ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04489394QuintexUpdated Apr 9, 2024

Quintex® Follow-up After One Year Minimum

An observational study in Degenerative Disc Disease, Spondylolisthesis and Trauma, sponsored by Aesculap AG. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-09.

Sponsored by Aesculap AG (part of B. Braun) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
60
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 29 studies in Intervertebral Disc Degeneration with a site in Germany — 4 open to participants now, 9 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Intervertebral Disc Degeneration · Germany.

Enrollment
11th of 18
60 · median 72
Started
2019
with 7 others
Observational
18 of 29
4 open now
Registered
20th of 29
by date
Lead sponsor
6 of 29
Aesculap AG

Among the 29 studies in Intervertebral Disc Degeneration with a site in Germany, this one is the 11th largest by enrollment of the 18 observational ones that give a count, is one of 8 that started in 2019, is one of 18 observational ones, and was the 20th registered.

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

462 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; 100 are open to participants now.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Degeneration studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 29 studies in Intervertebral Disc Degeneration with a site in Germany are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Germany have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Germany →

Who these studies take

Of the 60 Intervertebral Disc Degeneration studies recruiting now, 29 (48%) set no upper age limit and 16 (27%) stop at 75 or younger; 7 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 29 studies in Intervertebral Disc Degeneration with a site in Germany, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Prospective study, not randomised, non-interventional, monocentric, investigating an intended patient cohort of 60 patients already operated on the cervical spine due to degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine down to the first thoracolumbar VBR (C2-T1), who received a Quintex plate for stabilisation

03

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Trauma
  • Spinal Stenosis
  • Deformity of Spine
  • Pseudoarthrosis of Spine
  • Cervical Spondylosis
  • Instability; Back
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

adult patients

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • all patients who received a Quintex® Anterior Cervical Plate since 2014 until approx. end 2018 (minimum Follow-up is one year) in the study center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient not signed
  • Patients living outside a radius of 80 km around the study center
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Results measured by Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    The NDI is designed to measure neck-specific disability. The questionnaire has 10 items to measure patient-reported disability secondary to neck pain and activities of daily living including personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work status, driving, sleeping and recreation and patients rate their status from 0 (best) to 5 (worst imaginable). Individual item responses are summed to a total score, where 0 points indicate no activity limitations and 50 points indicate complete activity limitation.

    Time frame: One retrospective visit, between one and approx. five years post-op.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neck and arm pain

    Visual analogue scale for pain: The visual analogue scale (VAS) is a scale used to determine the pain intensity experienced by individuals. It consists of a line, approximately 10-15 cm in length, with the left side signifying no pain with a smiling face image and the right side signifying the worst pain ever with a frowning face image.

    Time frame: One retrospective visit, between one and approx. five years post-op.

  2. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction with Outcome of surgery documented in two aspects: is the Patient satisfied (four Point scale: very satisfied, satisfied, unsatisfied, very unsatisfied) and would the Patient like to undergo surgery again (yes, no, not willing to say)

    Time frame: One retrospective visit, between one and approx. five years post-op.

  3. Quality of life measured by EQ-5D-5L

    The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/ depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

    Time frame: One retrospective visit, between one and approx. five years post-op.

  4. Dysphagia assessment

    Bazaz score: The Bazaz Dysphagia Score is one criterion used to define dysphagia; it classifies dysphagia as severe, moderate, mild, or none

    Time frame: One retrospective visit, between one and approx. five years post-op.

  5. Complications

    Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events, reoperations and revisions rates

    Time frame: One retrospective visit, between one and approx. five years post-op.

  6. Postoperative Need for Pain medication

    The patient's Need for Pain Medication is measured by the WHO (World Health Organization) analgesic ladder

    Time frame: One retrospective visit, between one and approx. five years post-op.

  7. Radiological outcome from standard x-rays

    Radiologically: Fusion status, plate position, pot. migration of screws and plate, radiolucent lines

    Time frame: One retrospective visit, between one and approx. five years post-op.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz
    Koblenz, 56073, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bruchmann B, Kilian F. Follow-up of a new titanium cervical plate for fusion of the cervical spine. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 Oct 12;15:84651. doi: 10.52965/001c.84651. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37842541 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2019 to primary completion in Feb 2020, 3 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 24, 2020
First posted
Jul 28, 2020
StartActual
Nov 11, 2019
Primary completionActual
Feb 18, 2020
CompletionActual
Feb 18, 2020
Last update
Apr 9, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04489394
Lead sponsor
Aesculap AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 28, 2020
Start date
Nov 11, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 18, 2020
Completion
Feb 18, 2020
Last update
Apr 9, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion