ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04648891Updated May 23, 2024Results posted

Spasmodic Dysphonia Pain

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Lidocaine and Vibrating wand in Spasmodic Dysphonia, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-23.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to identify adjuvant methods to improve patient comfort during in-office laryngology procedures.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis:

The use of local anesthetic or vibrating instrument will decrease overall pain experienced by a patient with spasmodic dysphonia undergoing Botox injections.

Aims, purpose, or objectives:

To identify adjuvant methods to improve patient comfort during in-office laryngology procedures. Results demonstrated here should be transferrable to other transcutaneous in-office procedures in laryngology.

Background:

Spasmodic dysphonia is a vocal disorder characterized by uncontrollable voice breaks. Injection of botulinum neurotoxin into the laryngeal muscles is the mainstay of treatment. Patients require repeated treatments due to the temporary effect of botulinum neurotoxin. Laryngeal injections are commonly performed through the skin of the neck and can be associated with pain and discomfort. Local anesthetic administration prior to laryngeal injection is commonly performed in clinical practice, however its efficacy hasn't been evaluated and a third of surveyed otolaryngologists do not administer local anesthesia prior to the laryngeal injection of botulinum neurotoxin. Vibratory anesthesia involves the application of a local vibratory stimulus and has been found to reduce pain during various needle-related procedures. Vibratory anesthesia has not previous been evaluated for laryngeal injections.

This study will utilize the need for spasmodic dysphonia patients to receive repeated injections to incorporate a crossover design where patients receive three consecutive laryngeal injections of botulinum toxin experiencing injection without additional anesthesia, with local anesthesia, and with vibration anesthesia in a randomized order.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spasmodic Dysphonia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pain
03

In context

Dysphonia

132 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysphonia; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is close to the median of 30 across 87 interventional studies indexed under Dysphonia.

Browse Dysphonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,269 studies on the registry; 672 are open to participants now.

Of its 452 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 321 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Spasmodic dysphonia with or without tremor
  • Receiving botox as treatment via a transcricothyroid approach

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to lidocaine
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Patients will receive standard of care laryngeal injection of Botox via a transcricothyroid approach without additional anesthesia

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine

    Patients will receive standard of care laryngeal injection of Botox via a transcricothyroid approach following subcutaneous injection of lidocaine (approximately 2 minutes before Botox injection).

    Drug: Lidocaine

  • Experimental
    Vibrating Wand

    Patients will receive standard of care laryngeal injection of Botox via a transcricothyroid approach while using the vibrating wand.

    Device: Vibrating wand

Interventions

  • Subcutaneous injection 0.5cc 2% in 1:100,000 epinephrine

  • DeviceVibrating wand

    a vibrating instrument held adjacent to the cricothyroid space

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Experienced

    Measured on a Visual Analogue Scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subject Preference

    Subjects were asked which technique (Control, Lidocaine or Vibrating wand) they preferred the most

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted May 23, 2024

Participant flow

First Experimental Visit
Participant flow — First Experimental Visit
MilestoneControl, Then Lidocaine, Then Vibrating WandControl, Then Vibrating Wand, Then LidocaineLidocaine, Then Vibrating Wand, Then ControlLidocaine, Then Control, Then Vibrating WandVibrating Wand, Then Control, Then LidocaineVibrating Wand, Then Lidocaine, Then Control
Started586526
Completed586526
Not completed000000
Second Experimental Visit
Participant flow — Second Experimental Visit
MilestoneControl, Then Lidocaine, Then Vibrating WandControl, Then Vibrating Wand, Then LidocaineLidocaine, Then Vibrating Wand, Then ControlLidocaine, Then Control, Then Vibrating WandVibrating Wand, Then Control, Then LidocaineVibrating Wand, Then Lidocaine, Then Control
Started586526
Completed586526
Not completed000000
Third Experimental Visit
Participant flow — Third Experimental Visit
MilestoneControl, Then Lidocaine, Then Vibrating WandControl, Then Vibrating Wand, Then LidocaineLidocaine, Then Vibrating Wand, Then ControlLidocaine, Then Control, Then Vibrating WandVibrating Wand, Then Control, Then LidocaineVibrating Wand, Then Lidocaine, Then Control
Started586526
Completed586526
Not completed000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Experienced

Measured on a Visual Analogue Scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Pain Experienced
score on a scaleLaryngeal Injection of Botox Via a Transcricothyroid Approach
Control2 (1 to 3)
Lidocaine2 (1 to 3.5)
Vibrating Wand2 (1 to 3)
SecondarySubject Preference

Subjects were asked which technique (Control, Lidocaine or Vibrating wand) they preferred the most

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subject Preference
ParticipantsLaryngeal Injection of Botox Via a Transcricothyroid Approach
Control6
Lidocaine12
Vibrating Wand14

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events were collected for all subjects for the first experimental visit, second experimental visit and third experimental visit to end of study for a total of approximately 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)
Lidocaine0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)
Vibrating Wand0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Total of 32 participants were enrolled to receive all interventions; however, the order the intervention was received was randomized. All 32 subjects completed all study visits/interventions.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Laryngeal Injection of Botox Via a Transcricothyroid Approach
Median68 (61 to 75)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Laryngeal Injection of Botox Via a Transcricothyroid Approach
Female24
Male8
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Laryngeal Injection of Botox Via a Transcricothyroid Approach
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Laryngeal Injection of Botox Via a Transcricothyroid Approach
United States32
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2021 to primary completion in Jul 2023, 23 months.

Results were first posted in May 2024, 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 24, 2020
First posted
Dec 2, 2020
StartActual
Aug 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2023
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2023
Results first posted
May 23, 2024
Last update
May 23, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04648891
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
David G. Lott, M.D. (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 2, 2020
Start date
Aug 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2023
Completion
Jul 1, 2023
Results posted
May 23, 2024
Last update
May 23, 2024

Study contacts

David Lott, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lidocaine

Start the discussion