ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04344886Updated Dec 7, 2022

Optimization and Individualization of Diagnostic Scintigraphy Protocol and Minimally Invasive Radio-guided Parathyroid Surgery

An interventional study of Conventional (dual-phase) SPECT/CT and Multi-phase SPECT/CT in Primary Hyperparathyroidism, Thyroid Disease and Parathyroid Diseases, sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava. Completed at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-07.

Sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2016, registered Apr 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The radio-guided technique offers both help with in-vivo identification and ex-vivo confirmation of parathyroid adenoma. In-vivo accuracy is most important but its results are not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate if there is a beneficial effect of individualized timing of surgery using preoperative multi-phase 99mTc-MIBI single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT on in-vivo characteristics of minimally invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy.

Read the detailed description

Despite the relatively accurate preoperative topographic information, minimally invasive parathyroid surgery can still be very challenging, especially in the case of small adenoma in ectopic localization. Radioguided technique offers both help with in-vivo identification and ex-vivo confirmation of adenoma. Excellent ex-vivo radio guidance results are referred. But, in-vivo accuracy is most important but its results are not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate if there is a beneficial effect of individualized timing of surgery using preoperative multi-phase 99mTc-MIBI single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT on in-vivo characteristics of minimally invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Hyperparathyroidism
  • Thyroid Disease
  • Parathyroid Diseases
  • Parathyroid Adenoma

Keywords

  • minimally-invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy
  • in-vivo
  • ex-vivo
  • multi-phase SPECT/CT
  • individualized treatment
03

In context

Hyperparathyroidism, Primary

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperparathyroidism, Primary; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 68 across 60 interventional studies indexed under Hyperparathyroidism, Primary.

Browse Hyperparathyroidism, Primary studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Ostrava is the lead sponsor of 148 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients
  • No history of thyroid or parathyroid surgery
  • Diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism
  • Indication for 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT examination

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minor patients
  • Negative SPECT/CT findings
  • Patients refusing surgery
  • Previous combined surgery on the thyroid gland
  • Patients in high risk of general anesthesia
  • Patients who do not undergo surgery in the recommended time span
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Conventional (dual-phase) SPECT/CT

    Adult patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing conventional (dual-phase) SPECT/CT (after 10 and 150 minutes) and conventional minimally-invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy in a time span 2-3 hours from radionuclide administration.

    Procedure: Conventional (dual-phase) SPECT/CT · Procedure: Conventional minimally-invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy

  • Experimental
    Multi-phase SPECT/CT

    Adult patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing multi-phase SPECT/CT (after 10, 90, 150, 210 minutes) and individualized minimally-invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy performed in a recommended time span based on standardized uptake value calculation.

    Procedure: Multi-phase SPECT/CT · Procedure: Individualised minimally-invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureConventional (dual-phase) SPECT/CT

    Conventional (dual-phase) SPECT/CT (after 10 and 150 minutes)

  • ProcedureMulti-phase SPECT/CT

    Multi-phase SPECT/CT (after 10, 90, 150, 210 minutes)

  • ProcedureConventional minimally-invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy

    Conventional minimally invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy in a time span of 2-3 hours from radionuclide administration

  • ProcedureIndividualised minimally-invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy

    Individualized minimally-invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy performed in a recommended time span based on standardized uptake value calculation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success of surgery (%)

    Surgery was considered successful if there were lowering of parathyroid hormone serum level and calcemia to normal and histological confirmation of parathyroid gland adenoma/ hyperplasia.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. In-vivo sensitivity (%)

    Calculated from number of true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative cases identified by gamma probe during surgery. The parathyroid tissue was considered pathologic when the in-vivo radioactive counting was at least 1.15 times more than the background.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. In-vivo specificity (%)

    Calculated from number of true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative cases identified by gamma probe during surgery. The parathyroid tissue was considered pathologic when the in-vivo radioactive counting was at least 1.15 times more than the background.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. In-vivo accuracy (%)

    Calculated from number of true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative cases identified by gamma probe during surgery. The parathyroid tissue was considered pathologic when the in-vivo radioactive counting was at least 1.15 times more than the background.

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Ex-vivo sensitivity (%)

    Calculated from number of true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative cases identified by gamma probe during surgery. Radioactive ex-vivo counts in adenoma/ hyperplastic parathyroid gland greater than 20% of background was used as cutpoint for cure.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Ex-vivo specificity (%)

    Calculated from number of true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative cases identified by gamma probe during surgery. Radioactive ex-vivo counts in adenoma/ hyperplastic parathyroid gland greater than 20% of background was used as cutpoint for cure.

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Ex-vivo accuracy (%)

    Calculated from number of true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative cases identified by gamma probe during surgery. Radioactive ex-vivo counts in adenoma/ hyperplastic parathyroid gland greater than 20% of background was used as cutpoint for cure.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operating time (minutes)

    The operating time will be measured and recorded.

    Time frame: Duration of surgery

  2. Pathological parathyroid gland volume (ml)

    The pathological parathyroid gland volume in millilitres will be measured and recorded.

    Time frame: Duration of surgery

  3. Pathological parathyroid gland localisation (ectopic x eutopic)

    The pathological parathyroid gland localisation (ectopic x eutopic) will be recorded.

    Time frame: Duration of surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Ostrava
    Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region 70852, Czechia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will be made available to other researchers upon request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04344886
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 14, 2020
Start date
May 1, 2016
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2020
Last update
Dec 7, 2022

Study contacts

Vladimír Dedek, MD,PhD
study chair · University Hospital Ostrava
Martin Formánek, MD,PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital Ostrava

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion