CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05201222SOMMEIL_INDUITUpdated Nov 1, 2022

Predictive Value of Induced Sleep Endoscopy on Surgical Indication in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndromes

An observational study in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome, sponsored by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-01.

Sponsored by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
145
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) is a pathology that affects 2 to 15% of the French adult population and more than 30% of subjects over 65 years old. It consists of repeated collapses of the upper airways during sleep leading to interruptions in ventilation (apneas) or significant reductions in ventilation (hypopneas). Balagny et al. have demonstrated the occurrence of hypertension in patients screened positive for sleep apnea syndrome in a French general population cohort. It is also established that sleep apnea increases the risk of cardiovascular disorders, such as metabolic syndrome (combining abdominal obesity and metabolic disorders), hypertension, heart rhythm disorders, especially at night, atherosclerosis (deposits of atheromatous plaques on the artery walls) or type 2 diabetes. These different complications increase the risk of cardiovascular accidents such as cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, and expose to a risk of premature death (Inserm). The treatment of choice is night-time positive pressure ventilation, made possible by the use of a breathing apparatus (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or CPAP). Alternatives to CPAP are the use of a nocturnal Mandibular Advancement Orthosis (MAO) which advances the jaw and allows a pharyngeal opening, and surgery in selected patients. The phenomenon at the origin of apneas is due to a relaxation of the muscles of the pharyngeal wall located at different heights. This obstruction is favored by anatomical particularities specific to each individual. The clinical examination can detect certain anomalies (enlarged tonsils, obstructive soft palate, prominent tongue base, abnormal epiglottis) and propose surgery to remove the obstruction.

Nevertheless, it remains difficult to affirm that the detected anomaly is really at the origin of the obstruction and surgical failures are frequent. Endoscopy under induced sleep has been developed for about 10 years in France. This examination, widely used in the world, remains confidential in France. It consists, in the operating room, in inducing a medicated sleep (specific drugs delivered by an anesthetist) and performing a pharyngolaryngeal fibroscopy. The ENT physician can then visualize "live" the site and origin of the obstruction during an apnea.

The main objective is to evaluate the interest of endoscopy under sleep before making a surgical indication in a patient presenting a sleep apnea syndrome. The secondary objective is to evaluate the reliability of sleep endoscopy.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Apnea

1,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 145 is above the median of 106 across 386 observational studies indexed under Apnea.

Browse Apnea studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph is the lead sponsor of 335 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient with sleep apnea syndrome confirmed by polysomnographic or polygraphic recording, for whom a sleep endoscopy is performed: clinical/recording discordance, failure or intolerance of the proposed treatment (OAM, PPC); surgical indication for OSA (tonsillectomy and/or velopasty) between 11/12/2012 and 05/10/2020.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient whose age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient with sleep apnea syndrome confirmed by polysomnographic or polygraphic recording The parameters of interest (Apnea Hypopnea Index, percentage of snoring and desaturation during the recording) are collected and in an identical way by its two examinations. They differ by the recording of other parameters.
  • Patient for whom a sleep endoscopy is performed: clinical/recording discordance, failure or intolerance of the proposed treatment (OAM, PPC); surgical indication for OSA (tonsillectomy and/or velopasty)
  • French speaking patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient under court protection
  • Patient objecting to the use of his data for this research
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
145 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Interest of sleep endoscopy before making a surgical indication in a patient with sleep apnea syndrome

    This outcome corresponds to the number of patients for whom the surgical indication was maintained according to the data collected during the sleep endoscopy.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reliability of endoscopy under sleep

    This outcome corresponds to the comparison of the number of patients for whom the treatment considered before the sleep endoscopy and the type of treatment were finally performed.

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institut Arthur Vernes
    Paris, 75006, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chong KB, De Vito A, Vicini C. Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy in Treatment Options Selection. Sleep Med Clin. 2019 Mar;14(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Dec 3. PubMed 30709531 ↗
  • De Vito A, Carrasco Llatas M, Ravesloot MJ, Kotecha B, De Vries N, Hamans E, Maurer J, Bosi M, Blumen M, Heiser C, Herzog M, Montevecchi F, Corso RM, Braghiroli A, Gobbi R, Vroegop A, Vonk PE, Hohenhorst W, Piccin O, Sorrenti G, Vanderveken OM, Vicini C. European position paper on drug-induced sleep endoscopy: 2017 Update. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Dec;43(6):1541-1552. doi: 10.1111/coa.13213. Epub 2018 Sep 30. PubMed 30133943 ↗
  • Aljassim A, Pang KP, Rotenberg BW. Does Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Improve Sleep Surgery Outcomes? Laryngoscope. 2020 Nov;130(11):2518-2519. doi: 10.1002/lary.28668. Epub 2020 Apr 18. No abstract available. PubMed 32304328 ↗
  • Kezirian EJ, Hohenhorst W, de Vries N. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy: the VOTE classification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Aug;268(8):1233-1236. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1633-8. Epub 2011 May 26. PubMed 21614467 ↗
  • Kotecha B, De Vito A. Drug induced sleep endoscopy: its role in evaluation of the upper airway obstruction and patient selection for surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(Suppl 1):S40-S47. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.32. PubMed 29445527 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05201222
Lead sponsor
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Collaborators
Institut Arthur Vernes
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 21, 2022
Start date
Dec 15, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2022
Completion
Oct 31, 2022
Last update
Nov 1, 2022

Study contacts

Laurent YONA, MD
principal investigator · Institut Arthur Vernes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion