An interventional study of JADE Balloon in Critical Limb Ischemia and Peripheral Artery Disease, sponsored by Singapore General Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-02.
Sponsored by Singapore General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the 6-month safety and performance outcome of the non-compliant high pressure JADE balloon for the treatment of infrainguinal stenotic occlusive or stenotic TASC C \& D lesions in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia.
Pulsatile straight line blood flow to the foot is required to aid wound healing in the setting of chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). Patients with CLTI usually present with infra-popliteal arterial occlusions and endovascular therapies to restore blood flow are often preferred considering their inherently less invasive nature and because of multiple patient background comorbidities or absence of a suitable vein conduit in these patients. Below The Knee (BTK) plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) remains the only viable "standard of care" in the management of long "Real World" BTK Lesions. However tibial angioplasty is plagued by high rate of re-occlusion/stenosis because of barotrauma caused by the intra-arterial ballooning and subsequent development of neointimal hyperplasia. Devices coated with paclitaxel have been used successfully to limit restenosis by inhibiting the biologic pathway that leads to intimal hyperplasia. However, a recent formal systematic review and study-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating treatment of the infra-popliteal arteries with paclitaxel-coated balloons compared with conventional balloon angioplasty for critical limb ischemia (CLI) was recently published showing amputation-free survival was significantly worse in use of paclitaxel coated balloons compared to plain angioplasty. Furthermore current poor patency seen in BTK angioplasty is likely contributed in part by small vessel size and poor luminal gain after standard semi-compliant POBA. Vessel Preparation and Optimising POBA with High Pressure, Non-Compliant balloons may help achieve Luminal Gain for rapid and sustained flow for wound healing. The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the 6-month safety and performance outcome of the non-compliant high pressure JADE balloon for the treatment of infrainguinal stenotic occlusive or stenotic TASC C \& D lesions in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia.
1,542 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 282 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 74 across 1,066 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →Singapore General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 266 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.
Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Non-compliant high pressure JADE balloon for the treatment of infrainguinal stenotic occlusive or stenotic TASC C \& D lesions in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia.
Device: JADE Balloon
Suitable TASC C and D lesions will be treated with non-compliant high pressure JADE balloon.
Freedom from Major Adverse Events
A composite of freedom from device- and procedure-related mortality through 30 days
Time frame: 30 days post-index procedure
Performance Primary Endpoint
Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 6 months post-index procedure. (Clinically driven TLR is defined as any re-intervention performed for ≥ 50% diameter stenosis (visual estimate) at the target lesion after documentation of recurrent or unresolved and continuing clinical symptoms of the patient.)
Time frame: 6 months post-index procedure
Primary patency rate
defined as absence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis on Duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.5) at the target lesion and without TLR within the time of procedure and the given follow-up. Note: Any patient where DUS is not analysable at index and/or at follow-up, where there is documented significant progression of disease above the target lesion, or who undergo a major amputation prior to the time of follow-up will be excluded from the calculation of this endpoint.
Time frame: 6- and 12-month post-index procedure
Technical success
defined as the ability to cross and dilate the lesion and achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30%
Time frame: Immediately post-op
Freedom from clinically-driven TLR
defined as a repeat intervention to maintain or re-establish patency within the region of the treated arterial vessel plus 5mm proximal and distal to the treated lesion edge at the respective time points
Time frame: 12-month post-index procedure
Clinical success at follow-up
defined as an improvement of Rutherford classification at all follow- up time points of one class or more as compared to the pre-procedure Rutherford classification
Time frame: 6 and 12 months post index procedure
Wound healing
closure of primary wound by more than 70%
Time frame: 6 months post-index procedure
Freedom from major target limb amputation (above ankle)
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months post-index procedure
Improvements in walking
Comparison of the scores on the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) between baseline and follow-ups.
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months post-index procedure.
Freedom from serious adverse events
as defined per ISO 14155:2011
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months post-index procedure.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Singapore General Hospital