CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04829643Updated Mar 26, 2025

Axillary Staging in Early Breast Cancer: SNB vs PET/MRI

An interventional study of PET/MRI in Breast Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node and Early-stage Breast Cancer, sponsored by IRCCS San Raffaele. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-26.

Sponsored by IRCCS San Raffaele · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2020, registered Mar 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
246
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The gold standard of surgical treatment for patients with early breast cancer (BC) is breast conservation and sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Ongoing randomized trials are evaluating to omit surgery at all when axillary imaging is negative. However, the available diagnostic tools still have several limitations in accuracy.

Combining the specificity of PET, with the superior sensitivity of MRI, hybrid PET/MRI might be a non-invasive, one-stage, operator-independent imaging method to accurately define nodal status and, whenever negative, might replace surgery for axillary staging.

The project includes patients with \<3 cm BC without overt nodal involvement who will undergo PET/MRI prior to surgery. The primary aim is to compare the staging power between SNB and PET/MRI in detecting axillary lymph node macrometastases (>2 mm). Additionally, general concordance and diagnostic accuracy of PET/MRI vs SNB, eventual correlation with BC molecular subtypes and MRI findings will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

SNB is the gold standard for axillary staging in early BC patients. Although being a minimally invasive, it is time consuming both for surgeon and pathologist, it may add a further scar and is not free from complications: seroma, limitation of shoulder movement, nerve injury, lymphedema. To date, patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) with 1 to 2 positive nodes can be treated with SNB alone (ACOSOG Z011 trial NCT00003855[2-4]) and researchers are evaluating within large randomized trials to even omit surgery at all when axillary imaging is negative (SOUND (Sentinel node biopsy vs Observation after axillary Ultra-souND), PI and Study Chair Dr.O.Gentilini,MD, NCT02167490 and INSEMA (Intergroup-SEntinel-MAmma) trial NCT02466737.

While the role of surgery is decreasing, the role of preoperative imaging is increasing. In the future, imaging might even replace surgery in the axillary staging of BC patients, still providing an appropriate level of information to guide medical treatments which are more and more tailored on biology rather than on nodal status. In this context, an unmet need is to achieve the most accurate preoperative imaging assessment of the axilla in order to decide the appropriate treatment for each patient.

The hypothesis of this project is that PET/MRI might provide a single, one-stage, non-invasive, operator independent imaging modality in patients with small BC allowing to select the proper treatment for patients. PET/MRI is a relatively new imaging tool and its field of application is still object of scientific speculation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Sentinel Lymph Node
  • Early-stage Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • PET/MRI
  • sentinel node biopsy
  • early breast cancer
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 246 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS San Raffaele is the lead sponsor of 443 studies on the registry; 234 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • signed Informed Consent
  • age > 18
  • non palpable lymph nodes
  • no suspicious nodes at A-US (Axillary- ultrasound)
  • candidate to mastectomy or breast conserving surgery and BLS (Sentinel Node Biopsy)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • distant metastasis
  • inflammatory cancer
  • claustrophobia
  • allergy to contrast agent
  • severe renal insufficiency
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
246 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PET/MRI

    Patients with early breast cancer up to 3 cm without overt nodal involvement who are candidates to upfront surgery

    Diagnostic Test: PET/MRI

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPET/MRI

    A consecutive cohort of 247 patients with early BC and no suspicious nodes at both clinical and A-US evaluations and candidates to upfront surgery and SNB will be recruited

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. SNB vs PET/MRI

    Results from SNB will be compared to results from PET/MRI y results from SNB will be available and compared to results of preoperative PET/MRI

    Time frame: Within 1 month after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. A secondary outcome is the staging power of PET/MRI compared to preoperative A-US (Axillary Ultrasound)

    Study will focus on a subgroup of patients having one or two uncertain but no suspicious axillary nodes for which SNB is still indicated. Patient population will be divided into two cohorts: those with completely normal axillary lymph node at A-US and those with 1-2 axillary nodes with uncertain ultrasound features. These two groups will be analysed independently. The PET/MRI and A-US results will be compared to each other and ultimately to final pathology, calculating the concordance rate in terms of positive versus negative nodes and number of positive nodes detected by each method. The staging power of both preoperative exams will be evaluated by considering how many times the results from PET/MRI or A-US could have indicated the most appropriate axillary treatment according to pathological findings.

    Time frame: At 12 months

  2. Correlation between PET/MRI parameters and breast cancer prognosis

    Eventual associations between PET/MRI morphological and functional parameters with tumour prognostic features will be investigated.

    Time frame: 0 and 36 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Oreste Davide Gentilini
    Milano, MI 20132, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gentilini O, Veronesi U. Staging the Axilla in Early Breast Cancer: Will Imaging Replace Surgery? JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1031-2. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2337. No abstract available. PubMed 26291922 ↗
  • Pilewskie M, Jochelson M, Gooch JC, Patil S, Stempel M, Morrow M. Is Preoperative Axillary Imaging Beneficial in Identifying Clinically Node-Negative Patients Requiring Axillary Lymph Node Dissection? J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Feb;222(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 25. PubMed 26711795 ↗
  • Heusch P, Nensa F, Schaarschmidt B, Sivanesapillai R, Beiderwellen K, Gomez B, Kohler J, Reis H, Ruhlmann V, Buchbender C. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body PET/MRI and whole-body PET/CT for TNM staging in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Jan;42(1):42-8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2885-5. Epub 2014 Aug 12. PubMed 25112399 ↗
  • Stadnik TW, Everaert H, Makkat S, Sacre R, Lamote J, Bourgain C. Breast imaging. Preoperative breast cancer staging: comparison of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for axillary lymph node staging--initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2006 Oct;16(10):2153-60. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0276-4. Epub 2006 May 3. PubMed 16670863 ↗
  • Taneja S, Jena A, Goel R, Sarin R, Kaul S. Simultaneous whole-body (1)(8)F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol. 2014 Dec;83(12):2231-2239. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 28. PubMed 25282709 ↗
  • Melsaether AN, Raad RA, Pujara AC, Ponzo FD, Pysarenko KM, Jhaveri K, Babb JS, Sigmund EE, Kim SG, Moy LA. Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer. Radiology. 2016 Oct;281(1):193-202. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151155. Epub 2016 Mar 29. PubMed 27023002 ↗
  • Veronesi U, De Cicco C, Galimberti VE, Fernandez JR, Rotmensz N, Viale G, Spano G, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Berrettini A, Paganelli G. A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. Ann Oncol. 2007 Mar;18(3):473-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl425. Epub 2006 Dec 12. PubMed 17164229 ↗
  • van Nijnatten TJA, Goorts B, Voo S, de Boer M, Kooreman LFS, Heuts EM, Wildberger JE, Mottaghy FM, Lobbes MBI, Smidt ML. Added value of dedicated axillary hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI for improved axillary nodal staging in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients: a feasibility study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Feb;45(2):179-186. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3823-0. Epub 2017 Sep 14. PubMed 28905091 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04829643
Lead sponsor
IRCCS San Raffaele
Collaborators
IBFM- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Responsible party
Oreste Davide Gentilini (Head of Breast Unit, Head of Breast Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 2, 2021
Start date
Jun 1, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2024
Completion
Oct 30, 2024
Last update
Mar 26, 2025

Study contacts

ORESTE D GENTILINI, MD
principal investigator · Director Breast Unit

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion