ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04264897ANTHEMUpdated Nov 5, 2026Results posted

Antecedent Metabolic Health and Metformin Aging Study

A Phase 3 interventional study of Metformin and Placebo oral tablet in Aging, Insulin Sensitivity and Chronic Disease, sponsored by Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Nov 5, 2026Posted results revisedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
166
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 120 studies testing metformin in Insulin Resistance — 8 open to participants now, 11 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Metformin · Insulin Resistance.

Enrollment
22nd of 119
166 · median 60
Started
2020
the only one that year
Phase 3
20 of 120
2 open now
Registered
98th of 120
by date

Among the 120 studies testing metformin in Insulin Resistance, this one is the 22nd largest by enrollment of the 119 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2020, is one of 20 in phase 3, and was the 98th registered.

By phase

120 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 442 · 2 open
No phase27 · 1 open
Phase 3this study20 · 2 open
Phase 215 · 1 open
Phase 18 · 2 open
Phase 2/35 · 0 open
Phase 1/23 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2000; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2020.

Size and results

Median enrollment 60 across the 119 interventional studies. Of the 89 that completed or were terminated, 30 (34%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 120 studies testing metformin in Insulin Resistance, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Aging is the number one risk factor for the majority of chronic diseases. There are no pharmaceutical treatments to slow aging and prolong healthspan. The anti-diabetic drug metformin is considered a likely pharmaceutical candidate to slow aging. In this study, the investigators hypothesize that metformin treatment in subjects free of type 2 diabetes will improve insulin sensitivity and glucoregulation in insulin resistant individuals, but will decrease insulin sensitivity and glucoregulation in insulin sensitive subjects. Further, the investigators hypothesize that long-term metformin treatment will remodel mitochondria in a way that decreases mitochondrial function in subjects that are insulin sensitive, but improves mitochondrial function in subjects that are insulin resistant. The investigators will use a dual-site, 12- week drug intervention trial performed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled manner on 148 subjects recruited from two separate sites (Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (OMRF) and University of Wisconsin-Madison (UWM)). After consent and initial subject screening for chronic disease, subjects will be stratified to insulin sensitive (IS) or insulin resistant (IR) groups. Over a 12- week intervention, half of each group will take metformin and half will take a placebo. Pre- and post--intervention, subjects will complete a series of procedures to assess insulin sensitivity, glucose regulation, and biomarkers of aging. The same subjects will provide a skeletal muscle biopsy pre-- and post-intervention to assess the change in mitochondrial function and mitochondrial remodeling with and without metformin treatment. By completion of this project, the investigators expect to provide evidence that helps further delineate who may benefit from metformin treatment to slow aging.

Read the detailed description

Although there is epidemiological support for health benefits of metformin in patient populations, it is not clear if these protective effects extend to those free of disease. Therefore, there is a need to perform human studies determining which subjects free of chronic disease benefit from metformin treatment. Retrospective analysis of a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial in our lab revealed that subjects who were insulin sensitive had no effect or negative effects on insulin sensitivity when taking metformin during an exercise training program. These data suggest that in some subjects, metformin has detrimental metabolic outcomes that could accelerate aging. There are data both in support of and refuting that metformin inhibits mitochondrial complex I action and/or mitochondrial remodeling. The overall objective of this trial is to determine if subjects currently free of disease benefit from metformin treatment. There are two critical questions that remain unanswered in human subjects: 1) does antecedent metabolic health influence responses to metformin, and 2) does long-term treatment with metformin lead to mitochondrial remodeling and changes in function. To better understand the translational potential of a clinically relevant dose of metformin for the prevention of chronic conditions, this proposal aims to determine how antecedent metabolic health affects the response to metformin treatment, and identify the relationship between skeletal muscle mitochondrial remodeling and mitochondrial function with metformin treatment. The hypotheses are that: 1) metformin treatment in subjects free of Type 2 diabetes will improve insulin sensitivity and glucoregulation in insulin resistant individuals, but will decrease insulin sensitivity and glucoregulation in insulin sensitive subjects, and 2) long-term metformin treatment will remodel mitochondria in a way that decreases mitochondrial function in subjects that are insulin sensitive, but improves mitochondrial function in subjects that are insulin resistant. To test these hypotheses, a 12-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial will be performed in subjects 40-75 yrs of age, free of disease, and stratified by insulin sensitivity (insulin sensitive and insulin resistant). Pre- and post-training assessments include the hyperinsulinemic- euglycemic clamp to measure hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, continuous glucose monitoring to determine glucoregulation, and proposed blood-based biomarkers of aging. Further, the use of novel stable isotope labeling with proteomic analysis will determine individual and complex-specific mitochondrial remodeling. This approach will be combined with analysis of protein modification and turnover to comprehensively analyze mitochondrial effects of metformin treatment in skeletal muscle. By completion of this project, it is expected that there will be evidence that helps further delineate who may benefit from metformin treatment to slow aging.

03

Conditions studied

  • Aging
  • Insulin Sensitivity
  • Chronic Disease
  • Mitochondria
  • Insulin Resistance

Keywords

  • Blood Glucose Regulation
  • 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase
  • Healthspan
  • Skeletal muscle
  • Mitochondria
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 40-75 years of age (inclusive)
  • Free of chronic disease
  • Comprehension of the protocol as indicated by an ability to respond to questions about the study after reading the consent form.
  • Able to use and be contacted by telephone.
  • Able to speak, read, and understand English, and complete a questionnaire in English
  • Independently mobile

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Heart disease (history, abnormal , abnormal stress ECG)
  • Cerebrovascular disease (history)
  • Cancer (history)
  • Chronic respiratory disease (history, forced expiratory volume at one second/forced vital capacity [/FVC] \< 70, FEV1 \< 80% predicted)
  • Chronic liver disease (history, [ALT] > 52 IU/L)
  • Diabetes (history, ≥ 6.5, fasting blood glucose≥126 mg/dl, oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] ≥ 200 mg/dl at 2 hrs)
  • Impaired kidney function ( ,45 mL/min)
  • B12 lab values outside of normal range (\<193 or >982 pg/mL)
  • Alzheimer's (history)
  • Chronic kidney disease (history, abnormal blood kidney panel including serum creatinine > 1.4)
  • Problems with bleeding, on medication that prolongs bleeding time (if subject cannot safely stop prior to )
  • Those on glucose lowering drugs
  • Those planning to have imaging that requires intravenous contrast dye (within 6 weeks) or are on any of the following medications since they are with the use of metformin: Dofetilide, Lamotrigine, Pegvisomant, Somatropin, Trimethoprim, Trospium, Gatifloxacin, Cephalexin, Cimetidine, Dalfampridine
  • Tobacco use
  • Allergies to lidocaine or metformin
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
166 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Metformin - Insulin Sensative

    The investigators use a "ramp up" dosing protocol in which the amount of metformin (Hunter Pharmacy) will begin at 500 mg/day in week 1, increase to 1000 mg/day in week 2, and then to 1500 mg/day in week 3, as tolerated. At week 3 and for the remaining 9 weeks, the dose will remain at 1500 mg/day, which is a standard clinical dose (1500-2000 mg/day). If a subject has gastrointestinal discomfort with 1500 mg/day the dose, the investigators will lower the dose to 1000 mg/day. The investigators will split the dose with 1/2 given in the a.m. and 1/2 in the p.m. and taken with meals to minimize GI discomfort.

    Drug: Metformin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo - Insulin Sensitive

    Subjects assigned to the placebo group will receive visually identical pills (silicified microcrystalline cellulose, Micosolle®, K30 povidone, sodium starch glycolate, and magnesium stearate). The same dosing schedule will be followed as for metformin. The investigators use a "ramp up" dosing protocol in which the amount of placebo (Hunter Pharmacy) will begin at 500 mg/day in week 1, increase to 1000 mg/day in week 2, and then to 1500 mg/day in week 3, as tolerated. At week 3 and for the remaining 9 weeks, the dose will remain at 1500 mg/day. If a subject has gastrointestinal discomfort with 1500 mg/day the dose, the investigators will lower the dose to 1000 mg/day. The investigators will split the dose with 1/2 given in the a.m. and 1/2 in the p.m. and taken with meals to minimize GI discomfort.

    Drug: Placebo oral tablet

  • Experimental
    Metformin - Insulin Resistant

    The investigators use a "ramp up" dosing protocol in which the amount of metformin (Hunter Pharmacy) will begin at 500 mg/day in week 1, increase to 1000 mg/day in week 2, and then to 1500 mg/day in week 3, as tolerated. At week 3 and for the remaining 9 weeks, the dose will remain at 1500 mg/day, which is a standard clinical dose (1500-2000 mg/day). If a subject has gastrointestinal discomfort with 1500 mg/day the dose, the investigators will lower the dose to 1000 mg/day. The investigators will split the dose with 1/2 given in the a.m. and 1/2 in the p.m. and taken with meals to minimize GI discomfort.

    Drug: Metformin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo - Insulin Resistant

    Subjects assigned to the placebo group will receive visually identical pills (silicified microcrystalline cellulose, Micosolle®, K30 povidone, sodium starch glycolate, and magnesium stearate). The same dosing schedule will be followed as for metformin. The investigators use a "ramp up" dosing protocol in which the amount of placebo (Hunter Pharmacy) will begin at 500 mg/day in week 1, increase to 1000 mg/day in week 2, and then to 1500 mg/day in week 3, as tolerated. At week 3 and for the remaining 9 weeks, the dose will remain at 1500 mg/day. If a subject has gastrointestinal discomfort with 1500 mg/day the dose, the investigators will lower the dose to 1000 mg/day. The investigators will split the dose with 1/2 given in the a.m. and 1/2 in the p.m. and taken with meals to minimize GI discomfort.

    Drug: Placebo oral tablet

Interventions

  • Metformin (Hunter Pharmacy) following a "ramp up" dosing protocol with a targeted dose of 1500 mg/day for 12 weeks.

    Also known as: Glucophage, Glucophage extended-release, Fortamet, Glumetza, Riomet

  • DrugPlacebo oral tablet

    Silicified microcrystalline cellulose, Micosolle®, K30 povidone, sodium starch glycolate, and magnesium stearate

    Also known as: Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Insulin Sensitivity Index

    Insulin Sensitivity Index = M / I x 1000. M = Glucose disposal rate (mg/min), normalized to fat-free mass (kg). I = insulin concentration (mU/L) during steady state of the clamp (based on glucose infusion rate). We rely on the delta (post-pre) of the insulin sensitivity index as our primary outcome. Positive delta values indicate improved insulin sensitivity (a positive outcome), while negative delta values indicate lower insulin sensitivity (a negative outcome). Insulin sensitivity cannot be physiologically zero or negative. Maximum negative change insulin sensitivity index = -52.31 mg/kg FFM/min/mU/L. Maximum positive insulin sensitivity index = 42.32 mg/kg FFM/min/mU/L.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  2. Mean Change in Mitochondrial Function of the Electron Transport System Measured by Complex I Activity

    Mitochondrial respiration was measured using permeabilized muscle fibers from the vastus lateralis using high-resolution respirometry. We rely on the delta (change from post-pre) of the Complex I mitochondrial respiratory capacity. Positive values indicate an increase in mitochondrial respiratory capacity and improved outcomes, while negative values indicate a reduction in mitochondrial respiratory capacity and a negative outcome. There is no minimum or maximum reported for mitochondrial respiratory capacity of CI, but mitochondrial respiratory capacity of CI cannot physiologically be zero or negative. We and others have previously reported maximal complex I linked oxidative phosphorylation at approximately 250 pmol/mg of tissue/s in ultra-endurance athletes.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Daily Average Glucose Measure

    We measured blood glucose using a Dexcom Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) over seven days. We rely on the delta (change from pre to post) in mean glucose (mg/dL) levels. Positive values indicate an increase in blood glucose and a negative outcome, while negative values indicate a reduction in mean blood glucose and a positive outcome. Glucose values of 70-140 mg/dL generally represent a normal physiological range; values below 70 mg/dL indicate hypoglycemia excursions, while values above 180 mg/dL indicate hyperglycemia excursions.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  2. Mean Change in Blood-based Biomarker Measures of Aging

    This blood-based biomarker panel, developed by LeBrasseur and colleagues, measures changes in senescence-associated secretory phenotype proteins. This panel is associated with chronological age, biological age, and adverse clinical outcomes. Changes in the protein levels of biomarkers reflect changes in biological age. A greater abundance in these biomarkers is associated with greater frailty or biological aging. We rely on the delta (change from post-pre) of the biological markers. A positive value is associated with a negative outcome, while a negative value is associated with a positive outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 2, 2026

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from 2 sites: The Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation/University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin Resistant
Started48315235
Homa-ir based population - completed27203321
Re-distribution of subjects for insulin sensitivity index-based analyses population24232727
Completed27203321
Not completed21111914
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up7852
Withdrew: Investigator decision10070
Withdrew: Failed inclusion criteria43512
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0020

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change in Insulin Sensitivity Index

Insulin Sensitivity Index = M / I x 1000. M = Glucose disposal rate (mg/min), normalized to fat-free mass (kg). I = insulin concentration (mU/L) during steady state of the clamp (based on glucose infusion rate). We rely on the delta (post-pre) of the insulin sensitivity index as our primary outcome. Positive delta values indicate improved insulin sensitivity (a positive outcome), while negative delta values indicate lower insulin sensitivity (a negative outcome). Insulin sensitivity cannot be physiologically zero or negative. Maximum negative change insulin sensitivity index = -52.31 mg/kg FFM/min/mU/L. Maximum positive insulin sensitivity index = 42.32 mg/kg FFM/min/mU/L.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/kg Fat Free Mass/min/mU/L
Mean Change in Insulin Sensitivity Index
mg/kg Fat Free Mass/min/mU/LPlacebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin Resistant
Mean Change in Insulin Sensitivity Index-6.3 ± 17.91.8 ± 8.8-4.5 ± 9.72.1 ± 4.8
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo - Insulin Sensitive vs Placebo - Insulin Resistant vs Metformin - Insulin Sensitive vs Metformin - Insulin Resistant · Multivariable linear regression model · p = 0.576 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (final values): -2.443Only treatment main effects and treatment by indicator interaction terms were retained for reporting.
  • Placebo - Insulin Sensitive vs Placebo - Insulin Resistant vs Metformin - Insulin Sensitive vs Metformin - Insulin Resistant · Multivariable linear regression models · p = 0.488 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Median difference (net): 0.112Treatment Difference withing group: Post - Pre
PrimaryMean Change in Mitochondrial Function of the Electron Transport System Measured by Complex I Activity

Mitochondrial respiration was measured using permeabilized muscle fibers from the vastus lateralis using high-resolution respirometry. We rely on the delta (change from post-pre) of the Complex I mitochondrial respiratory capacity. Positive values indicate an increase in mitochondrial respiratory capacity and improved outcomes, while negative values indicate a reduction in mitochondrial respiratory capacity and a negative outcome. There is no minimum or maximum reported for mitochondrial respiratory capacity of CI, but mitochondrial respiratory capacity of CI cannot physiologically be zero or negative. We and others have previously reported maximal complex I linked oxidative phosphorylation at approximately 250 pmol/mg of tissue/s in ultra-endurance athletes.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · pmol/mg/s
Mean Change in Mitochondrial Function of the Electron Transport System Measured by Complex I Activity
pmol/mg/sPlacebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin Resistant
Mean Change in Mitochondrial Function of the Electron Transport System Measured by Complex I Activity0.99 ± 15.950.48 ± 11.79-5.98 ± 22.27-2.57 ± 13.67
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo - Insulin Sensitive vs Placebo - Insulin Resistant vs Metformin - Insulin Sensitive vs Metformin - Insulin Resistant · Multivariable linear regression model · p = 0.88 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05. Multivariable linear regression models: Treatment Main Effect) · Median difference (final values): 5.22
  • Placebo - Insulin Sensitive vs Placebo - Insulin Resistant vs Metformin - Insulin Sensitive vs Metformin - Insulin Resistant · Multivariable linear regression models: · p = 0.932 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.21Treatment x Baseline HOMA-IR
SecondaryMean Change in Daily Average Glucose Measure

We measured blood glucose using a Dexcom Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) over seven days. We rely on the delta (change from pre to post) in mean glucose (mg/dL) levels. Positive values indicate an increase in blood glucose and a negative outcome, while negative values indicate a reduction in mean blood glucose and a positive outcome. Glucose values of 70-140 mg/dL generally represent a normal physiological range; values below 70 mg/dL indicate hypoglycemia excursions, while values above 180 mg/dL indicate hyperglycemia excursions.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Change in Average Daily Glucose (mg/DL)
Mean Change in Daily Average Glucose Measure
Change in Average Daily Glucose (mg/DL)Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin Resistant
Mean Change in Daily Average Glucose Measure0.3 ± 9.30.8 ± 16.9-0.4 ± 10.6-8.3 ± 11.1
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo - Insulin Sensitive vs Placebo - Insulin Resistant vs Metformin - Insulin Sensitive vs Metformin - Insulin Resistant · Multivariable linear regression model · p = 0.057 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (final values): -4.49Treatment Difference withing group: Post - Pre
  • Placebo - Insulin Sensitive vs Placebo - Insulin Resistant vs Metformin - Insulin Sensitive vs Metformin - Insulin Resistant · Multivariable linear regression models · p = 0.244 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Median difference (final values): 0.21Multivariable linear regression models: Treatment x Baseline Metabolic Status
SecondaryMean Change in Blood-based Biomarker Measures of Aging

This blood-based biomarker panel, developed by LeBrasseur and colleagues, measures changes in senescence-associated secretory phenotype proteins. This panel is associated with chronological age, biological age, and adverse clinical outcomes. Changes in the protein levels of biomarkers reflect changes in biological age. A greater abundance in these biomarkers is associated with greater frailty or biological aging. We rely on the delta (change from post-pre) of the biological markers. A positive value is associated with a negative outcome, while a negative value is associated with a positive outcome.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Protein Expression (relative units)
Mean Change in Blood-based Biomarker Measures of Aging
Protein Expression (relative units)Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin Resistant
MMP-1386 ± 929-651 ± 168180 ± 530609 ± 1343
MPO-9442 ± 445711720 ± 9413759345 ± 176257-31943 ± 139016
IL-60.14 ± 1.12-0.06 ± 1.000.73 ± 3.5-0.02 ± 1.10
PAI-11151 ± 27000-12129 ± 38693-3444 ± 2722216407 ± 38436
Eotaxin10 ± 58-14 ± 312 ± 3416 ± 40
ActivinA-11 ± 41-6 ± 42-22 ± 54-10 ± 57
ADAMTS13-7161 ± 103221230842 ± 13131813147 ± 81801920 ± 167172
FAS2 ± 562-151 ± 349-43 ± 577792 ± 3619
GDF-1567 ± 12621 ± 5795 ± 77168 ± 202
ICAM-11338 ± 17293-5364 ± 16876-1724 ± 123561124 ± 31718
INFg-0.02 ± 1.3-0.16 ± 0.610.03 ± 1.44-0.04 ± 0.49
IL-150.01 ± 0.92-1.13 ± 4.83.70 ± 16.68-14.9 ± 51.38
IL-7-0.31 ± 6.24-3.18 ± 7.35-1.34 ± 7.191.34 ± 9.91
IL-80.28 ± 2.91-0.58 ± 2.940.33 ± 2.591.07 ± 2.09
MCP-16 ± 5411 ± 32-5 ± 4714 ± 52
MDC-11 ± 67-33 ± 875 ± 10398 ± 328
MMP-2-569 ± 23803-5747 ± 21459-9175 ± 190761578 ± 29394
MMP-782 ± 212-96 ± 477135 ± 191279 ± 370
MMP-93721 ± 5553-3602 ± 6142125103 ± 60279-10826 ± 53765
Osteoactivin-334 ± 1184-323 ± 1169-234 ± 1295-531 ± 1869
Osteopontin336 ± 5519374 ± 50691369 ± 35961955 ± 10590
PARC-491 ± 6054-4167 ± 112251466 ± 75061926 ± 17278
PDGF-AA-8587 ± 26863-8889 ± 268413295 ± 175929499 ± 25431
PDGF-AB28 ± 116-287 ± 1172117 ± 1460561 ± 1415
PLA2G7-2817 ± 14312-248 ± 4624917230 ± 50079-7747 ± 31756
RAGE-167 ± 24513 ± 310-125 ± 156-6 ± 359
RANTES-1395 ± 16663-358 ± 23741-1233 ± 171465279 ± 16267
SOST18 ± 716 ± 4716 ± 509 ± 69
SPARC38039 ± 316563-122037 ± 435422-1425 ± 22653103686 ± 410690
TNF RI8 ± 95-18 ± 13340 ± 11427 ± 132
TNF RII-40 ± 215136 ± 51472 ± 24615 ± 279
TNF-a0.47 ± 3.19-0.03 ± 2.35-0.14 ± 3.03-0.65 ± 8.08
uPAR-20 ± 57-27 ± 67-16 ± 5211 ± 74
VEGF-14 ± 26-39 ± 996 ± 506 ± 62
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo - Insulin Sensitive vs Placebo - Insulin Resistant vs Metformin - Insulin Sensitive vs Metformin - Insulin Resistant · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.004 · Mean difference (final values): -1555.07
  • Placebo - Insulin Sensitive vs Placebo - Insulin Resistant vs Metformin - Insulin Sensitive vs Metformin - Insulin Resistant · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.04 · Mean difference (final values): -29309.3

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment until completion of the study, up to 16 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/47 (0%)0/47 (0%)25/47 (53.2%)
Metformin0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)37/54 (68.5%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboMetformin
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders8/4719/54
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders7/4710/54
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/478/54
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders2/476/54
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/476/54
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/475/54
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/474/54
VesiclesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/473/54
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders1/473/54
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/473/54

Baseline characteristics

Subjects were re-assigned based on GIR (mg/kg FFM/min/mU/L) which is reflected here.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Years)Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin ResistantTotal
Age57 ± 857 ± 1057 ± 956 ± 1057 ± 10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin ResistantTotal
Female1018181561
Male14591240
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin ResistantTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native13026
Asian11024
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American10023
White1817262081
More than one race22116
Unknown or Not Reported10001
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin ResistantTotal
Hispanic or Latino11002
Not Hispanic or Latino2322272799
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/(m^2))Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin ResistantTotal
Mean27.4 ± 4.831.9 ± 6.428.0 ± 6.332.2 ± 6.529.9 ± 6.3
Precent Body Fat
Precent Body Fat(%)Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin ResistantTotal
Mean34.14 ± 12.7842.52 ± 7.0536.61 ± 10.1340.18 ± 7.3637.61 ± 10.35
Fat Mass
Fat Mass(kg)Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin ResistantTotal
Mean38.3 ± 18.136.1 ± 10.829.4 ± 12.737.4 ± 12.832.8 ± 14.2
Fat Free Mass
Fat Free Mass(kg)Placebo - Insulin SensitivePlacebo - Insulin ResistantMetformin - Insulin SensitiveMetformin - Insulin ResistantTotal
Mean54.0 ± 9.748.1 ± 8.351.0 ± 13.154.7 ± 11.952.1 ± 11.2

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma Shared Clinical and Translational Resources
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
    Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kumari S, Bubak MT, Schoenberg HM, Davidyan A, Elliehausen CJ, Kuhn KG, VanWagoner TM, Karaman R, Scofield RH, Miller BF, Konopka AR. Antecedent Metabolic Health and Metformin (ANTHEM) Aging Study: Rationale and Study Design for a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Dec 29;77(12):2373-2377. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab358. PubMed 34865016 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Results from the trial will be disseminated through presentations at professional meetings and through peer-reviewed publications. Data and other resources will be shared as required by NIH Resource Sharing policies.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: De-identified data will be shared following the publication of the primary manuscripts for each specific aim from the trial by the trial investigators.

Access criteria: Researchers interested in accessing de-identified data will contact the trial principal investigators to complete data use agreements and paper/presentation proposals needed for consideration of the proposed research.

10

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2020 to primary completion in Mar 2025, 55 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2026, 1 year 3 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Mar 2026.

Of 44 phase 3 interventional studies under Insulin Resistance, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 53. This study's 55 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 7, 2020
First posted
Feb 11, 2020
StartActual
Jul 29, 2020
Primary completionActual
Mar 12, 2025
CompletionActual
Mar 12, 2025
Results delay requested
Mar 11, 2026
Results first posted
Jul 2, 2026
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Results
Posted results revised
revised Nov 5, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionMean Change in Daily Average Glucose Measure: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Posted results revised
    Secondary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionMean Change in Daily Average Glucose Measure: how it is measured was reworded

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04264897
Lead sponsor
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2020
Start date
Jul 29, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 12, 2025
Completion
Mar 12, 2025
Results posted
Jul 2, 2026
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Benjamin F Miller, PhD
principal investigator · Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Adam Konopka, PhD
principal investigator · University of Wisconsin, Madison

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Metformin

Start the discussion