CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04792099COCOUpdated Jan 26, 2024

CPAP Or Nasal Cannula Oxygen for Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Continuous positive airway pressure and Nasal Cannula in Infant, Newborn, Disease, Hypoxia and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-26.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if in preterm infants \< 34 weeks' gestation at birth receiving respiratory support with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or nasal cannula (NC), CPAP compared with NC will decrease the number of episodes with oxygen saturations less than 85% of ≥10 seconds in a 24-hour randomized controlled trial. This will be a randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 parallel allocation of infants to CPAP or NC oxygen using stratified permuted block design.

Read the detailed description

We hope to determine whether in preterm infants \< 34 weeks' gestation at birth receiving respiratory support with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or nasal cannula (NC), CPAP compared with NC will decrease the number of episodes with oxygen saturations less than 85% of ≥10 seconds in a 24-hour randomized controlled trial.

This study will include preterm infants \< 34 weeks' gestation on respiratory support via CPAP with a PEEP ≤ 5 and FiO2 ≤ 30%. There will be two randomization strata [≥ 22+0/7 to ≤ 27+0/7 weeks, and ≥ 27+1/7 to ≤ 33+6/7 weeks. The purpose of stratification is to ensure an appropriate distribution of risk between study arms. This study will not be powered to detect outcome differences within or between strata.

Following informed consent, randomization, stratified by gestational age at delivery, will be performed using sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes. Each envelope will indicate either Treatment group (CPAP group) or Control group (NC group). The envelope will only be opened after informed consent has been obtained and just before starting the study on each infant.

This will be a single center randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 parallel allocation of infants to CPAP or NC oxygen using stratified permuted block design. 15-30 minutes will be provided as a washout period at the beginning of the intervention, followed by 24 hours on the intervention. Infants enrolled must meet CPAP stability criteria that are based on prior randomized clinical trials of weaning from CPAP to NC.

All infants enrolled in the study will have routine monitoring, uniform target saturation ranges of 91-95% with alarm limits set at 88-95%, and standard care for the duration of the study. The high alarm limit will be increased to 100% if an infant is weaned to 21% FiO2. Supplemental FiO2 will be titrated per unit routine to achieve goal target saturations. Pulse oximetry recordings will be downloaded using ixTrend (iexcellence, Wildau, Germany) software to a secure computer system or via Bedmaster software for later data analysis. The target oxygen saturations (91 to 95%) are based on data from the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of oxygen saturation targets which included data on 4911 infants from the SUPPORT, COT, and BOOST II trials.

Primary and secondary outcomes are described below. Other safety outcomes include recordings of episodes of bradycardia and circumstances surrounding the event. Pulse oximetry recordings will be downloaded using ixTrend software to a secure computer system for later data analysis. Abdominal and cerebral NIRS will also be performed with subsequent data analysis..

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant, Newborn, Disease
  • Hypoxia
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 284 are open to participants now.

Of its 156 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 124 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants must be currently utilizing CPAP (without a rate) with a PEEP ≤ 5 and FiO2 ≤ 30%
  • Infants must meet CPAP stability criteria as follow:
  • If previously intubated, must be extubated ≥ 72 hours
  • \< 3 self-resolving apneas (≤ 20 s) and/or bradycardia (\< 100 bpm) in any hour over previous 6 hours)
  • Gestational age \< 34 weeks' gestation at birth
  • Informed consent by parents/legal guardians

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of a major malformation
  • a neuromuscular condition that affects respiration
  • a terminal illness or decision to withhold or limit support
  • currently being treated for sepsis
  • enrollment in a competing trial
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Continuous positive airway pressure

    Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with blended oxygen delivered by binasal prongs or nasal mask.

    Procedure: Continuous positive airway pressure

  • Active comparator
    Nasal Cannula

    Blended oxygen delivered by nasal cannula (NC).

    Procedure: Nasal Cannula

Interventions

  • ProcedureContinuous positive airway pressure

    After study entry, CPAP will be provided via mask or binasal prongs in order to have a relatively uniform CPAP delivery system among infants in the treatment group. Bubble CPAP will be preferred over other modes of CPAP delivery. A PEEP of 5 will be used for uniformity.

    Also known as: CPAP

  • ProcedureNasal Cannula

    After study entry, flow will be set to 0.5 L/kg with 1L maximum while on NC during the study period to reduce the risk of inadvertent PEEP with higher flows. Initial FiO2 can be titrated to achieve target saturations, and may be increased up to 100% while on NC.

    Also known as: NC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of episodes with oxygen saturations less than 85% for ≥ 10 seconds

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. The coefficient of variability of oxygen saturations (relative standard deviation)

    The coefficient of variation is a standardized measure of dispersion of a frequency distribution defined as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean. It will be used in this study to assess the stability of oxygen saturations.

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

  2. The proportion of time with oxygen saturations > 95 % among infants requiring supplemental oxygen

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

  3. The proportion of time spent outside oxygen saturation target ranges (91-95%) among infants requiring supplemental oxygen

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

  4. The proportion of time with oxygen saturations less than 85%

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

  5. The median supplemental oxygen concentration

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

  6. The median transcutaneous carbon dioxide value

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

  7. The number of episodes (≥ 10 seconds) with oxygen saturations less than 80 %

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

  8. The number of recorded episodes (≥ 10 seconds) of bradycardia < 100/min

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

  9. The median cNIRS value

    Median cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy value during the 24 hour intervention period

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

  10. The median aNIRS value

    Median abdominal near-infrared spectroscopy value during the 24 hour intervention period

    Time frame: 24 hours of intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UAB Hospital
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04792099
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Responsible party
Siamak Yazdi (Principal Investigator, Neonatology Fellow, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 10, 2021
Start date
Aug 16, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 29, 2023
Completion
Mar 29, 2023
Last update
Jan 26, 2024

Study contacts

Waldemar A Carlo, MD
study director · University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion