ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07775729Updated Aug 20, 2026

Prospective Study of ProteiOS in Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

An interventional study of Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®) and Standard of Care (SOC) in Degenerative Disc Disease, Spinal Stenosis Lumbar and Lumbar Spine Fusion, sponsored by Isto Biologics. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by Isto Biologics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
280
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study evaluating Influx™ ProteiOS®, an allograft-derived growth factor product, in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Participants undergoing 1- to 2-level TLIF (L2-S1) are randomized 2:1 to receive ProteiOS or a control graft (local bone with optional cancellous chip augmentation, no ProteiOS). The primary objective is to determine whether the 12-month interbody fusion rate (assessed by CT using the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser classification) with ProteiOS is non-inferior to control, using a 5-percentage-point non-inferiority margin. Patient-reported outcomes (ODI, VAS, EQ-5D-5L), safety, and healthcare utilization are also assessed. A separate exploratory cohort at one study site will evaluate the same outcomes in participants undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without ProteiOS, without formal hypothesis testing.

Read the detailed description

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a widely used technique for degenerative lumbar spine pathology. Prospective, randomized evidence on fusion outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, safety, and healthcare utilization for ProteiOS in TLIF is currently limited to retrospective data. This study randomizes participants 2:1 to ProteiOS versus a within-category control (standard graft material, no ProteiOS), with central, blinded, independent radiographic review of CT and X-ray fusion outcomes. The primary endpoint is CT-confirmed interbody fusion (BSF-3) at 12 months, tested for non-inferiority (margin = 5 percentage points, assumed fusion rates 95% ProteiOS vs. 89% control, 80% power, one-sided α = 0.025, Farrington-Manning likelihood score method). Secondary endpoints include fusion at 6 and 24 months, X-ray-based interbody and posterolateral fusion assessment (Lenke classification for PLF), patient-reported outcomes at 3, 6, and 24 months, adverse events, and healthcare utilization

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • Spinal Stenosis Lumbar
  • Lumbar Spine Fusion
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region
  • Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Keywords

  • ProteiOS
  • HCT/P
  • bone graft
  • spinal fusion
  • lumbar interbody fusion
  • growth factor
  • allograft
  • TLIF
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

462 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; 100 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 280 is above the median of 60 across 256 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Isto Biologics as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-75 years, skeletally mature at time of surgery
  • Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented TLIF, with or without posterolateral fusion, as determined by the treating surgeon
  • For the ALIF study site only: degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented ALIF
  • Radiographic evidence of degenerative lumbar disease on CT, MRI, or plain radiograph (decreased disc height, herniated nucleus pulposus, ligamentum flavum/annulus hypertrophy, facet arthrosis/osteophyte, spinal canal or foraminal stenosis, or vertebral translation >3 mm)
  • Symptoms of low back pain, radiculopathy, or neurogenic claudication consistent with radiographic findings
  • Preoperative back pain ≥4 on a 0-10 VAS
  • Preoperative leg pain ≥3 on a 0-10 VAS, consistent with radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication
  • Preoperative ODI score ≥30
  • Failure of ≥6 months non-operative treatment (may be waived for progressive neurological deficit, new/worsening motor weakness, bowel/bladder dysfunction, or cauda equina syndrome)
  • Willing and able to comply with follow-up schedule and provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for surgery with synthetic bone grafts containing hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, or other radio-opaque material
  • >40
  • Prior lumbar spine fusion surgery at a level currently scheduled for surgery
  • or treatment for malignancy within the last 5 years (benign skin cancer permitted)
  • Osteoporosis/osteopenia (≤2.5 SD below age-matched mean)
  • Use of rhBMP-2 (Infuse) or other active biologics
  • Active or systemic infection, malignancy, or severe metabolic bone disease
  • Chronic use (>10 days)
  • Revision fusion at index levels
  • Participation in another interventional clinical study within 30 days of consent
  • Known pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
280 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TLIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)

    Influx™ demineralized cortical fibers combined 1:1 with ProteiOS®, ≥50% of total graft volume per level (5-15 cc total), optional cancellous allograft chip augmentation. If PLF indicated: 100% cortical fiber graft + ProteiOS + local bone in Fibrant PAK containment bag.

    Other: Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)

  • Active comparator
    TLIF - Control

    5-15 cc locally harvested autograft, optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation, no ProteiOS. If PLF indicated: cortical fiber graft + local bone in Fibrant PAK containment bag.

    Other: Standard of Care (SOC)

  • Experimental
    ALIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)

    Same ProteiOS-based mixture as TLIF treatment arm

    Other: Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)

  • Active comparator
    ALIF - Control

    Same control graft composition as TLIF control arm

    Other: Standard of Care (SOC)

Interventions

  • OtherAllograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)

    Allograft-derived growth factor product (ProteiOS®) containing endogenous osteoinductive, angiogenic, and chemoattractant proteins bound to a scaffold of choice

  • OtherStandard of Care (SOC)

    Local autograft with optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Fusion Success (via Computed Tomography (CT) analysis)

    Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  3. Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological

    Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council \[MRC\] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).

    Time frame: 12 Months

  4. Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

    Time frame: 12 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fusion (via Computed Tomography (CT))

    Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.

    Time frame: 6 and 24 months

  2. Fusion (x ray)

    Percentage of participants achieving fusion by X-ray. Interbody fusion (all participants): Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification, Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion); success = Grade 3; higher grade = better.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 months

  3. Adverse Events

    Nature (descriptive) and frequency (number) of procedure and biologic related Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 24 Months

  5. Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological

    Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council \[MRC\] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).

    Time frame: 3, 6, 24 Months

  6. Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 24 Months

  7. Healthcare utilization: Frequency of Hospital Visits

    Number of hospital visits per participant, up to 24 months.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  8. Healthcare Utilization: Length of Hospital Stay

    Duration of hospital stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  9. Healthcare Utilization: ICU Time

    Duration of ICU stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.

    Time frame: Up to 24 Months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2029, 36 months later.

Of 45 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, half reached primary completion within 52 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 43 and three quarters within 82. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 85 studies reached it within 50 months; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 72.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 11, 2026
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2029
CompletionEst.
Jan 2030
Last update
Aug 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07775729
Lead sponsor
Isto Biologics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion