An interventional study of Transverse preputial island flap (Duckett's technique) and Double-faced preputial flap (DFPF) in Hypospadias, Penoscrotal and Chordee, sponsored by dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MD. Completed. Open to male participants aged 6 Months to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-27.
Sponsored by dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes and complications of the transverse preputial island flap (Duckett's procedure) to those of double-faced preputial flap (DFPF) for one-stage repair of penoscrotal hypospadias with chordee, in addition to clinical functional evaluation by estimated urine flow.
Type of study: RCT
Review of literature:
Institutes of the study:
A multicenter study at Pediatric Surgery Departments, Al-Azhar University hospitals in Cairo and New Damietta. Number of cases: One-hundred-Forty four male patients. Time frame: period of 6 years.
Ethical Consideration:
The protocol will be discussed and approved for clinical study by the Ethical Research Committee at the principal investigator's hospital. The procedures and the aim of the study will be clearly explained to the patient and the family. A written informed consent will be obtained before enrollment of the patients into the study. The family refusal to give consent for one-stage repair is respected but does not deprive the patient from getting surgical care by two-stage repair.
Preoperative preparation:
All patients will be subjected to history taking, clinical examination, and necessary laboratory investigations (CBC, Coagulation profile, Liver and Renal Function tests, Electrolytes Panel, Urinalysis). They will receive a dose of single broad-spectrum antibiotic 30 min-1 hour before surgery. Patients will be randomly divided (using the computer-generated randomization table) into two equal groups, each will include 72 patients; Group I will undergo transverse preputial island flap (Duckett's technique) and Group II will undergo double-faced preputial flap (DFPF). Both techniques will be done by all members of the surgical team equally.
Follow-up:
Patients will be followed-up at OPD.
Statistical Analysis:
Data were collected using a data collecting sheets (annexes) and were analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD), range, and average and categorical variables were expressed as frequency count \& percentage. Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of frequency counts/percentage. A two-sided p-value \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Discussion:
It will focus on one-stage urethroplasty using the preputial flap for proximal hypospadias with chordee. The results obtained from this study will be compared between both group and with those reported in the literature.
Also, it will focus on results, complications, their management, and clinical evaluation by estimated urine caliber and micturition time. At the end, the investigators will conclude the reconstructive technique that gives the better results and least morbidity.
131 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypospadias; 34 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 144 is above the median of 68 across 102 interventional studies indexed under Hypospadias.
Browse Hypospadias studies →dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MD is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
72 patients (Group I) with penoscrotal hypospadias with chordee
Procedure: Transverse preputial island flap (Duckett's technique)
72 patients (Group II) with penoscrotal hypospadias with chordee
Procedure: Double-faced preputial flap (DFPF)
Urethrocutaneous fistula (number & percent)
Urethrocutaneous fistula
Time frame: 2 years
Meatal stenosis (number & percent)
Meatal stenosis
Time frame: 2 years
Urethral stricture (number & percent)
Urethral stricture
Time frame: 3 years
Penile rotation (number & percent)
Penile rotation
Time frame: 3 years
Urine stream (in caliber)
Urine stream
Time frame: 3 years
Urine stream (in meters)
Urine stream
Time frame: 3 years
Micturition time (in seconds)
Micturition time
Time frame: 3 years
Follow-up period (in months)
Follow-up period
Time frame: 5 years
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Yes — Data will be available for other researchers including methodology, figures, tables, results, and philosophy of discussion and the value this study will add to the literature
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MD