ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04862273CMR for CAUpdated Apr 13, 2026

CMR T1 Mapping for Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis

An observational study in Heart Failure NYHA Class II, Heart Failure NYHA Class III and Heart Failure NYHA Class IV, sponsored by University of Leipzig. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by University of Leipzig · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
112
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to test the diagnostic accuracy of T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis prospectively. The hypothesis is that T1 mapping in older patients with symptomatic heart failure, increased LV wall thickness and elevated cardiac biomarkers is non-inferior to the reference method to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis (CA).

As secondary measure, a web-based ATTR probability estimator for the diagnosis of CA will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an important differential diagnosis in older patients with symptomatic heart failure with preserved or mid-range ejection fraction and increased left ventricular wall thickness. The prevalence of CA among patients with heart failure and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is approximately 13%. However, diagnosis of CA is challenging because specific clinical signs are often lacking.

Amyloid fibrils deposit in the extracellular space of the myocardium increases myocardial T1 values on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Therefore, T1 imaging provides a promising non-invasive method to identify CA.

A preliminary retrospective analysis of 128 patients with increased LV wall thickness identified an area under the curve of 0.9954 (p\<0.0001) for native T1 to detect CA. The optimal cut-off value was 1341ms, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97%.

The investigators aim to test the diagnostic accuracy of T1 mapping for the diagnosis of CA compared to the reference method prospectively. Moreover, the web-based ATTR probability estimator for the diagnosis of CA will be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure NYHA Class II
  • Heart Failure NYHA Class III
  • Heart Failure NYHA Class IV
  • Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
  • Heart Failure With Mid Range Ejection Fraction
  • Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular
  • Cardiac Amyloidosis
03

In context

Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular

162 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 112 is below the median of 198 across 60 observational studies indexed under Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular.

Browse Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Leipzig is the lead sponsor of 148 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with symptomatic heart failure (NYHA functional class II to IV, LVEF ≥40%), increased left ventricular wall thickness and elevated cardiac biomarkers

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Symptomatic heart failure ( II-IV) with ≥40%
  • Increased LV wall thickness (≥12mm end-diastolic)
  • NT-proBNP ≥1000pg/mL
  • Elevated hs-troponin T ≥14ng/L

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • for CMR
  • Acute myocarditis
  • Acute myocardial infarction \<1 month
  • Severe aortic stenosis and RAISE score \< 2 points
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
112 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • CMR T1 mapping

    Diagnostic accuracy of T1 mapping and ATTR probability estimator are tested against the reference methods (99mTc-DPD scintigraphy, laboratory screening for multiple myeloma / AL amyloidosis; or cardiac biopsy, if noninvasive evaluation is inconclusive)

    Diagnostic Test: Native T1 CMR · Diagnostic Test: Web-based ATTR probability estimator (Pfizer, New York) · Diagnostic Test: 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy · Diagnostic Test: Laboratory screening for multiple myeloma / AL amyloidosis · Procedure: Cardiac biopsy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testNative T1 CMR

    Observed method

  • Diagnostic testWeb-based ATTR probability estimator (Pfizer, New York)

    Observed method

  • Diagnostic test99mTc-DPD scintigraphy

    Reference method

  • Diagnostic testLaboratory screening for multiple myeloma / AL amyloidosis

    Reference method

  • ProcedureCardiac biopsy

    If non-invasive tests for CA (99mTc-DPD scintigraphy, biochemistry) are inconclusive

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of T1 mapping for diagnosis of CA

    Comparison of CMR T1 mapping to the reference method for diagnosis of CA

    Time frame: up to 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of ATTR probability estimator to predict CA

    Comparison of a probability score to predict ATTR with the final diagnosis of ATTR

    Time frame: up to 7 days

  2. Association of parametric T1 values with cardiovascular outcome

    All-cause death, cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Association of ATTR probability estimator values with cardiovascular outcome

    All-cause death, cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Leipzig
    Leipzig, Saxony 04103, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2021 to primary completion in Mar 2023, 23 months.

Of 18 observational studies under Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 58. This study's 23 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 20, 2021
First posted
Apr 27, 2021
StartActual
Apr 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2023
CompletionActual
Dec 1, 2024
Last update
Apr 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04862273
Responsible party
Daniel Lavall (Cardiologist, University of Leipzig) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2021
Start date
Apr 1, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2023
Completion
Dec 1, 2024
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion