ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07707700Updated Jul 16, 2026

Validating a Neurocognitive Remediation Model for Visual-Attentional Pathway in Chinese Developmental Dyslexia

An interventional study of Action video game intervention group and Active Control (Non-Action Video Game) Group in Dyslexia, sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered Jun 2026).
  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Developmental dyslexia is a common and serious specific learning disability affecting up to one in eight children in Hong Kong, with profound consequences for academic success and personal well-being. For children learning to read the visually complex Chinese script, the challenge is particularly intense. A key research challenge is a long-standing "chicken-and-egg" debate: are weaknesses in the brain's fast-processing visual system (Magnocellular-Dorsal deficits) a cause of reading difficulties, or merely a consequence of limited reading practice? This uncertainty has constrained theoretical progress, creating a major barrier to developing effective, evidence-based support for struggling readers beyond traditional linguistic-based methods.

This project is designed to resolve this debate by directly testing if training a core visual-attentional skill can causally improve reading. The approach is built on investigator's strong pilot data, which established a novel "Neurocognitive Cascade Model": a framework suggesting that the integrity of foundational visual processing impacts reading through a sequential chain reaction flowing from visual attention to working memory.

To test the model, investigators will employ a rigorous, assessor-blind randomized controlled trial with 100 Cantonese-speaking children with developmental dyslexia. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group that plays action video games, scientifically proven to enhance visual attention, or an active control group that plays a different type of non-action, engaging game. This design allows investigators to isolate the specific impact of the visual-attentional training. The investigators will track changes at four time points-before, during, immediately after the intervention, and at a 6-month follow-up-using a multi-level assessment battery, including objective neural signals of visual processing, cognitive skills, and real-world reading performance measured with advanced eye-tracking technology.

This research will deliver new knowledge that is both scientifically and socially impactful. It will provide the first causal evidence for a visual-attentional pathway to reading remediation in Chinese developmental dyslexia, fundamentally shifting theoretical understanding of the disorder from a single, phonological deficit to a more comprehensive, multi-component model. The findings will have a significant translational impact, paving the way for innovative, non-reading-based interventions and new early screening tools. Ultimately, this project will offer a new, evidence-based approach to help children overcome the specific neurocognitive bottlenecks that hinder their ability to learn to read, with the potential to improve educational outcomes for a large and underserved population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dyslexia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dyslexia

127 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyslexia; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 76 is close to the median of 71 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Dyslexia.

Browse Dyslexia studies →

Lead sponsor

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University is the lead sponsor of 679 studies on the registry; 257 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Formal diagnosis of dyslexia by an educational or clinical psychologist using the Hong Kong Test of Specific Learning Difficulties in Reading and Writing (HKT-SpLD),39 with a literacy composite score at or below the 10th percentile.
  • Non-verbal IQ score ≥ 85 on Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices.
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (both eyes logMAR 0.1 or better).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

History of neurological or psychiatric disorders (e.g., epilepsy, psychosis).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Triple (Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
76 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Action Video Game (AVG) Intervention Group

    Participants will undergo 12 hours of training with a commercially available AVG (Rabbids: Party of Legends). The game consists of numerous fast-paced mini-games in which players track multiple objects, respond to unpredictable events, and filter out distractions, thereby placing high demands on visual-spatial attention and attentional control.

    Behavioral: Action video game intervention group

  • Sham comparator
    Active Control (Non-Action Video Game) Group

    Using a commercially available city-building and management simulation game (e.g., SimCity), which is engaging and cognitively demanding (requiring planning and resource management).

    Behavioral: Active Control (Non-Action Video Game) Group

Interventions

  • BehavioralAction video game intervention group

    Participants will undergo 12 hours of training with a commercially available AVG (Rabbids: Party of Legends). This game is a direct successor to the Rayman Raving Rabbids game used in AVG intervention studies and shares its core mechanics. The game consists of numerous fast-paced mini-games in which players track multiple objects, respond to unpredictable events, and filter out distractions, thereby placing high demands on visual-spatial attention and attentional control.

  • BehavioralActive Control (Non-Action Video Game) Group

    Participants will undergo 12 hours of training with SimCity. To control for non-specific effects (e.g., gaming time, engagement, motivation), this group will play a non-action video game of matched duration and format. The investigators will use a commercially available city-building and management simulation game (e.g., SimCity), which is engaging and cognitively demanding (requiring planning and resource management). However, it critically lacks the fast, unpredictable, and attention-intensive elements of action games, ensuring that any observed group differences can be attributed specifically to the visual-attentional training provided by the AVG.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Attention Span

    Cued Number Identification Task: This task assesses the rapid deployment of visual attention. A string of five numbers (Geneva font, size 24, 98% contrast) is presented for 200 ms, followed by a 50-ms visual cue 1 cm beneath the target number. Numbers are spaced to subtend a 3.8° visual angle and minimise lateral masking. The child's task is to verbally report the cued number. The primary metric is the number of correctly reported targets out of 20 trials.

    Time frame: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180

Other outcomes

  1. Verbal Backward Digit Span

    An experimenter reads a sequence of numbers aloud (e.g., '8-2-5') and the child must mentally reverse the sequence and repeat it back ('5-2-8'). The sequence length progressively increases, placing increasing demands on both the storage and manipulation components of working memory. The score is the number of correctly recalled sequences.

    Time frame: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180

  2. Coherent Motion Detection

    This task measures motion processing sensitivity using a random-dot kinematogram. Stimuli consist of 250 white dots (0.2° diameter; 50 cd/m²) moving at 0.24°/sec within a 5° circular aperture against a dark background (0.02 cd/m²). During each 400-ms trial, a percentage of 'signal' dots move coherently left or right. The task is to indicate the direct of the 'signal' dots.

    Time frame: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180

  3. Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (ssVEP)

    Participants will view vertically oriented, sinusoidal gratings at 90% contrast. To target the magnocellular pathway, we will use low spatial frequency (SF) gratings of 0.6 cycles/degree, with high-SF gratings of 6.0 cycles/degree as a control. Both stimuli will phase-reverse at 7.5 Hz, generating a dominant 15 Hz ssVEP response. Although fully isolating the parvo- and magnocellular pathways is difficult, this combination of low spatial and high temporal frequency aims to produce a stronger activation of the magnocellular visual pathway.

    Time frame: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180

  4. Silent Reading and Eye Movement

    Task: Participants will silently read 20 sentences constructed from age-appropriate, high-frequency Chinese characters (font: 'Free HK Kai', recommended by the Education Bureau). Each 18-character sentence spans two lines, with characters subtending a 2° visual angle. To ensure comprehension, a multiple-choice question will follow each sentence. Acquisition: Participants will be seated 50 cm from the screen with a forehead rest for stability. Eye movements will be recorded using a Tobii Pro Fusion eye-tracker (250 Hz sampling rate) following a successful nine-point calibration. Global Reading Metrics: Reading speed (characters per minute) and comprehension accuracy (%). Eye-Movement Metrics: Mean fixation duration, mean saccade length, and number of regressions

    Time frame: Baseline measurement on day 1, Mid-Intervention on day 1, within 30 minutes post-Intervention on day 1, and Follow-Up on day 180

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 35 months after the start.

Of 62 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dyslexia, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 69 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 57.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 16, 2026
First posted
Jul 16, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
Last update
Jul 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07707700
Responsible party
LEUNG Tsz Wing (Assistant Professor, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Study contacts

Tsz Wing Leung, PhD
Contact
jeffrey.TW.leung@polyu.edu.hk
+852 27664268

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion