CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05144659DFOF#TIOFUpdated Dec 17, 2021

Evaluation of Double Faced Transverse Preputial Onlay Island Flap for Hypospadias Repair in Pediatrics

An interventional study of Double faced transverse preputial onlay island flap and Transverse inner preputial onlay island flap in Hypospadias, sponsored by dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MD. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to male participants aged 1 Year to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-17.

Sponsored by dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 14 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Evaluation of double faced transverse preputial onlay island flap for hypospadias repair in pediatrics. The preputial onlay island flap technique has been popularized for hypospadias repair as a result of offering a consistent combination of excellent cosmetic results and acceptable complication rates. Like other techniques, urethrocutaneous fistulae continue to be the most common complications, in addition to other complications, and can be attributed to the affection of flaps vascularity. Some authors describe a technique that resolves some of these problems by combining the unique benefits of the double-faced preputial flaps.

This study aimed to evaluate double faced preputial onlay island flap technique for complication rate, outcomes for urinary stream, and cosmetic results.

Read the detailed description

Type of study: prospective RCT

Review of literature:

  • Different previous techniques for the repair of various levels of penile shaft hypospadias with chordee.
  • Demonstration of two different well-established techniques for repair of anterior, mid-penile, and posterior penile hypospadias without or with mild curvature.
  • Disadvantages of two-stage urethroplasty or technique as transverse inner preputial onlay island flap that involves dissection of the flap from its dorsal preputial tissue (as it affects the flap vascularity).
  • Merits of single-stage urethroplasty double-faced preputial onlay island flap (as it combines the benefits of vascularized pedicled flap, provides better functional and cosmetic results, and low complication rate).

This study will be conducted at pediatric surgery department at Al-Houssain and Sayed Galal University Medical Centers, in the period from May 2019 to February 2021, on 68 male patients with anterior, mid-penile, and posterior penile hypospadias without or with mild curvature.

Patients will be investigated by routine laboratory tests for fitness for surgery. All of them will undergo one-stage repair using either of 2 techniques of urethroplasty; double-faced preputial onlay island flap versus transverse inner preputial onlay island flap.

Written informed consent will be signed by the parents of all participants in the study.

Institutes of the study: A multicenter study at pediatric surgery departments, Al-Azhar University Medical Centers in Cairo, Egypt.

Number of cases: Sixty-eight male patients. Time frame: 3 years.

Ethical Consideration:

The protocol will be discussed and approved by the Ethics and Institutional Review Board Committee at the investigators' hospitals. The procedures and the aim of the study will be clearly explained to the patient and the family. Written informed consent will be obtained before enrollment of the patients into the study. The family's refusal to give consent for one-stage repair is respected but does not deprive the patient of getting surgical care by two-stage repair.

Preoperative preparation:

All patients will be subjected to history taking, clinical examination, and necessary laboratory investigations (CBC, Coagulation profile, Urinalysis). Participants will receive a dose of single broad-spectrum antibiotic 30 min-1 hour before surgery.

Patients will be randomly divided (using non-transparent closed envelope randomization method) into two equal groups, each will include 34 patients; Group A will undergo double faced preputial onlay island flap and Group B will undergo transverse inner preputial onlay island flap. All operations were done by the same surgical team.

Follow-up: patients will be followed-up at OPD at 1, 3, 12, and 24 months, for incidence of any complications. HOSE score questionnaire will be used for the evaluation of outcomes.

Statistical Analysis:

Data will be presented as mean, standard deviation, number \& percentage. For qualitative data, Chi-square test (X2) is used to compare between the two groups and independent-samples t-test of significance is used when comparing between two means. The significance level is set at P \<0.05. Statistical analysis will be performed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 23.0, IBM Corp, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY, USA.

Discussion:

It will focus on one-stage repair for anterior, mid-penile, and posterior penile hypospadias without or with mild penile curvature using double-faced preputial onlay island flap in comparison to inner preputial onlay island flap.

The results obtained from this study will be compared between both groups and with those reported in the literature.

Also, it will focus on results, complications, their management, and clinical evaluation by Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation (HOSE) questionnaire evaluation tool. Finally, the investigators will conclude the reconstructive technique that gives the better results and least morbidity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypospadias

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Double face;
  • Onlay island flap;
  • Inner preputial flap;
  • Hypospadias in pediatrics
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Young male pediatric patients diagnosed as anterior, mid-penile, or posterior penile hypospadias
  • with shallow and narrow urethral plate measuring less than 6 millimeters,
  • without or with mild penile curvature of less than 30º after degloving of the penis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with wide urethral plate suitable for tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty,
  • other types of hypospadias as penoscrotal, scrotal, perineal hypospadias,
  • patients with moderate or severe penile curvature,
  • recurrent cases, and
  • operations done by other surgeons
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Double faced transverse preputial onlay island flap (group A)

    Thirty-four patients undergo double faced transverse preputial onlay island flap are categorized as (group A)

    Procedure: Double faced transverse preputial onlay island flap

  • Active comparator
    transverse inner preputial onlay island flap (control group) (group B)

    Another thirty-four patients undergo transverse inner preputial onlay island flap are categorized as the control group = (group B)

    Procedure: Transverse inner preputial onlay island flap

Interventions

  • ProcedureDouble faced transverse preputial onlay island flap

    A well-established one-stage repair of penile hypospadias called Double faced transverse preputial onlay island flap

  • ProcedureTransverse inner preputial onlay island flap

    A second well-established one-stage repair of penile hypospadias called Transverse inner preputial onlay island flap

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Urethrocutaneous fistula

    Urethrocutaneous fistula in number of cases \&percentage

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Flap necrosis

    Flap necrosis in number of cases \&percentage

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Glannular dehiscence

    Glannular dehiscence in number of cases \&percentage

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Penile rotation

    Penile rotation in number of cases \&percentage

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Urethral diverticulum

    Urethral diverticulum in number of cases \&percentage

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Meatal location

    Meatal location in number of cases

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Meatal shape

    Meatal shape in number of cases

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Urinary stream direction

    Urinary stream in number of cases

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Erection

    Erection straightness in number of cases

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Fistula

    Fistula in number of cases

    Time frame: 3 years

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Mohammad Alsayed Daboos
    Cairo, 11651, Egypt
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be available for other researchers including methodology, figures, tables, results, and philosophy of discussion and the value this study will add to the literature

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05144659
Lead sponsor
dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MD
Responsible party
dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MD (Lecturer of pediatric surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 3, 2021
Start date
May 1, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2020
Completion
Feb 28, 2021
Last update
Dec 17, 2021

Study contacts

Khalid Abdelhaleem Hefney, MD
study chair · Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion