CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04235465Updated Jan 25, 2023

Dynamic Gait Index in Children With Dyslexia

An observational study in Dyslexia and Gait Disorders, Neurologic, sponsored by Marmara University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 14 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-25.

Sponsored by Marmara University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
8 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the present study is to investigate reliability in dyslexic children and compare it with healthy peers.

Read the detailed description

Assessments methods are very important for the detection and treatment of such problems and there is a need for studies that can be applied for the dyslexia group. However fewer attempts have been made to demonstrate the reliability of balance impairments tools in dyslexic children. The DGI is a test that has been used a lot lately because of its minimal requirement for space and equipment, as well as its ability to be used with different patients' groups. The aim of the present study is to investigate reliability in dyslexic children and compare it with healthy peers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dyslexia
  • Gait Disorders, Neurologic

Keywords

  • Dynamic Gait Index
  • Reliability
  • Balance
  • Gait
03

In context

Dyslexia

124 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyslexia; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 80 across 17 observational studies indexed under Dyslexia.

Browse Dyslexia studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University is the lead sponsor of 576 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

30 dyslexia patients, between 8 - 14 years of age, and 30 healthy volunteer peers

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of dyslexia by Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Intelligence quotient (IQ)> 85 results of WISC-R
  • Age between 8 - 14
  • Able to understand the commands given
  • Volunteer to study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having cognitive disorder
  • Having neuromuscular disorder
  • Having skeletal anomaly
  • Having visual or hearing problems
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Dyslexia Group

    30 patients will be included. Dynamic Gait Index and other assessments will be performed twice with a 7-day interval by two evaluators

    Other: Dynamic Gait Index

  • Healthy Control Group

    30 healthy children will be included. Dynamic Gait Index will be performed.

    Other: Dynamic Gait Index

Interventions

  • OtherDynamic Gait Index

    The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) measures functionality and dynamic balance in walking and stair climbing. The DGI consists of 8 items including normal gait on flat ground, gait with speed changes, gait with horizontal head movements, gait with vertical head movements, gait and pivot turn, gait and step over an obstacle, gait around obstacles and steps up and downstairs. The performance on each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (severe disorder) to 3 (independent walking). The total score is 24.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Dynamic Gait Index

    The Dynamic Gait Index measures functionality and dynamic balance in walking and stair climbing. The DGI consists of 8 items including normal gait on flat ground, gait with speed changes, gait with horizontal head movements, gait with vertical head movements, gait and pivot turn, gait and step over obstacle, gait around obstacles and steps up and down stairs. The performance on each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (severe disorder) to 3 (independent walking). The total score is 24.

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. The Dynamic Gait Index

    The Dynamic Gait Index measures functionality and dynamic balance in walking and stair climbing. The DGI consists of 8 items including normal gait on flat ground, gait with speed changes, gait with horizontal head movements, gait with vertical head movements, gait and pivot turn, gait and step over obstacle, gait around obstacles and steps up and down stairs. The performance on each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (severe disorder) to 3 (independent walking). The total score is 24.

    Time frame: Day 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Timed Up and Go Test

    The Timed Up and Go is a test used to measure mobility and evaluates walking speed, posture control, functional mobility and balance.

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Functional Reach Test

    Functional Reach Test (FRT) is a static balance test. Measurement is carried out by a tape measure attached to the wall parallel to the floor. The individual was standing parallel to a wall with the feet shoulder wide apart and the shoulders extended at 90 degrees flexion; in this position the third metacarpal head was recorded as the initial position. Then, the patient was asked to reach as forward as (s)he can, without taking a step. Again, the evaluator determined the position of the third metacarpal. The difference in centimeters between the first and second marks determined the FRT value. The FRT was performed three times and average value was taken.

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Marmara University School of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Istanbul, 34890, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Barela JA, Dias JL, Godoi D, Viana AR, de Freitas PB. Postural control and automaticity in dyslexic children: the relationship between visual information and body sway. Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Apr 16. PubMed 21498044 ↗
  • Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J, Repetti S. Reliability of four scales on balance disorders in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1920-5. doi: 10.1080/09638280701191859. Epub 2007 Apr 26. PubMed 17852286 ↗
  • de Freitas PB, Pedao ST, Barela JA. Visuomotor processing and hand force coordination in dyslexic children during a visually guided manipulation task. Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Oct;35(10):2352-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 22. PubMed 24960554 ↗
  • Gouleme N, Gerard CL, Bucci MP. The Effect of Training on Postural Control in Dyslexic Children. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0130196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130196. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26162071 ↗
  • Kapoula Z, Bucci MP. Postural control in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children. J Neurol. 2007 Sep;254(9):1174-83. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0460-0. Epub 2007 Aug 3. PubMed 17676356 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04235465
Lead sponsor
Marmara University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 22, 2020
Start date
Apr 2, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2018
Completion
Jul 31, 2018
Last update
Jan 25, 2023

Study contacts

Naime Evrim Karadag-Saygi, Prof
study chair · Department of PM&R, Marmara University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion