ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05145478Updated Aug 14, 2026

CRUSH PAD: Real-world Outcomes Following Use of Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) Technology in Calcified Common Femoral Lesions

An observational study in Femoral Arterial Calcification, Peripheral Arterial Disease and Claudication, sponsored by Yale University. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-14.

Primary conditionChronic Limb-Threatening IschemiaRegistry: Peripheral Arterial DiseaseReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Peripheral Arterial Disease — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, a narrower term within Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Yale University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2021; still recruiting 4 years 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary goal of the study is to obtain effect size data on the use of Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) technology in calcified common femoral lesions in patients with peripheral artery disease for a series of endpoints, including target lesion revascularization and health status, to enable future planning of comparative effectiveness research.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the generic health status outcomes and efficacy and safety outcomes following use of the Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) technology in calcified common femoral lesions in patients with PAD seen in routine clinical practice.

The main testable hypothesis is that the use of IVL is associated with a health status improvement that is equal or higher than the threshold of a minimally clinically important difference on the EQ5D. Preliminarily data will be derived for the primary endpoint target lesion revascularization to enable future planning of larger comparative effectiveness research.

Secondary objectives of the study are to document procedural success following the use of IVL in common femoral lesions, disease stage change, as well as disease-specific health status in the real-world.

02

Conditions studied

  • Femoral Arterial Calcification
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease
  • Claudication
  • Critical Limb Ischemia

Keywords

  • Peripheral Artery Disease
03

In context

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Reclassified

356 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 111 across 102 observational studies indexed under Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Browse Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,770 studies on the registry; 294 are open to participants now.

Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 129 (58%) have results posted.

Compared within Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Peripheral Arterial Disease. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Study population include patients with atherosclerotic lesions in the femoral artery who either have claudication or critical limb ischemia who are eligible to receive endovascular treatment in addition to be treated with Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) technology.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects presenting with claudication or CLI by Rutherford Clinical Category 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 of the target limbs
  • Subject is a suitable candidate for angiography and endovascular intervention per the latest clinical guidelines
  • Patient is scheduled to undergo treatment with Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) technology followed by standard of care treatment with DCB, BMS, DES at the physician's discretion.

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria

  • Target lesion that is located in a native, de novo common femoral artery
  • Target lesion reference vessel diameter is between 4.0mm and 7.0mm by visual estimate.
  • Target lesion is ≥70% stenosis by investigator via visual estimate.
  • Target lesion length is ≤50mm for lesions 70-99% stenosed. Target lesion can be all or part of the 50mm treated zone.
  • Chronic total occlusion, lesion length is ≤50mm of the total ≤50 mm target lesion.
  • Calcification is at least moderate defined as presence of fluoroscopic evidence of calcification: 1) on parallel sides of the vessel and 2) extending > 50% the length of the lesion if lesion is ≥50mm in length; or extending for minimum of 20mm if lesion is \<50mm in length.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with any medical condition that would make him/her an inappropriate candidate for treatment with Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty® System as per Instructions for Use (IFU) or investigator's opinion.
  • Subject is already enrolled in other (interventional) studies that would interfere with study endpoints.
  • Cognitive impairment as documented in medical records
  • Not speaking English or Spanish
  • Currently a prisoner
  • Pregnancy or nursing
  • Estimated survival less than 12 months at the time of screening
  • Prior history of CFA endarterectomy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL)

    Patients with calcified common-femoral artery disease, who are eligible to receive IVL per the FDA indications.

    Device: Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL)

Interventions

  • DeviceShockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL)

    Eligible patients with atherosclerotic lesions in the femoral artery who either have claudication or critical limb ischemia will receive endovascular treatment in addition to be treated with Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) technology.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Generic Health Status

    Generic Health Status will be measured using the EQ5D health status assessment. Descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults, consisting of five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain \& discomfort, Anxiety \& depression), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension. Higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems.

    Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

  2. Change in Generic Health Status

    Generic Health Status will be measured using the EQ5D health status assessment. Descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults, consisting of five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain \& discomfort, Anxiety \& depression), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension. Higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  3. Rate of Procedural Success

    Procedural success defined as residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥ grade D) prior to DCB

    Time frame: Immediately post procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients Free from TLR

    Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Assessed at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  2. Number of patients with new-onset MAEs

    The composite of new-onset Major Adverse Events (MAEs) is comprised of: * Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb, including CFA endarterectomy * Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle) * Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical, or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization * Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  3. Rate of Periprocedural clinical success

    Periprocedural clinical success as defined by residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥ grade D) prior to DCB or stenting.

    Time frame: During admission, before discharge up to 48 hours

  4. Change in Clinical Success

    Rutherford Category. Classification of PAD into acute and chronic limb ischemia associated by clinical symptoms. Evaluates patient's chronic limb pain and claudication by ABI/TBI. The category scale is from 0-6. The clinical interpretation of the scale is that a higher category indicates a worse condition.

    Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

  5. Change in Clinical Success

    Rutherford Category. Classification of PAD into acute and chronic limb ischemia associated by clinical symptoms. Evaluates patient's chronic limb pain and claudication by ABI/TBI. The category scale is from 0-6. The clinical interpretation of the scale is that a higher category indicates a worse condition.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Health Status

    Health status will be measured using the disease-specific Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ). PAD-specific, multi-dimensional health status instrument with a CLI specific module. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 60 months after the start.

Of 46 non-industry observational studies under Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 60 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 51 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 59.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 15, 2021
First posted
Dec 6, 2021
StartActual
Dec 1, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
Last update
Aug 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05145478
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 6, 2021
Start date
Dec 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 14, 2026

Study contacts

Kim Smolderen, PhD
Contact
kim.smolderen@yale.edu
203-737-7673
Carlos Mena-Hurtado, MD
principal investigator · Yale University
Kim Smolderen, PhD
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion