induction Phase: CC-93538 Trough Concentration at Week 16179472.2 ± 47.2
SecondaryMaintenance Phase: CC-93538 Trough Concentration at Week 48

Blood samples were collected to assess CC-93538 trough concentrations. Participants that discontinued Induction period without entering maintenance period are included in the CC-93538 360 mg QW arm.

Time frame:
Week 48
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Maintenance Phase: CC-93538 Trough Concentration at Week 48
ng/mLCC-93538 360 mg QWCC-93538 360 QW/Q2W
Maintenance Phase: CC-93538 Trough Concentration at Week 48165591.7 ± 58.576433.4 ± 64.1

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality, serious and non-serious adverse events were collected from first dose (day 1) and up to 181 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Induction and Maintenance Phase - CC-93538 360mg QW0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)16/20 (80%)
Maintenance - CC-93538 360mg QW/Q2W0/12 (0%)1/12 (8.3%)9/12 (75%)
Induction and Maintenance - Placebo0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)13/16 (81.3%)
Open-label Long-term Extension Phase - CC-93538 360mg QW0/44 (0%)7/44 (15.9%)39/44 (88.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventInduction and Maintenance Phase - CC-93538 360mg QWMaintenance - CC-93538 360mg QW/Q2WInduction and Maintenance - PlaceboOpen-label Long-term Extension Phase - CC-93538 360mg QW
Intervertebral disc protrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/201/120/160/44
CataractEye disorders0/200/120/161/44
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/200/120/161/44
Pilonidal diseaseInfections and infestations0/200/120/161/44
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/200/120/161/44
SacroiliitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/200/120/161/44
TendonitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/200/120/161/44
Neuroendocrine tumour of the rectumNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/200/120/161/44
VaricoceleReproductive system and breast disorders0/200/120/161/44
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 89
Most frequent other events
EventInduction and Maintenance Phase - CC-93538 360mg QWMaintenance - CC-93538 360mg QW/Q2WInduction and Maintenance - PlaceboOpen-label Long-term Extension Phase - CC-93538 360mg QW
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/206/123/1610/44
COVID-19Infections and infestations2/204/120/1613/44
Injection site reactionGeneral disorders and administration site conditions5/202/121/165/44
PyrexiaGeneral disorders and administration site conditions0/201/124/164/44
InfluenzaInfections and infestations1/200/121/1611/44
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/202/121/163/44
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders3/201/121/163/44
BronchitisInfections and infestations0/200/122/162/44
MigraineNervous system disorders0/200/122/160/44
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/200/120/165/44

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CC-93538 360 mg QWPlaceboTotal
Mean40.8 ± 16.7941.8 ± 17.6341.2 ± 16.90
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CC-93538 360 mg QWPlaceboTotal
Female14620
Male181028
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CC-93538 360 mg QWPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino321648
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CC-93538 360 mg QWPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian321648
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

25 sites
  • Local Institution - 024
    Gifu, Gifu 5011194, Japan
  • Local Institution - 022
    Himeji-shi, Hyōgo 670-8560, Japan
  • Local Institution - 009
    Nishinomiya, Hyōgo 663-8501, Japan
  • Local Institution - 018
    Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken 890-8520, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0025
    Tsu, Mie-ken 514-8507, Japan
  • Local Institution - 025
    Tsu, Mie-ken 514-8507, Japan
  • Local Institution - 023
    Sendai, Miyagi 982-8502, Japan
  • Local Institution - 016
    Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan
  • Local Institution - 002
    Osaka, Osaka 545-8586, Japan
  • Local Institution - 007
    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan
  • Local Institution - 001
    Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan
  • Local Institution - 010
    Akita, 010-8543, Japan
  • Local Institution - 017
    Hirosaki, 036-8545, Japan
  • Local Institution - 015
    Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
  • Local Institution - 020
    Kitakyushu, 802-8561, Japan
  • Local Institution - 004
    Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
  • Local Institution - 011
    Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
  • Local Institution - 013
    Nagaoka, 940-2085, Japan
  • Local Institution - 006
    Nagoya, 454-8509, Japan
  • Local Institution - 021
    Nagoya, 467-8602, Japan
  • Local Institution - 008
    Niigata, 951-8510, Japan
  • Local Institution - 012
    Ōgaki, 503-8502, Japan
  • Local Institution - 005
    Shibukawa, 377-8577, Japan
  • Local Institution - 019
    Tokyo, 108-8329, Japan
  • Local Institution - 003
    Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05214768
Lead sponsor
Celgene
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2022
Start date
Mar 4, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2024
Completion
Aug 22, 2025
Results posted
Sep 18, 2025
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Bristol-Myers Squibb
study director · Bristol-Myers Squibb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cendakimab

Start the discussion