ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04515069Updated Aug 17, 2020

Survival of Hybrid Laminate Veneers Using Two Different Tooth Preparation Techniques:Randomized Clinical Trial

An interventional study of traditional technique of tooth preparation and aesthetic preevaluative temporary technique for tooth preparation in Discoloration, Tooth, Malformed Tooth and Diastema, sponsored by Cairo University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 44 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-17.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2017, registered Aug 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 44 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of laminate veneers constructed using a recent polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material following the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) technique of tooth preparation in comparison to traditional technique.

Read the detailed description

Six recruited patients (4 females, 2 males; ranging from: 20-30 years old and with mean age 24.6 years), who needed indirect laminate veneer restorations were included in this study. Patients were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Department of Fixed Prosthodontics,Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University The participants received a total of 54 laminate veneers between April 2017 and February 2018. Written informed consent was acquired from all participating patients. Randomization was done using a computer generated 2 column list by the aid of Random.org in a 1:1 ratio. Allocation concealment was achieved using numbered cards in opaque sealed envelopes. Aluminium foil was placed inside the envelope to render the envelope impermeable to intense light. These envelopes were placed in a box and each participant was allowed to grasp one envelop the day of operation. Allocation concealment was performed by an investigator with no clinical involvement in the trial. This study is a single blinded study as the assessor was blinded to the assigned study groups. Blinding of the participants was not applicable as one of the techniques required extra visits. Blinding of the operator was not applicable as one clinician performed the tooth preparation in both techniques.A total of 54 laminate veneers were divided into two equal groups (n=27) according to the technique of tooth preparation: group T: traditional technique and group A: aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary technique. VITA ENAMIC material was used for CAD/CAM construction of laminate veneers. Cementation was performed using a light cured resin cement. The laminate veneers were evaluated at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteriea. The data was collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Discoloration, Tooth
  • Malformed Tooth
  • Diastema

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • veneers
  • hybrid ceramics
  • CAD/CAM
  • tooth preparation techniques
  • USPHS criteria
03

In context

Tooth Discoloration

105 studies on the registry are indexed under Tooth Discoloration; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 48 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Tooth Discoloration.

Browse Tooth Discoloration studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,941 studies on the registry; 1,458 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 44 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient-related criteria:

    • Patients consulting the outpatient clinic of the department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
    • Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures.
    • Provide written consent.
    • Accepts the one year follow-up period.

Tooth related criteria:

  • Malaligned and malformed teeth in the aesthetics zone
  • Multiple spacing
  • Diastema
  • Slightly and moderately discolored teeth
  • Good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient-related criteria:

  • Medically compromised patients, as they would not be able to attend multiple appointments or might require special management.
  • Uncooperative patients, who would not abide by the instructions or attend the appointments.

Tooth related criteria:

  • Deciduous teeth; as the study was targeting only permanent teeth.
  • Teeth with previous restorations, which might add another variable to the study (type of old restorative material, extent of recurrent caries). This could also affect the bond of laminate veneers to tooth structure.
  • Patients with parafunctional habits, large restorations, or excessive tooth wear.
  • Initially, scaling and polishing was performed. Patients were instructed on improving their oral hygiene and maintaining effective plaque control. However, if their gingival health did not improve, they were excluded from the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Traditional technique for tooth preparation.

    Tooth preparation performed directly on the tooth structure

    Procedure: traditional technique of tooth preparation

  • Active comparator
    Aesthetic preevaluative temporary technique

    Aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) was fabricated according the planned wax-up. Once the APT was approved both aesthetically and functionally, tooth preparation was performed through the APT.

    Procedure: aesthetic preevaluative temporary technique for tooth preparation

Interventions

  • Proceduretraditional technique of tooth preparation

    Depth cutter wheels of predetermined depths (Komet, Germany) were used to perform the preparation directly on the tooth structure. Depth cuts were performed on the labial surface using depth cutter wheels (Komet, Germany) with radius of 0.3 mm and 0.5 mm which is directly related to the thickness of the laminate veneers in the cervical and incisal one thirds respectively. Then islands of tooth structure between depth orientation grooves were removed. Proximal reduction: The interproximal reduction was completed just labial to the contact areas using a round end tapered diamond stone (Mani, Japan), and polishing was performed using polishing strips (Sof-Lex, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). Incisal reduction: Vertical depth grooves were created. Then, the round end tapered diamond stone (Mani, Japan)was used to create 1.5 mm incisal butt joint preparation. Then, finishing and polishing of tooth preparation was performed.

    Also known as: Group T

  • Procedureaesthetic preevaluative temporary technique for tooth preparation

    The data obtained from digital smile design was used for construction of the diagnostic wax-up. The wax-up was then be transferred to the mouth using a silicone index, creating the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT). The APT was tested esthetically and functionally. Once approved by the operator and the patient, tooth preparation was performed through the APT. Depth cuts were performed similar to those performed in the traditional preparation with the difference of being prepared on the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary instead of directly on the dental structure. Using tapered stone with round end (Mani, Japan), islands of tooth structure between depth orientation grooves were removed. Proximal reduction, Incisal reduction Finishing and polishing of tooth preparation were carried out using the same technique as in the Group T with the difference of being performed through the APT, resulting in minimal tooth preparation

    Also known as: Group A

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival of laminate veneers using modified USPHS

    Patients were called back after 1 week as the baseline to assess the veneer restorations. Assessment was carried out by an experienced observer blinded to the assigned study group for each patient. Laminate veneers were examined at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteriae and the USPHS scores of Alfa, Bravo and Charlie were used for rating . Patients were also questioned about possible post-operative complaints. Digital photographs were made after placement of the veneers and during follow-up sessions.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Yara Attia
    Cairo, 11728, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Clinical Study Report

Supporting information: Clinical study report

Time frame: starting 6 months after publication

Access criteria: Data will be available for students and researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2017 to primary completion in Mar 2019, 23 months.

Of 44 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tooth Discoloration, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 21. This study's 23 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 52 studies reached it within 8 months; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 18.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 13, 2020
First posted
Aug 17, 2020
StartActual
Apr 13, 2017
Primary completionActual
Mar 20, 2019
CompletionActual
May 5, 2019
Last update
Aug 17, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04515069
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Yara Attia (Assistant Lecturer, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 17, 2020
Start date
Apr 13, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2019
Completion
May 5, 2019
Last update
Aug 17, 2020

Study contacts

Hanaa Zaghloul, PhD
study director · Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics, Misr International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion