ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02270957ABCUpdated Jan 26, 2022Results posted

Clarification of Abatacept Effects in SLE With Integrated Biologic and Clinical Approaches

A Phase 2 interventional study of Abatacept and Placebo in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, sponsored by Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-26.

Sponsored by Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2014, registered Oct 2014).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 10 studies in Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic by Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic · Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation.

Started
2014
with 1 other
Phase 2
2 of 10
none open now
Registered
7th of 10
by date

Among the 10 studies in Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic by Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, this one is one of 2 that started in 2014, is one of 2 in phase 2, and was the 7th registered.

By phase

10 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Observational2 · 0 open
Phase 12 · 0 open
Phase 1/22 · 0 open
Phase 2this study2 · 0 open
No phase1 · 0 open
Phase 41 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1995; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2014.

Size and results

Median enrollment 20 across the 8 interventional studies, 2,908 across the 2 observational. Of the 8 that completed or were terminated, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Download CSVWith an account: the 10 studies in Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic by Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial of abatacept for the treatment of lupus arthritis and other manifestations of lupus. Patients with lupus and at least 3 tender and 3 swollen joints and \</= 20 mg prednisone have other background immune suppressants withdrawn at entry. They can elect to receive up to a total of 320 mg depomedrol (in two or more injections) between the screening visit and the visit 2 months after dosing begins. Abatacept (125 mg) or placebo is administered in weekly subcutaneous doses. After 3 months of treatment patients who are not responding may elect to receive open label abatacept with or without additional standard of care therapies. Such patients are considered non responders. The primary endpoint is the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (BILAG)-linked Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) which will require a clinically significant improvement in arthritis and other active features of lupus

Read the detailed description

Research Hypothesis: Abatacept is effective in lupus arthritis and this will be discernible in a small trial with robust endpoints which incorporates withdrawal of background immune suppressants

Study Schematic: Abatacept 125 mg or placebo will be given in a 1:1 randomization subcutaneously each week for six months. All patients may elect to continue six more months on open label Abatacept. Background Immune Suppressants will be withdrawn at any time between screening and the first dosing visit. At or after screening, patients may elect 40-160 mg depomedrol shots prn not to exceed 320 mg total up to and including the Month 2 Visit (two months after the first dosing visit) After that, additional steroids or immune suppressants, if necessary, will be allowed but the patient will be considered a non-responder in the primary endpoint at six months on that basis. At of after the 3 month visit patients with significant clinical flare may also elect to receive open label Abatacept but will be considered non-responders in the primary endpoint at six months.

Primary Objective: To compare response rates between Abatacept-Treated and Placebo-Treated Patients with active lupus arthritis in a trial designed with background immune suppressant withdrawal, limited steroid rescue, and a robust, discriminatory endpoint. The trial design and primary endpoint of response by BICLA (defined below) have been pre-tested by us for safety and ability to ensure placebo group non-response, underscoring our powering of the study. This will support a rational decision about further development of abatacept for SLE at minimal cost.

Secondary clinical outcome measures used as endpoints will include: SRI 4/5, changes in joint counts, SLEDAI, BILAG, CLASI, PGA, and LFA REAL measures.

The definitions of the clinical outcome measures are as follows: BICLA: BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment, This is defined as British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index scores that were severe at entry (BILAG A scores) improving to a moderate (BILAG B) level (or better) and all features that were moderate at entry improving to a mild level (BILAG C scores) or resolved (BILAG D scores) without increase in any other BILAG feature or SLEDAI scoring (see SLEDAI definition below), as well as no more than 10% worsening in a Physician's Global Assessment or any additional treatments after the protocolized baseline rescue (e.g. no new SLE treatments after the two month visit). SLEDAI stands for the Systemic Lupus Erythematosis Disease Activity Index. SRI 4/5 is defined as SLEDAI improvement by at least 4 points (or 5 points respectively), no increase in BILAG-measured disease activity and no more than 10% worsening in a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). CLASI stands for the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index. PGA stands for Physician's Global Assessment. LFA REAL stands for the Lupus Foundation of America Rapid Evaluation of the Activity of Lupus. This instrument is in a pilot phase but will be tested in the ABC study.

PK and immunogenicity studies will also be performed to help in interpretation of outcomes. Novel biologic discovery will be integrated into the clinical trial to support both pre-specified and exploratory biomarker discovery. Data will be generated that might be used to help select more appropriate patient subsets for future trials and, along with PK data, help to guide optimal dosing strategies. Optimizing patient selection and dosing are important goals for further increasing demonstrable effect size in trials by increasing the response rates in the treatment group.

This study will be performed as a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 1:1 randomization of patients to abatacept 125 mg weekly subcutaneous dose or placebo, with the withdrawal of background immune suppressants. Limited steroid rescue is allowed between the screening visit and the Month 2 visit per protocol. Additional standard of care rescue medications may be used after that as needed but will define non-response at the primary endpoint date of six months. Flaring patients may elect to receive open label abatacept at Month 3 but will also be defined as non-responders in the primary endpoint. All patients may elect to receive open label abatacept for an additional six months after the primary endpoint date, with two follow up visits (2 and 4 months post medication withdrawal) to assess withdrawal effects and to complete the safety assessments.

Accrual Goal: This study will continue to recruit until we achieve the goal of 60 patients who complete study visits through the 6 month endpoint.

Correlative Studies: Extensive exploratory protocol-specific and ancillary immune pharmacodynamic studies, focusing first on changes in IFN alpha, BLyS and other B Cell pathways. A major focus will also be on T Cell pathways with a focus on T suppressor/TH17 dichotomy after treatment with abatacept. A responder analysis will be performed in order to generate hypotheses useful for selecting appropriate patients for this treatment and optimizing dosing strategies.

Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events of special interest (infusion reactions and infections) will be collected and described. Stopping Rules: Patients may be withdrawn by the investigator for non-compliance or safety. All patients terminating before six months will be considered non responders in the primary analysis. Use of off protocol immune suppressants will not necessarily dictate withdrawal but will determine non-responder status. A DSMB board of at least two physicians (four are currently participating) will review data and may stop the study if needed.

03

Conditions studied

  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Signed Written
  2. Four 1997 revised ACR Classification Criteria for SLE
  3. Active polyarticular arthritis meeting at minimum BILAG 2004 B definition with a minimum of 3 tender and 3 swollen joints observed at the screening visit
  4. Men and women 18 to 70 years of age.
  5. Women of and men with partners of childbearing potential must use an acceptable method of throughout the study
  6. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and Study Day 1 (baseline visit) and may not be breast feeding

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current severe, organ-threatening disease (e.g. acute nephritis appropriate for induction therapy, CNS lupus (excepting chorea, cranial neuropathy, and resolving optic neuritis) or any lupus condition requiring cyclophosphamide, biologic therapy, or IV bolus of >/= 500 mg.
  2. Subjects who are incapable of understanding or completing study-related assessments.
  3. Subjects with any condition, whether or not related to SLE, which, in the opinion of the investigator, might place a subject at unacceptable risk for participation in the study.
  4. Subjects with a history of cancer in the last 5 years, other than non-melanoma skin cell cancers cured by local resection or carcinoma in situ.
  5. Subjects who currently abuse drugs or alcohol.
  6. Subjects with acute herpes zoster or cytomegalovirus (CMV) within 2 months of screening.
  7. Subjects who have received any within 3 months of first dose.
  8. Subjects with any serious bacterial infection within the last 3 months, unless treated and resolved with antibiotics, or any chronic bacterial infection (eg, chronic pyelonephritis, osteomyelitis, or bronchiectasis).
  9. Subjects at risk for tuberculosis (TB).
  10. Subjects known to be positive for surface antigen or unless negative by PCR or RIBA
  11. Acute hemolytic anemia with \< 7.0 g/dL or known change in Hg by 2.0 g/dL within four months
  12. WBC \< 2500/mm3 (\< 3 x 109/L) unless due to chronic stable lupus activity
  13. \< 40,000/mm3 (\< 3 x 109/L) (If less than 100,000 must have been stable (within a range of 10,000/mm3 ) within two months of screening or in two tests during the screening period.
  14. Serum creatinine > 2 times the
  15. Serum or AST > 2.5 times the ULN
  16. Any other laboratory test results that, in the opinion of the investigator, might place a subject at unacceptable risk for participation in the study.
  17. Known allergy/sensitivity to the study agent or carrier.
  18. Treatment with drug within 28 days (or 5 terminal half-lives) of the Day 1 dose.
  19. Cyclophosphamide within 3 months of Day 1 or bolus IV steroids >/=500 mg within 1 month
  20. Prednisone > 20 mg qd after the screening visit

    -

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Abatacept

    Patients receive Abatacept 125 mg subcutaneously weekly for six months. An optional continuation up until 12 months is allowed. Background immune suppressants are withdrawn at the beginning of the study and the option of depomedrol up to 320 mg total (in divided doses) is allowed at any time up through the visit 2 months after study medication is started. After this additional rescue is allowed with any standard of care treatment and/or open label abatacept (since patients are blinded) but this additional rescue will define non-response in the primary endpoint at six months.

    Biological: Abatacept

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Patients receive placebo instead of Abatacept in a double blind fashion. Otherwise participation is the same, including that at the time of treatment failure they may elect any standard of care treatment and/or to begin taking open label abatacept but this rescue will define non-response in the primary endpoint at six months.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • BiologicalAbatacept

    Also known as: Orencia

  • OtherPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA)

    The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index is a scoring system for progress of disease activity over the prior month with a scoring system that rates each organ system as "A" or severe, "B" or moderate, "C" or mild vs no activity in the past month. To meet the BICLA endpoint requires all baseline severe features (BILAG A) improving to moderate (BILAG B), mild or resolved, and all baseline BILAG B features improving to mild or resolved without increase in any other feature on either the BILAG or a different measure called the SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index). Furthermore there must be no increase in Physician's Global Assessment or any rescue medications after the month 2 visit. Only those meeting all of these criteria meet the primary endpoint.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Nov 25, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAbataceptPlacebo
Started3135
Completed2731
Not completed44
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy24
Withdrew: Adverse event20

Outcome measures

PrimaryBritish Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA)

The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index is a scoring system for progress of disease activity over the prior month with a scoring system that rates each organ system as "A" or severe, "B" or moderate, "C" or mild vs no activity in the past month. To meet the BICLA endpoint requires all baseline severe features (BILAG A) improving to moderate (BILAG B), mild or resolved, and all baseline BILAG B features improving to mild or resolved without increase in any other feature on either the BILAG or a different measure called the SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index). Furthermore there must be no increase in Physician's Global Assessment or any rescue medications after the month 2 visit. Only those meeting all of these criteria meet the primary endpoint.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA)
ParticipantsAbataceptPlacebo
British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA)88
Statistical analysis
  • Abatacept vs Placebo · Chi-squared · p = >0.999
Post-hocSLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4)

Comparing the endpoint date at six months to Baseline, there must be a 4 point decreased in SLEDAI score (SLEDAI is defined as the SLE Disease Activity Index). The SLEDAI is a discontinuous scale in which each type of sign or symptom of active SLE is assigned a fixed number of points. Although the scale includes possible signs or symptoms adding up to more than 100 points it is rare for any (even very severe) patient to ever have a total score \> 20. To meet the SLE Responder Index endpoint, There must also be no worsening of BILAG (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (described in the primary endpoint section) and no worsening of PGA (a visual analogue scale reflecting physicians global assessment) by more than 10% of the scale. To meet this endpoint there must also be no new or increased medication initiated after Baseline other than the steroid rescues up to Month 2.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4)
ParticipantsAbataceptPlacebo
SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4)98
Statistical analysis
  • Abatacept vs Placebo · Chi-squared · p = 0.587
Post-hoc4 Point Improvement in the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)

The SLEDAI is a discontinuous scoring system that weights disease activity not by severity of individual symptoms but by the weighting of organs. This makes it less robust for comparing one group of patients to another, but it is quite useful to gave numbers of patients with improvement, since to lower the score a rigorous improvement must be documented

Time frame:
Comparison of Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
4 Point Improvement in the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)
ParticipantsAbataceptPlacebo
4 Point Improvement in the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)98
Statistical analysis
  • Abatacept vs Placebo · Chi-squared · p = 0.587 (None of the endpoints were met in any pre-specified unbiased Full Analysis Set analysis)

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Abatacept0/31 (0%)6/31 (19.4%)29/31 (93.5%)
Placebo0/35 (0%)4/35 (11.4%)35/35 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventAbataceptPlacebo
gastroenteritisGastrointestinal disorders1/310/35
viral syndromeInfections and infestations1/311/35
sickle cell crisisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/310/35
fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/310/35
suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders1/310/35
cholecystitisGastrointestinal disorders1/310/35
cardiac valve dysfunctionCardiac disorders0/311/35
opiate overdoseSocial circumstances0/311/35
respiratory compromiseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/311/35
Acute renal failureRenal and urinary disorders0/311/35
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventAbataceptPlacebo
gastroenteritisGastrointestinal disorders17/3111/35
urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations5/3117/35
upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations15/3116/35
oral candidaInfections and infestations0/318/35
sinusitisInfections and infestations4/318/35
bronchitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/314/35
vaginal yeast infestationInfections and infestations1/315/35
injection site reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/313/35
rashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/314/35
otitis mediaEar and labyrinth disorders1/314/35

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AbataceptPlaceboTotal
Mean43.8 ± 10.946.9 ± 11.945.4 ± 11.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AbataceptPlaceboTotal
Female293463
Male213
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)AbataceptPlaceboTotal
Caucasian172643
African8614
Asian000
Native American/Alaskan Native639
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)AbataceptPlaceboTotal
United States313566
anti-dsDNA positive
anti-dsDNA positive(participants)AbataceptPlaceboTotal
Number51217
low complement
low complement(participants)AbataceptPlaceboTotal
Number5914
Number with at least one BILAG "B" score
Number with at least one BILAG "B" score(Participants)AbataceptPlaceboTotal
Count of participants313566
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2. PubMed 33687069 ↗
  • Thanou A, James JA, Arriens C, Aberle T, Chakravarty E, Rawdon J, Stavrakis S, Merrill JT, Askanase A. Scoring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity with simple, rapid outcome measures. Lupus Sci Med. 2019 Dec 30;6(1):e000365. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000365. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31921432 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We will share de-identified results through an application process, linked to our institutional research cohorts, where there is a standard operating procedure approval process where research is deemed to be appropriate and relevant to SLE

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: June 2021-May 2023

Access criteria: contact the PI at joan-merrill@omrf.org

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2014 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 59 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2020, 1 year 11 months after primary completion.

Of 95 phase 2 interventional studies under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 56. This study's 59 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2014
First posted
Oct 22, 2014
StartActual
Jan 2014
Primary completionActual
Dec 2018
CompletionActual
Dec 2021
Results first posted
Nov 25, 2020
Last update
Jan 26, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02270957
Lead sponsor
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2014
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2018
Completion
Dec 2021
Results posted
Nov 25, 2020
Last update
Jan 26, 2022

Study contacts

Joan T Merrill, MD
study director · Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Abatacept

Start the discussion