CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04455399TIVIUpdated Apr 27, 2021

Time Efficiency Comparison of Two IntraVitreal Injection Techniques

An interventional study of Intravitreal injection guide (Malosa) and Dual Blade Eyelid Speculum in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema and Retinal Vein Occlusion With Macular Edema, sponsored by Peregrine Eye and Laser Institute. Completed at 1 site in Philippines. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-27.

Sponsored by Peregrine Eye and Laser Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prospective, single-center, randomized, clinical trial (RCT) comparing the time efficiency and safety of a single-use intravitreal injection (IVI) guide versus a traditional technique using a dual blade speculum among patients undergoing IVI for various indications.

Read the detailed description

Prospective, single-center, randomized, clinical trial (RCT) comparing the efficiency and safety of a single-use IIG with a traditional technique using a dual blade speculum among patients undergoing IVI for various indications.

The investigators will include eyes of adult patients scheduled to undergo unilateral IVI for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), choroidal neovascular membrane from pathologic myopia (PM) and uveitis. The investigators will exclude eyes with a history of extraocular or intraocular infection within 3 months of the scheduled IVI date, scleral thinning, history of previous glaucoma surgery, history of pars plana vitrectomy, hypersensitity to the IVI drug, propracaine or povidone iodine, and inability to understand the informed consent form.

The eyes will be randomly assigned in 1:1 fashion into two injection arms: intravitreal injection guide (IIG) and dual blade speculum (DBS). At the time of injection, a random number generator will be used to generate an odd or even number for each eye. Odd eyes will be assigned to IIG and even eyes will be assigned to DBS. For same day bilateral injection, once the first eye is randomized to one technique, the second eye will be automatically assigned to the other technique. The study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients will provide informed consent prior to start of study procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
  • Diabetic Macular Edema
  • Retinal Vein Occlusion With Macular Edema
  • Uveitic Macular Edema
  • Choroidal Neovascularization

Keywords

  • intravitreal injection
  • intravitreal injecton guide
  • macular edema
  • time efficiency
  • anti-VEGF
03

In context

Macular Degeneration

1,473 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 206 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 51 across 984 interventional studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.

Browse Macular Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

Peregrine Eye and Laser Institute is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eyes of adult patients requiring intravitreally injected medications for non-infectious indications

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of extraocular or intraocular infection within 3 months of the scheduled IVI date
  • Scleral thinning
  • History of previous glaucoma surgery
  • History of pars plana vitrectomy
  • Hypersensitivity to the IVI drug, proparacaine or povidone iodine
  • Inability to understand the informed consent form
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Intravitreal injection guide

    Single use, combination ocular surface caliper to determine point of intravitreal injection and set-depth injection guide to limit injection needle entry into the eye

    Device: Intravitreal injection guide (Malosa)

  • Other
    Dual blade eyelid speculum

    Dual blade eyelid speculum to open eyelids followed by Castroviejo surgical caliper to measure injection point 3.5 mm from limbus

    Device: Dual Blade Eyelid Speculum

Interventions

  • DeviceIntravitreal injection guide (Malosa)

    A single use, multifunction device will be used to push away an eyelid to expose injection site, indicate injection point about 4 millimeters from surgical limbus, and directs needle perpendicular to the ocular surface while limiting intraocular needle incursion

    Also known as: Malosa intravitreal injection guide

  • DeviceDual Blade Eyelid Speculum

    A conventional dual blade eyelid speculum will be use to push away eyelids. A Castroviejo surgical caliper will be used to mark the injection site.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of intravitreal injection procedure

    Duration in seconds from application to removal of single-blade or dual blade speculum

    Time frame: At time of injection procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse event rate

    Frequency of adverse events and serious adverse events after intravitreal injection

    Time frame: Immediately and up to 1 month after the intravitreal injection procedure

  2. Patient preference for IVI technique

    Patient survey as to which technique is more comfortable and preferred among patients with prior injection experience using the dual blade speculum

    Time frame: Immediately post injection using single-blade speculum

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Peregrine Eye and Laser Instittute
    Makati City, MM 1209, Philippines
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Uy HS, Artiaga JCM. Comparison of Two Different Intravitreal Injection Techniques. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 8;15:2383-2389. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S309501. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34135566 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04455399
Lead sponsor
Peregrine Eye and Laser Institute
Responsible party
Harvey Siy Uy (Medical Director, Peregrine Eye and Laser Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2020
Start date
Nov 9, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 9, 2021
Completion
Jan 9, 2021
Last update
Apr 27, 2021

Study contacts

Harvey S Uy, MD
principal investigator · Peregrine Eye and Laser Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion