ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05029726Updated Feb 17, 2026

Regional Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 Injectable Solution plus clonidine and normal saline in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, sponsored by John O'Toole. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-17.

Sponsored by John O'Toole · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2022; still recruiting 4 years 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Opioid overuse is a widespread public health crisis in the United States with increasing rates of addiction and overdose deaths from prescription opioids. Reducing the need for opiate analgesics in the post-operative setting has become a high priority in minimizing long-term opioid use in surgical patients. This study will serve to demonstrate the efficacy of the addition of regional analgesic techniques in reducing post-operative opioid requirements in patients undergoing common lumbar spinal surgical procedures.

Read the detailed description

Opioid abuse and misuse remain a public health crisis in the United States, notably in patients with chronic pain from degenerative spine disease. Perioperative pain management for patients undergoing spinal surgery remains largely reliant on opioid medications, with several known adverse effects including, but not limited to delirium, postoperative urinary retention (POUR), constipation and nausea. These side effects contribute to increased hospital length of stay (LOS) with increased incidence of overall in-hospital complications, perioperative costs, and increased rates of opioid habituation and addiction.

Dependence on prescription opioids has been associated with wide-ranging social and economic consequences including increased opioid overdose resulting in death, growing opioid-related incarcerations, and spiraling opioid-related healthcare cost from treatment of addiction, opioid-related mental health issues, and debilitating chronic pain. Long-term requirements for opioid medications may be associated with the use of higher doses of opioids in the perioperative period for patients undergoing invasive surgery for spinal degenerative conditions. Studies have demonstrated that patients who consume fewer opioids for 30 days after surgery are less likely to progress to become chronic opioid users. Regional analgesic techniques have shown promise in decreasing post-operative pain and opioid requirements in thoracic and abdominal surgery but difficulties with post-operative neurological assessments have limited their use in spinal surgery. Inter-fascial plane blocks, however, have emerged as a safe and potentially useful regional analgesic technique to mitigate the pain-inducing effects of posterior spine surgery.

Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (ESPBs), specifically, involve ultra-sound guided injection of local anesthetic (LA) posteriorly beneath the erector spinae muscles resulting in longitudinal and ventrolateral spread of the anesthetic into the paravertebral space where the ventral and dorsal rami of the spinal nerves are located thereby inducing a multi-level analgesic effect. Depending upon the LA used, this effect may last for 4 to 36 hours.

The proposed study will examine the efficacy of preoperative ESPBs in reducing post-operative opioid utilization and its associated complications specifically after minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar spine surgery including both decompressive and instrumented fusion procedures. The guiding principle of MIS spine surgery is reduction of iatrogenic injury by utilizing muscle dilating approaches and tubular retractors rather than conventional open, subperiosteal muscle stripping techniques. The latter typically results in muscle denervation and devascularization as well as postoperative muscle atrophy and dead space creation that increase postoperative pain, muscle dysfunction, prolonged recovery times and complications. Since MIS spinal surgical procedures preserve normal paraspinal musculature compared to open surgery, the magnitude of effect of ESPBs may actually be more pronounced in this population.

The investigators hypothesize that by conducting this investigation within the rigor of a double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, the results will definitively demonstrate that the addition of regional analgesia in the form of ESPB during MIS lumbar spine surgery will 1) reduce post-operative opioid consumption and 2) reduce opioid-related complications and hospital LOS but 3) have no adverse effects on postoperative pain control.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
  • Lumbar Disc Herniation
  • Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
  • Lumbar Spondylosis
  • Lumbar Radiculopathy
  • Lumbar Spine Instability
  • Synovial Cyst
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
  • Degenerative Intervertebral Discs

Keywords

  • erector spinae plane block
  • minimally invasive spine surgery
  • regional anesthesia
  • randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Spinal Stenosis

458 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Stenosis; 105 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 125 is above the median of 80 across 281 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Stenosis.

Browse Spinal Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with John O'Toole as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-80
  • Undergoing one of 3 procedure types: 1) 2 or more levels of MIS decompression (e.g., discectomy, foraminotomy, laminectomy); 2) 1-3 levels of MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (with or without additional levels of MIS decompression for no greater than 3 total operative levels); 3) 1-3 levels of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or MIS lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) accompanied by posterior percutaneous instrumentation at the same levels
  • Willing and able to give consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opioid tolerant at the time of the surgical procedure--defined as consuming greater than 30mg of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) daily (https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/prescribing/guideline.html)
  • Presence of an indwelling pain device (e.g., intrathecal opioid pump, spinal cord stimulator, dorsal root ganglion stimulator)
  • Known allergy to bupivacaine, clonidine or similar local anesthetics
  • Indication for surgery other than degenerative disease (e.g., neoplasm, infection, trauma)
  • Chronic kidney disease (stage 3 or greater), or hepatic failure
  • Active pregnancy
  • Disease process or mental illness that would preclude accurate evaluation of pain in the perioperative period
  • Active Worker's Compensation litigation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
125 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Investigational

    Patients will undergo regional ESPB with bupivacaine plus clonidine in the holding area of the OR immediately prior to surgery. 30mL of 0.25% bupivacaine/1:200,000 epinephrine/50mcg clonidine will be administered bilaterally (total 60ml) to the lumbar paraspinal erector spine plane using ultrasound-guidance.

    Drug: Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 Injectable Solution plus clonidine

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    Patients will receive a placebo injection of normal saline via the same ESPB technique. 30ml of normal saline will be administered bilaterally (total 60ml) to the lumbar paraspinal erector spine plane using ultrasound-guidance.

    Drug: normal saline

Interventions

  • DrugBupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 Injectable Solution plus clonidine

    Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 plus clonidine 50 micrograms in 30cc syringes administered as ESPB

  • Drugnormal saline

    normal saline in 30cc syringes administered using ESPB technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Inpatient opioid consumption

    Mean per day inpatient opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MME)

    Time frame: Every 1 day during inpatient admission up to 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-discharge opioid consumption

    Total and per day mean postoperative opioid consumption after hospital discharge in MME as recorded in medication diary by patients

    Time frame: 14 days (+/- 7days) ,56 days (+/- 14 days) and 90 days (+/- 19) postoperatively

  2. Postoperative opioid prescriptions filled

    • Total MMEs of opioid prescriptions filled as found on the Illinois Prescription Monitoring Program website

    Time frame: From hospital discharge to 90 days postoperatively

  3. Length of hospital stay

    Duration of hospital stay postoperatively measured in days as determined by the time at which each patient met discharge criteria

    Time frame: From time of surgery to time discharge criteria met in hours, up to 2160 hours

  4. Postoperative Urinary Retention (POUR)

    Incidence of POUR measured as proportion of inpatient hospital days demonstrating the need for straight catheterization or foley placement

    Time frame: Immediately post-surgery to discharge, up to 90 days

  5. Post-operative delirium

    Incidence of post-operative delirium as measured by the need for placement of physical restraints

    Time frame: Immediately post-surgery to discharge

  6. Post-operative delirium

    Incidence of post-operative delirium as measured by the administration of new anti-psychotic medications

    Time frame: Immediately post-surgery to discharge, up to 90 days

  7. Postoperative pain scores

    Mean daily VAS (visual analog scale) pain scores recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR)

    Time frame: Every 1 day during inpatient admission up to 30 days

  8. Patient-reported pain and functional outcomes

    Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain in the back and leg (0-10 with 10 being worst)

    Time frame: From baseline preoperative values to 6 week post-operative values

  9. Patient-reported pain and functional outcomes

    Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; 0 to 100 with 100 being worst)

    Time frame: From baseline preoperative values to 6 week post-operative values

  10. Patient-reported pain and functional outcomes

    Change in Short Form 12/6D (SF-12/6D; 0 to 100 with 0 being worst)

    Time frame: From baseline preoperative values to 6 week post-operative values

  11. Peri-operative complications

    Prospectively documented medical and surgical complications/adverse events (AEs) including rates of readmission or reoperation for AEs

    Time frame: Time of surgery to 6 weeks postoperative

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chin KJ, Lewis S. Opioid-free Analgesia for Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Blocks in a Multimodal Anesthetic Regimen. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):E379-E383. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002855. PubMed 30180150 ↗
  • Chin KJ, Dinsmore MJ, Lewis S, Chan V. Opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia with bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a case report of two patients. Eur Spine J. 2020 Dec;29(Suppl 2):138-144. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06133-8. Epub 2019 Sep 3. PubMed 31482311 ↗
  • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. PubMed 27501016 ↗
  • Melvin JP, Schrot RJ, Chu GM, Chin KJ. Low thoracic erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgery: a case series. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Sep;65(9):1057-1065. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1145-8. Epub 2018 Apr 27. PubMed 29704223 ↗
  • Singh S, Choudhary NK, Lalin D, Verma VK. Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;32(4):330-334. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000603. PubMed 31033625 ↗
  • Ueshima H, Inagaki M, Toyone T, Otake H. Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study. Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):254-257. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0114. Epub 2018 Nov 15. PubMed 30424594 ↗
  • van den Broek RJC, van de Geer R, Schepel NC, Liu WY, Bouwman RA, Versyck B. Evaluation of adding the Erector spinae plane block to standard anesthetic care in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 7;11(1):7631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87374-w. PubMed 33828209 ↗
  • Armaghani SJ, Lee DS, Bible JE, Archer KR, Shau DN, Kay H, Zhang C, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ. Preoperative opioid use and its association with perioperative opioid demand and postoperative opioid independence in patients undergoing spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 1;39(25):E1524-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000622. PubMed 25417827 ↗
  • Kalakoti P, Hendrickson NR, Bedard NA, Pugely AJ. Opioid Utilization Following Lumbar Arthrodesis: Trends and Factors Associated With Long-term Use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Sep 1;43(17):1208-1216. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002734. PubMed 30045343 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05029726
Lead sponsor
John O'Toole
Responsible party
John O'Toole (Professor of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 31, 2021
Start date
Feb 1, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 17, 2026

Study contacts

Bart Jacher
Contact
bartosz_jacher@rush.edu
(888) 352-7874
Morgan Mulcahy
Contact
morgan_l_mulcahy@rush.edu
(888) 352-7874
John O'Toole, MD
principal investigator · Rush University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion