ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04964492VASOKITUpdated Jun 12, 2026

Assessment of the Hemodynamic Effect of Hydroxocabalamin in Refractory Vasodilatory Shock

An observational study in Vasoplegia, Hemodynamics and Intensive Care Unit, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-12.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
18
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Through clinical cases or retrospective work with small sample size, some authors have observed an improvement in hemodynamic parameters, with a reduction or even withdrawal of norepinephrine after administration of a single dose of hydroxocobolamin (HCB) in refractory vasoplegic shock (cardiac surgery, liver transplantation and septic shock).

HCB produces beneficial alterations in NO metabolism and may be suitable in vasoplegic syndrome. In addition, HCB seems to be involved in the elimination of hydrogen sulfide which also has an endogenous vasodilator function in the vascular endothelium. By these different actions it would cause vasoconstriction in vascular smooth muscle cells. Previous reports demonstrate that HCB was useful for refractory vasoplegic syndrome.

The investigators will conduct a retrospective data collection of patients who was given intravenous HCB for refractory vasoplegic shock since January 2019.

Read the detailed description

Vasoplegic shock is defined by arterial hypotension, a high cardiac output with a normal or high cardiac index, collapsed systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and high dose of norepinephrine in the absence of hypovolaemia. The drop in secondary organ perfusion pressure ultimately leads to multiple organ failure and death.

Through clinical cases or retrospective work with small sample size, some authors have observed an improvement in hemodynamic parameters, with a reduction or even withdrawal of norepinephrine after administration of a single dose of hydroxocobolamin (HCB) in refractory vasoplegic shock (cardiac surgery, liver transplantation and septic shock).

HCB produces beneficial alterations in NO metabolism and may be suitable in vasoplegic syndrome. In addition, HCB seems to be involved in the elimination of hydrogen sulfide which also has an endogenous vasodilator function in the vascular endothelium. By these different actions it would cause vasoconstriction in vascular smooth muscle cells. Previous reports demonstrate that HCB was useful for refractory vasoplegic syndrome.

The investigators will conduct a retrospective data collection of patients who was given intravenous HCB for refractory vasoplegic shock since January 2019.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vasoplegia
  • Hemodynamics
  • Intensive Care Unit
  • Shock

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • vasoplegia
  • hydroxocobalamin
  • hemodynamics
  • intensive care unit
  • shock
03

In context

Vasoplegia

48 studies on the registry are indexed under Vasoplegia; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 200 across 19 observational studies indexed under Vasoplegia.

Browse Vasoplegia studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens is the lead sponsor of 586 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All SVR (systemic vascular resistance) patients over 18 years of age who had received a dose of HCB since January 1 2019 will be included. Patients who received treatment for another indication were not included.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All SVR patients over 18 years of age who had received a dose of HCB since January 1 2019 will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who received treatment for another indication were not included.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • responders to treatment

    A patient will be defined as a responder to hydroxocobolamin infusion if there is an increase of more than 20% in Average blood pressure, relative to the pre-treatment value, for at least 15 minutes within one hour of treatment administration.

  • non-responders to treatment

    A patient will be defined as a non-responder to hydroxocobolamin infusion if there is not an increase of more than 20% in Average blood pressure, relative to the pre-treatment value, for at least 15 minutes within one hour of treatment administration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients responding to treatment with HCB

    A patient will be defined as a responder to hydroxocobalamin infusion if there is an increase of more than 20% in average blood pressure, relative to the pre-treatment value, for at least 15 minutes within one hour of treatment administration.

    Time frame: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. The change in average blood pressure over time in responder patients

    Blood pressure is measured in units of millimeters of mercury (mmHg).

    Time frame: one hour

  2. The change in average blood pressure over time in non-responder patients

    Blood pressure is measured in units of millimeters of mercury (mmHg).

    Time frame: one hour

  3. The change in doses of NAd (mg/h) in responder patients

    Time frame: one hour

  4. The change in doses of NAd (mg/h) in non-responder patients

    Time frame: one hour

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Amiens-Picardie
    Amiens, 80054, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2020 to primary completion in Jan 2021, 11 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 13, 2021
First posted
Jul 16, 2021
StartActual
Jan 15, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jan 8, 2021
CompletionActual
Jan 8, 2021
Last update
Jun 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04964492
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 16, 2021
Start date
Jan 15, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 8, 2021
Completion
Jan 8, 2021
Last update
Jun 12, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion