ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07732036Updated Jul 28, 2026

Inhalation Aromatherapy for Patients Undergoing Conservative Sharp Wound Debridement:

An interventional study of Inhalation Aromatherapy in Aromatherapy, sponsored by Singapore General Hospital. Recruiting at 2 sites in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-28.

Sponsored by Singapore General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn if inhalation aromatherapy works to reduce anxiety and pain in patients with venous leg ulcers undergoing conservative sharp wound debridement (CSWD). It will also learn about the feasibility of implementing this intervention in clinical practice. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does inhalation aromatherapy reduce anxiety levels during CSWD procedures, as measured by STAI-S scores? Does inhalation aromatherapy reduce pain intensity during CSWD procedures? Is inhalation aromatherapy feasible and acceptable to implement in a clinical setting? What are the protocol adherence rates and potential areas of missing data?

Researchers will compare inhalation aromatherapy using Asian essential oil extracts to standard care to see if aromatherapy works to reduce anxiety and pain during wound debridement.

Participants will:

Receive either inhalation aromatherapy or standard care during their CSWD procedure Complete State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) questionnaires before and after the procedure Rate their pain intensity using visual analog scales during the debridement Provide feedback on treatment satisfaction and acceptability Attend clinic visits for wound debridement as part of their standard care

This pilot study hypothesizes that inhalation aromatherapy is feasible and acceptable to implement in a clinical setting and may be associated with differences in anxiety and pain intensity during CSWD, compared to standard care

02

Conditions studied

  • Aromatherapy

Keywords

  • Venous leg ulcers
  • Sharp wound debridement
  • Aromatherapy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Singapore General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 270 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

-≥21 years old

-Venous leg ulcers requiring conservative sharp wound debridement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known sensitivity or to essential oils or any components in the Aromatherapy scent formulation
  • Allergic rhinitis, asthma, chronic lung disease or any disease that impairs the sense of smell
  • Airway hypersensitivity to fragrances, paint/gasoline fumes or turpentine
  • Using aromatherapy of any kind
  • Taking any anti-psychotic drugs
  • Incapable of providing verbal/written consent
  • On anti-anxiety medications
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Inhalation Aromatherapy- Intervention group

    Participants allocated to the intervention group receive a personal nasal inhalation stick infused with a blend of Asian aromatic plant extracts formulated by a qualified aromatherapist, selected based on known anxiolytic and analgesic pharmacological properties. The final blend is determined through a scent preference evaluation conducted with five VLU patient volunteers prior to the main study. Participants inhale the stick for 5 minutes before entering the clinic room and continue using it throughout the CSWD procedure for up to 10 minutes or until the procedure is completed, inhaling at least twice in each nostril prior to the procedure. Aromatherapy works through positive olfactory effects and direct modulation of the amygdala via the olfactory nerve, potentially reducing anxiety and enhancing comfort during the procedure. Each participant is issued their own inhalation stick for personal use across all study visits to maintain hygiene and ensure consistent dosing.

    Other: Inhalation Aromatherapy

  • Placebo comparator
    Inhalation Placebo-Control group

    Participants allocated to the control group receive a personal nasal inhalation stick identical in appearance, size, and packaging to the intervention stick, containing certified organic jojoba carrier oil with no known anxiolytic properties. Jojoba oil has a barely perceptible, slightly sweet aroma and is widely used in aromatherapy blends. Participants follow an identical inhalation protocol to the intervention group, inhaling for 5 minutes before the procedure and continuing throughout CSWD for up to 10 minutes or until the procedure is completed. This ensures that any non-specific effects of the inhalation ritual, including focused breathing and expectation of benefit, are equally present in both arms, thereby isolating the specific pharmacological effect of the aromatic compounds.

    Other: Inhalation Aromatherapy

Interventions

  • OtherInhalation Aromatherapy

    Patients are allocated to either the Inhalation Aromatherapy or Inhalation Placebo group in a 1:1 ratio via randomly permuted block randomization. The randomization sequence is generated by a non-study member using a computer-generated program. Allocation concealment is maintained through the use of sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes to prevent selection . Inhalation aromatherapy intervention an inhalation stick containing a blend of Asian aromatic plant extracts, including Basil, Elemi, and Calamansi, specifically selected for their pharmacological properties in alleviating anxiety, agitation, stress, and pain. Unlike conventional pharmacological interventions, the dose is not fixed but individually determined by the frequency of inhalation, varying based on individual pharmacokinetics and personal response to the aroma. Patients inhale at least twice, once in each nostril, beginning five minutes before the procedure and continuing throughout CSWD for up to ten minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participation Rate

    The number of recruited patients divided by total eligible patients approached, expressed as a percentage.

    Time frame: Throughout the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027.

  2. Retention rate

    The number of patients remaining divided by total patients who consented, expressed as a percentage.

    Time frame: The number of participants completed 3rd clinic visit/15th day, across the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027. Clinic visit 1 - 1st Day- week 1, Clinic visit 2 -8th Day- week 2, Clinic visit 3- 15th Day- week 3.

  3. Percentage Change in State Anxiety Level During Conservative Sharp Wound Debridement

    Percentage change in STAI-S score at T1 (2nd clinic visit/2nd week/8th day): (pre-CSWD STAI-S minus post-CSWD STAI-S) divided by pre-CSWD STAI-S, multiplied by 100. Unit: percentage change on STAI-S scale. Percentage change in STAI-S score at T2 (3rd clinic visit/3rd week/15th Day), calculated. Unit: percentage change on STAI-S scale. Reported separately to assess sustainability of effect over time.

    Time frame: Completed at 3rd clinic visit/15th day, across the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027. Clinic visit 1 - 1st Day- week 1, Clinic visit 2 -8th Day- week 2, Clinic visit 3- 15th Day- week 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Protocol Adherence Rate

    Protocol adherence, which is given by the proportion of patients correctly receiving the allocated treatment out of all patients who consented to the study.

    Time frame: Assessed throughout the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027.

  2. Attrition Rate and Extent of Missing Data

    Attrition rates (withdrawal or loss-to-follow-up as compared to completion of all 3 clinic visits)

    Time frame: Assessed through the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027. Clinic visit 1 - 1st Day- week 1, Clinic visit 2 -8th Day- week 2, Clinic visit 3- 15th Day- week 3.

  3. Change in Pain Intensity During Conservative Sharp Wound Debridement

    Change in pain intensity during CSWD, which is given by the difference in VAS score before and after CSWD

    Time frame: Change in pain intensity measured pre- and post-CSWD at T1 (2nd Clinic visit/8th Day) and T2 (3rd Clinic visit/15th Day) to assess sustainability, using (VAS), scored 0-100mm. Clinic visit 2 -8th Day- week 2, Clinic visit 3 -15th Day -week3.

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rohi Ganji M, Jafari F, Rezaeian S, Abdi H, Farzaei MH, Khatony A. The Effect of Inhalation Aromatherapy and Music Therapy on Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Shockwave Lithotripsy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 29;2022:8015798. doi: 10.1155/2022/8015798. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35815287 ↗
  • RETRACTION: The Role of Orthobiologics in Chronic Wound Healing. Int Wound J. 2025 Aug;22(8):e70744. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70744. PubMed 40769517 ↗
  • Liu YF, Ni PW, Huang Y, Xie T. Therapeutic strategies for chronic wound infection. Chin J Traumatol. 2022 Jan;25(1):11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 6. PubMed 34315658 ↗
  • James KA, Stromin JI, Steenkamp N, Combrinck MI. Understanding the relationships between physiological and psychosocial stress, cortisol and cognition. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 6;14:1085950. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1085950. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36950689 ↗
  • Thomas DC, Tsu CL, Nain RA, Arsat N, Fun SS, Sahid Nik Lah NA. The role of debridement in wound bed preparation in chronic wound: A narrative review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 4;71:102876. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102876. eCollection 2021 Nov. PubMed 34745599 ↗
  • Cui J, Li M, Wei Y, Li H, He X, Yang Q, Li Z, Duan J, Wu Z, Chen Q, Chen B, Li G, Ming X, Xiong L, Qin D. Inhalation Aromatherapy via Brain-Targeted Nasal Delivery: Natural Volatiles or Essential Oils on Mood Disorders. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 12;13:860043. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.860043. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35496310 ↗
  • Fiala CA, Abbott LI, Carter CD, Hillis SL, Wolf JS, Schuster M, Dulski R, Grice EA, Rakel BA, Gardner SE. Severe pain during wound care procedures: A cross-sectional study protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2018 May 7:10.1111/jan.13699. doi: 10.1111/jan.13699. Online ahead of print. PubMed 29733454 ↗
  • Matsuzaki K, Upton D. Wound treatment and pain management: a stressful time. Int Wound J. 2013 Dec;10(6):638-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01038.x. Epub 2012 Aug 21. PubMed 22905710 ↗
  • Hedigan F, Sheridan H, Sasse A. Benefit of inhalation aromatherapy as a complementary treatment for stress and anxiety in a clinical setting - A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2023 Aug;52:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101750. Epub 2023 Apr 5. PubMed 37031643 ↗
  • Zhang N, Yao L. Anxiolytic Effect of Essential Oils and Their Constituents: A Review. J Agric Food Chem. 2019 Dec 18;67(50):13790-13808. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00433. Epub 2019 Jun 13. PubMed 31148444 ↗
  • Woo KY. Chronic wound-associated pain, psychological stress, and wound healing. Surg Technol Int. 2012 Dec;22:57-65. PubMed 23023574 ↗
  • Brown A. The assessment and treatment of wound pain. Nurs Times. 2015 Nov 18-24;111(47):15-7. PubMed 26721090 ↗
  • Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Marucha PT, Malarkey WB, Mercado AM, Glaser R. Slowing of wound healing by psychological stress. Lancet. 1995 Nov 4;346(8984):1194-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92899-5. PubMed 7475659 ↗
  • McGuire L, Heffner K, Glaser R, Needleman B, Malarkey W, Dickinson S, Lemeshow S, Cook C, Muscarella P, Melvin WS, Ellison EC, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Pain and wound healing in surgical patients. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Apr;31(2):165-72. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3102_8. PubMed 16542131 ↗
  • Briggs M, Nelson EA, Martyn-St James M. Topical agents or dressings for pain in venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD001177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001177.pub3. PubMed 23152206 ↗
  • Gardner SE, Abbott LI, Fiala CA, Rakel BA. Factors associated with high pain intensity during wound care procedures: A model. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Aug;25(4):558-563. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12553. Epub 2017 Aug 14. PubMed 28805960 ↗
  • Rodd-Nielsen E, Harris CL. Conservative sharp wound debridement: an overview of Canadian education, practice, risk, and policy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;40(6):594-601. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182a9ae8c. PubMed 24202223 ↗
  • Sun X, Jiang K, Chen J, Wu L, Lu H, Wang A, Wang J. A systematic review of maggot debridement therapy for chronically infected wounds and ulcers. Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;25:32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.1397. Epub 2014 May 16. PubMed 24841930 ↗
  • Tian X, Liang XM, Song GM, Zhao Y, Yang XL. Maggot debridement therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis. J Wound Care. 2013 Sep;22(9):462-9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.9.462. PubMed 24005780 ↗
  • Malone M, Bjarnsholt T, McBain AJ, James GA, Stoodley P, Leaper D, Tachi M, Schultz G, Swanson T, Wolcott RD. The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. J Wound Care. 2017 Jan 2;26(1):20-25. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.20. PubMed 28103163 ↗
  • Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett C, Harding K, Romanelli M, Stacey MC, Teot L, Vanscheidt W. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S1-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.11.s2.1.x. PubMed 12654015 ↗
  • Anghel EL, DeFazio MV, Barker JC, Janis JE, Attinger CE. Current Concepts in Debridement: Science and Strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep;138(3 Suppl):82S-93S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002651. PubMed 27556779 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 15 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 17, 2026
First posted
Jul 28, 2026
StartActual
Jun 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 30, 2028
Last update
Jul 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07732036
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 28, 2026
Start date
Jun 5, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 28, 2026

Study contacts

Nanthakumahrie Gunasegaran
Contact
nanthakumahrie.gunasegaran@sgh.com.sg
97250435 ext. +65

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion