ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07646977Updated Sep 2, 2026

CORonary Thrombus Modification to Prevent MIcrovascular Damage in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (The CORMI Trial)

An interventional study of Coronary thrombus modification and Standard stent implantation in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, sponsored by Odense University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-02.

Sponsored by Odense University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 38 studies in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction with a site in Denmark — 4 open to participants now, 9 under way, 1 of them phase 3. ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction · Denmark.

Planned enrollment
23rd of 34
100 · median 171
Started
2026
with 1 other
No phase
17 of 38
3 open now
Registered
38th of 38
by date
Lead sponsor
4 of 38
Odense University Hospital

Among the 38 studies in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction with a site in Denmark, this one is the 23rd largest by planned enrollment of the 34 interventional ones, is one of 2 that started in 2026, is one of 17 with no phase, and was the 38th registered.

By phase

38 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study17 · 3 open
Phase 25 · 0 open
Phase 35 · 1 open
Phase 45 · 0 open
Observational4 · 0 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2003; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 171 across the 34 interventional studies, 164 across the 4 observational. Of the 23 that completed or were terminated, 5 (22%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 38 studies in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction with a site in Denmark, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of coronary thrombus modification on preventing the microvascular damage associated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to limit the associated myocardial damage assessed by myocardial salvage index after 3 months. Furthermore, the project will evaluate coronary microvascular damage assessed invasively using both continuous and bolus thermodilution before and after stent implantation. In addition, the project will evaluate the diagnostic ability and associations of pre-stenting invasive physiological measurement to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements.

Read the detailed description

Background: ST-elevation segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) most often occurs when an atherosclerotic plaque ruptures, causing blockage of the epicardial coronary artery leading to transmural ischemia of the myocardium. Due to ongoing ischemia, rapid restoration of blood flow with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is vital to prevent further damage to the myocardium.

However, reopening of the coronary artery is by itself associated with damage to the myocardium, known as reperfusion injury. Reperfusion injury is a complex phenomenon mediated by several factors caused by the rapid restoration of blood flow. Oxidative stress, accumulation of intracellular calcium, rapid restoration of pH, and induction of inflammation are some of the underlying biological mechanisms.

Furthermore, the primary PCI procedure can cause distal embolization of the thrombus causing microvascular damage. In STEMI, coronary microcirculation plays a crucial role in myocardial reperfusion and recovery and cannot be visualizable by coronary angiography (CAG). The coronary microvascular dysfunction associated with primary PCI may lead to impaired myocardial reperfusion and worse outcomes. The increased microvascular damage occurs in part due to distal embolization of the thrombus and due to reperfusion injury to the ischemic area.

Coronary thrombus modification might lessen the distal embolization of the thrombus, by less abrupt changes to the thrombus, potentially reducing the damage associated with primary PCI with stent implantation. Ischemic post-conditioning is a coronary thrombus modification that has been introduced to alleviate the injury associated with reperfusion in patients with occluded coronary vessels. Ischemic post-conditioning can be achieved by briefly and repetitively blocking the culprit artery with a balloon inflated at a nominal size before completely reestablishing blood flow to the infarcted artery. The coronary thrombus modification achieved by ischemic post-conditioning could potentially lessen the distal embolization associated with primary PCI also in patient with partially reopened vessels by more slowly modifying the thrombus, and conditioning the damaged microcirculation to better tolerate ischemic damage if distal embolization occurs.

Using the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and the novel microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) microvascular damage and dysfunction can be assessed invasively during primary PCI. Both MRR and IMR can be measured using the thermodilution method, which can be obtained either using continuous (only MRR) or bolus saline injection (MRR and IMR). Continuous thermodilution is obtained using the hyperemic effects of continuous infusion for saline, with minimal influence on hemodynamics, and have previously shown great reproducibility. Meanwhile, bolus thermodilution requires drug-induced hyperemia, usually obtained using intravenous adenosine, without the need for a specialized infusion catheter.

While coronary microvascular dysfunction in the setting of STEMI is an important predictor of clinical outcomes, most of the evidence is related to post-procedure measurements, which limits its ability in guiding treatment during the procedure. The data on pre-stenting measurements of microvascular damage is limited but could potentially serve as a tool in guiding treatment in future trials and more knowledge on the relationship of pre-stenting measurements and CMR outcomes is highly needed.

Even with rapid revascularization during STEMI, damage to the myocardium still occurs. The golden standard for assessing the degree of damage is cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The amount of myocardium perfused by the culprit vessels influences the degree of potentially salvageable myocardium by intervention, and the effects of treatment in patients with STEMI are usually evaluated by the amount of myocardium saved, called the myocardial salvage index (MSI), where lower MSI are associated with adverse outcomes following STEMI.

Methods: The study is a single-center randomized clinical trial in patients with STEMI referred for primary PCI. Patients will undergo physiological evaluation, with continuous and bolus thermodilution, after coronary flow has been achieved and prior to a 1:1 randomization between coronary thrombus modification or standard stent implantation. All patients will undergo PCI with stent implantation. At the end of the procedure, patients will undergo a repeat physiological evaluation with pressure and flow measurements, using both continuous and bolus thermodilution. Afterwards, the patients will undergo a CMR before discharge and within 7 days. Finally, CMR and invasive physiological evaluation will be repeated 3 months after the index procedure.

Using the electronic patient journal, clinical follow-up will be conducted in all included patients. Only information regarding death, myocardial infarction, any new revascularization and hospitalization for new or worsening heart failure will be collected. Clinical follow-up using the electronic patient journal will be conducted after 12 months, 24 months, and five years.

Statistics and sample size: Data is expected to be normally distributed, but normality will be tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test or the Shapiro-Wilk test. Categorical data will be presented as numbers and frequencies, while Continuous data will be presented as means with standard deviations. Data will be compared using the Student´s t-test for continuous data, and Chi2-test for categorical data. When not normally distributed, data will be presented as medians with 25th and 75th quartile and compared using non-parametric tests. Associations will be evaluated using linear regression when data is continuous and using logarithmic regression when categorical. All analysis will be conducted as intention-to-treat.

An IMR ≥ 40, MRR ≤ 3, R(micro) > 500 CFR \< 2, pre-stenting FFR ≤ 0.80 and post-stenting FFR \< 0.90 will be considered abnormal. The optimal cut-off value of MRR and Rmicro is yet to be determined, why additional analysis will be conducted with an abnormal definition of MRR ≤ 2.5, R(micro) > 1000, and using the median of both values.

For the estimated sample size, data was based on the literature, where a previous study (Lønborg et. al. Ref number 1) found an IS/AAR of 51% ± 16 after ischemic post-conditioning and 63% ± 16 in the control group after 3 months. That study only enrolled patients with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0-1 in the infarct related coronary artery.

As enrollment in the present study is not limited to TIMI 0-1 and MSI = 1-IS/AAR (and linear transformation preserves the SD), we estimated a MSI of 37% ± 16 in the control group and 47% ± 16 in the coronary thrombus modification group. With a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, 80% power, and a two-sample t-test, 42 patients are required in each group (84 total) to detect a statistically significant difference. To account for an anticipated loss to follow-up of 15%, a total of 100 patients is required.

03

Conditions studied

  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Keywords

  • Microvascular damage
  • Continuous thermodilution
  • Bolus thermodilution
  • Myocardial damage
  • Cardiac MRI
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ST-elevation at the J-junction in a minimum of two contiguous leads with a minimum of ≥ 0.1 mV in all leads, except for V2 and V3 (which required ≥ 0.2 for men ≥ 40 years old, ≥ 0.25 in men \< 40 years old, or ≥ 0.15 mV for all women) or new left bundle branch
  • Admission to hospital within 12 hours of symptom debut
  • Angiographic signs of a culprit lesion planned to be treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years or inability to provide
  • of \< 12 months
  • Hemodynamically instability
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Known asthma or severe
  • Expected inability to perform physiological measurements (due to severely tortuous arteries, ostial disease or very distal disease),
  • CMR (estimated \< 30 mL/min, magnetic or mechanically activated implants, or any prior metal implants, severe claustrophobia)
  • Expected to or unavoidable to use thrombectomy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Coronary thrombus modification

    Procedure: Coronary thrombus modification

  • Active comparator
    Standard stent implantation

    Procedure: Standard stent implantation

Interventions

  • ProcedureCoronary thrombus modification

    Inflation of a short balloon not larger than the vessel size for 30 seconds following deflation for 30 seconds repeated a total of 4 times. Thereafter, patients will undergo standard stent implantation as per operator decision.

  • ProcedureStandard stent implantation

    Predilation before stent implantation will follow normal clinical guidelines, and to the discretion of the operator. patients will undergo standard stent implantation as per operator decision.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Myocardial salvage index

    Calculated as the ratio of undamaged myocardium at 3 months to the area-at-risk ((Area-at-risk - final infarct size)/Area-at-risk)

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. CMR metrics of myocardial damage

    Infarct size measured on CMR. Both the individual values and the change will be assessed.

    Time frame: within 7 days and after 3 months

  2. Left ventricular volumes by CMR

    Left ventricular volumes measured by CMR. Both the individual values and the change between will be assessed.

    Time frame: within 7 days after index procedure and after 3 months

  3. LVEF measured by CMR

    Left ventricular ejection fraction measured by CMR. Both the individual values and the change between will be assessed.

    Time frame: within 7 days of index procedure and after 3 months

  4. MVO measured by CMR

    Microvascular obstruction measured by CMR. Both the individual values and the change between will be assessed.

    Time frame: within 7 days and after 3 months

  5. IMH measured by CMR

    Intramyocardial hemorrhage measured by CMR. Both the individual values and the change between will be assessed.

    Time frame: within 7 days and after 3 months

  6. Rmicro

    Absolute microvascular resistance measured by continuous thermodilution. Both the individual values and the change between will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-stenting, post-PCI and after 3 months

  7. IMR

    Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) measured by continuous thermodilution. Both the individual values and the change between will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-stenting, post-PCI and after 3 months

  8. MRR (cont)

    Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) measured by continuous thermodilution. Both the individual values and the change between will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-stenting, post-PCI and after 3 months

  9. MRR (bolus)

    Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) measured by bolus thermodilution. Both the individual values and the change between will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-stenting, post-PCI and after 3 months

  10. Angiography-based microvascular assessment

    Contemporary angiography-based microvascular assessment compared to wire-based microvascular function

    Time frame: Post-PCI and 3-month

  11. ST-segment resolution

    Measured in the lead with the maximal elevation and as the sum

    Time frame: 90 minutes after blood flow is established

  12. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Combined endpoint of the rates of death, myocardial infarction, any new revascularization, hospitaization for new or worsening heart failure based on electronic patient journals

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 year and 5 years

  13. Death

    Rates of death based on electronic patient journals

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 year and 5 years

  14. Myocardial infarction

    Rates of myocardial infarction based on electronic patient journals

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 year and 5 years

  15. Revascularization

    Rates of any new revascularization based on electronic patient journals

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 year and 5 years

  16. Heart failure hospitalization

    Rates of hospitaization for new or worsening heart failure based on electronic patient journals

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 year and 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lonborg J, Kelbaek H, Vejlstrup N, Jorgensen E, Helqvist S, Saunamaki K, Clemmensen P, Holmvang L, Treiman M, Jensen JS, Engstrom T. Cardioprotective effects of ischemic postconditioning in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, evaluated by magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb 1;3(1):34-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.905521. Epub 2010 Jan 26. PubMed 20118154 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD used in the results publication

Access criteria: Upon reasonable request

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2029, 32 months after the start.

Of 134 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 64. This study's planned 32 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 143 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 64.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 8, 2026
First posted
Jun 15, 2026
StartActual
Jul 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2029
CompletionEst.
Jan 2034
Last update
Sep 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07646977
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 15, 2026
Start date
Jul 13, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion