ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05122780PROMISEUpdated Jul 26, 2024

Prognostic Value of Precision Medicine in Patients With MINOCA (PROMISE Trial).

A Phase 4 interventional study of Coronary angiography and OCT imaging in Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Active, not recruiting at 3 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-26.

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of our study is to evaluate if the use of a precision-medicine approach with a specific therapy tailored on the underlying pathogenic mechanism will improve the quality-of-life in MINOCA patients. The investigators further aim at investigating wherever a precision-medicine approach will improve the prognosis, healthcare related costs, and if that a different profile of plasma biomarkers and microRNAs may serve as diagnostic tools for detecting specific causes of MINOCA and to assess response to therapy. Finally, beyond its pivotal role in differential diagnosis, the investigators hypothesize that cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may provide a morphological and functional cardiac characterization as well as help in the prognostic stratification.

Read the detailed description

PROMISE study is a randomized multicenter prospective superiority phase IV trial comparing "precision medicine approach" versus "standard of care" in improving the prognosis and/or the quality-of-life of patients presenting with MINOCA. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to "precision medicine approach" consisting of a comprehensive diagnostic work up aim at elucidating the pathophysiological mechanism of MINOCA and consequently a tailored pharmacological approach versus "standard of care" consisting of standard diagnostic algorithm and therapy for myocardial infarction.

The aim of the study is to evaluate if the use of a precision-medicine approach with a specific therapy tailored on the underlying pathogenic mechanism will improve the quality-of-life in MINOCA patients (primary objective). The investigators further aim at investigating wherever a precision-medicine approach will improve the prognosis, healthcare related costs, and if that a different profile of plasma biomarkers and microRNAs may serve as diagnostic tools for detecting specific causes of MINOCA and to assess response to therapy (secondary objectives). Finally, beyond its pivotal role in differential diagnosis, the investigators hypothesize that cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may provide a morphological and functional cardiac characterization as well as help in the prognostic stratification (secondary objective).

The study is a multicentre trial involving 3 centers: IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli (Study Promoter), Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato.

It will include 180 patients aged >18 years hospitalized for MINOCA randomized 1:1 to a "precision medicine approach" consisting of a comprehensive diagnostic work-up, analysis of circulating biomarkers and micro RNA expression profile and pharmacological treatment specific for the underlying cause versus a "standard approach" consisting of routine diagnostic work-up and standard medical treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

Keywords

  • MINOCA
  • coronary spasm
  • OCT
03

In context

MINOCA

29 studies on the registry are indexed under MINOCA; 18 are open to participants now.

Browse MINOCA studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 952 studies on the registry; 541 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ability to give to the study
  • Age > 18y
  • MINOCA diagnosis, defined as:

    • Acute myocardial infarction (based on Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Criteria):
    • Evidence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography (i.e., no coronary artery stenosis >50%) in any major epicardial vessel.
    • No specific alternate diagnosis for the clinical presentation (i.e. non-ischemic causes of myocardial injury such as sepsis, pulmonary embolism, and myocarditis).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or limited capacity to give to the study
  • Age \< 18 y
  • Pregnant and breast-feeding women or patients considering becoming pregnant during the study period will be excluded. For women of , the use of a highly effective measure is required in order to be included in the study. "Highly effective contraceptive" is defined in accordance with the recommendations of the Clinical Trial Facilitation Group as a contraceptive measure with a failure rate of less than 1% per year (https://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01-About_HMA/Working_Groups/CTFG/2020_09_HMA_CTFG_Contraception_guidance_Version_1.1_updated.pdf).
  • Alternate diagnosis for the clinical presentation (i.e. non-ischemic causes of myocardial injury such as sepsis, pulmonary embolism, valve disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and myocarditis). Also patients presenting with Takotsubo syndrome will be excluded.
  • to contrast-enhanced CMR, eg, severe renal dysfunction ( \<30 mL/min), non-CMR-compatible pacemaker or defibrillator.
  • Contraindication to drugs administrated: e.g a history of to drugs administrated or its , significant renal and/or hepatic disease.
  • Patients with comorbidities having an expected survival \<1-year will be excluded.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    "Precision medicine approach"

    Comprehensive diagnostic work-up with: * Coronary angiography and ventriculography in all patients * OCT at the time of coronary angiography in the cath-lab. * Acetylcholine provocative test (to assess the presence of coronary vasospasm) at the time of coronary angiography in the cath-lab. * TE-Echo and/or CE-Echo (if distal/microvascular embolization is suspected) * Blood sampling for circulating biomarkers and miRNA expression profile * Trans-thoracic echocardiography in all patients during the index hospitalization * CMR in all cases during the index hospitalization. Targeted pharmacological treatment specific for the underlying cause: * DAPT ± stent implantation (if required), statins, beta-blockers, ACEi/ARB (in case of evidence of plaque rupture/erosion) * CCB and/or nitrates (in case of documentation of coronary vasospasm) * Anticoagulation (in case of coronary embolism).

    Procedure: Coronary angiography · Diagnostic Test: OCT imaging · Procedure: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): · Diagnostic Test: Acetylcholine provocative test · Diagnostic Test: TT-Echocardiography · Diagnostic Test: TE/contrast echocardiography · Diagnostic Test: Cardiac magnetic resonance · Diagnostic Test: Circulating biomarkers · Drug: Antiplatelet Drug · Drug: Statin · Drug: Beta blocker · Drug: ACEi/ARB · Drug: CCB · Drug: Nitrates · Drug: Anticoagulant

  • Other
    "Standard approach"

    Routine diagnostic work-up with: * Coronary angiography and ventriculography * Transthoracic echocardiography in all patients during the index hospitalization * CMR with contrast media only if clinically indicated (i.e. to exclude myocarditis or takotsubo syndrome) Standard medical treatment with: * DAPT in all patients * Beta-blockers (if indicated by the clinical context, i.e. documentation of left ventricular ejection fraction \<50%, tachycardia). * High intensity statins in all patients * ACEi/ARB (if clinically indicated).

    Procedure: Coronary angiography · Diagnostic Test: TT-Echocardiography · Diagnostic Test: Cardiac magnetic resonance · Drug: Antiplatelet Drug · Drug: Statin · Drug: Beta blocker · Drug: ACEi/ARB

Interventions

  • ProcedureCoronary angiography

    coronary angiography will be performed via the transradial or transfemoral approach with the use of a 6F sheath. Coronary angiography will be performed within 90 minutes from hospital admission in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation, and within 48 hours in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation. Unfractionated heparin (initial weight-adjusted intravenous bolus of 60 IU/Kg, with repeat boluses to achieve an activated clotting time of 250 to 300 seconds) was administered in all patients. If evidence of plaque rupture

  • Diagnostic testOCT imaging

    OCT imaging will be performed in the culprit artery in all patients randomized to the "precision medicine approach". A 0.014-inch guidewire will be placed distally in the target vessel and an intracoronary injection of 200 µg of nitroglycerine will be performed. Frequency domain OCT (FD-OCT) images are acquired by a commercially available system (C7 System, LightLab Imaging Inc/ St Jude Medical, Westford, MA) connected to an OCT catheter (C7 Dragonfly; LightLab Imaging Inc/ St Jude Medical, Westford, MA), which was advanced to the culprit lesion. The FD-OCT run will be performed using the integrated automated pullback device at 20 mm/s. During image acquisition, coronary blood flow will be replaced by continuous flushing of contrast media directly from the guiding catheter at a rate of 4 ml/s with a power injector in order to create a virtually blood-free environment.

  • ProcedurePercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI):

    PCI with stent implantation will be considered in selected cases with evidences of plaque rupture

  • Diagnostic testAcetylcholine provocative test

    ACh will be administered in a stepwise manner into the left coronary artery (LCA) (20-200 μg) or into the right coronary artery (RCA) (20-50 μg) over a period of 3 min with a 2-3 min interval between injections. Coronary angiography will be performed 1 min after each injection of these agents and/or when chest pain and/or ischaemic ECG shifts were observed. The decision of testing with provocative test LCA or RCA as first will be left to the discretion of the physicians; both LCA and RCA will be tested if the first test was negative. Angiographic responses during the provocative test will be assessed in multiple orthogonal views in order to detect the most severe narrowing and/or analysed by using computerized quantitative coronary angiography (QCA-CMS, Version 6.0, Medis-Software, Leiden, The Netherlands).

  • Diagnostic testTT-Echocardiography

    TT-Echo will be used to calculate left and right ventricular and atrial dimensions, left and right ventricular systolic function, transmitral flow Doppler spectra, mitral and tricuspidal valve annulus tissue Doppler spectra, ejection time and stroke volume, inferior vena cava, aorta and pulmonary artery diameters and Doppler spectra, according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography.

  • Diagnostic testTE/contrast echocardiography

    In patients with angiographic evidence or suspicion of distal microembolization, TE-Echo consisting of an echocardiographic probe inserted in to the oesophagus will be used to detect a hidden cardioembolic source (i.e. left atrial thrombus); in patients with suspected left ventricular source of cardioembolism, contrast echocardiography consisting of a 0.3ml solution of SONOVUE will be used.

  • Diagnostic testCardiac magnetic resonance

    CMR will be performed during hospital stay on a 1.5-T system equipped with a 32-channel cardiac coil. Patients underwent conventional CMR including cine, T2-weighted, first pass perfusion, and conventional breath-held late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).

  • Diagnostic testCirculating biomarkers

    Blood sampling for circulating biomarkers and miRNA expression profile at the time or within 12 hours of coronary angiography. Blood sampling will be processed and analysed in the research laboratory of the Department of Cardiovascular Science. Biological aliquots will be preserved at XBiogem Biobank at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome (see section 33).

  • DrugAntiplatelet Drug

    acetylsalicylic acid (loading dose 250mg intravenously followed by 75mg orally) + P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (i.e. Clopidogrel, 300 or 600mg loading dose orally, followed by 75 mg orally daily).

  • DrugStatin

    i.e. atorvastatin; dosages titrated on the patient's clinical characteristics

  • i.e. bisoprolol; dosages titrated on blood pressure, ECG, heart rate

  • DrugACEi/ARB

    Drug pages: ACE inhibitors · Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)

    i.e. ramipril; dosages titrated on blood pressure, ECG, heart rate

  • DrugCCB

    i.e. diltiazem; dosages titrated on blood pressure, ECG, heart rate

  • i.e. nitroglycerine; dosages titrated on blood pressure, ECG, heart rate

  • DrugAnticoagulant

    i.e. warfarin; the selection of the anticoagulant agent will be based on the clinical scenario, contraindications etc

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Angina status

    Angina status will be evaluated using the single-item "angina stability scale" and the two-item "angina frequence scale" of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Scores are calculated by summing items within a dimension and transforming it to a 0-100 scale, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible level of health. \* To reduce the risk of detection and performance bias, a team of 2 cardiologists blinded to group allocation and belonging to an external cardiology unit will submit and collate the questionnaires from study participants.

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

  2. eattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)

    Quality of life will be evaluated using the nine-item scale of "physical limitations scale", the three-item "treatment satisfaction scale" and two-item "disease perception scale" of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Scores are calculated by summing items within a dimension and transforming it to a 0-100 scale, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible level of health. \* To reduce the risk of detection and performance bias, a team of 2 cardiologists blinded to group allocation and belonging to an external cardiology unit will submit and collate the questionnaires from study participants.

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events

    Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of all-cause mortality; re-hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure; repeated coronary angiography) will be evaluated at 1-year follow-up in MINOCA patients.

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

  2. Healthcare primary related-costs

    Healthcare primary related costs will be evaluated as mean costs (including procedures, tests, medicines).

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

  3. Healthcare secondary related-costs

    Healthcare secondary related-costs will be evaluated as mean quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

  4. Healthcare secondary related-costs

    Healthcare secondary related-costs will be evaluated as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as the cost per QALY.

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

  5. Ability of different circulating biomarkers as diagnostic biomarker and stratification tool for specific causes of MINOCA.

    Measurement of cardiac circulating biomarkers: -miRNAs (miR-16, miR-26a, miR-145, miR-222, miR-155-5p, miR-483-5p, miR-45): to measure miRNA reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) will be employed and results will be expressed in relative expression (2-ΔΔCT Method).

    Time frame: during index hospitalization (at the time or within 12 hours of coronary angiography)

  6. Ability of different circulating biomarkers as diagnostic biomarker and stratification tool for specific causes of MINOCA.

    Measurement of cardiac circulating biomarkers: -Endothelin 1: It will be assessed through ELISA immunoassay and results will be expressed in Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL).

    Time frame: during index hospitalization (at the time or within 12 hours of coronary angiography)

  7. Ability of different circulating biomarkers as diagnostic biomarker and stratification tool for specific causes of MINOCA.

    Measurement of cardiac circulating biomarkers: -Neuropeptide Y: It will be assessed through ELISA immunoassay and results will be expressed in Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL).

    Time frame: during index hospitalization (at the time or within 12 hours of coronary angiography)

  8. Ability of different circulating biomarkers as diagnostic biomarker and stratification tool for specific causes of MINOCA.

    Measurement of cardiac circulating biomarkers: -soluble CD40 ligand: It will be assessed through ELISA immunoassay and results will be expressed in Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL).

    Time frame: during index hospitalization (at the time or within 12 hours of coronary angiography)

  9. Ability of CMR in evaluating different mechanisms of MINOCA and their prognostic value through morphological and functional cardiac characterization.

    Morphological cardiac characterization will be assessed by measurement of left and right ventricle volumes (in ml or ml/m2).

    Time frame: from day 3 to day 7 from the acute coronary event

  10. Ability of CMR in evaluating different mechanisms of MINOCA and their prognostic value through morphological and functional cardiac characterization.

    Morphological cardiac characterization will be assessed by measurement of the presence of myocardial edema using T2-weighted sequences and a 17 segments assessment model of cardiac segmentation.

    Time frame: from day 3 to day 7 from the acute coronary event

  11. Ability of CMR in evaluating different mechanisms of MINOCA and their prognostic value through morphological and functional cardiac characterization.

    Morphological cardiac characterization will be assessed by measurement of the presence of defect of perfusion using first pass perfusion sequences and a 17 segments assessment model of cardiac segmentation.

    Time frame: from day 3 to day 7 from the acute coronary event

  12. Ability of CMR in evaluating different mechanisms of MINOCA and their prognostic value through morphological and functional cardiac characterization.

    Morphological cardiac characterization will be assessed by measurement of the presence of fibrosis using late gadolinium enhancement sequences and a 17 segments assessment model of cardiac segmentation (estimated as LGE % of the cardiac segment involved).

    Time frame: from day 3 to day 7 from the acute coronary event

  13. Ability of CMR in evaluating different mechanisms of MINOCA and their prognostic value through morphological and functional cardiac characterization.

    Morphological cardiac characterization will be assessed by measurement of the presence of myocardial infarct size (estimated as grams or % of left ventricular myocardial mass).

    Time frame: from day 3 to day 7 from the acute coronary event

  14. Ability of CMR in evaluating different mechanisms of MINOCA and their prognostic value through morphological and functional cardiac characterization.

    Functional cardiac characterization will be assessed by measurement of right and left ventricles eject fraction (estimated as %).

    Time frame: from day 3 to day 7 from the acute coronary event

  15. Ability of CMR in evaluating different mechanisms of MINOCA and their prognostic value through morphological and functional cardiac characterization.

    Functional cardiac characterization will be assesaed by measurement of regional kinetic abnormalities using a 17 segments assessment model of cardiac segmentation.

    Time frame: from day 3 to day 7 from the acute coronary event

07

Study locations

3 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tamis-Holland JE, Jneid H, Reynolds HR, Agewall S, Brilakis ES, Brown TM, Lerman A, Cushman M, Kumbhani DJ, Arslanian-Engoren C, Bolger AF, Beltrame JF; American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Myocardial Infarction in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019 Apr 30;139(18):e891-e908. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000670. PubMed 30913893 ↗
  • Niccoli G, Scalone G, Crea F. Acute myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis: mechanisms and management. Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 21;36(8):475-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu469. Epub 2014 Dec 18. PubMed 25526726 ↗
  • Del Buono MG, Montone RA, Iannaccone G, Meucci MC, Rinaldi R, D'Amario D, Niccoli G. Diagnostic work-up and therapeutic implications in MINOCA: need for a personalized approach. Future Cardiol. 2021 Jan;17(1):149-154. doi: 10.2217/fca-2020-0052. Epub 2020 Jul 6. PubMed 32628045 ↗
  • Safdar B, Spatz ES, Dreyer RP, Beltrame JF, Lichtman JH, Spertus JA, Reynolds HR, Geda M, Bueno H, Dziura JD, Krumholz HM, D'Onofrio G. Presentation, Clinical Profile, and Prognosis of Young Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): Results From the VIRGO Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 28;7(13):e009174. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009174. PubMed 29954744 ↗
  • Grodzinsky A, Arnold SV, Gosch K, Spertus JA, Foody JM, Beltrame J, Maddox TM, Parashar S, Kosiborod M. Angina Frequency After Acute Myocardial Infarction In Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2015;1(2):92-99. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcv014. Epub 2015 Jul 23. PubMed 28239487 ↗
  • Planer D, Mehran R, Ohman EM, White HD, Newman JD, Xu K, Stone GW. Prognosis of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: propensity-matched analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun;7(3):285-93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000606. Epub 2014 May 20. PubMed 24847016 ↗
  • Jespersen L, Abildstrom SZ, Hvelplund A, Galatius S, Madsen JK, Pedersen F, Hojberg S, Prescott E. Symptoms of angina pectoris increase the probability of disability pension and premature exit from the workforce even in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2013 Nov;34(42):3294-303. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht395. Epub 2013 Sep 26. PubMed 24071763 ↗
  • Montone RA, Niccoli G, Fracassi F, Russo M, Gurgoglione F, Camma G, Lanza GA, Crea F. Patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries: safety and prognostic relevance of invasive coronary provocative tests. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):91-98. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx667. PubMed 29228159 ↗
  • Montone RA, Niccoli G, Russo M, Giaccari M, Del Buono MG, Meucci MC, Gurgoglione F, Vergallo R, D'Amario D, Buffon A, Leone AM, Burzotta F, Aurigemma C, Trani C, Liuzzo G, Lanza GA, Crea F. Clinical, angiographic and echocardiographic correlates of epicardial and microvascular spasm in patients with myocardial ischaemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Apr;109(4):435-443. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01523-w. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Erratum In: Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Apr;112(4):570. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02110-2. PubMed 31270616 ↗
  • Crea F, Niccoli G. Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis: The Need for Precision Medicine. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;12(11 Pt 1):2222-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 17. No abstract available. PubMed 30343094 ↗
  • Pasupathy S, Air T, Dreyer RP, Tavella R, Beltrame JF. Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circulation. 2015 Mar 10;131(10):861-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011201. Epub 2015 Jan 13. Erratum In: Circulation. 2015 May 12;131(19):e475. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000212. PubMed 25587100 ↗
  • Dastidar AG, Baritussio A, De Garate E, Drobni Z, Biglino G, Singhal P, Milano EG, Angelini GD, Dorman S, Strange J, Johnson T, Bucciarelli-Ducci C. Prognostic Role of CMR and Conventional Risk Factors in Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructed Coronary Arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Oct;12(10):1973-1982. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Feb 13. PubMed 30772224 ↗
  • Lindahl B, Baron T, Erlinge D, Hadziosmanovic N, Nordenskjold A, Gard A, Jernberg T. Medical Therapy for Secondary Prevention and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2017 Apr 18;135(16):1481-1489. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026336. Epub 2017 Feb 8. PubMed 28179398 ↗
  • Ford TJ, Stanley B, Good R, Rocchiccioli P, McEntegart M, Watkins S, Eteiba H, Shaukat A, Lindsay M, Robertson K, Hood S, McGeoch R, McDade R, Yii E, Sidik N, McCartney P, Corcoran D, Collison D, Rush C, McConnachie A, Touyz RM, Oldroyd KG, Berry C. Stratified Medical Therapy Using Invasive Coronary Function Testing in Angina: The CorMicA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 11;72(23 Pt A):2841-2855. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 25. PubMed 30266608 ↗
  • Ford TJ, Stanley B, Sidik N, Good R, Rocchiccioli P, McEntegart M, Watkins S, Eteiba H, Shaukat A, Lindsay M, Robertson K, Hood S, McGeoch R, McDade R, Yii E, McCartney P, Corcoran D, Collison D, Rush C, Sattar N, McConnachie A, Touyz RM, Oldroyd KG, Berry C. 1-Year Outcomes of Angina Management Guided by Invasive Coronary Function Testing (CorMicA). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 13;13(1):33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 11. PubMed 31709984 ↗
  • Rosano GMC, Tousoulis D, McFadden E, Clarke J, Davies GJ, Kaski JC. Effects of neuropeptide Y on coronary artery vasomotion in patients with microvascular angina. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;238:123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 16. PubMed 28476516 ↗
  • Toyo-oka T, Aizawa T, Suzuki N, Hirata Y, Miyauchi T, Shin WS, Yanagisawa M, Masaki T, Sugimoto T. Increased plasma level of endothelin-1 and coronary spasm induction in patients with vasospastic angina pectoris. Circulation. 1991 Feb;83(2):476-83. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.2.476. PubMed 1825037 ↗
  • Fong SW, Few LL, See Too WC, Khoo BY, Nik Ibrahim NN, Yahaya SA, Yusof Z, Mohd Ali R, Abdul Rahman AR, Yvonne-Tee GB. Systemic and coronary levels of CRP, MPO, sCD40L and PlGF in patients with coronary artery disease. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 14;8:679. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1677-8. PubMed 26576922 ↗
  • Jaguszewski M, Osipova J, Ghadri JR, Napp LC, Widera C, Franke J, Fijalkowski M, Nowak R, Fijalkowska M, Volkmann I, Katus HA, Wollert KC, Bauersachs J, Erne P, Luscher TF, Thum T, Templin C. A signature of circulating microRNAs differentiates takotsubo cardiomyopathy from acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2014 Apr;35(15):999-1006. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht392. Epub 2013 Sep 17. PubMed 24046434 ↗
  • Li S, Lee C, Song J, Lu C, Liu J, Cui Y, Liang H, Cao C, Zhang F, Chen H. Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for coronary plaque rupture. Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 18;8(29):48145-48156. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18308. PubMed 28624816 ↗
  • Montone RA, Cosentino N, Graziani F, Gorla R, Del Buono MG, La Vecchia G, Rinaldi R, Marenzi G, Bartorelli AL, De Marco F, Testa L, Bedogni F, Trani C, Liuzzo G, Niccoli G, Crea F. Precision medicine versus standard of care for patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): rationale and design of the multicentre, randomised PROMISE trial. EuroIntervention. 2022 Dec 2;18(11):e933-e939. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00178. PubMed 35734824 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05122780
Collaborators
Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
Responsible party
MONTONE ROCCO ANTONIO (Principal Investigator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 17, 2021
Start date
Jul 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 26, 2024

Study contacts

Nicola Cosentino, MD
principal investigator · Centro Cardiologico Monzino
Riccardo Gorla, MD
principal investigator · IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Nitrates

Start the discussion