An observational study in Dental Crowding, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 13 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.
Sponsored by Cairo University · Observational
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and efficiency of Intraoral Scanning (IOS) versus conventional impressions in assessing dental crowding among a group of Egyptian children. Accurate space analysis and crowding assessment are essential for pediatric orthodontic planning. Intraoral scanners offer a digital alternative that may improve patient comfort and reduce procedure time compared to traditional alginate impressions. This observational cross-sectional study aims to provide clinical evidence regarding the validity of digital impression techniques in pediatric dental settings.
Dental crowding is one of the most common malocclusions observed in pediatric dentistry, requiring precise diagnostic models for accurate treatment planning and space analysis. Traditional alginate impression procedures often cause discomfort, gag reflexes, and anxiety in pediatric patients. The emergence of intraoral digital scanners (IOS) provides a 3D digital approach that enhances patient acceptance and streamlines diagnostic workflows.
In this cross-sectional study, eligible Egyptian children presenting with dental crowding will undergo both intraoral digital scanning and conventional impression procedures. Dental arch measurements, space analysis, and crowding severity will be assessed using both methods to evaluate agreement, effectiveness, procedure duration, and patient acceptance. The study aims to contribute clinical data on the application and feasibility of digital workflow technologies in pediatric dentistry in Egypt.
88 studies on the registry are indexed under Crowding; 22 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 31 is below the median of 664 across 14 observational studies indexed under Crowding.
Browse Crowding studies →Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,941 studies on the registry; 1,458 are open to participants now.
Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Pediatric patients attending the outpatient clinics who require space analysis and evaluation for dental crowding.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Egyptian children presenting with dental crowding who will undergo both intraoral scanning and conventional impressions.
Device: Introral Scanner · Other: Conventional Alginate Impression
Digital intraoral scanning for dental crowding assessment.
alginate impression for dental crowding assessment.
Arch Perimeter
Time frame: At the baseline visit during impression taking
Mesiodistal Teeth Widths
Time frame: At the baseline visit during impression taking
Dental Crowding
Time frame: At the baseline visit during impression taking
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.