CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05015829DALLASUpdated Aug 20, 2021

Diagnostic Impact of Low-dose Dobutamine Echocardiography in Low-flow Low-gradient Aortic Stenosis

An observational study in Aortic Valve Stenosis, Valvular Stenosis and Valvular Heart Disease, sponsored by Odense University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-20.

Sponsored by Odense University Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

When aortic valve-area is \<1.0cm2 and transvalvular mean-gradient is >40mmHg, the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis (AS) is straightforward. However, some patients present with an apparently reduced valve-area, despite transvalvular-gradient \<40mmHg; Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG AS). When a patient with LFLG AS also presents with LVEF \<50%, guidelines recommends performing a Low-Dose Dobutamine-echocardiography (LDDE) to confirm true-severe AS. However, nearly 30% of patients with LFLG AS do not show an adequate respond to Dobutamine. More commonly, patients present with the combination of LFLG AS, despite LVEF≥50%. In this group of patients the use of LDDE remains undisclosed.

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and diagnostic usefulness of LDDE in patients with LFLG AS with LVEF≥50%. Furthermore we will examine factors associated with inadequate response to LDDE.

150 symptomatic and/or asymptomatic patients with LFLG and LVEF≥50% and a control group with LVEF\<50% will be enrolled at the Department of Cardiology, OUH. Patients will undergo clinical evaluation including LDDE, blood analyses, CT-scan and cardiac Mri.

Only a limited number of studies examine the possible use of LDDE in patients with LFLG AS and LVEF≥50% and no study has been performed documenting the safety and feasibility.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Valvular Stenosis
  • Valvular Heart Disease
03

In context

Heart Diseases

3,639 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Diseases; 461 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is below the median of 294 across 1,241 observational studies indexed under Heart Diseases.

Browse Heart Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Odense University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 468 studies on the registry; 109 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with LFLG AS followed at the Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital will be offered participation in the study.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Low-flow (SVi\<35 ml/m2) low-gradient (mean gradient \<40 mmHg) AS with estimated AVA\<1.0 cm2 referred to the Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital.
  2. Age > 18 years.
  3. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other moderate-severe valvular heart disease.
  2. Unwilling to participate in the study.
  3. Poor echocardiographic window.
  4. Inability to follow-up due to temporary citizenship Registration Number (CPR-Number) or emigration within the study period.
  5. Pregnant women.
  6. Patients with severe chronic renal failure (eGFR\<40 ml/min) will not undergo cardiac MRi or CT angiography.
  7. Known contrast allergy.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Classical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis

    LVEF\<50% SVi \< 35.0 mL/m2 Aortic mean gradient \< 40 mmHg AVA \< 1.0 cm2.

    Diagnostic Test: Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

  • Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis

    LVEF\>50% SVi \< 35.0 mL/m2 Aortic mean gradient \< 40 mmHg AVA \< 1.0 cm2.

    Diagnostic Test: Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDobutamine Stress Echocardiography

    Change in echocardiographic 2D and doppler measurements during infusion with Dobutamine 5 µg/kg/min till max dosage of 20 µg/kg/min.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse effects during Dobutamine infusion

    1. The occurrence of angina pectoris, severely high systolic blood pressure \>200 mmHg or ventricular premature beats Lown Grade \>3 or supra-ventricular arrhythmias or tachycardia assessed by ECG. 2. Occurrence of signs of echocardiographic subvalvular obstruction; (systolic anterior motion of the mitral leaflet (SAM), high velocities (\>2 m/sec) in the LV outflow tract and late peaking systolic jet).

    Time frame: Dobutamine infusion, up to 30 minutes

  2. Factors associated with flow-reserve

    a) Gender (male/female).

    Time frame: Dobutamine infusion, up to 30 minutes

  3. Factors associated with flow-reserve

    b) Aortic valve calcification assessed by cardiac CT (AU).

    Time frame: Dobutamine infusion, up to 30 minutes

  4. Factors associated with flow-reserve

    c) Myocardial fibrosis assessed by MRi (%).

    Time frame: Dobutamine infusion, up to 30 minutes

  5. Factors associated with flow-reserve

    d) Baseline myocardial systolic and diastolic function estimated by echocardiography (Global Longitudinal Strain (%), Strain Ratesystolic (SRs), deceleration time of mitral E-wave (ms) and end-systolic wall-stress corrected LVEF (dynes).

    Time frame: Dobutamine infusion, up to 30 minutes

  6. Factors associated with flow-reserve

    e) The ongoing use of beta-blockers (%, dosis).

    Time frame: Dobutamine infusion, up to 30 minutes

  7. Factors associated with flow-reserve

    f) Association with outcomes (rate of AVR, hospitalization for cardiac failure, death).

    Time frame: Dobutamine infusion, up to 30 minutes

  8. The ability of LDDE to predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

    Rate of AVR

    Time frame: 1 day til 3 years

  9. The ability of LDDE to predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

    Hospitalization for cardiac failure

    Time frame: 1 day til 3 years

  10. The ability of LDDE to predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

    All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 1 day til 3 years

  11. The ability of LDDE to predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

    Cardiovascular mortality

    Time frame: 1 day til 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05015829
Lead sponsor
Odense University Hospital
Collaborators
University of Southern Denmark, Region of Southern Denmark
Responsible party
Nils Sofus Borg Mogensen (Doctor, Odense University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2021

Study contacts

Nils Mogensen, MD
Contact
nils.sofus.borg.mogensen@rsyd.dk
61286371 ext. +45

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion