ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07577635Updated Jul 2, 2026

Impact of Iridotomy/Iridectomy Size on Postoperative Pupillary Block and Dysphotopsia Following DMEK

An observational study in Pupillary Block After DMEK, Laser Iridotomy / Surgical Iridectomy and Dysphotopsia, sponsored by University of Leipzig. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-02.

Sponsored by University of Leipzig · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the standard surgical treatment for corneal endothelial disorders. A postoperative pupillary block may occur despite routine preoperative laser iridotomy or intraoperative surgical iridectomy. Insufficient size or incomplete patency of the iridotomy/iridectomy (IT) may contribute to this complication, while excessively large openings may be associated with postoperative dysphotopsia. This prospective observational study investigates the association between IT size measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and the occurrence of postoperative pupillary block and dysphotopsia after DMEK.

Read the detailed description

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) represents the current standard procedure for surgical treatment of corneal endothelial diseases. During DMEK, a gas bubble is placed in the anterior chamber to attach the graft. In rare cases, this may lead to postoperative pupillary block with acute intraocular pressure elevation and severe pain. To prevent this complication, preoperative Nd:YAG laser iridotomy or intraoperative surgical iridectomy is routinely performed. Nevertheless, pupillary block continues to occur in a subset of patients.

One potential cause is an iridotomy or iridectomy that is too small or not fully patent, which may be misclassified as open on slit-lamp examination. Conversely, large iridotomy openings may induce postoperative dysphotopsia. Currently, no standardized recommendations exist regarding optimal IT size in the setting of DMEK, and systematic data correlating IT size with pupillary block and dysphotopsia are lacking.

This study is designed as a prospective, monocentric, non-interventional observational study. Adult patients undergoing DMEK at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Leipzig, with either preoperative laser iridotomy or intraoperative surgical iridectomy are invited to participate. AS-OCT imaging of the iris is performed preoperatively or postoperatively as an additional study-related diagnostic procedure to quantify IT size. All surgical procedures and clinical follow-up examinations remain unchanged from standard care.

Postoperatively, clinical outcomes including the occurrence of pupillary block are documented during routine follow-up. New postoperative dysphotopsia is assessed using a structured, German-adapted dysphotopsia questionnaire based on the instrument described by Vera et al., administered after resolution of the intracameral gas bubble and corneal edema.

The primary endpoint is the occurrence of postoperative pupillary block after DMEK. The secondary endpoint is the occurrence and severity of new postoperative dysphotopsia. A total of 100 consecutive patients will be included over a planned study period of 12 months. The study aims to explore associations between IT size and postoperative complications in order to improve perioperative risk stratification in DMEK surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pupillary Block After DMEK
  • Laser Iridotomy / Surgical Iridectomy
  • Dysphotopsia
  • Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Leipzig is the lead sponsor of 148 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for corneal endothelial disease at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Leipzig, in whom a preoperative laser iridotomy or intraoperative surgical iridectomy is performed as part of standard care.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged ≥ 18 years
  • Patients undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Leipzig
  • Preoperative Nd:YAG laser iridotomy or intraoperative surgical iridectomy performed as part of standard care
  • Ability to provide written
  • Willingness to complete the postoperative dysphotopsia questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide or refusal to participate
  • Pre-existing surgical iridectomy
  • Missing or incomplete preoperative or postoperative anterior segment OCT data
  • Active anterior uveitis or panuveitis at the time of surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testAnterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT)

    Additional anterior segment OCT imaging of the iris to quantify the size and patency of the iridotomy or iridectomy in DMEK patients, performed as a non-invasive, contact-free study-related diagnostic procedure alongside routine clinical examinations.

  • OtherDysphotopsia Questionnaire

    Structured patient questionnaire to assess occurrence and severity of new postoperative dysphotopsia after DMEK.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of postoperative pupillary block after DMEK

    Pupillary block is defined as intraocular pressure \>25 mmHg with a centrally deep anterior chamber and partial or complete peripheral angle closure.

    Time frame: Within the first five postoperative days, including day 0 (date of surgery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occurrence and severity of postoperative dysphotopsia

    Assessed using a structured dysphotopsia questionnaire based on the instrument by Vera et al., providing an ordinal severity score.

    Time frame: between 2 weeks and 1 year postoperatively

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 7 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 26, 2026
First posted
May 11, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
Last update
Jul 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07577635
Responsible party
Christian Girbardt (Principal Investigator, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 11, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 2, 2026

Study contacts

Christian Girbardt, Dr. med.
Contact
christian.girbardt@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
+493419721650

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion