ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04688125Updated Feb 28, 2025

Evaluation of An Optical Measurement Algorithm Combined With Patient and Provider Input to Reduce Mask Exchanges During Initial Positive Airway Pressure Therapy

An observational study in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) and Sleep Apnea Syndromes, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-28.

Primary conditionObesity Hypoventilation SyndromeRegistry: Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome, a narrower term within Sleep Apnea, Obstructive.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
67
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive ventilation are common treatment modalities for obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, and chronic alveolar hypoventilation from a variety of causes. Use of positive airway pressure (PAP) requires use of an interface, commonly referred to as a "mask." There are a range of mask options available, differing in configuration and sizing, including masks that fit into the nostrils (nasal pillows, NP), cover the nose (nasal masks, NM), cover both the nose and the mouth (oronasal masks, ONM), and rarely those that fit into the mouth (oral masks, OM) or over the entire face. The variety of masks, sizes, and materials result from the wide variety of facial configurations and patient preferences along with requirements to provide a good seal for varying pressure requirements. Failure to find a good match for a given patient may result in significant side effects, such as eye irritation owing to leak into the eyes, skin pressure sores, noise generation, and inadequate therapy when air leaks are extreme. Pressure sores, mask dislodgement, claustrophobic complaints, air leaks, and sore eyes occur in 20-50% of patients with OSA receiving PAP, and these effects negatively correlate with PAP compliance. Furthermore, several trials point to differences in compliance related to which types of masks are utilized. In a randomized cross-over trial, compliance was 1 hour more per night in patients using NM compared to those using ONM.1 In another, NPs were associated with fewer adverse effects and better subjective sleep quality than NMs.2 Therefore, failure to find an acceptable mask results in lower or non-compliance, and therefore treatment failure.

Currently, finding a right mask is performed either using crude templates, or via an iterative process, variably guided by experts in mask fitting. There are no standard certifications or algorithms to guide mask fitting. Given the above, it would be very desirable to find a reliable method to reduce the errors in mask fitting so that the costs, inconvenience, and suffering are all reduced.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be recruited from Mayo Clinic sleep medicine practices who have completed testing and are initiating PAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), or central sleep apnea syndrome (CSA). Testing will be performed for clinical reasons on patients referred for evaluation for sleep disordered breathing. Testing is at the clinician's discretion and can be either polysomnography or home sleep apnea tests. Patients meeting inclusion and not meeting exclusion criteria will be offered the opportunity to participate in this study.

Participating patients will be randomized into one of two groups: the Active group or the Usual Care. A member of the study team register each patient to use the MaskFit AR™ mobile application to take facial measurements and generate mask recommendations. The patient will then be provided with a list recommendations and will be invited to use this list to select their mask from their durable medical equipment company. This is the differentiating part of the study, with the recommendation for a mask being decided by the patient's group assignment. The recommendation for masks may or may not be different from the one written on initial prescription. After the initial visit at the study center, all participants will also be contacted for a follow-up call and will also be asked to complete brief online surveys, one after 40 days and one after 90 days following the first visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
  • Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS)
  • Sleep Apnea Syndromes
03

In context

Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome Reclassified

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 67 is above the median of 50 across 25 observational studies indexed under Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome.

Browse Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,271 studies on the registry; 672 are open to participants now.

Of its 452 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 321 (71%) have results posted.

Compared within Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sleep Apnea, Obstructive. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Male and female age ≥18 years old who initiating PAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), or central sleep apnea syndrome (CSA).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Sleep testing shows an apnea-hypopnea index or respiratory event index ≥5
  • Patient is PAP naïve or no PAP use within the last 10 years
  • Patient's diagnosis is obstructive sleep apnea, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, or central sleep apnea syndrome
  • Prescribed therapy is CPAP, A-PAP, or BPAP in a spontaneous modality
  • Patient is able to provide consent
  • Patient is English speaking (limited to English for device)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prescribed therapy is BPAP ST or ASV
  • Patient is not able to provide consent
  • Patient is not able to speak or read English
  • Nasal or facial trauma or surgery that leaves atypical facial features
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
67 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mask exhange

    Number of patient-initiated requests for mask changes during the first 90 days of PAP use

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. PAP Satisfaction

    Measured using the PAP satisfaction questionnaire. CPAP Questionnaire is a 12 item questionnaire, with items 1-6 a Likert like scale asking about various types of discomfort, and questions 7-12 using a 100 mm VAS to answer questions related to PAP and sleep satisfaction.

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dibra MN, Berry RB, Wagner MH. Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Choosing the Best Interface. Sleep Med Clin. 2020 Jun;15(2):219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2020.02.008. PubMed 32386696 ↗
  • Avellan-Hietanen H, Brander P, Bachour A. Symptoms During CPAP Therapy Are the Major Reason for Contacting the Sleep Unit Between Two Routine Contacts. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Jan 15;15(1):47-53. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7568. PubMed 30621836 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this study, after deidentification, may be shared with other researchers.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Data will be available throughout the study and will continue to be analyzed on an ongoing basis after the study is completed.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 42 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 8, 2020
First posted
Dec 29, 2020
StartActual
Jun 17, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Feb 28, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04688125
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Timothy Morgenthaler (Consultant, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 29, 2020
Start date
Jun 17, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Feb 28, 2025

Study contacts

Timothy Morgenthaler, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion